Rank #3303 on CommentsLevel 301 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
OfflineSend mail to rollertoaster Block rollertoaster Invite rollertoaster to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Consoles Owned:||Wii, 3DS, GBA, PC|
|Date Signed Up:||4/14/2012|
|Location:||New York USA|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#12931|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#721|
|Content Thumbs:||147 total, 287 , 140|
|Comment Thumbs:||11483 total, 13147 , 1664|
|Content Level Progress:|| 70% (7/10) |
Level 14 Content: New Here → Level 15 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 60% (60/100) |
Level 301 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 302 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
|Times Content Favorited:||5 times|
|Total Comments Made:||3153|
latest user's comments
|#8 - It would never sell. Nintendo as a brand would never be taken … [+] (1 new reply)||03/06/2016 on Nintento smartphone concept?||+1|
|#22 - The earliest versions of the idiom leave out the "master …||03/06/2016 on cats||+1|
|#27 - Sciencexplain is this a real [+] (25 new replies)||03/06/2016 on Tumblr-Comp #3||+4|
#99 - newall (03/06/2016) [-]
yes and no. While your muscles in theory are capable of much more than you think they are, this is only a general rule for the average human.
For example, pro strongmen often perform lifts that literally tear their muscles from the ligaments.
Likewise, if you're anorexic and barely have any muscle-mass whatsoever, you aren't going to be able to generate the force required to snap bones, even if your subconcious takes over and gives you magic muscles.
Also, if you're a zombie, this would only work once, as they have no living tissue with which to regenerate the destroyed muscle fibre, so you'd end up having non-functioning arms very quickly.
#61 - anon (03/06/2016) [-]
Two things to add.
There was a story my parents read about a grandmother who lifted a car on her own to rescue a younger member of her family who was trapped. This took place during a serious natural disaster, so tensions were high.
The other thing is that myth about electricty sending people flying. It's actually people's own legs spasming from the shock. One recorded case sent a man 100 feet away.
#74 - anon (03/06/2016) [-]
So you're saying with a little bit of help, people can jump 100 feet?
Fucking shits crazy. But I can believe it.
#66 - sexuality (03/06/2016) [-]
If the human bite is capable of biting through a human finger with the ease of a carrot stick, but our brain won't let us cause that amount of harm to ourselves....
Then why can't I bite through a fully cooked chicken wing with the same ease?
Like, the bones and all? Maybe I'm retarded, but I just can't imagine biting through anything with a solid bone in it is truly as easy as biting through a boneless carrot.
#69 - heffrey (03/06/2016) [-]
You very well could, but your mind restricts your muscles because you would end up damaging your teeth and tearing your muscles. You can already damage your teeth without using your full muscle capacity, but if you were able to, you'd likely shatter your teeth on your way through the bone.
#91 - pendumonium (03/06/2016) [-]
He is saying that if it is equally difficult to bite through a chicken wing and a finger, in order for the statement in the comp to be true, it has to be equally difficult to bite through a chicken wing and a carrot.
There shouldn't be any restrictions on your brain with regards to self harm when eating a chicken wing, so if that's the only reason it his harder to bite off a finger, chewing whole chicken wings shouldn't be a problem at all.
#93 - pendumonium (03/06/2016) [-]
You're right. I think the message is communicated poorly in the text, but I get what they're saying. To me it just comes across as "Your finger and a carrot will snap at about the same biting pressure, but your brain restricts your from applying the same pressure to your finger as to a carrot.". Did the first time I read it, anyway
|#37 - I'm happy for him that he got one, but some people really over… [+] (3 new replies)||02/29/2016 on An Oscar prediction||+1|
#74 - anon (03/02/2016) [-]
Film politics, not government.
|#36 - Honestly, the one thing Kanye truly deserves an award for is h… [+] (1 new reply)||02/29/2016 on An Oscar prediction||0|
#44 - anon (02/29/2016) [-]
nah he doesnt
people nowadays forgot what putting effort in music means.
random youtubers are able to improvise stuff like that
and people on here try to tell me kanye has enough talent to deserve any kinda prize.
kanyes texts are laughable...wtf is he even talking in his fuckin songs.
kanye cant sing.
ofc what he produces is "neat", but being talented is something different.
but thats my opinion.
|#75 - Pretty sure you're describing eugenics right now bro [+] (11 new replies)||02/29/2016 on Did You Know Comp Part 4||0|
#81 - brobathehutt (02/29/2016) [-]
Eugenics is concerned with making absolutely perfect genes, I.E. everyone is 6 feet tall and has an IQ over 140. Avoiding bad genes, as in down syndrome and other genetic disorders, is common fucking sense. You can do this by not letting them have kids. It's not like you need to have a certain population of retards.
#96 - anon (02/29/2016) [-]
You realize that Downs Syndrome isn't cause by "bad genes" right? It's caused by having an extra copy of a chromosome. And you're acting like the father is a complete fucking retard with the mind of a child who can't do anything for himself.
#118 - anon (02/29/2016) [-]
thats kinda the thing... bad genetics caused that extra copy
#190 - gigabowzer (02/29/2016) [-]
"Most cases of Down syndrome are not inherited. When the condition is caused by trisomy 21, the chromosomal abnormality occurs as a random event during the formation of reproductive cells in a parent. The abnormality usually occurs in egg cells, but it occasionally occurs in sperm cells."
Please do some research before spouting complete nonsense.
#207 - brobathehutt (02/29/2016) [-]
Let me go ahead and explain to you why most cases are not known to be inherited. For one thing down syndrome wasn't recognized until 1862, and until it was recognized anyone with down syndrome was generally killed or ostracized so chances are they didn't reproduce. Even though it was recognized in 1862 not much was known about it until about 1956, so there could be people from the time frame from 1862 to 1956 that did actually have less severe downs (they would be referred to as slow) and they could of reproduced and we wouldn't know they had downs, so any future offspring that had it could still be genetic and we just have no idea due to lack of family information. In addition to that, most retards were institutionalized until very recently and thus couldn't really reproduce. They weren't let out until years after 1956. Lastly, like every other genetic disorder, it doesn't necessarily surface in your immediate offspring, sometimes it takes a couple of generations.
So lets go over our possibilities. 1.) We don't have good records on who has downs and who doesn't until pretty recently, so we have a few cases that are probably inherited and we just don't know due to shitty knowledge. 2.) Most retards don't reproduce and until pretty recently pretty much all of the known retards didn't get a chance to. 3.) Like other genetic diseases, it doesn't always surface in immediate offspring.
I won't say that most cases are inherited, because that would actually be very hard to support and would likely be false, however I will say that we have some cases that are inherited we don't know about due to shitty knowledge + almost every retard until very recently wasn't able to reproduce so it kind of eliminates a large amount of possible inherited cases.
Long story short, you need to use critical thinking with your research otherwise it's just data that is meaningless to you.
#221 - anon (02/29/2016) [-]
People with Down Syndrome usually don't reproduce, so most cases worldwide come from parents that don't have the syndrome. Chances of having a child with the syndrome are between 35% to 50% if the mother has it; less is known about how the condition of the father affect the probabilities (most males with Down Syndrome are infertile or have a lower fertility rate)
#280 - brobathehutt (02/29/2016) [-]
What do you want a source on, that most retards don't reproduce? There isn't going to be a source on everything like i just told you part of research is using critical thinking to come to a conclusion of the research, otherwise the research is meaningless data. If you want a source on anons percentage than I don't know let him get it for you.
|#100 - Not if you play on hardcore mode||02/29/2016 on Well, now you're fucked.||0|
|#3164 - **rollertoaster used "*roll 1, 1-1000000*"** **rollertoaste…||02/27/2016 on Roll to be KING||0|
|#66 - thx||02/26/2016 on Straight Up Caught Comp. 23||-2|
|#25 - He's back at it again with the white vans [+] (2 new replies)||02/25/2016 on Straight Up Caught Comp. 23||+29|
#65 - anon (02/26/2016) [-]
omg so funny xD