|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
| Level 110 Content: Funny Junkie |
OfflineSend mail to nolanmclynchlynch Block nolanmclynchlynch Invite nolanmclynchlynch to be your friend flag avatar
- Views: 21891OC
504 121 Total: +383
- Views: 9399Proof
298 22 Total: +276
- Views: 17928Two kinds of people
110 24 Total: +86
- Views: 4751Just thought
52 11 Total: +41
latest user's comments
|#58 - Maybe I'm just retarded....||09/21/2013 on 2spooky4admin||0|
|#25 - And it's also a four point seat belt, Which the top two are un… [+] (2 new replies)||08/04/2013 on Car drifts off the freeway||+6|
|#24 - It was done purposefully. Trust me. I watch a lot of stance vi… [+] (13 new replies)||08/04/2013 on Car drifts off the freeway||+7|
#29 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/04/2013) [-]
Well that just makes it worse, she was (presumably) paid to have her breasts shown on TV, she not just a slut, she's a prostitute.
#117 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/05/2013) [-]
You seriously don't understand how language works do you?
She is providing sexual pleasure for money.
#120 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/05/2013) [-]
I was using the word in a metaphorical sense more than a literal one, but yes, they might as well be.
#122 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/06/2013) [-]
You don't know what the word metaphor means, do you?
#125 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/07/2013) [-]
There is no shame, calling her a prostitute is valid whether literal or metaphorical.
However you clearly do not know what a metaphor is.
A metaphor is a comparison, you still need to base that comparison on something. I can't say "the woman in the video is a tree," because there are no grounds for such a comparison.
I can however say "the woman in the video is a prostitute" metaphorically, because, while the literal definition of prostitute only applies to physical sexuality, the comparison of getting paid money to provide sexual pleasure is valid.
Also, as I said "I was using the word in a metaphorical sense more than a literal one." It's both. I know that by dictionary definition, prostitute only refers to physical sexuality, but due to the similarity in intent, I would not hesitate to call a porn star a prostitute.
But I'll be deleting this book mark, so don't bother replying. You clearly just want to go around and insult people over minuscule semantics and your own fallacies.
|#121 - Picture||08/04/2013 on WTF||+3|
|#155 - For some reason, This really creeps me out.||07/04/2013 on Leviathan Comp. 2||0|
|#1579 - Male. yes||06/18/2013 on Would you?||0|
|#102 - If you're dumb enough to put metal in a microwave; let alone a…||06/01/2013 on They fell for it...||0|
|#63 - Comment deleted||06/01/2013 on They fell for it...||0|
|#60 - You must be a blast at parties. [+] (3 new replies)||06/01/2013 on They fell for it...||+8|
#68 - jakatackka (06/01/2013) [-]
(Deleted the first reply because it inserted a godawful smiley face)
Yes, I am (insert non-gay emoticon showing that I'm joking). Honestly, I don't mind if you prank someone, as long as you're willing to fix anything you've damaged. The issue is when you do hundreds of dollars of damage for the sake of a laugh, and then they're the ones footing the bill for foolishly listening to you.
|#59 - Comment deleted||06/01/2013 on They fell for it...||0|
Join Subscribe morbid-channel