Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

nostalgamos    

no avatar Level -14 Content: Sort of disliked
Offline
Send mail to nostalgamos Block nostalgamos Invite nostalgamos to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/03/2011
Last Login:8/23/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 14 total,  0 ,  14
Comment Thumbs: 15 total,  4 ,  19
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -14 Content: Sort of disliked → Level -13 Content: Sort of disliked
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -109 Comment: others can't stand you → Level -90 Comment: annoying
Subscribers:0
Content Views:28
Total Comments Made:16
FJ Points:-29

latest user's comments

#81 - Repost  [+] (2 new replies) 05/08/2012 on 1983 -5
User avatar #87 - pukingrainbows (05/08/2012) [-]
of his own content. Check the usernames.
#110 - jacobofthehill (05/08/2012) [-]
Flagged Comment Picture
This image was flagged 1389739651
that makes it worse
#133 - OCs were thumbed down and ******* reposts are on … 04/16/2012 on Taste the rainbow. 0
#483 - be proud of you. i finished my higher mathematics mod… 01/22/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
#476 - if you would write it on a paper 01/21/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
#475 - yeah cause i deleted it. Too many pinkie downs from some idi… 01/21/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
#473 - as I said  [+] (4 new replies) 01/21/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
User avatar #474 - nickhols (01/21/2012) [-]
ah. sorry i didnt see it.
I was looking through the thread and could only find people who thought there was a right answer.
User avatar #489 - abunnywithaboner (01/22/2012) [-]
technically there IS a wrong one, as one isnt useing the order of operations
User avatar #504 - nickhols (01/22/2012) [-]
No, there isn't
both use the order of operations
people don't understand that the order of operations is semi-subjective, primarily concerning implied multiplication (this problem) and also a little bit of the exponent part.
Both follow the first operation, (1+2)=3,so now we have 6/2(3)
We skip the exponent part, because obviously there are none.

Now we get to the problem: the multiplication and division step. all multiplication and division steps with more then one function tend to pose a problem, since ideally they would be done at the same time. The whole "left to right" thing is just a rule of pinkie.
This is why, as i stated, we no longer use division signs.

SO, from here there are 2 ways to do it. The first would be using the left to right method. We do 6/2 first, and get 3. so then it is 3(3) which is obviously nine.

However, an increasingly prevailing way of solving this is by implied multiplication, stating that 2(3) is a single term and should be solved solved accordingly. Then it is essentially 6/(2(3)) since it is a single term, and 6 has to be divided by it all together. So it's 6/6=1

Both started with parentheses and follow the order of operations through the multiplication/division step. They're both right, or wrong, depending on how you look at it. But the problem is written incorrectly, so it's kinda a moot point.
#475 - nostalgamos (01/21/2012) [-]
yeah cause i deleted it. Too many pinkie downs from some idiots who could'nt understand what i said.78
#472 - Comment deleted 01/21/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
#470 - [url deleted] Wolfram FTW! ;-D 6/2(1+3) …  [+] (2 new replies) 01/21/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
#476 - nostalgamos (01/21/2012) [-]
if you would write it on a paper
#472 - nostalgamos has deleted their comment.
#467 - nope sry 01/21/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
#461 - haha so many math pros xD pinkie down and show eve…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/21/2012 on Math ain't even mad. 0
#480 - anonymous (01/21/2012) [-]
yes, i've been through 5 semesters worth of math classes, and i'm going to college to be a fucking engineer, yet i'm wrong. i would like you to tell me what exactly is wrong with what i said.
#483 - nostalgamos (01/22/2012) [-]
be proud of you.

i finished my higher mathematics modules on my university, too.

If you write 6/2(1+2) its the same like (6/2)*(1+2) and not 6/(2*(1+2))
[ 16 Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1050

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)