Upload
Login or register

ninjaspartan

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:9/04/2010
Location:on a boat
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#6207
Comment Ranking:#8415
Highest Content Rank:#3235
Highest Comment Rank:#3881
Content Thumbs: 312 total,  478 ,  166
Comment Thumbs: 2600 total,  4480 ,  1880
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 26 Content: Peasant → Level 27 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 23% (23/100)
Level 223 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:45199
Times Content Favorited:29 times
Total Comments Made:2250
FJ Points:2641
Favorite Tags: You (3) | fast (2) | five (2) | this (2) | times (2) | title (2)
Gimmie a straw and a paper clip and spawn me into a room with an elite military force, and I'll show you how I prepare a meal.

That meant nothing in particular, but hi! I'm new here. I'm gonna need a guide, so put on your helmet. I got a pair for the both of us.

latest user's comments

#159 - Awaken my masters 06/24/2016 on 2nd Ammendment +1
#88 - Yes, I responded because I read them. And Id like to … 06/24/2016 on tinder 0
#86 - Okay then. That means you're a biological male that sexually a…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/24/2016 on tinder 0
User avatar
#87 - platinumaltaria (06/24/2016) [-]
rightyouareharry.gif

Actually they were defined differently by psychologists, who are probably the people to be trusted on such things.
I never denied anything... read the comments, I have nothing to hide.
User avatar
#88 - ninjaspartan (06/24/2016) [-]
Yes, I responded because I read them.

And Id like to think that social construct really isn't defined by psychologists of all people... doctors, congressmen, scientists and your local deli shop owner do better jobs defining social construct for the masses than the failing field of psychology ever did.
#84 - Did you go to the doctors to switch your penis to a vagina, yes or no.  [+] (4 new replies) 06/24/2016 on tinder 0
User avatar
#85 - platinumaltaria (06/24/2016) [-]
No.
User avatar
#86 - ninjaspartan (06/24/2016) [-]
Okay then. That means you're a biological male that sexually associates as the female gender. Under social construct you are a female by personal request and male by biologically scientific reproductive definition until you choose to become otherwise.

See, I don't get why it's so hard to seperate science from social construct, it was already done when "gender" and "sex" we're made out to be more than just synonyms by the transgender community. There's no need to deny the existence of the genitalia between your legs just so people will use the right pronouns with you.
User avatar
#87 - platinumaltaria (06/24/2016) [-]
rightyouareharry.gif

Actually they were defined differently by psychologists, who are probably the people to be trusted on such things.
I never denied anything... read the comments, I have nothing to hide.
User avatar
#88 - ninjaspartan (06/24/2016) [-]
Yes, I responded because I read them.

And Id like to think that social construct really isn't defined by psychologists of all people... doctors, congressmen, scientists and your local deli shop owner do better jobs defining social construct for the masses than the failing field of psychology ever did.
#58 - Nah, I just don't like the fact that people are looking to Web… 06/18/2016 on Mirror's Edge -1
#52 - Well, I mean, if Webster is no longer the final word on the En…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/18/2016 on Mirror's Edge 0
User avatar
#53 - frutus (06/18/2016) [-]
Touché. I admit I may be wrong, but I don't care enough about this issue so I'm gonna stop replying.
User avatar
#55 - hanabro (06/18/2016) [-]
I mean, you're right. It's just that people don't LIKE that you're right.

"Literally Literally means Literally, except when Literally means Literally" is a grammatically correct sentence in this language now.
User avatar
#58 - ninjaspartan (06/18/2016) [-]
Nah, I just don't like the fact that people are looking to Webster to prove that they're right.
#49 - >>#48  [+] (5 new replies) 06/18/2016 on Mirror's Edge 0
User avatar
#51 - frutus (06/18/2016) [-]
Does it make me wrong?
User avatar
#52 - ninjaspartan (06/18/2016) [-]
Well, I mean, if Webster is no longer the final word on the English language...
User avatar
#53 - frutus (06/18/2016) [-]
Touché. I admit I may be wrong, but I don't care enough about this issue so I'm gonna stop replying.
User avatar
#55 - hanabro (06/18/2016) [-]
I mean, you're right. It's just that people don't LIKE that you're right.

"Literally Literally means Literally, except when Literally means Literally" is a grammatically correct sentence in this language now.
User avatar
#58 - ninjaspartan (06/18/2016) [-]
Nah, I just don't like the fact that people are looking to Webster to prove that they're right.
#48 - Yeah, they also have "lol" in the dictionary now as …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/18/2016 on Mirror's Edge +4
User avatar
#50 - wootsauce (06/18/2016) [-]
Oh FFS... sigh
#44 - Wow, amazing. I now have no use for the word "figurativel…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/18/2016 on Mirror's Edge +18
User avatar
#47 - frutus (06/18/2016) [-]
Call me crazy, but I'm right on this one.
User avatar
#49 - ninjaspartan (06/18/2016) [-]
>>#48
User avatar
#51 - frutus (06/18/2016) [-]
Does it make me wrong?
User avatar
#52 - ninjaspartan (06/18/2016) [-]
Well, I mean, if Webster is no longer the final word on the English language...
User avatar
#53 - frutus (06/18/2016) [-]
Touché. I admit I may be wrong, but I don't care enough about this issue so I'm gonna stop replying.
User avatar
#55 - hanabro (06/18/2016) [-]
I mean, you're right. It's just that people don't LIKE that you're right.

"Literally Literally means Literally, except when Literally means Literally" is a grammatically correct sentence in this language now.
User avatar
#58 - ninjaspartan (06/18/2016) [-]
Nah, I just don't like the fact that people are looking to Webster to prove that they're right.
#162 - You say that, but you also have to think about how there's no … 06/15/2016 on Hillary Gun Logic 101 0