Upload
Login or register

repostsrepost

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:5/26/2012
Last Login:6/12/2015
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 570 total,  659 ,  89
Comment Thumbs: 2440 total,  3764 ,  1324
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 56 Content: Sammich eater → Level 57 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 56.99% (57/100)
Level 223 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:35890
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:2728
FJ Points:2986

latest user's comments

#112 - he's a police officer. Police shouldn't have guns? 06/11/2015 on I'm Not a Racist - RE:... +1
#108 - Funny how all news sources conveniently start the video clips …  [+] (16 new replies) 06/11/2015 on I'm Not a Racist - RE:... 0
User avatar
#154 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
so instead of using pepper pray or maybe even a taser he goes straight for bullets?
#188 - repostsrepost (06/11/2015) [-]
except he didn't go to bullets. He drew his gun and then holstered it. no bullets involved
User avatar
#192 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
ahh yes he reaches for his gun so that if he needed it, it would fire pillows
#194 - repostsrepost (06/11/2015) [-]
Fortunately bullets weren't needed. Once the cop realized that he holstered his gun. If he had needed bullets then a gun that fires pillows would've gotten him killed
User avatar
#156 - Elk (06/11/2015) [-]
OH SHIT HE'S GOT A GUN I BETTER SPRAY HIM IN THE EYES
User avatar
#159 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
I mean I could see if the kid was far but he was really close. attacking the eyes is a good strategy anyway
User avatar
#163 - Elk (06/11/2015) [-]
Not if they have a gun. What if they start shooting blindly?
User avatar
#164 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
I think their first instinct would be to rub their eyes. not shoot
User avatar
#165 - Elk (06/11/2015) [-]
You think. Please, stop your overly liberal bullshit agenda for one day. I'm tired of every controversial thing that ever happens, you always blindly side with the victim. It's very annoying.
User avatar
#168 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
if you don't like what I say then why respond to me? The officer thought the kid had a gun but he didn't it's much easier to recover from pepper spray than from a bullet wound. Especially if the suspect is innocent.
User avatar
#169 - Elk (06/11/2015) [-]
Because what you're saying is retarded and needs to be fixed ASA NOW. Think about what you're saying. The cop didn't even shoot, so pepper spray is entirely irrelevant. You're just trying to find a problem with the system. You do it literally every damn day.
User avatar
#174 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
there is a problem in the system... police brutality, while not running wild, is still a big issue. Justice isn't always justice and a lot of things are outdated and could use reform. Police usually shoot first and ask questions later which sucks. They're getting too trigger happy and no one is safe, not animals, babies, women, children and especially not men. Don't think it would hurt for them to use nonlethal options, like rubber bullets which hurt like a bitch but wont kill you.
#175 - Elk (06/11/2015) [-]
**Elk used "*roll picture*"**
**Elk rolled image** Or people could just stop being thugs.
User avatar
#176 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
yea cause a dog curiously walking to look at someone who's at the door is such a thug.
User avatar
#177 - Elk (06/11/2015) [-]
yea cause das wut always happen

Jesus Christ, you're such a fucking idiot when it comes to politics.
User avatar
#179 - hoponthefeelstrain (06/11/2015) [-]
I know it doesn't always happen, doesn't change the fact that police brutality is a real thing.
#101 - Evil European Cisgendered racist republicans killing all the p… 06/11/2015 on Daily reminder 0
#77 - the blue and white checkered pattern is the Bavarian flag. whi… 06/11/2015 on Car Company Logos +5
#77 - Climate change is real, it's been happening for longer than hu…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/11/2015 on Meteor -4
User avatar
#83 - leightonsolomon (06/11/2015) [-]
Nope. Almost the entire scientific community is in agreement that climate change is human driven. It does take a while of course, buts lets also not forget that last year was the warmest year on record.

www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/may/28/wall-street-journal-denies-global-warming-consensus
#88 - repostsrepost (06/11/2015) [-]
www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/05/19/updated-nasa-data-polar-ice-not-receding-after-all/

www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/satellite-data-no-global-warming-past-18-years

Tell that to people in Boston who had some of the highest snowfall on record. new data from NASA shows that polar ice caps are not receding. Climate fluctuates as it has been for millions of years. It still isn't as warm as it was at the peak of the Roman Empire or even the Middle Ages. And last I checked, Julius Caesar wasn't driving around Gaul in a Hummer.
User avatar
#99 - leightonsolomon (06/11/2015) [-]
And are you seriously using the same argument all deniers use? "HUR ITS NOT THAT WARM RIGHT NOW AND IT ACTUALLY SNOWED A LOT SOME PLACES SO ALL EVIDENCE YOU HAVE IS FAKE"
And heres some credible sources buddy.
climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

User avatar
#93 - LEAVEMYINTERNETZ (06/11/2015) [-]
>using sources that aren't scientific papers
lol
#87 - anon (06/11/2015) [-]
No, 97% agree we play a part.
No way in hell we know to what degree, so forget climate change and focus on pollution.
Seriously, all Al Gore's shitstorm started was carbon credits. Fat lot of good that did.

We stop pollution we remove the human factor.
#89 - repostsrepost (06/11/2015) [-]
So let's reverse all of human progress and go back to the Bronze age? Good luck with that.
User avatar
#114 - neoexdeath (06/11/2015) [-]
No, we start funding non-fossil fuel research like those streets with solar panels built in and geothermal power to stop dumping so much carbon and crap into the atmosphere.
#76 - Haven't watched cable news in years(too sensationalist for me)…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/11/2015 on Meteor 0
User avatar
#98 - dagreatmax (06/11/2015) [-]
Why are those channels even allowed to be on TV?
#109 - repostsrepost (06/11/2015) [-]
well in a free society how's to decide what can be allowed on TV? Is this North Korea?
User avatar
#110 - dagreatmax (06/11/2015) [-]
We don't allow those kind of channels here in Canada, one of the american fox-like channel wanted to start broadcasting here but the weren't allowed.
#112 - repostsrepost (06/11/2015) [-]
who's we? Are you a government official who decides what content is ok and what isn't? I doubt average Canadians have any say in that. Is there not any standard of free speech in Canada? Or is it only content which the government deems is acceptable is allowed?

I don't even watch Fox but the idea that we ban a news network because the government doesn't like it is absurd. If you watch any news network(except MSNBC) before 8PM you're getting the same information being reported more or less.
User avatar
#122 - dagreatmax (06/11/2015) [-]
Well obviously I'm okay with that channel being banned, we don't need that kind of news over here. We already have a somewhat similar station called TVA, not as bad but not a good station.
#1242076 - does she like eggs? 06/11/2015 on Video Games Board - console... 0
#1241483 - The timing of them releasing the free ODST DLC... this had to …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/09/2015 on Video Games Board - console... 0
User avatar
#1241506 - huntergriff (06/09/2015) [-]
It probably was.
#33 - *soccer player 06/09/2015 on Mariah Carey -9
#25 - we all know lava can't melt stone beams 06/09/2015 on Hawaiian conspiracy +1