Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

noblexfenrir

Rank #2795 on Comments
noblexfenrir Avatar Level 267 Comments: Pure Win
Offline
Send mail to noblexfenrir Block noblexfenrir Invite noblexfenrir to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:12/29/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2795
Highest Content Rank:#1347
Highest Comment Rank:#1957
Content Thumbs: 9067 total,  10491 ,  1424
Comment Thumbs: 7301 total,  13684 ,  6383
Content Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 190 Content: Anon Annihilator → Level 191 Content: Anon Annihilator
Comment Level Progress: 93% (93/100)
Level 267 Comments: Pure Win → Level 268 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:12
Content Views:231965
Times Content Favorited:539 times
Total Comments Made:7574
FJ Points:3872
Favorite Tags: You (14) | a (7) | Distraction (4) | i (4) | look (4) | the (4) | and (3) | God (3) | my (3) | oh (3) | please (3) | RUN (3) | she (3) | are (2) | but (2) | Cookie (2) | do (2) | eated (2) | game (2) | is (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 30215
    Thumbs Up 1069 Thumbs Down 54 Total: +1015
    Comments: 172
    Favorites: 75
    Uploaded: 05/21/11
    Bow chicka wow wow Bow chicka wow wow
  • Views: 23608
    Thumbs Up 1060 Thumbs Down 92 Total: +968
    Comments: 160
    Favorites: 136
    Uploaded: 04/29/11
    Offencive Comp part 2 Offencive Comp part 2
  • Views: 14104
    Thumbs Up 573 Thumbs Down 14 Total: +559
    Comments: 23
    Favorites: 13
    Uploaded: 01/14/12
    When I grow up When I grow up
  • Views: 32200
    Thumbs Up 689 Thumbs Down 171 Total: +518
    Comments: 92
    Favorites: 30
    Uploaded: 12/05/12
    Backseat atheist Backseat atheist
  • Views: 12576
    Thumbs Up 441 Thumbs Down 79 Total: +362
    Comments: 39
    Favorites: 11
    Uploaded: 06/04/12
    Oh the irony Oh the irony
  • Views: 16269
    Thumbs Up 426 Thumbs Down 79 Total: +347
    Comments: 57
    Favorites: 21
    Uploaded: 12/20/12
    Ray Comfort predicted this Ray Comfort predicted this
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > [ 51 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

  • Views: 1255
    Thumbs Up 10 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +6
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 01/16/12
    Message to SOPA Message to SOPA
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

  • Views: 7897
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +11
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 04/10/11
    Pop up Smith Pop up Smith
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#233 - I could only give it a quick read but the problems that instan… 12/17/2014 on You see what had happened... 0
#74 - -not even taking into consideration his impaired judgement, ye… 12/17/2014 on Hands up! 0
#73 - "If someone is on trial for murder..." He wasn…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/17/2014 on Hands up! 0
User avatar #75 - GodofTV (12/19/2014) [-]
"He wasn't on trial for murder. It was an indictment, which is by definition a situation where the burden of proof is on those claiming the crime was committed."
In that you are correct, and I would counter with a well known prosecutor's saying "You can indict a ham sandwich", the meaning of this is that if there is even the slightest inkling that a crime was committed then there should be an indictment.

The reason I returned to this discussion isn't to challenge your points, its clear that you have no issue with unarmed teenagers getting shot (or maybe your fine just because he was black?), what I wanted to bring to your attention the curious case of witness #40.
www.nydailynews.com/news/national/witness-40-ferguson-grand-jury-racist-liar-report-article-1.2047404
The testimonial of this woman (inexplicable presented by the prosecutor) coincided so perfectly with every claim by Wilson that it had a major impact on the case. She did interviews with Fox News, who praised her bravery and candor. The only problem is that she was nowhere near the scene. And she's mentally unstable (bipolar disorder) and refuses to take her medication. And her reason for being on the scene changed (from 'visiting a friend' to 'I like to go to black neighborhoods in order to study them so I won't call n*ggers). The woman, Sandra McElroy, had lied during the trials of two other high profile police cases in the St. Louise area. In fact, the police know she is a well known fraud and still allowed her testimony.
www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CDEQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fblogs%2Fthe_slatest%2F2014%2F12%2F16%2Fwitness_40_michael_brown_football_player_witness_unreliability_history_of.html&ei=t6uTVMbpMomZNs-tgegO&usg=AFQjCNG4iue7l0T3x0eIfQNOoOwTD892nA&bvm=bv.82001339,d.eXY

www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/unmasking-Ferguson-witness-40-496236

This was the only witness that perfectly corroborated Wilson's story.
User avatar #74 - noblexfenrir (12/17/2014) [-]
-not even taking into consideration his impaired judgement, yes I do believe attacking an officer is well within his means. Sorry if you just don't think people make stupid decisions, but it happens.

"This isn't an opinion, it's a moral imperative "
Stop saying unarmed like it means anything. This was an individual who was attacking a police officer who had also previously gone for that officers gun. An officer who is already injured from the individual and is being charged at, has to make a split second decision and he did not feel he would be able to safely detain this man if he got to him. Thus fearing for his own safety. Do you get angry with home owners who shoot home invaders?

"I'm the only one using facts"
Hardly. Your points can basically be summarized as you thinking Brown couldn't have done any damage to Wilson and Wilson is just a constant lier.

"ruining this nation wide discussion"
Lol what discussion? We should discuss how this one black teen fucked up and made stupid decisions and attacked an officer? There are ridiculous amounts of police brutality and abuse of power out there and yet people keep focusing on the one where the officer was actually in the right.

"cold blood, not those trying to voice their concerns."
Prove it was in cold blood. I want proof that against the officers testimony, the autopsy evidence, and Wilsons medical exam, that Wilson was in no real danger and just wanted to kill the man for the sake of killing him. I don't want what you believe, I want evidence. Chances are you have none.

#52 - The entire problem was when we validated the concept of "… 12/16/2014 on I'm probably just a bigot. 0
#32 - While I don't hate them, I'm indifferent. Generally people do … 12/16/2014 on Fucking Dahvie 0
#122 - Fetus? I wanna save the petri dish, it's a fortune to replace …  [+] (1 new reply) 12/16/2014 on Abortion Explained 0
#125 - theoneaboveall (12/16/2014) [-]
U a witty lil cunt i'll give ya dat m8
#93 - Let's put a backstory to this scenario shall we? The … 12/16/2014 on Truth 0
#75 - Sort of relevant to the airbag fear. I was wakeboardi… 12/16/2014 on Spoopy fears comp part 2 0
#107 - How high is he holding them? My brother freaked his ***…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar #119 - theoneaboveall (12/16/2014) [-]
The fetus is already dead bruh
User avatar #122 - noblexfenrir (12/16/2014) [-]
Fetus? I wanna save the petri dish, it's a fortune to replace them if we go dropping them willy nilly.
#125 - theoneaboveall (12/16/2014) [-]
U a witty lil cunt i'll give ya dat m8
#70 - -to wear them because they are extremely uncomfortable and tak…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Hands up! 0
User avatar #72 - GodofTV (12/16/2014) [-]
"I feel this-" "I think this-" "This in my opinion-"
I haven't used any of these phrases, I'm not using conjecture or opinion. If you're a principled human being then you should see the value in maintaining a society wherein individuals are forbidden from shooting unarmed adolescents 6-7 times. This isn't an opinion, it's a moral imperative
"Give facts, or just fuck off."
Seems to me that I'm the only one using facts, you're spouting the same Fox News bullshit that's ruining this nation wide discussion. I will say this again, the burden of proof should fall on the shoulders of the man who shot an unarmed teenager to death in cold blood, not those trying to voice their concerns.
User avatar #71 - GodofTV (12/16/2014) [-]
"That isn't how claims work, you have to provide evidence he did have his hands up."
If someone is on trial for murder, as Wilson should have been, then the burden falls on him to prove it was in fact self defense.
"... leaning charging motion and was staggered by previous shot."
Assuming for a moment that this telling of events is true, if a boy is staggering from having being shot then it should not have been necessary to shoot him in the head.
"Either give evidence of this being a constant in Wilsons past or evidence which leads you to believe this happened."
The point is this cannot be proven, his wounds should have been noted on the scene but, mysteriously, no one took pictures of them. Despite what protocol dictates. Funny, isn't it?
"NO ONE WITHOUT A WEAPON (who wasn't attempting suicide by police)"
Apparently you weren't able to completely read my sentence (perhaps it was too long or challenging for you?) because I'm sure that if you had you wouldn't have removed the qualifier I added in order to further you're point.
"He was clearly not deterred, so Wilson had to shoot until he was dead."
So you're claim is that if Wilson had merely shot Michael Brown twice, this unarmed, untrained teenager would still have managed to beat the large officer? If that's the case then Wilson isn't fit to protect anyone.
"They are trained to diffuse a situation in the most immediate way possible."
In that you are simply incorrect, they are trained to diffuse the situation NO MATTER how long it takes. No where does it dictate that an officer has 5 seconds to calm someone before blowing their brains out of their skull.
"If someone is hell bent on putting the officer or another person in danger"
If you believe for one second that a teenager walked up to a cop car unprovoked and started attacking an officer then this debate it pointless because you are clearly too far removed from reality to harken to reason.
User avatar #73 - noblexfenrir (12/17/2014) [-]
"If someone is on trial for murder..."
He wasn't on trial for murder. It was an indictment, which is by definition a situation where the burden of proof is on those claiming the crime was committed and must then convince a grand jury of this same conclusion. Clearly they agreed with Wilson's account of events.

"not have been necessary to shoot him in the head. "
The bullets were fired quickly after one another, it makes it difficult to stop shooting to make sure how each bullet affected the man when he's charging you. It also is difficult to tell the difference immediately between someone staggering/falling forward with constant forward momentum, and continuing their charge.

"The point is this cannot be proven"
Then we deal with the evidence that we have. Conspiracies are nice for mulling over, but they require evidence like everything else.

"this unarmed, untrained teenager would still have managed to beat the large officer?"
The teenager who previously went for the officers gun and still was charging him after taking a few shots? Yes.

"If that's the case then Wilson isn't fit to protect anyone."
I say different.

" No where does it dictate that an officer has 5 seconds..."
An officer has to diffuse a situation in the safest and fastest way possible. Someone who is a danger to either another individual or the officer himself is putting the officer in a situation where they have to determine whether or not the threat is credible enough to use deadly force. I and the grand jury agree that this situation dictated this level of force.

"a teenager walked up to a cop car unprovoked and started attacking an officer"
Did you even read the testimony of events? It was said that Wilson approached them after noticing the cigars in Browns hands, he pulled his car out in front of them and when he went to exit Brown slammed the door shut. He wasn't unprovoked considering he just committed a crime and an officer was now approaching him-
User avatar #75 - GodofTV (12/19/2014) [-]
"He wasn't on trial for murder. It was an indictment, which is by definition a situation where the burden of proof is on those claiming the crime was committed."
In that you are correct, and I would counter with a well known prosecutor's saying "You can indict a ham sandwich", the meaning of this is that if there is even the slightest inkling that a crime was committed then there should be an indictment.

The reason I returned to this discussion isn't to challenge your points, its clear that you have no issue with unarmed teenagers getting shot (or maybe your fine just because he was black?), what I wanted to bring to your attention the curious case of witness #40.
www.nydailynews.com/news/national/witness-40-ferguson-grand-jury-racist-liar-report-article-1.2047404
The testimonial of this woman (inexplicable presented by the prosecutor) coincided so perfectly with every claim by Wilson that it had a major impact on the case. She did interviews with Fox News, who praised her bravery and candor. The only problem is that she was nowhere near the scene. And she's mentally unstable (bipolar disorder) and refuses to take her medication. And her reason for being on the scene changed (from 'visiting a friend' to 'I like to go to black neighborhoods in order to study them so I won't call n*ggers). The woman, Sandra McElroy, had lied during the trials of two other high profile police cases in the St. Louise area. In fact, the police know she is a well known fraud and still allowed her testimony.
www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CDEQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fblogs%2Fthe_slatest%2F2014%2F12%2F16%2Fwitness_40_michael_brown_football_player_witness_unreliability_history_of.html&ei=t6uTVMbpMomZNs-tgegO&usg=AFQjCNG4iue7l0T3x0eIfQNOoOwTD892nA&bvm=bv.82001339,d.eXY

www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/unmasking-Ferguson-witness-40-496236

This was the only witness that perfectly corroborated Wilson's story.
User avatar #74 - noblexfenrir (12/17/2014) [-]
-not even taking into consideration his impaired judgement, yes I do believe attacking an officer is well within his means. Sorry if you just don't think people make stupid decisions, but it happens.

"This isn't an opinion, it's a moral imperative "
Stop saying unarmed like it means anything. This was an individual who was attacking a police officer who had also previously gone for that officers gun. An officer who is already injured from the individual and is being charged at, has to make a split second decision and he did not feel he would be able to safely detain this man if he got to him. Thus fearing for his own safety. Do you get angry with home owners who shoot home invaders?

"I'm the only one using facts"
Hardly. Your points can basically be summarized as you thinking Brown couldn't have done any damage to Wilson and Wilson is just a constant lier.

"ruining this nation wide discussion"
Lol what discussion? We should discuss how this one black teen fucked up and made stupid decisions and attacked an officer? There are ridiculous amounts of police brutality and abuse of power out there and yet people keep focusing on the one where the officer was actually in the right.

"cold blood, not those trying to voice their concerns."
Prove it was in cold blood. I want proof that against the officers testimony, the autopsy evidence, and Wilsons medical exam, that Wilson was in no real danger and just wanted to kill the man for the sake of killing him. I don't want what you believe, I want evidence. Chances are you have none.

user's channels

Join Subscribe atheism
Join Subscribe fucking-science
Join Subscribe morbid-channel
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1757 / Total items point value: 4077

Comments(161):

[ 161 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #191 - revengeforfreeze (02/16/2014) [-]
Plz respond
User avatar #192 to #191 - noblexfenrir (02/16/2014) [-]
Oh wow sorry mate, for some reason I wasn't notified you posted on here before. Strange, but either way, I can't honestly say I have seen then, or seen any TED talks outside of segments here and there.
User avatar #194 to #192 - indone (06/19/2014) [-]
Did you watch any TED videos since?
User avatar #195 to #194 - noblexfenrir (06/20/2014) [-]
Some yes, although I find myself not connecting with TED's format of short explanations and little debate availability. They're good for background noise but for videos I pay special attention to, they don't fit the bill.
User avatar #196 to #195 - indone (06/20/2014) [-]
That's why I prefer open debate things like the ones Sam Harris usually engages in.

Who's your favourite scientist? Mine has to be Sam, man, he's so down to earth and smart.
User avatar #197 to #196 - noblexfenrir (06/20/2014) [-]
Dawkins or Carroll I'd have to say.
User avatar #198 to #197 - indone (06/20/2014) [-]
Carroll?
User avatar #199 to #198 - noblexfenrir (06/20/2014) [-]
Theoretical cosmologist at CIT. One of his books is "the arrow of time". He's not a Dawkins or a Harris, but I prefer him as a scientist.
User avatar #193 to #192 - revengeforfreeze (02/16/2014) [-]
No problem, it has happened to me too.

Interesting. They are packed with knowledge though so you ought to watch them , in my opinion
User avatar #190 - revengeforfreeze (02/07/2014) [-]
So, I've a question.

Have you seen any of the religiously themed TED talks?
#189 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (12/24/2013) [-]
Hey Noblex, thought you might be interested in this. You know Aronra right? Then you probably also know that he uses document maps to illustrate phylogenetic clades although these maps where animated rather than real.

So i decided to make my own phylogeny replication with document maps, although since i'm not an experienced paleonthologist it'll probably be less complex than most phylogeny project and will probably have to be constantly updated to fix errors and add information i overlooked, it's also in Dutch but i can translate it.

If you have any good articles or sources with information on taxonomic ranks i'd appreciate it very much.
User avatar #188 - schnizel (11/11/2013) [-]
Sup bro?
User avatar #187 - schnizel (11/10/2013) [-]
Daily reminder
That my people were the original heretics
#184 - anonymous (10/22/2013) [-]
Is that all you do is **** on others beliefs?
User avatar #185 to #184 - noblexfenrir (10/22/2013) [-]
If they're wrong? Ofcourse I do. If it's just an opinion I think is wrong? I'll explain why I do but it's up to them how they take it.
User avatar #183 - christophrhitchens (10/17/2013) [-]
back from the dead
User avatar #180 - betta (10/12/2013) [-]
EAUGHGUGRHWAU!

Y U THUMB DOWN MY COMIC

lol, I don't really care that you didn't like it. I'm just here to get some input on why you didn't like it.
User avatar #181 to #180 - noblexfenrir (10/12/2013) [-]
Jesus that was quick response, are you sitting watching the thumbs for it?

Anyways, the joke pacing was just really off. Really slow in the beginning for a joke that's been told to death in every variation possible, a shoehorned in joke about her eyes, and to be honest the over exaggerated language does annoy me when there is no reason for it whatsoever (I think it had something to do with nipples and lighting aflame), it's just there to be there.

Basically comic was too long for the joke you were doing and the joke you chose is overused in my opinion.
User avatar #182 to #181 - betta (10/12/2013) [-]
True, but I just thought it'd be interesting to break the 4th wall a bit with the joke. I do need to work on making my comics shorter though; I agree with that.

Thank you for the input (:

I actually am watching the thumbs. I have no other website to check right now, so why the **** not :T
#178 - garymotherfinoak has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #179 to #178 - garymotherfinoak (08/30/2013) [-]
wrong profile, sorreh
User avatar #172 - robinwilliamson (06/23/2013) [-]
I'm a fan of your work, you're an honorable member of the Religion Board. God bless you.......oh wait
#154 - kanade **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#157 to #154 - anonymous (04/18/2013) [-]
He's really good at feigning intelligence and expertise. thats about it
User avatar #155 to #154 - noblexfenrir (04/14/2013) [-]
Thank you. It really means alot. I love reading your threads, you either bring up questions I'm curious to see the answer to, and on a few occasions shown me information I was unaware of.

Especially considering as of late I have had very little drive to converse on the board simply because it's getting tiring. Not the debating mind you, I love that to death. The people are more the problem. The most recent bout with xJokeface on your gay marriage thread is a very good example, it's just getting more and more difficult to show a shred of seriousness or even respect to some of the regulars there.
#156 to #155 - kanade **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#144 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#143 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#142 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#141 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#140 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#139 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#138 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#137 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
#136 - anonymous (03/11/2013) [-]
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD

JESUS CHRIST is the Light of the world. Whoever follows Him will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. Open your heart to Jesus Christ !
[ 161 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)