Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

oniiking

Rank #4600 on Subscribers
oniiking Avatar Level 206 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to oniiking Block oniiking Invite oniiking to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/03/2011
Last Login:12/14/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#15677
Highest Content Rank:#3427
Highest Comment Rank:#6336
Content Thumbs: 2786 total,  3343 ,  557
Comment Thumbs: 1149 total,  1506 ,  357
Content Level Progress: 48% (48/100)
Level 126 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 127 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 206 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 207 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:17
Content Views:333873
Times Content Favorited:28 times
Total Comments Made:621
FJ Points:3725
Favorite Tags: r34 (3)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 28579
    Thumbs Up 597 Thumbs Down 58 Total: +539
    Comments: 131
    Favorites: 28
    Uploaded: 04/09/14
    MMO Games MMO Games
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#255 - Policies are made to stop situations like this, if he had foll…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/11/2014 on No evidence 0
#262 - drewjitsu (12/11/2014) [-]
That is an inaccurate allegation ("...in this case he still killed a man"). The evidence doesn't suggest that any one officer killed the man, but that pressure on the man's chest and head were contributing factors. Therefore, another question exists: Would another takedown have yielded the same result because of swarming the suspect to reduce the possibility of escape? Based on the wording from all the information I've read/heard, that is a possibility.

At this point I must emphasize that I don't have all the details so I'm relying on the people that do/did (i.e. the grand jury) to fill in the gaps. I acknowledge that I could be wrong and I do not intend any of what I'm saying to be taken as fact, but only my perception, opinion, and rationalization of the facts that I have seen and heard. I do encourage these discussions and find your points to be well stated. I ask these questions for the purpose of encouraging a thoughtful discussion and I thank you for keeping it polite. If I am wrong, I would gladly read any evidence as I am not emotionally invested in this case. Specifically, I'm not certain of what the coroner said aside from what I've heard on the news, which I typically do not trust because most stations are driven by ratings above facts.
#245 - "Can an officer be held accountable for that death if he …  [+] (3 new replies) 12/11/2014 on No evidence 0
#251 - drewjitsu (12/11/2014) [-]
That would certainly open him up to punishment from within the police department. I should have been more clear and asked if he could be held legally accountable. The distinction is important because breaking a policy and breaking a law are not the same thing; one leaves you at the mercy of your employer and the other leaves you at the mercy of your gov't. It may be splitting hairs, but that is necessary when dealing with the fate of another individual.

There were most likely more questions to be answered as well but they are best answered by the people who had access to all of the information and legal advice (which I presume is given, otherwise what's the point of a jury if they don't know anything about the law).
User avatar #255 - oniiking (12/11/2014) [-]
Policies are made to stop situations like this, if he had followed the procedure given to him then he would have most likely avoided this situation. Even if it was an accident it was still due to his negligence. So he should still be held accountable on both fronts. If he had only disobeyed the rules and nothing happened then he really would have only received a slap on the wrist as you said "he did not break a law" but in this case he still killed a man with his actions and he should take responsibility for it.
#262 - drewjitsu (12/11/2014) [-]
That is an inaccurate allegation ("...in this case he still killed a man"). The evidence doesn't suggest that any one officer killed the man, but that pressure on the man's chest and head were contributing factors. Therefore, another question exists: Would another takedown have yielded the same result because of swarming the suspect to reduce the possibility of escape? Based on the wording from all the information I've read/heard, that is a possibility.

At this point I must emphasize that I don't have all the details so I'm relying on the people that do/did (i.e. the grand jury) to fill in the gaps. I acknowledge that I could be wrong and I do not intend any of what I'm saying to be taken as fact, but only my perception, opinion, and rationalization of the facts that I have seen and heard. I do encourage these discussions and find your points to be well stated. I ask these questions for the purpose of encouraging a thoughtful discussion and I thank you for keeping it polite. If I am wrong, I would gladly read any evidence as I am not emotionally invested in this case. Specifically, I'm not certain of what the coroner said aside from what I've heard on the news, which I typically do not trust because most stations are driven by ratings above facts.
#119 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 12/11/2014 on FJ rules -1
#120 - rebaj (12/11/2014) [-]
How about just one finger
#113 - Don't tempt me  [+] (3 new replies) 12/11/2014 on FJ rules -1
#116 - rebaj (12/11/2014) [-]
I'm not I swear. I'm just clarifying these rules.
#119 - oniiking (12/11/2014) [-]
#120 - rebaj (12/11/2014) [-]
How about just one finger
#102 - Don't tell me what to do  [+] (5 new replies) 12/11/2014 on FJ rules -1
#112 - rebaj (12/11/2014) [-]
I think he means a bit more lewd. Like panty shots and shit. Faces and innocent stuff excluded.
User avatar #113 - oniiking (12/11/2014) [-]
Don't tempt me
#116 - rebaj (12/11/2014) [-]
I'm not I swear. I'm just clarifying these rules.
#119 - oniiking (12/11/2014) [-]
#120 - rebaj (12/11/2014) [-]
How about just one finger
#407 - Picture 12/10/2014 on IT Crowd 0
#23 - milking someones death for thumbs, nice. 12/09/2014 on Predicted in 2011 0
#34 - There may actually be truth to that. The problem is that they …  [+] (1 new reply) 12/09/2014 on Check it 0
#57 - Valid (12/10/2014) [-]
That's true
On the other hand, GG is just misrepresented
#30 - Again, I don't have to label a group because they label themse…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/09/2014 on Check it +1
#31 - Valid (12/09/2014) [-]
I think that bellbottomshark is saying that what you see on FJ and other sites about SJWs are not everything that they are. They may be presented to us, like how GG is presented to mass media.

For all we know, the majority of them might be people who are fighting for legislations such as affirmative action and actually have very Valid and logical reasoning behind their arguments.
User avatar #34 - oniiking (12/09/2014) [-]
There may actually be truth to that. The problem is that they are identifying with a group that are known for these characteristics. And it's not hard to separate themselves from the insanity. They could just as easily talk about the equality of all human beings and not just women under the name of egalitarians but they choose to be "Social Justice Warriors". And unlike gamergate these people can be singled out and analyzed. Their beliefs are worn on their sleeves and they praise their leaders who follow these insane ideologies to a T, hypocrisy included.
Lie with dogs and all that.
#57 - Valid (12/10/2014) [-]
That's true
On the other hand, GG is just misrepresented
#26 - You can view it as propaganda if you want, I personally don't …  [+] (5 new replies) 12/09/2014 on Check it -1
#28 - bellbottomshark (12/09/2014) [-]
*shrug* well carry on. It always works out best when you label a group so you can dismiss them. Just as long as you keep in mind that the things they are trying to talk about, inequality arising from race, gender, class are actual issues when they aren't being satirised by both sides' hyperbole.
User avatar #30 - oniiking (12/09/2014) [-]
Again, I don't have to label a group because they label themselves. This is what they stand for. And for the record I have no issue with feminism as a whole. I fully agree with gender equality and any movement that strives for it. I do NOT agree with social justice warriors and their sexist and racist comments or their poor excuses, their appeal to emotions, or their lies and deceit. When this argument started I asked you to point out any argument that any sjw had ever given that would be considered valid and you gave none yourself. How can you advocate for a group you have no support for whatsoever?

2.bp.blogspot.com/-3pyhjtj-6iY/VEuFxrTBFOI/AAAAAAAAAyQ/eFMTQiC3MaI/s1600/femfreqsexism1.PNG
www.funnyjunk.com/Anita+sarkeesian/funny-pictures/5355044/
pbs.twimg.com/media/B0GzV04IUAAXkNj.jpg:large
manboobz.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/jbfakesarkqu.png
i.imgur.com/ph3qZjf.png
#31 - Valid (12/09/2014) [-]
I think that bellbottomshark is saying that what you see on FJ and other sites about SJWs are not everything that they are. They may be presented to us, like how GG is presented to mass media.

For all we know, the majority of them might be people who are fighting for legislations such as affirmative action and actually have very Valid and logical reasoning behind their arguments.
User avatar #34 - oniiking (12/09/2014) [-]
There may actually be truth to that. The problem is that they are identifying with a group that are known for these characteristics. And it's not hard to separate themselves from the insanity. They could just as easily talk about the equality of all human beings and not just women under the name of egalitarians but they choose to be "Social Justice Warriors". And unlike gamergate these people can be singled out and analyzed. Their beliefs are worn on their sleeves and they praise their leaders who follow these insane ideologies to a T, hypocrisy included.
Lie with dogs and all that.
#57 - Valid (12/10/2014) [-]
That's true
On the other hand, GG is just misrepresented
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 900

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#12 to #11 - oniiking (06/21/2014) [-]
I love you, even if you did this all for thumbs it takes an honorable man to go through with his word no matter how much work it was.
User avatar #13 to #12 - evilhomer (06/21/2014) [-]
A man is as good as his word.
User avatar #10 - theugandanhero (05/27/2014) [-]
I find it pretty funny that klein mirci was only on for a day and yet in that entire time (and firsthand experience) managed to piss off the FJ community as a whole.
I'm glad that douche is gone for now.
Sorry for posting this but I had checked his profile recently to see if he'd been on lately but apprently not, but I noticed your funny comment on his profile.
User avatar #8 - garymotherfingoak (05/25/2014) [-]
dun h8 m8
User avatar #9 to #8 - oniiking (05/25/2014) [-]
I don't know you son.
User avatar #7 - twi (05/12/2014) [-]
:c
#1 - zonefreak (01/11/2014) [-]
Where will u be posting your google drive folder?
User avatar #2 to #1 - oniiking (01/11/2014) [-]
It should be done uploaded by the morning, I will put it in my status.
 Friends (0)