Upload
Login or register

notthistime

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/10/2011
Last Login:6/30/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#12750
Highest Content Rank:#4363
Highest Comment Rank:#3729
Content Thumbs: 551 total,  695 ,  144
Comment Thumbs: 2356 total,  2776 ,  420
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 43 Content: Sammich eater → Level 44 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 30% (30/100)
Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 222 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:1
Content Views:37016
Times Content Favorited:27 times
Total Comments Made:511
FJ Points:2631

Text Posts

  • Views: 21953
    Thumbs Up 344 Thumbs Down 67 Total: +277
    Comments: 37
    Favorites: 21
    Uploaded: 02/07/14
    (untitled) (untitled)
  • Views: 9910
    Thumbs Up 247 Thumbs Down 19 Total: +228
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 6
    Uploaded: 09/22/14
    FJ on gamergate in a nutshell FJ on gamergate in a nutshell
  • Views: 2285
    Thumbs Up 32 Thumbs Down 0 Total: +32
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/21/14
    painal painal
  • Views: 831
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +10
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/05/11
    fuck yea fuck yea

latest user's comments

#34 - they probably just rounded off the decimals to make the number… 06/15/2016 on Female Violence +13
#176 - while we're on a political post on FJ can anyone give me some …  [+] (20 new replies) 05/30/2016 on Wagiangorc Zoch Kictuphu 0
User avatar
#235 - thelastamerican (05/31/2016) [-]
Shove everything else aside for a moment, the foundation, her involvement with possible unproven, and unlovable insider trading, her $25,000 speaking engagements, and focus for a moment on the E-mails.

She is known to have had a personal E-mail server. She received E-mails from at least 1 secure government server. We know that there are several E-mails that were classified on her server. We also know that she deleted several thousand E-mails. We know that several hackers at the very least identified and attempted to break into her server. There are two cases where we are fairly certain that they seceded. These are the facts so far.

Let me explain to you how illegal that is. First, it's illegal to attempt to privately own secret documents, weather you know they're secret or not. Weather they're marked as such or not. Second, she deleted a bunch of her E-mails as soon as someone blew the whistle on her. What were in those E-mails? We know they were not all routine family emails like she claims, because we've recovered several of them that were business related from other people's computers. Third, SOMEONE allowed these emails to be sent in the first place. Some IT guy out there is about to be twisting in the wind because he allowed the secure government server to be connected with an unsecured account.

Now, let's imagine that the shoe were on a less moneyed, less connected foot. Let's say it's a submarine sailor on board a sub that is on menuvers. This sailor decides to take a selfie of himself on the bridge. (They're told not to do this, because it endangers the security of the ship. Similarly to how Secretary Clinton was told she couldn't have a personal email server) Now, the picture is already taken, and the sailor realizes the mistake he's made, but instead of telling his CO, he destroys his phone. That'll land him with about 20 years in federal prison if he's caught at it. But instead of going to prison, or being punished in any way, they're going to promote this sailor to rear admiral.

What irks me about this entire situation, is that what she has done is clearly illegal. The law concerning secret documents of all kinds has been fixed, fiddled with and refined to near perfection. There is no question that her actions were illegal. The question is weather or not she is to be held to the same standards as everyone else.
User avatar
#185 - saxong (05/30/2016) [-]
There have been no provable links between her receiving money (in unknown amounts) and her political decision making.

There has been no proven link (yet) between her private email server and any direct harm to the US in any way.

There are extremely silly people who hold politicians to answer for every single one of their policy decisions in their entire career.

She will need to alter her platform somewhat if she wants any hope of receiving a large portion of Sanders supporters who, unlike myself, are hilariously ignorant of the detrimental impact that voting third party or writing in the name of a politician with similar views to one of the major party candidates has on both of their chances of winning.

She's a politician through-and-through, but better the politician we know than the emotionally unstable wildcard businessman we don't.
User avatar
#236 - thelastamerican (05/31/2016) [-]
The fact that the emails have not lead to the US being harmed isn't even remotely the point. The point is that it is illegal for her to have received those emails on a private server in the first place. If you or I had done the same thing we would be enjoying the remainder of our decade in a federal prison. But she's running for president.

I think that she should be held to the same standards as everyone else.
User avatar
#191 - sasy (05/30/2016) [-]
What about the email scandal? Again, that shit is the biggest no-no for her. Why should i vote someone into a position of being able to get all the government secrets, when she sold the ones she had
User avatar
#196 - saxong (05/30/2016) [-]
I'm not combing through an entire wikipedia page to find where you're claiming she sold anything. Please provide something more focused than that. If you don't have proof, then fuck off with your wikipedia pages.
User avatar
#198 - sasy (05/30/2016) [-]
"Im sorry you provided proof about this complicated situation, but i dont feel like reading the proof, so i wont believe it, and fuck off"
Look its only long because its so complicated. your just as bad as the SJWs for discarded proof like this feggit
User avatar
#201 - saxong (05/30/2016) [-]
It's not proof of anything, show me the part where she took money for her emails and I'll suck your dick for being right, until then, stop pretending that because there's a lot of words that your point is in there and I'm just too dumb to read them all.
User avatar
#204 - sasy (05/30/2016) [-]
Look man, no ones too dumb to do anything. You're actually being smart in questioning me. The stupid thing would be to take everything i say as fact, without looking for proof.
But in all honestly, Its not there. thats the surface. the FBI is still investigating whether she actually sold them or not to know what to charge her with. Either way tho she still took classified shit into her private email. Which is fishy enough as that risks major consequences. But maybe she did it because she felt like it. I dunno. The FBI has been investigating this for month, and she seems to be avoiding questions about it.
Also its weird that shes running for president. Because no matter what, shes gonna get jail time for taking the classified stuff into her private emails. And if she gets into presidency, then that would turn into an impeachment .
Its pretty retarded, honestly
User avatar
#207 - saxong (05/30/2016) [-]
Everything I've seen has said that everything in the emails was classified after the fact though. Like you said though, I dunno either. Maybe she's just an old lady who wanted to keep using her yahoo email address because she can't remember the new one and there was nothing wrong at all besides her not listening to her staff.

We'll see when it's all done, I just hope it's before the convention, i just want a straight answer about this nonsense.
User avatar
#184 - sasy (05/30/2016) [-]
The email scandal. Shes been selling classified info over emails. Thats probably the biggest no-no for her.
User avatar
#227 - xgrandmoffx (05/30/2016) [-]
Why would foreign states buy information from her? I thought they would just hack the servers.
User avatar
#232 - sasy (05/30/2016) [-]
it really doesnt work that way like it does in the movies.
And even if they could do that, buying them would just be easier. and if they get caught hacking it could start a war, but with buying secrets, the seller is to blame, not the buyer
User avatar
#234 - xgrandmoffx (05/30/2016) [-]
Either way, it could start a war. Hacking might leave fewer witnesses, though, making it harder to prove who has the information.
User avatar
#189 - burnlogic (05/30/2016) [-]
Do you have proof for that statement?
User avatar
#195 - burnlogic (05/30/2016) [-]
Yeah I can't find it. Where is that allegation exactly because if there is evidence supporting this why aren't the republicans all over her about it? Say what you will about government incompetence but when it comes to politicians and political dirt the parties will be all over it.
User avatar
#202 - sasy (05/30/2016) [-]
Same reason she hasnt been arrested yet. All of this is still being investigated by the FBI. If someone talks shit, then she gets out of it, she can sue them for slander. People cant talk shit until they know for a fact she'll get the guilty verdict
User avatar
#203 - saxong (05/30/2016) [-]
If there was proof, she'd have been tried. Why would they hold off on accusing someone of something they have proof of her guilt of? You're literally saying that your proof of her guilt is that there's no proof of her guilt. Go lock yourself up on that logic.
User avatar
#205 - sasy (05/30/2016) [-]
its still under investigation
User avatar
#182 - theugandanhero (05/30/2016) [-]
Go to Reddit and look at some (if not most) of the deplorable things she's done in the past, and look at what she's doing now.
#51 - i didnt say all of the comments. and did you notice how all of… 05/21/2016 on good for her 0
#39 - so many of the comments are positive what the hell are you tal…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/20/2016 on good for her 0
#50 - anon (05/21/2016) [-]
"She wasted her time..."
"She could have avoided this situation..."
And literally an entire post about we wuz kangs.
Hmmm I Dunno what the fuck justtocomment could be talking about...
#51 - notthistime (05/21/2016) [-]
i didnt say all of the comments. and did you notice how all of those comments are completely red thumbed? guess what that means. most people dont agree with them. a lot of the bad comments are probably just trolls too, but your anon so you have the right to not pay attention to detail i guess.
#26 - im up in novi 05/16/2016 on Anon meets Steve Martin +1
#85 - damn i forgot you were a thing. back to trying to troll i see. 05/07/2016 on Master of disguise +1
#5 - its a good thought but she's not exactly what anyone thinks of…  [+] (9 new replies) 04/18/2016 on Wow. +13
#6 - imashitbricks (04/18/2016) [-]
She's black enough to feed my fetish
User avatar
#23 - zipov (04/19/2016) [-]
Race treason is no fetish, it's an abomination, you heretic.
#66 - imashitbricks (04/19/2016) [-]
If race mixing is heretical than I'll gladly die an apostate.
User avatar
#69 - zipov (04/19/2016) [-]
You probably mix fine whisky with pepsi.
User avatar
#71 - imashitbricks (04/20/2016) [-]
No, but that being said I don't restrict myself to just whiskey. Tequila and sake can be just as good if not better than the whiskey.
User avatar
#72 - zipov (04/20/2016) [-]
Mixing will give you a hangover.

It would be a lie to say I only drink vodka.
But it is the staple of my diet.
#32 - anon (04/19/2016) [-]
Good, we need no slav in our blood.
User avatar
#40 - zipov (04/19/2016) [-]
But you are getting nigger blood, so joke on you, fuckboy.
#63 - anon (04/19/2016) [-]
#42 - then it just comes down to how much the force can effect magic…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/12/2016 on Kylo Ren & Harry potter. 0
User avatar
#106 - yunoknow (04/13/2016) [-]
Two force users can battle each other out just with the force, so I'd say there could be some interaction with magic. Lightsabers on the other hand can't cut through the force or anything immaterial, so I doubt it works on spells and the like.
#5 - Picture 04/11/2016 on notthistime's profile 0
#136 - man that ******* roll tho. but really this is some grade c eff… 03/24/2016 on Bow and Arrow +4