Upload
Login or register

nothingtodohere

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:10/20/2011
Last Login:6/19/2013
Location:Coventry
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 1840 total,  2160 ,  320
Comment Thumbs: 2063 total,  2502 ,  439
Content Level Progress: 40% (40/100)
Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 119 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 61% (61/100)
Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:2
Content Views:82328
Times Content Favorited:104 times
Total Comments Made:608
FJ Points:3985
Favorite Tags: i (3) | to (3) | WTF (3) | bro (2) | game (2) | here (2) | is (2) | Nothing (2) | otters (2) | see (2) | the (2) | u (2) | y (2) | You (2)

latest user's comments

#8 - Btw. The one with the Power Rangers. They're the the mighty mo…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/06/2013 on Remember That Time When +1
User avatar
#9 - nothingtodohere (02/06/2013) [-]
Sorry. NOT the morphin ones. And I didn't mean so associate them with a drug due to my misspelling.
#321 - OK agreed. 02/05/2013 on Statistics don't lie 0
#319 - If the amount of porn watched IS on the x axis then A vertical…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/05/2013 on Statistics don't lie 0
User avatar
#320 - stealthfoxbrony (02/05/2013) [-]
I'm just gunna say we're both wrong, as there are too many undetermined factors in this graph.
User avatar
#321 - nothingtodohere (02/05/2013) [-]
OK agreed.
#315 - Actually according to my comments the only flaw in the graph i…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/04/2013 on Statistics don't lie 0
User avatar
#316 - stealthfoxbrony (02/04/2013) [-]
But that would mean the amount you admit to watching would increase infinitely in an incredibly small amount of time.
User avatar
#319 - nothingtodohere (02/05/2013) [-]
If the amount of porn watched IS on the x axis then A vertical line will show the amount admitted to because it would be the distance between the Y axis and the line that would show the amount. If it is a vertical line then its X value remains constant, suggesting that at that particular point is the limit to which you will admit to watching porn. Remember that we're looking for the X value, the y value is redundant. And since when was "time" a factor in this. Nowhere is time stated.
User avatar
#320 - stealthfoxbrony (02/05/2013) [-]
I'm just gunna say we're both wrong, as there are too many undetermined factors in this graph.
User avatar
#321 - nothingtodohere (02/05/2013) [-]
OK agreed.
#314 - Comment deleted 02/04/2013 on Statistics don't lie 0
#86 - The line that represents that particular field is equal to a y…  [+] (7 new replies) 02/03/2013 on Statistics don't lie 0
User avatar
#100 - stealthfoxbrony (02/03/2013) [-]
How would that theory work in conjunction with the other lines?
The forearm strength is increasing.
As is the amount of horse penises seen.
As the capacity for horse genitalia pictures is fundamentally infinite, your logic does not make sense.
User avatar
#315 - nothingtodohere (02/04/2013) [-]
Actually according to my comments the only flaw in the graph is that the line of the amount of porn the viewer admits to watching should be vertical which would mean that the amount of porn watched could be on the X axis and the graph would be correct.
User avatar
#316 - stealthfoxbrony (02/04/2013) [-]
But that would mean the amount you admit to watching would increase infinitely in an incredibly small amount of time.
User avatar
#319 - nothingtodohere (02/05/2013) [-]
If the amount of porn watched IS on the x axis then A vertical line will show the amount admitted to because it would be the distance between the Y axis and the line that would show the amount. If it is a vertical line then its X value remains constant, suggesting that at that particular point is the limit to which you will admit to watching porn. Remember that we're looking for the X value, the y value is redundant. And since when was "time" a factor in this. Nowhere is time stated.
User avatar
#320 - stealthfoxbrony (02/05/2013) [-]
I'm just gunna say we're both wrong, as there are too many undetermined factors in this graph.
User avatar
#321 - nothingtodohere (02/05/2013) [-]
OK agreed.
#314 - nothingtodohere has deleted their comment.
#7 - Hang on. According to that graph the amount of porn watched is…  [+] (9 new replies) 02/03/2013 on Statistics don't lie -4
User avatar
#11 - stealthfoxbrony (02/03/2013) [-]
no
Because all the other labels are for the Y axis
therefore the amount of porn he you admit to watching remains constant.
#86 - nothingtodohere (02/03/2013) [-]
The line that represents that particular field is equal to a y value, not an x value as the distance between the line and the x axis remains constant. Therefore the line's value for X increases whereas the value for Y remains constant. Ergo, if the amount of porn watched is on the X axis then that line shows an ever increasing amount of pornography viewed, which would nullify the suggestion that the amount of porn the viewer admits to watching remains limited. If that line were to be correct then it would be equal to an X value and would have the form of a VERTICAL line. CHECKMATE !!!!!
User avatar
#100 - stealthfoxbrony (02/03/2013) [-]
How would that theory work in conjunction with the other lines?
The forearm strength is increasing.
As is the amount of horse penises seen.
As the capacity for horse genitalia pictures is fundamentally infinite, your logic does not make sense.
User avatar
#315 - nothingtodohere (02/04/2013) [-]
Actually according to my comments the only flaw in the graph is that the line of the amount of porn the viewer admits to watching should be vertical which would mean that the amount of porn watched could be on the X axis and the graph would be correct.
User avatar
#316 - stealthfoxbrony (02/04/2013) [-]
But that would mean the amount you admit to watching would increase infinitely in an incredibly small amount of time.
User avatar
#319 - nothingtodohere (02/05/2013) [-]
If the amount of porn watched IS on the x axis then A vertical line will show the amount admitted to because it would be the distance between the Y axis and the line that would show the amount. If it is a vertical line then its X value remains constant, suggesting that at that particular point is the limit to which you will admit to watching porn. Remember that we're looking for the X value, the y value is redundant. And since when was "time" a factor in this. Nowhere is time stated.
User avatar
#320 - stealthfoxbrony (02/05/2013) [-]
I'm just gunna say we're both wrong, as there are too many undetermined factors in this graph.
User avatar
#321 - nothingtodohere (02/05/2013) [-]
OK agreed.
#314 - nothingtodohere has deleted their comment.
#3 - So what if you need a ****? 01/30/2013 on Some clever witty title. 0
#52 - Picture 01/30/2013 on Read Read As Read 0
#16 - Picture 01/28/2013 on Damn it Kool Aid! 0