Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:1/25/2011
Last Login:2/27/2016
Content Thumbs: 3571 total,  3974 ,  403
Comment Thumbs: 6355 total,  9615 ,  3260
Content Level Progress: 82% (82/100)
Level 128 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 129 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win
Content Views:155757
Times Content Favorited:237 times
Total Comments Made:2350
FJ Points:8324
Favorite Tags: Balls (2) | FJ (2) | get (2) | of (2)

latest user's comments

#11 - So basically this lady is retarded, dogs would be much happier…  [+] (3 replies) 08/11/2015 on Dogs Can't Read -2
#14 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
at least she's making an effort to make the world better, unlike you
User avatar
#25 - biglez (08/11/2015) [-]
Not a very good effort. Go read to kids or something that might benefit from it. I highly doubt the dogs give a fuck about her reading to them.
#24 - radtroll (08/11/2015) [-]
**radtroll used "*roll picture*"**
**radtroll rolled image**
*Like you know anything about my life or the charity work I do
#24 - I just installed windows 10 and turned off the all privacy rel…  [+] (15 replies) 08/11/2015 on Windows of Privacy +1
User avatar
#56 - VongolaX (08/11/2015) [-]
what do you mean privacy related stuff?
#65 - rollfourexplain (08/11/2015) [-]
**rollfourexplain used "*roll 1, 0000-9999*"**
**rollfourexplain rolls 9,112**

>>#39 for a picture.

Basically Microsoft is recording a lot of extra stuff and you have to find sly ways to stop them.

It would be perfectly fine but Microsoft has thrown around some vague wording that they might cut off your windows security updates if you bypass their stuff.
User avatar
#122 - battletechmech (08/11/2015) [-]
basically it's insanely easy to stop them from recording your stuff. They ask you during installation in bold letters.
User avatar
#52 - frenzyhero (08/11/2015) [-]
what does windows key+tab do?
#68 - rollfourexplain (08/11/2015) [-]
**rollfourexplain used "*roll 1, 0000-9999*"**
**rollfourexplain rolls 5,035**

WindowsKey+Tab lets you bring up smaller pictures of available "windows" and cycle thought them. WindowsKey+Shift+Tab makes you cycle the opposite way.

The better thing to use is Alt+Tab and Alt+Shift+Tab IMO.

I can confirm that this has been a thing since at least Windows Vista. Which honestly was fine, it just was a bit wasteful with RAM. >>#24
#71 - frenzyhero (08/11/2015) [-]
Is it like this?
#73 - rollfourexplain (08/11/2015) [-]
**rollfourexplain used "*roll 1, 0000-9999*"**
**rollfourexplain rolls 5,083**

Yep. It'll cycle thought those menus with the one in front fading and appearing in the back. That's a nice wallpaper.
>Katawa Shoujo

Well it can't be worse than a Virtual Novel porn game so whatever. I only know the name because there was a post about it several days ago.

Now that I think of it you probably just grabbed this randomly off the internet, didn't you.
#102 - ohmytoast (08/11/2015) [-]
You should try Katawa Shoujo, really. Not for the porn, but because the story is amazingly beautiful. Pic related
User avatar
#82 - frenzyhero (08/11/2015) [-]
grabbed what off the internet?
The wallpaper is of Touhou, and I just took the screencap.

I'm on Vista though, and I get to that menu by clicking some button on my mouse. I just got the mouse last week, I'd never seen that menu before.
#83 - rollfourexplain (08/11/2015) [-]
**rollfourexplain used "*roll 1, 0000-9999*"**
**rollfourexplain rolls 5,817**

Well at first I assumed it was your screenshot but then I figured you got that off of Google images or something.

On your keyboard there is a key that has the Windows logo on it. If you hold it down and then press tab you should bring up that exact thing your mouse button is bringing up. I'm sure of it.
User avatar
#85 - frenzyhero (08/11/2015) [-]
Oh. I never noticed that. I never had a need for the windows key.

Yeah, you can see this page on that screenshot though, so it would have been impossible to pull it from google.
#86 - rollfourexplain (08/11/2015) [-]
*roll limit reached 1, 0000-9999*

Oh duh. How could I not realize that? Again, nice wallpaper.

Well goodnight. I need to get to bed.
#88 - frenzyhero (08/11/2015) [-]
Did you want the wallpaper or something? I have more in this style, too.
User avatar
#46 - quasimodem (08/11/2015) [-]
omg thank you
#26 - alexanderh (08/11/2015) [-]
So much easier to find a specific window if you have a ton of them open.
And if you have multiple monitors, each monitor displays only the windows it has.
#21 - Story time >be me, in college >face looking like…  [+] (1 reply) 08/11/2015 on Satisfying +5
User avatar
#22 - qanonymousp (08/11/2015) [-]
smart play ;)
#35 - a sane person would say I hope I never have to use it.  [+] (1 reply) 08/11/2015 on Go Ahead.... Make My Day.... +10
User avatar
#72 - Silthrim (08/11/2015) [-]
Have you ever met an infantryman who was sane?
#24 - Yeah this is 100% ********, sorry to be a buzzkill  [+] (5 replies) 08/11/2015 on Feel Good Week +1
User avatar
#29 - notanotheraccount (08/11/2015) [-]
It actually happens, it's rare, but it does happen, with all sorts of disabilities like that. It's the same thing that happened with the deaf kid who woke up and could hear, just a different disability. The human body is a really amazing thing that we still dont fully understand.
User avatar
#30 - radtroll (08/11/2015) [-]
It happens that she would FEEL , not Stand up.
paralyzed people develop muscular atrophy (basically super weak muscles), so even after they recover, they need moths/years of physiotherapy to recover their motor skills, standing up being a hard one.

User avatar
#41 - ninjabadger (08/11/2015) [-]
I think the post means they found out she could feel when she laughed.

They probably put her through therapy to get her to the point where she could walk. Doubt it would be a quick process, so it's more of a "she can walk now (years later) because of this event".

That's just my two cents.
User avatar
#31 - notanotheraccount (08/11/2015) [-]
Ahh, i thought you meant her suddenly being able to feel again was bullshit, my bad.
User avatar
#34 - radtroll (08/11/2015) [-]
it's cool bud
Non-invasive Neuromodulation of leg movements after paralysis
vid is related, and beautiful
#33 - Can someone please get the souce?  [+] (4 replies) 08/10/2015 on Is... is this science? +1
User avatar
#37 - loljkisback (08/11/2015) [-]
#35 - blahblahhban (08/11/2015) [-]
The Animals House of the Rising Sun Old School Computer Remix House of the Rising Sun by the Animals performed on technology.
User avatar
#39 - radtroll (08/11/2015) [-]
thanks, this helped me find it
The Animals House of the Rising Sun Old School Computer Remix
User avatar
#38 - loljkisback (08/11/2015) [-]
Well then

#6 - I wanna **** on that man's face so bad ...  [+] (36 replies) 08/10/2015 on Thanks Obama 20 -29
User avatar
#49 - cantexplain (08/11/2015) [-]
that's a... you should probably go to therapy
#36 - dudeyouisnasty (08/11/2015) [-]
Is that the best you can do. Shit on bush, people have done that since his dad was in office. The least you could do is be original.
#32 - penalcupcake (08/11/2015) [-]
Well that's just kinda being unnecessarily...vile.
User avatar
#35 - radtroll (08/11/2015) [-]
See Iraq today? That his amazing work
#39 - darkjustifier (08/11/2015) [-]
and I thank him for it, however the economy I will not thank him for
User avatar
#38 - penalcupcake (08/11/2015) [-]
It's a combined effort from the last 4 or 5 presidents all mixed together with incompetent local police and military forces actually.
User avatar
#10 - heartlessrobot (08/11/2015) [-]
When I read your comment the 1st time I thought you said "sit" not "shit".
User avatar
#7 - sphincterface (08/11/2015) [-]
He's not a bad person though. Shitty president, but he wasn't evil or mean....
User avatar
#46 - whtkid (08/11/2015) [-]
Nobody ever acknowledges that he didn't believe in Global warming
User avatar
#48 - sphincterface (08/11/2015) [-]
Well truth be told, people are starting to not believe in it anymore....which is just stupid honestly.
User avatar
#34 - skeery (08/11/2015) [-]
He led a country into war on false pretenses, he should be in jail
User avatar
#51 - spaaceghoost (08/11/2015) [-]
Read up on all of the shit that went down before the invasion of Iraq. The UN was a huge part of it, the UK wanted in, and a whole shitload of other stuff. It wasnt a "hurr durr, lets invade because I said so." Even the UN thought they had a distinct possibility of chemical weapons.
#43 - rollfourexplain (08/11/2015) [-]
**rollfourexplain used "*roll 1, 0000-9999*"**
**rollfourexplain rolls 7,076**

To be fair the CIA really did think that dictator guy in Iraq had a nuclear bomb. Hussain... something or other was even bluffing somewhat.

They were false pretenses but they weren't lies is what I'm trying to say.
User avatar
#41 - dudeyouisnasty (08/11/2015) [-]
Truth be told, Obama has done the same thing as Bush started. One of the key differences is there was no national outcry for vengeance. Obama sent troops to foreign nations in the name of policing and aid. The difference is, there was no need to destroy another nation. Obama didnt push it because there was little to no resistance, as the primary exporter of unrest was already engaged with US forces sent in by Bush. Due to the little resistance, Obama was able to remove what little ground troops were sent There were only small threats, not all out attack on American soil and maintain a small presence of military training officers.

The problem with Iraq was 9/11, what is the leader of the US supposed to do when a terrorist group acts on its declaration of war? Let it go unpunished? Sure the way he went about it wasn't perfect, some say it was dead wrong. Problem is, we cant go back and try an alternative, maybe bombing the hell out of them and leaving would have worked better. But he could have made worse decisions, he could have done as a sect of Americans wanted to do, nuke the place. I'm serious, there was a statistically sizable amount of Americans who wanted to nuke the middle east. Some wanted to bomb it to hell and leave, some wanted to invade and take their country, others still wanted to do exactly what he did, some more wanted to send in troops to help the government, and some wanted to do nothing to them and instead focus on our selves.

He could have been far worse, and if the war is the worst thing he's done, thats fine with me. The only thing about the war that angers me, is the amount of dead Americans Remember though, it wasn't just America that invaded many European nations agreed to invade as well I would have rather bombed the hell out of that sand pit and warned them not to do it again or I wouldn't be as nice next time.

As for the argument about civilian casualties, civilian casualties are limited by rules of conventional warfare. However, these guerrillas dont care about civilian casualties. They used innocent families as bullet shields, the blood of those innocents inst on our heads, its on the heads of those who forced them into the line of fire, the terrorists.
You should just be happy I wasn't president, if there was a town that harbored terrorist commanders I would have wiped them from the map. There would have been a empty desert left behind once the bombers left. I dont take shit from anyone, someone breaks into my house, I shoot first and dont give a damn later. Those children poked the hornets nest.
User avatar
#53 - discobleach (08/11/2015) [-]
what did Iraq have to do with 9/11?
#62 - dudeyouisnasty (08/11/2015) [-]
Not sure if stupid, joking, or trying really bad to troll.
User avatar
#63 - discobleach (08/11/2015) [-]
there is no correlation between the two.
please provide evidence to the contrary.
#65 - dudeyouisnasty (08/11/2015) [-]
Anyone with functioning brain cells can understand the relation ship. I'll indulge you with one more thing.

9/11 > Public Outrage > Invasion of Iraq
User avatar
#66 - discobleach (08/11/2015) [-]
i assume the public outrage was directed at those responsible for 9/11.
not Iraq
User avatar
#67 - dudeyouisnasty (08/11/2015) [-]
As long as you are genuinely unsure of the reasons and not just trying for attention i'll keep chatting.

Yes, but those responsible harbored themselves in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, that is not the only reason, the US has had bad relations with Iraq since the 60's. In my opinion we involved ourselves way to much, 9/11 was the result. In a way the terror attack was inevitable since Islamic extremists have wanted to kill us all since their inception. However, our close involvement has had one of two effects, delaying the terror attack or bringing it about sooner. We will never know as we cannot change history, all we can do is look at our past mistakes and learn from them. The problem here is, there is no lesson that can be agreed upon by a majority, we also have no agreement on how to move on from here. We are continuing to receive threats from ISIS in the form of executions of Christians and other prisoners. Some want to sit down and try to reason with them, others want to bomb them to hell. In reality neither solution is a good one, these people are demented, they cannot reason, however bombing them wont solve anything. One of the only things that can be done now it to just fight them were there strongholds show up by training Iraqi security forces and providing air support.
User avatar
#68 - discobleach (08/11/2015) [-]
iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
following the attacks there was a mission in afghanistan. the one in iraq 2 years later was totally unrelated.
User avatar
#69 - dudeyouisnasty (08/11/2015) [-]
You dont seem to get it, Afghanistan was the first front, Iraq was just as much a problem as Afghanistan, they harbored the same terrorist groups, Al-Qaeda was stretched across the Arab nations, as well as ally terrorist groups. Iraq was two years later because it reduced the strain on US forces, could you imagine invading both nations at once. That would have required a huge portion of US forces, potentially leaving the mainland vulnerable on another front. Once Afghanistan was subdued the Iraqi campaign was opened. The time game does not negate the relation between the two.
User avatar
#70 - discobleach (08/11/2015) [-]
there were no allies to al qaeda in iraq before the war even started.


i repeat. at the time of the war, there was no correlation between iraq and al qaeda.
saddam hussein never had a connection with them.

User avatar
#71 - dudeyouisnasty (08/12/2015) [-]
Your own wiki article Such a reliable source anyway says that it is believed they only started five months after the invasion of Iraq. It could have been four or six, or even further than that. There was no connection between Saddam and Al-Qeada, I never said that Saddam was working with them, because he wasn't until the invasion. However, Iraq was a major exporter of militants, before the invasion they were sending troops to Afghanistan to fight US forces, it was partially determined that invading Iraq would slow the export of militants. However, Bush also had an interest to invade as a sort of revenge for his fathers failed campaign.

Long story short, even if we didnt invade Iraq Islamic extremists would have flocked to the safe harbor that was Iraq and continued attacks on western nations. During Afghanistan you better believe that Al-Qaeda was looking for allies, and Iraq was prime for recruitment.
#42 - dudeyouisnasty (08/11/2015) [-]
I feel better now.

Have a good day.
User avatar
#40 - herrokitteh (08/11/2015) [-]
Roosevelt did the same and people hail him as one of the best presidents, he just had way more charisma. A smiling snake is still a snake.
#33 - donutspanker (08/11/2015) [-]
But jet fuel can't melt steel beams...
User avatar
#61 - beams (08/11/2015) [-]
But what it can do is start fires in a neighboring building following the initial explosion. These fires may ignite the fuel tanks used for certain generators. With the compressed fuel lighting off like a fuse, a large proportion of the building's structure weakens from the heat expanding the metal and softening it. Said building then collapses.
User avatar
#24 - baditch (08/11/2015) [-]
I thought he was an okay president actually...
User avatar
#50 - sorihisis (08/11/2015) [-]
I was never a fan of the no child left behind act
#29 - brisineo (08/11/2015) [-]
Okay on foriegn policy
Poor on economy
Expert of not giving a crap
#54 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Okay on foreign policy? Lol electing Bush and his series of failures afterwards made the whole world see America as being completely unfit to elect a good leader. He confirmed anew the stereotype of emotionally manipulable rednecks. I don't think he could have done any worse for Americas foreign policy if he tried.
#47 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
My own two cents: I don't understand why moderates hate him. He wasn't that conservative. I being a conservative/libertarian type have my own criticisms of him, but if you're kind of a middle of the road guy, why hate Bush? He spent more money on health care and schools. Most people agree with those things. I don't but I'm weird...
User avatar
#55 - gohex (08/11/2015) [-]
Healthcare is a controversial topic. In the US at least, so many varied opinions on that.

I don't get how you could be against funding schools though. Imho education & research are the two most important things we can fund.
#45 - nicktrue (08/11/2015) [-]
www.usdebtclock.org/ and Obama is doing better?
User avatar
#37 - drtrousersnake (08/11/2015) [-]
well if a terrorist attack happens in the middle of your give money to the schools campaign, it really throws a wrench into plans.
#7 - My friend is actually called Islam, he's a kickass computer en…  [+] (1 reply) 08/10/2015 on Aladdin +6
User avatar
#12 - tenaciouslee (08/11/2015) [-]
That 60 fps gif tho.