Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:1/12/2010
Last Login:10/21/2016
Comment Ranking:#22324
Highest Content Rank:#18700
Highest Comment Rank:#6949
Content Thumbs: 33 total,  37 ,  4
Comment Thumbs: 720 total,  846 ,  126
Content Level Progress: 62.71% (37/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 170 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 171 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Content Views:356
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:359
FJ Points:682

latest user's comments

#65 - I can confirm this. **** the humvee get that tank back to base…  [+] (2 replies) 04/03/2015 on F-16 +2
User avatar
#66 - RiflemanFunny (04/03/2015) [-]
Well none of these other fucks obviously doesn't understand military protocols. I live like 5 miles away from Ft. Stewart so I have heard my fair share of military shit.
User avatar
#72 - fpsnoob (04/04/2015) [-]
You've got to be on crack comparing a humvee or a tank to an f-16.

First of all as previously stated, the B-52 isn't in danger with a single engine being out.

Second you seem to be forgetting that when you're talking about an F-16, there's a pilot's life on the line. From my time in the USAF, I've noticed that pilots will push as far as they can, sometimes even to their death, to try to bring the jet back in one piece. They know that if they crash a single jet, even if it's not directly their fault, they will likely lose their wings, and to a lot of them that matters more than life. And then even if the pilot does eject, it's still not exactly a safe procedure.

If you seriously believe that the US military will allow an F-16 to crash in order to allow a B-52 that isn't in any serious danger to land first, you are completely clueless.