Upload
Login or register

ottofan

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:4/07/2012
Last Login:9/29/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#8732
Highest Content Rank:#1520
Highest Comment Rank:#6661
Content Thumbs: 7217 total,  7902 ,  685
Comment Thumbs: 1437 total,  1676 ,  239
Content Level Progress: 13% (13/100)
Level 172 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 173 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 50% (50/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:2
Content Views:211078
Times Content Favorited:297 times
Total Comments Made:263
FJ Points:8753

Text Posts

latest user's comments

#45 - but why  [+] (1 reply) 09/09/2016 on The Jokes Write Themselves 0
#58 - blablawat (09/09/2016) [-]
**blablawat used "*roll picture*"**
**blablawat rolled image** because of this ?
#195 - but it still does have references to what Trump said and why i…  [+] (2 replies) 09/02/2016 on Trumper Comp33 0
User avatar
#197 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Seriously look at the clinton meter, half the them are still trump. The rest are good things about clinton.

www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/statements/
User avatar
#196 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
It doesnt reference to why its not true, it just gives a false meter for half of them saying something like "be more specific" or "technically". Then it has a random statement from hillary about trump being bad "oh this is 100% true". Anything trump said bad about clinton, which everyone knows already and its obviously so true... Politifact - "false clinton never did this"
#190 - Well, only thing we can do is wait and see what happens. If Tr…  [+] (4 replies) 09/02/2016 on Trumper Comp33 0
User avatar
#194 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Politifact is owned by Tampa Bay Times, a liberal newspaper in florida. Liberal = not trump
User avatar
#195 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
but it still does have references to what Trump said and why it's not true.
User avatar
#197 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Seriously look at the clinton meter, half the them are still trump. The rest are good things about clinton.

www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/statements/
User avatar
#196 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
It doesnt reference to why its not true, it just gives a false meter for half of them saying something like "be more specific" or "technically". Then it has a random statement from hillary about trump being bad "oh this is 100% true". Anything trump said bad about clinton, which everyone knows already and its obviously so true... Politifact - "false clinton never did this"
#187 - Here what he has said and mostly proved to do b…  [+] (7 replies) 09/02/2016 on Trumper Comp33 -1
User avatar
#189 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Anything that the author or site slightly disagrees with is labeled as false. Especially the things that have no right or wrong answer.
User avatar
#188 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
This is pretty ridiculous, according to this website the quote "The number of illegal immigrants could be 3 million. It could be 30 million." isnt true. Yeah its a broad statement however the quotes of 11 million is purely a guess from our government. The same guess we've used for a number of years. Nobody actually knows so how could they tell if the statement is true or false. Apparently this is false as well, "Inner-city crime is reaching record levels." However it's 100% true, ever since black lives matter with the rioting and such crime is very high. Notice how they mix in a couple negative things about trump and positive things about hillary and gage them as 100% true. Website is dumb as fuck.
User avatar
#190 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
Well, only thing we can do is wait and see what happens. If Trump wins, it's certainly going to be interesting what he is actually going to do.
User avatar
#194 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Politifact is owned by Tampa Bay Times, a liberal newspaper in florida. Liberal = not trump
User avatar
#195 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
but it still does have references to what Trump said and why it's not true.
User avatar
#197 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Seriously look at the clinton meter, half the them are still trump. The rest are good things about clinton.

www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/statements/
User avatar
#196 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
It doesnt reference to why its not true, it just gives a false meter for half of them saying something like "be more specific" or "technically". Then it has a random statement from hillary about trump being bad "oh this is 100% true". Anything trump said bad about clinton, which everyone knows already and its obviously so true... Politifact - "false clinton never did this"
#182 - Look, I personally think Trump is a ******* genius and is play…  [+] (9 replies) 09/02/2016 on Trumper Comp33 -2
User avatar
#184 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
You're just generalizing and making broad statements without any sort of referencing. There's no way to know who cares about the country, however he's losing billions of dollars of his own money. If he loses he'll have wasted so much. He has no backward motivation to win like Hillary does. He's just a guy that decided to run because he though he would be right for the job. He's said that in numerous interviews. From everything he says he cares deeply about the united states. If he didn't why would he be spouting policies that will make life harder for him as a member of wall street. Do you know about what he did recently in mexico? He went and met with the president of mexico and handled the situation very well. They talked it out and the president expressed interest in working WITH trump to take down the drug cartel. Trump has the skills to be a diplomat when he needs to. He didn't just talk about his skills, he actually flew down to mexico and proved it. I see the point your trying to make but that's just personal hearsay. There's no real evidence to point to what you're saying other than feeling.
User avatar
#187 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/


Here what he has said and mostly proved to do be false.

The only thing I really like with Trump is that he is anti-establishment and shaking the American politics. And his choice of VP is christian nut. Religion fucks up so much. (Yes, including islam.)
User avatar
#189 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Anything that the author or site slightly disagrees with is labeled as false. Especially the things that have no right or wrong answer.
User avatar
#188 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
This is pretty ridiculous, according to this website the quote "The number of illegal immigrants could be 3 million. It could be 30 million." isnt true. Yeah its a broad statement however the quotes of 11 million is purely a guess from our government. The same guess we've used for a number of years. Nobody actually knows so how could they tell if the statement is true or false. Apparently this is false as well, "Inner-city crime is reaching record levels." However it's 100% true, ever since black lives matter with the rioting and such crime is very high. Notice how they mix in a couple negative things about trump and positive things about hillary and gage them as 100% true. Website is dumb as fuck.
User avatar
#190 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
Well, only thing we can do is wait and see what happens. If Trump wins, it's certainly going to be interesting what he is actually going to do.
User avatar
#194 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Politifact is owned by Tampa Bay Times, a liberal newspaper in florida. Liberal = not trump
User avatar
#195 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
but it still does have references to what Trump said and why it's not true.
User avatar
#197 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Seriously look at the clinton meter, half the them are still trump. The rest are good things about clinton.

www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/statements/
User avatar
#196 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
It doesnt reference to why its not true, it just gives a false meter for half of them saying something like "be more specific" or "technically". Then it has a random statement from hillary about trump being bad "oh this is 100% true". Anything trump said bad about clinton, which everyone knows already and its obviously so true... Politifact - "false clinton never did this"
#177 - I can't be the only one who doesn't trust neither Trump or Cli…  [+] (12 replies) 09/02/2016 on Trumper Comp33 +2
User avatar
#198 - jeitron (09/02/2016) [-]
Yes, polls show that a good majority of the country hate both candidates but there seems to be a dichotomy of the "two party system" so people will either believe that those two are the only choice while anything else(third party) is "throwing away your vote" or vote tactically in which they vote against the person who they dont want to win even if they dont like tge person they're voting for(the lesser evil).


User avatar
#180 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Doesnt matter, your flag isnt red white and blue. I don't know what there is not to trust. Have you even seen a full 30 minutes speech from trump? He's one of the most common sense candidates i've seen in awhile.
User avatar
#182 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
Look, I personally think Trump is a fucking genius and is playing a role because he is a business man. He doesn't give a shit about the american people at all. He does it because he CAN. And all the support he got shows what problems there is with the american society and how they feel. But will he be fit as a president? I don't think so. He has no political experience to do it. Most things he said turn out to be false.
User avatar
#184 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
You're just generalizing and making broad statements without any sort of referencing. There's no way to know who cares about the country, however he's losing billions of dollars of his own money. If he loses he'll have wasted so much. He has no backward motivation to win like Hillary does. He's just a guy that decided to run because he though he would be right for the job. He's said that in numerous interviews. From everything he says he cares deeply about the united states. If he didn't why would he be spouting policies that will make life harder for him as a member of wall street. Do you know about what he did recently in mexico? He went and met with the president of mexico and handled the situation very well. They talked it out and the president expressed interest in working WITH trump to take down the drug cartel. Trump has the skills to be a diplomat when he needs to. He didn't just talk about his skills, he actually flew down to mexico and proved it. I see the point your trying to make but that's just personal hearsay. There's no real evidence to point to what you're saying other than feeling.
User avatar
#187 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/


Here what he has said and mostly proved to do be false.

The only thing I really like with Trump is that he is anti-establishment and shaking the American politics. And his choice of VP is christian nut. Religion fucks up so much. (Yes, including islam.)
User avatar
#189 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Anything that the author or site slightly disagrees with is labeled as false. Especially the things that have no right or wrong answer.
User avatar
#188 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
This is pretty ridiculous, according to this website the quote "The number of illegal immigrants could be 3 million. It could be 30 million." isnt true. Yeah its a broad statement however the quotes of 11 million is purely a guess from our government. The same guess we've used for a number of years. Nobody actually knows so how could they tell if the statement is true or false. Apparently this is false as well, "Inner-city crime is reaching record levels." However it's 100% true, ever since black lives matter with the rioting and such crime is very high. Notice how they mix in a couple negative things about trump and positive things about hillary and gage them as 100% true. Website is dumb as fuck.
User avatar
#190 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
Well, only thing we can do is wait and see what happens. If Trump wins, it's certainly going to be interesting what he is actually going to do.
User avatar
#194 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Politifact is owned by Tampa Bay Times, a liberal newspaper in florida. Liberal = not trump
User avatar
#195 - ottofan (09/02/2016) [-]
but it still does have references to what Trump said and why it's not true.
User avatar
#197 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
Seriously look at the clinton meter, half the them are still trump. The rest are good things about clinton.

www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/statements/
User avatar
#196 - fergin (09/02/2016) [-]
It doesnt reference to why its not true, it just gives a false meter for half of them saying something like "be more specific" or "technically". Then it has a random statement from hillary about trump being bad "oh this is 100% true". Anything trump said bad about clinton, which everyone knows already and its obviously so true... Politifact - "false clinton never did this"
#81 - The biggest reason I play on console is that I never have to w…  [+] (26 replies) 08/07/2016 on PC +79
#280 - aywrightinglish (08/07/2016) [-]
Ya bet you circle jerk with a bunch of toher stuff. Ypu are in Fj after all.
User avatar
#239 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
>actually thinking high framerates boils down to a circlejerk

t. someone that has never played a game at 144+ FPS
#389 - anon (08/07/2016) [-]
Maybe some people just don't care as much? As long as it doesn't drop under 30 I'm fine, even if I'd like 60 frames. Also don't act like elitists don't turn frames into a stupid pissing contest.
User avatar
#394 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
It's far from a pissing contest, 100+ FPS is objectively better, especially for games with fast paced combat. 30 FPS is only really acceptable in 2 situations. The first being the game has massive amounts of motion blur thrown on it, which just makes the game look horrible and only really goes to hide the 30 FPS at a glance, and the second being in slower paced games like strategy games and the like. 30 FPS should've died a decade ago, with even TVs pushing 60-120hz, people shouldn't accept 30 FPS as a standard anymore.
#336 - anon (08/07/2016) [-]
I don't notice framerate at all when playing, so long as it doesn't suddenly drop to 5 fps. I couldn't tell which of my games run 60fps and which run 30.
User avatar
#490 - markipliergame (08/07/2016) [-]
if you cant notice the difference between 60 and 30 then you physically have something wrong with you
User avatar
#344 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
Then you need to pay more attention, there's a very clear difference between 30, 60, and 120 FPS, especially once you get up to t 120-144 FPS.
#123 - sentinyl (08/07/2016) [-]
You realize that to meet the minimum requirements of almost any game you only need like $200, right? I mean you might not get the highest framerate, so you can't circlejerk about it with some nerds or that kind of shit.
#364 - twentyten (08/07/2016) [-]
200? Used maybe, and it probably wont run very well at all.
#159 - tripelace (08/07/2016) [-]
**tripelace used "*roll picture*"**
**tripelace rolled image**Rather then pay $200 every 2 or 3 years, I'd pay $300 + every 6 or seven years. That's just me though...
User avatar
#345 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
Don't forget the $60 a year for online and (usually) higher prices for games on console. On top of that, you really don't need to upgrade every 2-3 years, especially if you stay at 1080p.
User avatar
#539 - taggz (08/09/2016) [-]
50 now, n ps3 had free multiplayer,
#387 - anon (08/07/2016) [-]
Ya I call bullshit on games being anything more than marginally higher in price. Steam isn't the only thing that has sales, PSN/XBL stores do to, plus regular game stores can have frequent sales, used copies, and the option to bring in games you don't want anymore for cash. It's not like Steam has any unique thing by having sales.
User avatar
#487 - markipliergame (08/07/2016) [-]
#363 - twentyten (08/07/2016) [-]
60 for online? ha, if pc gamers don't pay for full retail why would console players?
User avatar
#369 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
Because the cost for the subscription to Xbox Live/PS+ very rarely go on sale, the same can't be said for full PC games. Consoles are doing better with sales, but they're not as good as PC yet.
#372 - twentyten (08/07/2016) [-]
Please, I can find a 12 month gold sub for less than 2/3 than retail price easily.
User avatar
#377 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
Let me guess, probably from some backwater, shady as fuck, site. The difference between both of these is that the sales on PC come from legitimate retailers. On top of that, 99% of the playerbase is not going to look deeper than Amazon/their console for their subs.
#382 - twentyten (08/07/2016) [-]
Ah yes, eBay shady as fuck. I'm talking about subs here, not games. It's already obvious pc games are cheaper, but I already got a counter argument for that.
User avatar
#383 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
Alright, we'll say you get it for $40 instead of $60, it's still $40 you have to pay each year just to use your own internet to play online. What's this counter argument for PC games being cheaper?
#384 - twentyten (08/07/2016) [-]
I don't have to pay for, the thing people like you don't understand. It's not forced. As for the counter, I can share my digital games and still play them at the same time. Basically cut the cost in half. No need to wait for sales.
User avatar
#385 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
You don't have to pay for it, no. But you also don't have to pay for your games at all on PC because of pirating. To counter something with "w-well I just don't have to pay for it" is stupid. Also, Steam also has family sharing so there goes your point entirely.
#390 - twentyten (08/07/2016) [-]
You must lack some reading comprehension. I never said "w-well I just don't have to pay for it" is a counter argument cheaper games. It's a counter to your remark about "it's still $40 you have to pay each year"... I don't HAVE TO pay anything.

As for the steam family sharing:
"Can two users share a library and both play at the same time?
No, a shared library may only be accessed by one user at a time."

I'm not limited by that on consoles. "so there goes your point entirely." Haha, nope.
User avatar
#393 - nathanbiggs (08/07/2016) [-]
Someone is still essentially tasked with paying for the game, most likely full price. Then, if the game is multiplayer, someone has to have paid for a subscription to XBL/PS+. Then, you have the worse performance, lack of mods, lower resolution, the list goes on. Even if both users have to pay for it on PC, there's a damn good chance it'll come out to be less expensive than going through all these hops to play it on console. And again, you can just pirate the game on PC if this is just a race to the cheapest.
User avatar
#298 - thegamepixel (08/07/2016) [-]
Even if that is true, which it isn't, $200 every 2-3 years or 60$ every year for online + $400 for each console every 4-5 years. The only console generation that was 6-7 years was the 360/PS3 one. All others are shorter and this one's almost over with the Neo and Scorpio. PC gaming is cheaper.
User avatar
#192 - ietam (08/07/2016) [-]
Why do you think that a pc grows obsolete faster? a 300 dollar pc that performs the same as a console will perform the same as a console 6 years later.

channels owned

Subscribe fucking-ironic

user's friends