Upload
Login or register

phunkyzilla

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 20
Date Signed Up:4/27/2011
Last Login:8/19/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#6988
Highest Content Rank:#1879
Highest Comment Rank:#2962
Content Thumbs: 3846 total,  4475 ,  629
Comment Thumbs: 5761 total,  8118 ,  2357
Content Level Progress: 42% (42/100)
Level 138 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 139 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 77% (77/100)
Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:3
Content Views:169567
Times Content Favorited:66 times
Total Comments Made:3862
FJ Points:4378

latest user's comments

#64 - If we all just ignore the ******* and feminists I used to thin…  [+] (4 new replies) 08/13/2016 on BLM Video Game +4
User avatar
#79 - machiavellianhumor (08/13/2016) [-]
yeah same with you idiots about gamergate. you "ignore live matters" activists are pure stupidity
User avatar
#83 - phunkyzilla (08/13/2016) [-]
I'm not with gamergate nor do I personally subscribe to their beliefs and ideals. I just am stating my opinion as anyone else might. no where in any of my sentence did I claim allegiance to said group. you can't just up and assume people's stances on things dummy
User avatar
#66 - pyjamadog (08/13/2016) [-]
Self-fulfilling prophecy
User avatar
#74 - phunkyzilla (08/13/2016) [-]
I like how your statement works on a metaphorical level but not a literal one. it's almost word play
#273 - What's wrong with the little boy with the mohawk? if you read …  [+] (1 new reply) 08/13/2016 on SJW comp: bloody bloody... +6
#291 - bloodredwind (08/13/2016) [-]
I think the take away is that he wanted to be a girl because girls get to play with boy things, but not the other way around. Not so much enraging as it is sad. pic unrelated
#95 - This isn't an actual illustration of the cave allegory. but go…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/13/2016 on Allegory of the Cave 0
User avatar
#105 - autumnanubis (08/14/2016) [-]
Would you care to explain the differences because in my opinion it is extremely accurate.
User avatar
#113 - phunkyzilla (08/15/2016) [-]
in the original allegory the shadows are casted on the wall by things that are passing by. not by an oppressing shadowy figure. it was meant to demonstrate that those who were below philosophers didn't see the world for what it truly was because they were just too simple to understand and it was necessary for those who did to sheppard the dumb along
User avatar
#114 - autumnanubis (08/15/2016) [-]
It isn't an "oppressing shadowy figure". The shadows on the wall represent the imperial evidence presented by intellectuals, they do not understand it and it is not an observation of their own. The shadows are not cast by the light of the sun and as such means they are not shadowed by and disconnected from philosophy. Objects are passed in front of the light for the purpose of displaying the shadows to the chained ones. Nearly every single illustration of the allegory appears this way.
User avatar
#115 - phunkyzilla (08/15/2016) [-]
yeah but in this illustration it clearly implies that simpletons will blindly sit in the cave listening to the news while those high enough to see that they're false images will leave the cave and find memes. I'm just saying this is not a good illustration of the original one in which the shadows cast on the wall were just from real life passing by the wall's entrance
User avatar
#116 - autumnanubis (08/15/2016) [-]
But they were not, the shadows cast on the wall were not of things passing the entrance. I already said this.
#14 - Pro tip: she's lying. hoes that aren't interesting or have mad… 08/11/2016 on No worries, they are... 0
#47 - PERFECT SCORE! 08/11/2016 on movie idea 0
#151 - anytime my friend. it's only with teamwork will we all stand t… 08/11/2016 on Real true love stories 0
#147 - It is good that you've lived through those experiences my frie…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/11/2016 on Real true love stories +1
#148 - zielscheibe (08/11/2016) [-]
Thank you , kind stranger
User avatar
#151 - phunkyzilla (08/11/2016) [-]
anytime my friend. it's only with teamwork will we all stand through the waves of time and strife yo. I'm just doing my part
#91 - Her baby is allowed to just sit there because she's holding th… 08/11/2016 on Finishing a good... 0
#58 - they were warned about the attacks on benghazi several hours i…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/11/2016 on When memes become reality +3
User avatar
#157 - redandgreen (08/14/2016) [-]
The (many) investigations seemed to show that she wasn't negligent and it was impossible to get troops there in time,
User avatar
#158 - phunkyzilla (08/15/2016) [-]
But not warning the people there???? what's the excuse for that, the embassy had soldiers coming to it. its not unlike an embassy to have a vehicle in it
User avatar
#159 - redandgreen (08/15/2016) [-]
Where's your evidence that she is at fault for that? I've seen a lot of claims but again - show evidence.
#53 - operations that people died in in which she was the head of. t…  [+] (9 new replies) 08/11/2016 on When memes become reality +2
User avatar
#54 - redandgreen (08/11/2016) [-]
Somebody dying on an operation she was head of is not proof of negligence though. The FBI statements related to using a private email server though, not murder.

I really don't like her but people keep saying she's killed people and I have never seen any actual evidence only people's opinion.
#65 - anon (08/11/2016) [-]
seriously? that´s what you´re going with?

Thankfully there´s enough Americans with more than the 1.5 brain cells you´re sporting.
User avatar
#155 - redandgreen (08/14/2016) [-]
If you have a problem with people asking for evidence for claims then you're the one lacking brain cells.
#60 - gigabowzer (08/11/2016) [-]
Fcking brits thinking they have the full story on the Benahzi incident. Go back to drinking your Brexit tea In all seriousness, it was already shown that she was negligent in dealing with the situation. Military commanders wanted to go in and save the troops, but were ordered to stand down without any explanation at all. That is why the families of the soldiers who died want answers. Because NO ONE is even answering the questions that were posed. The only response that Hillary gave was "What does it matter at this point?"
User avatar
#156 - redandgreen (08/14/2016) [-]
The investigations seem to show that she wasn't negligent and no troops could have arrived in time.
User avatar
#58 - phunkyzilla (08/11/2016) [-]
they were warned about the attacks on benghazi several hours in advance and using any sort of instant messaging device could''ve reached the soliders as well as the political leaders at the embassy yet they didn't. That's gross negligence that caused lives which is a crime you can be tried for.
User avatar
#157 - redandgreen (08/14/2016) [-]
The (many) investigations seemed to show that she wasn't negligent and it was impossible to get troops there in time,
User avatar
#158 - phunkyzilla (08/15/2016) [-]
But not warning the people there???? what's the excuse for that, the embassy had soldiers coming to it. its not unlike an embassy to have a vehicle in it
User avatar
#159 - redandgreen (08/15/2016) [-]
Where's your evidence that she is at fault for that? I've seen a lot of claims but again - show evidence.