Click to expand


Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:11/27/2011
Last Login:7/01/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 246 total,  275 ,  29
Comment Thumbs: 403 total,  476 ,  73
Content Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 20 Content: Peasant → Level 21 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 136 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 137 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Content Views:16081
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:102
FJ Points:576
I made an account for NSFW. I stayed for NSFW.

Funny Pictures

latest user's comments

#10 - stop reusing that picture, I can only masturbate to it so many times 03/16/2015 on web shite -1
#6 - That dog is clearly attempting suicide 03/16/2015 on animal comp 0
#12 - Picture 03/03/2015 on Dogs and Ghosts 0
#11 - didn't get the joke but my name is in big letters so that's cool 03/03/2015 on AWWW SHIT SON MORE MEET SALLY 0
#54 - I didn't know ashton kutcher browsed FJ 03/03/2015 on unique eyes -3
#53 - this post made me realize I have awfully average eyes  [+] (1 new reply) 03/03/2015 on unique eyes +3
User avatar #128 - joshualegitsky (03/03/2015) [-]
Perk up bud just take in some l lysosine, kinda don't know spelling but google will help, and your eyes will darken. Might end up being cool
#15 - holy **** I just noticed that... and not one person sto…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/03/2015 on suck it up 0
#16 - nargogh (03/03/2015) [-]
Survival of the fittest
#19 - I don't get it, why the red thumbs? Yeah it's ****** up…  [+] (18 new replies) 03/03/2015 on At least I'm Not A Liar -7
#52 - Rascal (03/03/2015) [-]
or red thumb a comment
#20 - ultradivinus (03/03/2015) [-]
Yes, you should. But there are exceptions to rules. Denying the holocaust and the second world war only serves to build platforms for hate groups. It perpetuates killing and violence, something Germany, in my opinion, is right to ban.
User avatar #120 - Conquistador (03/04/2015) [-]

Complete BS. The Jews "suffering" pales in comparison to other people that have suffered throughout the ages. The reason you think that is Jews own the majority of media corporations, and they have always been paranoid since the dawn of time.
#122 - ultradivinus (03/05/2015) [-]
Whoa bro. Nah. You've got some serious mental issues if your rationalization to the holocaust not being bad is because there have been others that suffered more.

It doesn't matter honestly. Idc if the Carthaginians suffered more, if niggers have been suffering more since slavery, it truly doesn't matter. We should be pushing our species towards the end of causing suffering in such inhumane ways. I don't think the jews should be empowered, nor given free shit for what Germany did. I only believe that we shouldn't be allowed to deny such atrocities. Everyone should know what has been done so that less and less people believe it's okay to do that to anyone.
User avatar #123 - Conquistador (03/05/2015) [-]
It wasn't nearly as bad as they say it was. I partially belong to a race that has had their own continent and ways of life taken away and most of our population destroyed, yet pure bred natives are around the same size population wise as Jews in the US but you don't nearly see as many crap about colonization of the Americas as you would about the holocaust. You know why? Because Jews own the media. The problem is we weren't given shit compared to what the Jews got. They literally got a whole country to themselves, they get shitloads of funding from western nations, and they even get to get away with murder and war crimes. Yet nobody bats an eye. Hell, the "gas chambers" they talk about so much probably weren't even real.
User avatar #125 - compared (03/05/2015) [-]
Thanks for the mention, hope you are well.
User avatar #126 - Conquistador (03/10/2015) [-]
Go away mentionfag.
User avatar #127 - compared (03/10/2015) [-]
#31 - youdoublecongoid (03/03/2015) [-]
But that's utterly and completely retarded, sir. "le haet greupz" AKA people with other opinions have just as much right as you do in a free country. If you want to supress fascism by forcing people to think the way you do, act the way you do under law, haven't you basically become just what you are trying to stop, except you are screaming friedleben unlike Hitler who screameohwaithedid.

>killing and violence

Thank god that's out of the picture, and we have the amazing UN to give the US the kill all the violent people, and some others. Truly we are living in an era of peace and prosperity. It certanly is not so that we as a species will continue slaughtering eachother for lulz and sheckles, just because it's in our nature to destroy just as much as create?

Don't be a dictatorial asshat who force people to do exactly as you want. Unless ofcourse, your political affilliation is fascism? We could be friends int that case, you and I who'm share alot of ideas. A thing I never really liked about a lot of fascist countries tough is that the free-speech was in fact suppressed. So we might not agree just there.
#40 - rexxxar (03/03/2015) [-]
Well, that is where you are wrong. A "free country does not mean that you are free to go around spreading hate, or in other ways make innocent people suffer because of your beliefs.
The same way a free country has laws on speeding and drunk driving.
You do have rights to speak freely, but on the other hand we also have the right to punish you for making innocent people suffer.

so you are free to do whatever you please, but face the consequences when what you do is so goddamn ignorant, stupid, harmful or against the wellbeing of your surroundings or the general populace
#41 - youdoublecongoid (03/03/2015) [-]
Mate, if I drinve drunk, I might swing into a kid and kill it. If I riot in the streets like it's 1930's Germany, I will get assaulted by the cops, and rightfully so. If I rally people to conform to my political ideas, I am turning public opinion, wich is legal, and a necessety for a free country. A free country does not mean that the majority of people can sit in a bubble and go either "muh libruls" or "muh conservtivs"
#43 - rexxxar (03/03/2015) [-]
A free country means that there is room for everyone.
And, ideally there should be room for everybody.
But, if you reduce the freedom of an innocent gorup/minority/majority/whatever
because of some ideas as to what is rigth and wrong, i believe that it is okay to reduce the freedom of said person, to ensure the continued freedom of the group.
And that is why things like tholocaust denial is a crime. By denying it, you might reduce it's significance and thus create a platform where people begin to believe it was just an anecdote or never happened. it gives credibility to a terrifying regime - a regime that did some hideous acts against humanity.

I'm all in for free speech, but there is a limit. And blaming a societys problems on a minority or making a group of innocents scapegoats for something is against everything a free country stands for.
User avatar #124 - Conquistador (03/05/2015) [-]
"reduce it's significance"

My sides...

"Oy vey, have you had time to remember the holocaust, goy? We only make 3 movies and books about it every other year."
#77 - youdoublecongoid (03/03/2015) [-]
No you see that's we're you're wrong. You either have free speech, or you don't, to cite Lars Wilks. There's no middle-ground to something as free speech. You may not have a little free speech just as you may not have a little death penalty. Beliving in free speech for yourself and the majority is saying "I am right. My ideas and my thoughts stem from the only correct line of thinking. In this line of thinking, there are room for differences, but any difference I think is too much, is dissqualified, and should be criminal"

There can never be freedom if I am not allowed to say "The Titanic didn't sink. It actually ascended to heaven as was commanded by our lord and saviour Djengis Kahn!". Did you read that? It sure was retarded, eh? Still, if I am not allowed to say it a thought is criminalized. If I am not able to read scientific revisionism about the subject, suddenly research is forbidden. Do you catch my drift, bro? If anything, the criminalization of something will most likely make people ask "The fuck do you need to criminalize something we all know to be wrong"

When someone's thoughts are restricted just to save your own ideals, you are doing some 1984 shit. OBEY. If you lived in Hitler's Germany, and were not allowed to question the war declared by Judea, would you not feel a tingleing sensation of wonder? Why those this state not allow me to do read this? I am not even trying to shill, I am just saying that if you stand up for freedom of speech for some, and not for other's, you aren't standing up for free speech. You are undeniably, defenitivly just trying to criminalize people you do not like.
#86 - rexxxar (03/03/2015) [-]
I think we disagree less than it seems.
I believe too that complete freedom of speech is important. But as with a lot of things it is simply not possible in a society with so much ignorance, lies etc.
Personally, i believe that everyone should have the right to say whatever crap they believe in.
But the problem is that our society is not on a cultural, technological or developed plateu where it is possible. In the future, maybe not even far out, we can achieve it because of a more universal level of knowledge and cultural development. Just not now, sadly
And as you mention, there are problems with regulation.
(Look at sex between siblings, there is no more any valid reason for it to be this frowned upon, illegal und so wider, except that we think it is "wrong")

But, i still believe that completely free speech will cause more suffering and problems right now, than regulations. Another place where unregulated free speech is a problem, is when your utterances causes pain, suffering or loss for a innocent thirdpart (see the Nazi genocide, or huttu and Tuttu genocide in Africa)
So many innocent died because of a skewed belief that became the norm due to it being voiced enough, which is sad, because out of those 6 mio. Jews killed in holocaust, i cannot believe that more than a miniscule amount where actually responsible for anything justifying a horrible death.

And, btw, ty for a sober and well-mannered debate An example of free speech used right ;)

#88 - youdoublecongoid (03/03/2015) [-]
Likewise. It's very fun to debate with people, and especially when it's well-mannered. Sadly I feel like there are still things unsaid and opinions not stated, and, yet more sadly, I must now go hit the goddamn bed, or I won't be able to function tommorow. Perhaps ther'll be more discussion later. Bye.
#89 - rexxxar (03/03/2015) [-]
Perhaps there will be, goodnight to you

shit, that picture, are you a swede? sørens svenskere...
User avatar #85 - youdoublecongoid (03/03/2015) [-]
I do apologize for any misstakes in my grammar. I am really tired and it's late here.
#13 - because America is just that much better at establishing independence 03/03/2015 on Why Poland +3
#12 - so we all know it's a joke... and yet it's still not funny 03/03/2015 on Witty cumbacks +6
[ 102 Total ]

user's friends

What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - chessvencent (12/30/2013) [-]
stickied by robertegj
User avatar #4 - mrdrpage (08/17/2014) [-]
User avatar #5 to #4 - robertegj (08/19/2014) [-]
wish I could thumb you

because I know that's how you like it ;)
#3 - chessvencent (01/08/2014) [-]
fag plays the item game, FAG
#1 - Rascal (10/19/2013) [-]
YOU THINK I MAKE MINIMUM WAGE ARE YOU DEATH. I THINK YOU JUST **** ANIMALS BECAUSE YOU ANIMAL ****** AND **** . I have 20K to play with, chicks, and children and animal suits, so maybe i yes.
 Friends (0)