Upload
Login or register

noblexfenrir

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:12/29/2010
Stats
Comment Ranking:#3716
Highest Content Rank:#1347
Highest Comment Rank:#1669
Content Thumbs: 9070 total,  10496 ,  1426
Comment Thumbs: 10506 total,  17432 ,  6926
Content Level Progress: 68.99% (69/100)
Level 190 Content: Anon Annihilator → Level 191 Content: Anon Annihilator
Comment Level Progress: 44% (44/100)
Level 292 Comments: Post Master → Level 293 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:12
Content Views:233886
Times Content Favorited:540 times
Total Comments Made:8447
FJ Points:6205
Favorite Tags: You (14) | a (7) | Distraction (4) | i (4) | look (4) | the (4) | and (3) | God (3) | my (3) | oh (3) | please (3) | RUN (3) | she (3) | are (2) | but (2) | Cookie (2) | do (2) | eated (2) | game (2) | is (2)

  • Views: 30308
    Thumbs Up 1069 Thumbs Down 55 Total: +1014
    Comments: 172
    Favorites: 74
    Uploaded: 05/21/11
    Bow chicka wow wow Bow chicka wow wow
  • Views: 23650
    Thumbs Up 1060 Thumbs Down 92 Total: +968
    Comments: 160
    Favorites: 136
    Uploaded: 04/29/11
    Offencive Comp part 2 Offencive Comp part 2
  • Views: 14111
    Thumbs Up 573 Thumbs Down 14 Total: +559
    Comments: 23
    Favorites: 13
    Uploaded: 01/14/12
    When I grow up When I grow up
  • Views: 32531
    Thumbs Up 690 Thumbs Down 171 Total: +519
    Comments: 92
    Favorites: 30
    Uploaded: 12/05/12
    Backseat atheist Backseat atheist
  • Views: 12713
    Thumbs Up 441 Thumbs Down 79 Total: +362
    Comments: 39
    Favorites: 11
    Uploaded: 06/04/12
    Oh the irony Oh the irony
  • Views: 16379
    Thumbs Up 427 Thumbs Down 79 Total: +348
    Comments: 57
    Favorites: 21
    Uploaded: 12/20/12
    Ray Comfort predicted this Ray Comfort predicted this
  • Views: 1301
    Thumbs Up 10 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +6
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 01/16/12
    Message to SOPA Message to SOPA
  • Views: 8010
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +11
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 04/10/11
    Pop up Smith Pop up Smith

latest user's comments

#75 - Loving this south park season so far, although I will say it's…  [+] (5 replies) 09/30/2016 on South Park presidential debate +3
User avatar
#186 - scorcho (22 hours ago) [-]
the joke is just the most relevant it has ever been.
before this new season, i already thought that the douche and turd analogy fits perfectly for this current election.
#109 - skebaba (09/30/2016) [-]
TBH, it's quite fitting for this Presidential run, tho.
User avatar
#94 - sirnigga (09/30/2016) [-]
i wouldve chosen a noose vs a cup of bleach
#77 - warwolfrider (09/30/2016) [-]
**warwolfrider used "*roll picture*"**
**warwolfrider rolled image**its called a running gag
User avatar
#79 - noblexfenrir (09/30/2016) [-]
I understand that, doesn't make it funny in the way it's being used.
#121 - First 2 years he had a democrat controlled house and 57 (+2) s…  [+] (3 replies) 09/30/2016 on Choose your character. +1
User avatar
#128 - battletechmech (09/30/2016) [-]
How do you think we got stuck with obamacare
User avatar
#123 - mrforte (09/30/2016) [-]
There's only so much you can do in 2 years. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't most of his passed bills get repealed after the houses gained republican majority? I'm surprised Obamacare even survived.
User avatar
#129 - noblexfenrir (09/30/2016) [-]
But you certainly can do enough in 2 years as president. So we can assume anything he wanted to actually get done would have been during this time and anything else is just fluff for voters.

and I don't believe so, they focused heavily on just obamacare and it was saved time and again through various means, one of which being the supreme court which I believe overstepped in their rulings.
#162 - You clearly do very little research if you didn't even read th…  [+] (2 replies) 09/30/2016 on Trumper Comp58 0
#163 - ishotthedeputy (12 hours ago) [-]
I'm not referencing one article, but his whole page. Here's the link www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/. Politifact is a very reliable source and is widely regarded as the least biased site out there. Just because they're pointing out his consistent lies doesn't mean they're biased. Actually you thinking there is one is a pretty big indicator that *you're* blindly biased. If you want to go through the "False" and "Pants on Fire" claims and tell me how they're so biased and overlook things, be my guest.
User avatar
#164 - noblexfenrir (9 hours ago) [-]
Sure why not:

-Pant's on fire claims-

""Our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they've ever been in before. Ever. Ever. Ever."

Calling this claim a lie is absolutely absurd because it's trying to turn a non-literal statement into an objective one. If I fall down the stairs and say it was "the most pain I've ever felt" am I a complete liar if 20 years ago I did something that I would say hurt more? No because it's reading too much into it. He's speaking of current time, and he's not wrong. Higher unemployment, single motherhood, rates of violence and murder, etc. These are objective issues and he was expressing how dire their current situation is.

"The number of illegal immigrants "could be 3 million. It could be 30 million."

They say zero possibility, I find that hard to believe since assessment of these numbers is vague at best. Direct numbers years ago pointed to 11-12 million, there have been analysts looking at remittance transfers and these could suggest significantly higher numbers one of which was suggested was 30 million. The fact this is pants on fire is idiotic since there are reputable sources for it's claim, yet Hillary makes the claim "After Britain’s vote to leave the European Union, "within 24 hours, Americans lost $100 billion from our 401(k)s."" and it's rated mostly true while admitting it's not a long term problem, I can say during any daily low in the stock market that people have lost record amounts in their 401k's, but I would sound like an idiot for suggesting it means anything. There is no context in verifying the "truth" in these statements.

""Inner-city crime is reaching record levels.""

Rated pants on fire because "A possible uptick doesn't erase 25 years of decline." yet areas like Baltimore, St. Louis, and Milwakee are at the same levels they were in 1990 and various other areas like Chicago, New orleans, and DC are back to 2000-2005 levels. When either 100% or 50% of your decline is rendered null in the last 5 or so years, yeah it fucking does erase the previous years.

"Says the U.S. election system is "rigged.""

With what went on in the Democrat primaries, illegal immigrants and felons casting votes, and a common system where the dead surprisingly rise every 4 years to cast a ballot, I don't understand how this could possible be "pants on fire", half true or even maybe mostly false, but pants on fire is just being blind.

""Hillary Clinton says she wants to, ‘raise taxes on the middle class.’ ""

Lol the reason this is pants on fire is "Phonetic analysis says otherwise.". So it doesn't matter if her proposed tax plan is going to raise taxes on the middle class, because she didn't say it directly from her fucking mouth hole, Trump is therefor blatantly lying. This could have easily been "mostly true" with the reason being: Plan will increase taxes on middle class, but never actually said the words. See simple.

I could keep going but I'm honestly getting angry reading either blatant misrepresentation after misrepresentation or individual comments removed from their context taken at face value. Even conflating the deflation of the housing bubble with the housing crisis to rate it mostly true when Clinton said Trump rooted for the housing crash. There is a massive difference between the two, and if you actually know that difference, her lie becomes exactly that, a lie. and if she willingly did it on purpose, a malicious one.
#160 - "you sure are making a lot of big assumptions that make …  [+] (4 replies) 09/29/2016 on Trumper Comp58 +2
#161 - ishotthedeputy (09/29/2016) [-]
Literally during the debate he said he never claimed the Chinese invented the concept of global warming when he clearly tweeted that exact same thing. Politifact has a bunch of other ludicrous examples so I'll just direct you to that.
User avatar
#162 - noblexfenrir (09/30/2016) [-]
You clearly do very little research if you didn't even read the politifact article you're speaking of, although I'd advise against politifact since they have a very clear bias and so I wouldn't consider them an objective source on the matter involving presidential candidates.

He said the involvement of china in global warming was a joke, but he does think global warming is a hoax, which I adamantly disagree with him on. So him saying he never claimed such a thing is true, since the only time the issue was mentioned he made clear it was in joking form.

If this is your strongest example then that's quite sad.
#163 - ishotthedeputy (12 hours ago) [-]
I'm not referencing one article, but his whole page. Here's the link www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/. Politifact is a very reliable source and is widely regarded as the least biased site out there. Just because they're pointing out his consistent lies doesn't mean they're biased. Actually you thinking there is one is a pretty big indicator that *you're* blindly biased. If you want to go through the "False" and "Pants on Fire" claims and tell me how they're so biased and overlook things, be my guest.
User avatar
#164 - noblexfenrir (9 hours ago) [-]
Sure why not:

-Pant's on fire claims-

""Our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they've ever been in before. Ever. Ever. Ever."

Calling this claim a lie is absolutely absurd because it's trying to turn a non-literal statement into an objective one. If I fall down the stairs and say it was "the most pain I've ever felt" am I a complete liar if 20 years ago I did something that I would say hurt more? No because it's reading too much into it. He's speaking of current time, and he's not wrong. Higher unemployment, single motherhood, rates of violence and murder, etc. These are objective issues and he was expressing how dire their current situation is.

"The number of illegal immigrants "could be 3 million. It could be 30 million."

They say zero possibility, I find that hard to believe since assessment of these numbers is vague at best. Direct numbers years ago pointed to 11-12 million, there have been analysts looking at remittance transfers and these could suggest significantly higher numbers one of which was suggested was 30 million. The fact this is pants on fire is idiotic since there are reputable sources for it's claim, yet Hillary makes the claim "After Britain’s vote to leave the European Union, "within 24 hours, Americans lost $100 billion from our 401(k)s."" and it's rated mostly true while admitting it's not a long term problem, I can say during any daily low in the stock market that people have lost record amounts in their 401k's, but I would sound like an idiot for suggesting it means anything. There is no context in verifying the "truth" in these statements.

""Inner-city crime is reaching record levels.""

Rated pants on fire because "A possible uptick doesn't erase 25 years of decline." yet areas like Baltimore, St. Louis, and Milwakee are at the same levels they were in 1990 and various other areas like Chicago, New orleans, and DC are back to 2000-2005 levels. When either 100% or 50% of your decline is rendered null in the last 5 or so years, yeah it fucking does erase the previous years.

"Says the U.S. election system is "rigged.""

With what went on in the Democrat primaries, illegal immigrants and felons casting votes, and a common system where the dead surprisingly rise every 4 years to cast a ballot, I don't understand how this could possible be "pants on fire", half true or even maybe mostly false, but pants on fire is just being blind.

""Hillary Clinton says she wants to, ‘raise taxes on the middle class.’ ""

Lol the reason this is pants on fire is "Phonetic analysis says otherwise.". So it doesn't matter if her proposed tax plan is going to raise taxes on the middle class, because she didn't say it directly from her fucking mouth hole, Trump is therefor blatantly lying. This could have easily been "mostly true" with the reason being: Plan will increase taxes on middle class, but never actually said the words. See simple.

I could keep going but I'm honestly getting angry reading either blatant misrepresentation after misrepresentation or individual comments removed from their context taken at face value. Even conflating the deflation of the housing bubble with the housing crisis to rate it mostly true when Clinton said Trump rooted for the housing crash. There is a massive difference between the two, and if you actually know that difference, her lie becomes exactly that, a lie. and if she willingly did it on purpose, a malicious one.