Click to expand


Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/18/2011
Last Login:7/28/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 48 total,  73 ,  25
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level 13 Comments: New Here → Level 14 Comments: New Here
Total Comments Made:24
FJ Points:78

latest user's comments

#23 - I'll admit the hight of the series was that episode. You just… 03/16/2015 on Pausing at the right... 0
#163 - Cake bread covered in sprinkles sounds way better than plain b… 01/05/2015 on Fairy Bread +1
#317 - Link: 11/09/2014 on Wundercannonshrek 0
#313 - I think he did something wrong absolutely, you can't justify l… 11/09/2014 on Wundercannonshrek 0
#311 - Food for thought if anyone's interested: An experiment wa…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/09/2014 on Wundercannonshrek +4
#200 - I kind of see what the first one is saying. She's being a cun… 10/31/2014 on true sexism 0
#29 - The only jokes that get posted on here are lesbian jokes, if y…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/19/2013 on D'awww so sweet. +11
User avatar #30 - flemsdfer (11/19/2013) [-]
anymore* She used to have tons of shows and got booted off each one for being all about lesbians and nothing else. She finally toned down on the lesbian comments to a tolerable level and got some different things to talk about.
User avatar #38 - princessren (11/19/2013) [-]
didn't she have a sitcom before she came out
how the heck could all the jokes of been about her being a lesbian then if she wasn't out?
User avatar #40 - flemsdfer (11/19/2013) [-]
Her sitcom did good until she came out. Then it did really good, but quickly lost ratings because that's all it was, her being gay. She then had a very short lived talk show, starred in some small things, then finally the show she has now which has been doing well.
#2 - I think so too  [+] (2 new replies) 02/03/2013 on Stop it +22
#3 - pooplol (02/03/2013) [-]
User avatar #11 - holycrapimacupcake (02/03/2013) [-]
Why the hell did I laugh at this?
#9 - Picture 01/19/2013 on In the feels -1
#49 - You can never completely prevent someone from acquiring a gun …  [+] (2 new replies) 01/18/2013 on Oh Obama -1
User avatar #52 - bindmind (01/18/2013) [-]
Most people have an issue with weaponry that has a certain magazine size or killing power.

For example, you don't want someone walking around with a 45mm NATO round. That thing will break on impact with your skin, and rip up your insides. Nasty stuff.

On the other hand, something like a .45 leaves a clean wound, and isn't nearly as messy or deadly. It also still retains a good amount of stopping power, perfect for defense.

Another issue is lighting up your target, which is why people are concerned about magazine size. The smaller the magazine, the more the shooter has to reload, the more opportunities to charge the bastard.

I hate the concept of "IF THEY BAN THIS, WHO'S STOPPING THEM FROM BANNING THIS TOO?". Well, Jesus, use some friggin' reason. They're not going to go banning everything in sight because it's a little dangerous. Chainsaws are dangerous, hammers are dangerous. Hell, a board of wood is dangerous. But those aren't going to get banned, because banning them is silly.

Also, I'm Canadian. Feel free to call me biased.
User avatar #55 - cockassunited (01/18/2013) [-]
Except hammers kill more people a year then any type of rifle.
[ 24 Total ]


Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 800


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)