Upload
Login or register

radtroll

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:1/25/2011
Last Login:2/27/2016
Stats
Content Thumbs: 3571 total,  3974 ,  403
Comment Thumbs: 6355 total,  9615 ,  3260
Content Level Progress: 82% (82/100)
Level 128 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 129 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:4
Content Views:155757
Times Content Favorited:237 times
Total Comments Made:2350
FJ Points:8324
Favorite Tags: Balls (2) | FJ (2) | get (2) | of (2)

latest user's comments

#16 - Because the mare existence of such person puts other people at risk.  [+] (4 replies) 08/25/2015 on graffiti -1
#20 - anon (08/25/2015) [-]
If you have opinions like that and can't even spell "mere" properly I have bad news for you
User avatar
#21 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
because this is FJ I'm not really gonna proof read everything I type, it's not an academic paper you dick dribble anon
User avatar
#17 - tormain (08/25/2015) [-]
I mean why should I kill myself?
User avatar
#18 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
because you consume resources that other people need, pointlessly. Life would be better without you.
#13 - **radtroll used "*roll picture*"** **radtroll rolled image…  [+] (6 replies) 08/25/2015 on graffiti 0
User avatar
#14 - tormain (08/25/2015) [-]
Why?
User avatar
#16 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
Because the mare existence of such person puts other people at risk.
#20 - anon (08/25/2015) [-]
If you have opinions like that and can't even spell "mere" properly I have bad news for you
User avatar
#21 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
because this is FJ I'm not really gonna proof read everything I type, it's not an academic paper you dick dribble anon
User avatar
#17 - tormain (08/25/2015) [-]
I mean why should I kill myself?
User avatar
#18 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
because you consume resources that other people need, pointlessly. Life would be better without you.
#138 - Comment deleted 08/25/2015 on >Furries +2
#71 - you're not really helping your situation if you wanna be …  [+] (4 replies) 08/25/2015 on I wanna try this -4
User avatar
#134 - testaburger (08/25/2015) [-]
"trapped light"
You mean shining a light inside and closing the door real quick?
lol
#138 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
light within mirror, when turned off it's a regular mirror
assuming the mirror is 100% reflective (which is not reall6y possible, but you can get close and have light bouncing off for a measurable amount of time, it's been done like 20 years ago in Russia
User avatar
#100 - ribbedandstudded (08/25/2015) [-]
If you want to get down to it, "trapped light" would make no difference.
Mirrors reflect most of the light that hits it, not all. Light goes really fast fast enought to go around the earth 7 times in a second In a fraction of a second, that light would have been bounced around so many times that the mirror will have absorbed all of the light. Now you have a pitch black room.

Let's toy with the idea that you have 2 things: mirrors that reflect 100% of light that hits them and a light source that is 100% transparent. What would you see? also assuming that you can observe without being there, as your body would absorb ask of the light in this scenario

You would see endless reflections of the same empty space, defined only by the shape of the wall. This shape would get increasingly smaller until it gets incomprehenably small... and then it gets smaller... what it would do once it gets smaller that the photons that make the image in the first place beats the heck out of me.
User avatar
#74 - jzwangpk (08/25/2015) [-]
Bruh, you're the one being a smartass by invoking quantum and all that shit. I'm literally thinking about this as basic as it gets. A room with nothing in it is pitch black inside, no matter what it's made of. It also does exist, regardless of whether there's an observer inside it. There's a time and place for invoking 'if a tree falls in the forest' and this isn't it. That's as simple as it gets. An empty box that just happens to have mirrors for walls is still nothing more than an empty box.

If you want to get down to the nitty-gritty about shit like trapped light then you start getting into questions about how the room/box was constructed, and the post literally gives no context aside from 'a room with absolutely nothing in it'. I don't think I'm the one reading too far into it here.
#69 - well if there is no light source nothing would be visible anyw…  [+] (6 replies) 08/25/2015 on I wanna try this -2
User avatar
#70 - jzwangpk (08/25/2015) [-]
Did I really ask for it? Did I really? The fucking post says 'WITH ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN IT'. I think having a candle in there disqualifies that. Of course I'm assuming that the mirrors are joined perfectly at the sides such that no light leaks in, but again the post says 'room', not 'box', so I don't think it's too far-fetched of an assumption.
#71 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
you're not really helping your situation
if you wanna be a smartass then here goes:

1- a room with nothing in it to most people means no objects. trapped light isn't an object to most people, plus that was tumble, you know what they meant.

2- a room with nothing in it does not exist, if there is an observer in it then there IS something in it, if there is no observer in it than it does not exist because it has no observer (can I get an Amen for quantum physics?)

3- a room is a big box, or a box is a small room, they are one and the same, just prospective issue.
User avatar
#134 - testaburger (08/25/2015) [-]
"trapped light"
You mean shining a light inside and closing the door real quick?
lol
#138 - radtroll (08/25/2015) [-]
light within mirror, when turned off it's a regular mirror
assuming the mirror is 100% reflective (which is not reall6y possible, but you can get close and have light bouncing off for a measurable amount of time, it's been done like 20 years ago in Russia
User avatar
#100 - ribbedandstudded (08/25/2015) [-]
If you want to get down to it, "trapped light" would make no difference.
Mirrors reflect most of the light that hits it, not all. Light goes really fast fast enought to go around the earth 7 times in a second In a fraction of a second, that light would have been bounced around so many times that the mirror will have absorbed all of the light. Now you have a pitch black room.

Let's toy with the idea that you have 2 things: mirrors that reflect 100% of light that hits them and a light source that is 100% transparent. What would you see? also assuming that you can observe without being there, as your body would absorb ask of the light in this scenario

You would see endless reflections of the same empty space, defined only by the shape of the wall. This shape would get increasingly smaller until it gets incomprehenably small... and then it gets smaller... what it would do once it gets smaller that the photons that make the image in the first place beats the heck out of me.
User avatar
#74 - jzwangpk (08/25/2015) [-]
Bruh, you're the one being a smartass by invoking quantum and all that shit. I'm literally thinking about this as basic as it gets. A room with nothing in it is pitch black inside, no matter what it's made of. It also does exist, regardless of whether there's an observer inside it. There's a time and place for invoking 'if a tree falls in the forest' and this isn't it. That's as simple as it gets. An empty box that just happens to have mirrors for walls is still nothing more than an empty box.

If you want to get down to the nitty-gritty about shit like trapped light then you start getting into questions about how the room/box was constructed, and the post literally gives no context aside from 'a room with absolutely nothing in it'. I don't think I'm the one reading too far into it here.