Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

oikake

Rank #2403 on Content
oikake Avatar Level 238 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to oikake Block oikake Invite oikake to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 31
Date Signed Up:4/16/2012
Last Login:12/21/2014
Location:UK
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2403
Comment Ranking:#9992
Highest Content Rank:#227
Highest Comment Rank:#1959
Content Thumbs: 21006 total,  23277 ,  2271
Comment Thumbs: 3952 total,  4717 ,  765
Content Level Progress: 71.2% (712/1000)
Level 220 Content: Mind Blower → Level 221 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 50% (50/100)
Level 238 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 239 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:793836
Times Content Favorited:1415 times
Total Comments Made:1113
FJ Points:2128
Favorite Tags: The Game (2)

latest user's comments

#100 - actually we are solving world hunger by killing the hungry people! 12/16/2013 on I Would Pay Anything 0
#9 - Picture 12/15/2013 on I Would Pay Anything +1
#8 - Dude i would actively hunt down and kill starving African chil…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/15/2013 on I Would Pay Anything +97
User avatar #17 - tittylovin (12/16/2013) [-]
I would nuke the bad parts of Africa and send in botanists to terraform it.
Save the world, kill niggers, create jobs, infinite firefly. Literally no downside.
#53 - fuckyallniggas (12/16/2013) [-]
Funnyjunk, A community of non-racists
User avatar #100 - oikake (12/16/2013) [-]
actually we are solving world hunger by killing the hungry people!
User avatar #15 - dumdumduu (12/16/2013) [-]
We'd be solving overpopulation and getting great entertainment, both at the same time.

Oh, and we'd also get new episodes of Firefly. I only see positives in this plan.
User avatar #10 - xuvious (12/15/2013) [-]
i would join your hunting group
#69 - I need to print some of these out and stealth swap them on fri… 12/14/2013 on Alternate Movie Art +1
#108 - I love how Seth Rogens character figured it out, and played al… 12/14/2013 on Facebook +3
#248 - dont forget to take into account the clay the katana forgers u… 12/13/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. 0
#4 - I once ordered 12 double cheeseburgers, fries and a large shak… 12/12/2013 on I can't be alone... +4
#36 - mmmm added diabeetus 12/12/2013 on how to eat a whole pizza in... 0
#1 - Picture 12/09/2013 on Metal Cookies 0
#10 - nee naw nee naw nee naw!!  [+] (1 new reply) 12/09/2013 on Idea (see desc) 0
User avatar #14 - biscuitsunited (12/09/2013) [-]
Oh god, THE ENGLISH!
#11 - remind me of this... 12/09/2013 on Mercury is cool 0
#32 - You call that a knife? THIS IS A KNIFE!!!  [+] (3 new replies) 12/08/2013 on I stabbed a Nokia +39
#61 - waaw (12/08/2013) [-]
That's not a knife, that's a spoon.
#97 - deadinferno (12/08/2013) [-]
Awwgh I see you've played knifey-spoony before!
#50 - anonymous (12/08/2013) [-]
You call that a knife??

THIS IS A KNIFE!!!
#29 - pretty much sure he will be happy with sex... that is all 12/06/2013 on Marry Me 0
#75 - Electric Blue 12/05/2013 on Purpl 0
#215 - "If you managed to strike a direct full on blow on the ga…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. 0
#227 - angelusprimus (12/06/2013) [-]
In the original post you claimed longsword is a blunt force weapon.
All you have "proven" is that in very specific, highly unlikely circumstances it can cause blunt force trauma. It doesn't make it a blunt force weapon.
And if you hit me with a handle of the shotgun on the head you could kill me.
That does not mean that shotgun is a blunt force weapon.
#67 - green  [+] (2 new replies) 12/05/2013 on Purpl +5
#72 - baconface (12/05/2013) [-]
User avatar #75 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
Electric Blue
#38 - I dont care, the pump reaches on both sides of the car... 12/05/2013 on You want more red circles... 0
#199 - Yeh Ulfberht or some **** , who knows... vikings d…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. 0
#252 - anonymous (04/03/2014) [-]
Vikings wrote.
User avatar #253 - oikake (04/03/2014) [-]
SHUSH... you ruin vikings for everyone!
#173 - well i was just answering your question, you asked why the kat…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. 0
User avatar #176 - noshakingthrone (12/05/2013) [-]
I wasn't really asking, but I'm pretty sure you are aware of that...
#172 - sorry but you seem very narrow minded in your view. i…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. +1
#179 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
If i was wearing a full gauntlet, steel, and you were swinging a blade at me, and for some reason i didn't gave my shield, i'd damn right catch it on the gauntlet, turn it into a glancing blow, and then smash you into the face with the gauntlet. If you managed to strike a direct full on blow on the gauntlet at the wrist then yes, I'd probably have a broken wrist, or more likely severely cut one. because you cant fully armor the joints.
I'd still be in better position because there would be a damn good chance you destroyed your sword.
And yes, ofcrose there was misuse of swords. But that would benefit the opponent who would take only minimum damage, while attacker had to deal with blowback and counter attack with completely messed up balance.
I'm not saying that it never happened. You can use a shotgun to buldgeon someone on the head today. Sure. Its just far more effective and safer to you if you use it as intended.
#215 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
"If you managed to strike a direct full on blow on the gauntlet at the wrist then yes, I'd probably have a broken wrist, or more likely severely cut one"

I WIN!!!
#227 - angelusprimus (12/06/2013) [-]
In the original post you claimed longsword is a blunt force weapon.
All you have "proven" is that in very specific, highly unlikely circumstances it can cause blunt force trauma. It doesn't make it a blunt force weapon.
And if you hit me with a handle of the shotgun on the head you could kill me.
That does not mean that shotgun is a blunt force weapon.
#166 - but they still had a sword equipped and would use it in CQB an… 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. 0
#157 - sorry, but common sense says that if a 3 lb sword hit me one a…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. +1
#168 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
I'm a member of ARMA.
I've been training with swords since 2002.
Plate is made to redistribute strikes. Sword simply does not carry enough focused power to cause damage through. Strike hurts, yes, can even cause bruises, usually on the edges, but will not do damage. They are very good protection, otherwise no one would wear 60lbs oven on their bodies.
Chain would be pushed into your flesh, ripping it. Strong enough cut would cut through enough links to cut into flesh. Very little damage comes from blunt force.
and I don't limit myself with the sword. I'm fully aware of how sword works. I also know that idiotically hitting plate with the blade does only one thing. Destroys the blade. I am not guessing here. I do this in my free time for over 11 years.
But if you don't believe me, go to the site I linked to, go to the forums and ASK people who like me do this every day.
User avatar #172 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
sorry but you seem very narrow minded in your view.

if you wore a plate gauntlet/bracer would you allow me a full force strike on your wrist with a 3lb sword?

because i know that the damage to your wrist whilst not chopping it off would at least cause some sort of fracture.

The same with a chainmail hit

I am not discounting your experience, but fighting now, in a controlled environment wiht modern knowledge is totally different than the chaos and brutality of war. Where I am certain the "misuse" of swords was extremely common, and was to a certain extent still an effect method of fighting.

actually i am sure i have read of people looking at armies and going "hey guys they all wear chainmail and plate. no swords today"
#179 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
If i was wearing a full gauntlet, steel, and you were swinging a blade at me, and for some reason i didn't gave my shield, i'd damn right catch it on the gauntlet, turn it into a glancing blow, and then smash you into the face with the gauntlet. If you managed to strike a direct full on blow on the gauntlet at the wrist then yes, I'd probably have a broken wrist, or more likely severely cut one. because you cant fully armor the joints.
I'd still be in better position because there would be a damn good chance you destroyed your sword.
And yes, ofcrose there was misuse of swords. But that would benefit the opponent who would take only minimum damage, while attacker had to deal with blowback and counter attack with completely messed up balance.
I'm not saying that it never happened. You can use a shotgun to buldgeon someone on the head today. Sure. Its just far more effective and safer to you if you use it as intended.
#215 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
"If you managed to strike a direct full on blow on the gauntlet at the wrist then yes, I'd probably have a broken wrist, or more likely severely cut one"

I WIN!!!
#227 - angelusprimus (12/06/2013) [-]
In the original post you claimed longsword is a blunt force weapon.
All you have "proven" is that in very specific, highly unlikely circumstances it can cause blunt force trauma. It doesn't make it a blunt force weapon.
And if you hit me with a handle of the shotgun on the head you could kill me.
That does not mean that shotgun is a blunt force weapon.
#145 - with regards to their usual opponent, of plate armour and chai…  [+] (11 new replies) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. +1
#150 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
No it isn't, please go read article I linked.
Longsword weights in average only 3 lbs, its desgined to hurt joints, and combat is designed to throw opponent on the ground and then STAB. To throw opponent on the ground, you will generally use the shield, which is just as much offensive as defensive weapon.
Longsword doesn't have the weight or focus to blunt hurt enemies in plate. And it is strong enough to cut through chainmail with repeated hits.
For blunt damage you need a mace, or preferably war hammer.
User avatar #185 - varrlegrimscythe (12/05/2013) [-]
Actually that is the weight of a modern longsword made with good quality steel, with the forging methods of midevil times they would put the blade at around 10 pounds due to they had to fold iron or steal (the Japanese weren't the only ones who used this process) more metal was used in the creation of the blade, making it heavier, some great swords weighed up to 30+ pounds.
#191 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
God no.
That is completely discredited old historical error.
All of the research done in the swords in past 25 years completely discredits that theory. Not to mention found swords which never pass weight of 6lbs. For two handed swords.
here is a good starting point, again:
www.thearma.org/essays/weights.htm
User avatar #192 - varrlegrimscythe (12/05/2013) [-]
Did a quick search of other sites as well turns out I was wrong, sorry about that.
#195 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
Is cool, easy mistake to make. Its actually taught in schools. For a long time, that's what was believed.
Thankfully new research has started dispelling that error.
User avatar #157 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
sorry, but common sense says that if a 3 lb sword hit me one and area of plat close to my flesh, the blunt force trauma would still hurt a lot. if not break bone.

And with chainmail the hit would hurt more, they wouldnt need to repeatedly hit the same spot, 1 good clean torso shot would break ribs.

I didnt delve into fighting style deeply, and i know there were blunt weapons designed to specifically cause that trauma.

But just because a sword is sharp, doesnt mean the effect couldnt and didnt cause a lot of blunt trauma to armoured foes.

By limiting yourself to the view of a sword being used one way and having only one effect you limit your own understanding of a weapon.

Use you own knowledge, your imagination of the actual properties and you will see what i said, whilst not the entire truth is still true
#168 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
I'm a member of ARMA.
I've been training with swords since 2002.
Plate is made to redistribute strikes. Sword simply does not carry enough focused power to cause damage through. Strike hurts, yes, can even cause bruises, usually on the edges, but will not do damage. They are very good protection, otherwise no one would wear 60lbs oven on their bodies.
Chain would be pushed into your flesh, ripping it. Strong enough cut would cut through enough links to cut into flesh. Very little damage comes from blunt force.
and I don't limit myself with the sword. I'm fully aware of how sword works. I also know that idiotically hitting plate with the blade does only one thing. Destroys the blade. I am not guessing here. I do this in my free time for over 11 years.
But if you don't believe me, go to the site I linked to, go to the forums and ASK people who like me do this every day.
User avatar #172 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
sorry but you seem very narrow minded in your view.

if you wore a plate gauntlet/bracer would you allow me a full force strike on your wrist with a 3lb sword?

because i know that the damage to your wrist whilst not chopping it off would at least cause some sort of fracture.

The same with a chainmail hit

I am not discounting your experience, but fighting now, in a controlled environment wiht modern knowledge is totally different than the chaos and brutality of war. Where I am certain the "misuse" of swords was extremely common, and was to a certain extent still an effect method of fighting.

actually i am sure i have read of people looking at armies and going "hey guys they all wear chainmail and plate. no swords today"
#179 - angelusprimus (12/05/2013) [-]
If i was wearing a full gauntlet, steel, and you were swinging a blade at me, and for some reason i didn't gave my shield, i'd damn right catch it on the gauntlet, turn it into a glancing blow, and then smash you into the face with the gauntlet. If you managed to strike a direct full on blow on the gauntlet at the wrist then yes, I'd probably have a broken wrist, or more likely severely cut one. because you cant fully armor the joints.
I'd still be in better position because there would be a damn good chance you destroyed your sword.
And yes, ofcrose there was misuse of swords. But that would benefit the opponent who would take only minimum damage, while attacker had to deal with blowback and counter attack with completely messed up balance.
I'm not saying that it never happened. You can use a shotgun to buldgeon someone on the head today. Sure. Its just far more effective and safer to you if you use it as intended.
#215 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
"If you managed to strike a direct full on blow on the gauntlet at the wrist then yes, I'd probably have a broken wrist, or more likely severely cut one"

I WIN!!!
#227 - angelusprimus (12/06/2013) [-]
In the original post you claimed longsword is a blunt force weapon.
All you have "proven" is that in very specific, highly unlikely circumstances it can cause blunt force trauma. It doesn't make it a blunt force weapon.
And if you hit me with a handle of the shotgun on the head you could kill me.
That does not mean that shotgun is a blunt force weapon.
#139 - The edge of a katana is hardened, and brittle. If they ever di…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. 0
User avatar #171 - noshakingthrone (12/05/2013) [-]
I'm just saying this demonstration doesn't prove shit because each of the swords is handled differently in this "test". I'm not gonna argue about which sword is "better" because they are simply made to be used in a completely different way. This is like putting a sniper rifle against an assault rifle in a test of long range accuracy...
User avatar #173 - oikake (12/05/2013) [-]
well i was just answering your question, you asked why the katana broke.
User avatar #176 - noshakingthrone (12/05/2013) [-]
I wasn't really asking, but I'm pretty sure you are aware of that...
#138 - nothing in Japan was heavy..... may i direct your at…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/05/2013 on Suck it, weaboos. +3
#182 - anonymous (12/05/2013) [-]
Sumo is a Japanese sport ....I may be wrong, but I don't think that some fat guy is going to win against a samuri with a sword. .....Im basically saying that to the extent of my knowledge Sumo's were not a standard military unit in Feudal Japan
#183 - anonymous (12/05/2013) [-]
still commenter #182 posting.....but The long sword is way fucking cooler than the Katana.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 6680 / Total items point value: 7570

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 - YllekNayr ONLINE (01/04/2013) [-]
Heya, if you happen to want to post any more D&D related stuff, there's a channel for it here: www.funnyjunk.com/channel/dungeons-n-drags
#1 - matoob (12/17/2012) [-]
here's a gif to cheer you "up"
here's a gif to cheer you "up"
#2 to #1 - itemmaaan (12/20/2012) [-]
The sauce may I have?
User avatar #3 to #2 - matoob (12/20/2012) [-]
im sorry i dont have it
 Friends (0)