Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu


Rank #2252 on Comments
neutrality Avatar Level 242 Comments: Doinitrite
Send mail to neutrality Block neutrality Invite neutrality to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 113
Date Signed Up:4/11/2012
Last Login:11/21/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2778
Comment Ranking:#2252
Highest Content Rank:#2150
Highest Comment Rank:#2075
Content Thumbs: 4923 total,  5358 ,  435
Comment Thumbs: 4816 total,  5195 ,  379
Content Level Progress: 22% (22/100)
Level 147 Content: Faptastic → Level 148 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 242 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 243 Comments: Doinitrite
Content Views:202301
Times Content Favorited:1148 times
Total Comments Made:838
FJ Points:9018
Favorite Tags: pillow sex (5)

Sort by:

funny pictures

1 2 3 4 > [ 21 Funny Pictures Total ]
Sort by:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#51 - You shamelessly stole this from a Talented comedian (Tom Segur…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/20/2014 on All of my What??? +33
#67 - Womens Study Major (11/20/2014) [-]
You're getting mad over something that was done somewhere else and then posted on FJ.

Congrats, you're raging over a repost.
User avatar #52 - leonhardt (11/20/2014) [-]
#27 - No, this is how time actually works that was one of the things…  [+] (14 new replies) 11/20/2014 on a few more centuries... +42
User avatar #46 - squiblles (11/20/2014) [-]
yes, but for the difference of 1hr=7yrs, the gravity would have to be tremendous. I don't know the calculations to find out, but I imagine they couldn't even stand up in that. anyone really good at science around here?
#75 - Womens Study Major (11/20/2014) [-]
Size doesn't affect speed of rotation.
#50 - derpyllama (11/20/2014) [-]
Assuming a non-rotating neutron star makes the math pretty easy. This is a bad assumption, but it doesn't really matter in this case because it won't change the result entirely.

You essentially have to be at the Schwarszchild radius (the radius coordinate of the event horizon for a given mass) which is not physical for a neutron star. The only way to get time dilation like this from general relativity is a black hole. So that whole scene is pretty bad.

I find that you would need to be at R ~ 1.00000000029 R_schwarzschild
#145 - Womens Study Major (11/20/2014) [-]
The planet they are on is orbiting a black hole, very close and very quickly
User avatar #70 - ninjalllama (11/20/2014) [-]
hey it's my clever version
User avatar #38 - wheteverlol (11/20/2014) [-]
From what I know interstellar had a few scientists to help with the physics behind the movie. Especially how black holes effect the universe, What was the part you think the movie did not get right? They even got a new graphical engine to depict what an actual black hole would look like. Vid related. INTERSTELLAR Featurette - The Science Of Interstellar (2014) Matthew McConaughey Sci-Fi Movie HD
User avatar #107 - wartox (11/20/2014) [-]
The Science Of Interstellar - 720p HD

Here's the full 40-something-minute version of "The Science of Interstellar"
They explain how they went about trying to make the movie as realistic as possible
#47 - derpyllama (11/20/2014) [-]
Astrophysics grad student here.

They messed up quite a bit actually. The way they perceive time passing is correct, but the scale on which it occurs for the neutron star is completely wrong.

You would need to be essentially at the Schwarzschild radius of the mass of the neutron star to experience the kind of time dialation they claim in the movie in the movie, which is unphysical since it's not a black hole.

Also, the whole part with slowing the space craft down after the explosion is wrong. The material that was blown off the ship would have changed the center of mass, so the ship would no longer be rotating around the same axis, making docking smoothly like that impossible.

There is also the whole thing where he would have been spaghettified before he crossed the event horizon of the black hole due to tidal forces. This could have potentially be avoided as gravitational tidal forces are actually less severe around larger mass black holes such as the super massive black hole at the center of our galaxy, but for a black hole with mass on the order of 1 solar mass to 10 solar (Which I believe they claimed that it was. I think they called it a collapsed star once.) masses the forces mean he upside-down pepsi.

There are a bunch of other things that are kind of silly too. Having your first choice of planet to visit be a planet extremely close to a neutron star is one of those.
User avatar #159 - Whetstone (11/20/2014) [-]
Maybe I'm wrong, but I also feel like the environment of that first planet close to the black hole was off. If that planet were orbiting that close, the difference in gravity from the surface opposite to the black hole and the difference in gravity from the surface closest to the black hole would cause extreme tidal forces (similar in a way to Jupiter's moon Io) on the planet kneading the planet like dough creating large amounts of heat in its core. And with that, the planet should have been a more hot and volcanic planet.
#116 - lolpakka (11/20/2014) [-]
That whole part smelled like bullshit for me, especially with it's end scene. The smell of the screenwriters sweat while trying to figure out how to make some conflict at last has almost hit my nose.

Why did they visit that planet at all, if they knew about the huge dilatation?
How comes that noone has seen those huge tidal waves from orbit?
Why did they go down in person if that robot could have done the whole job alone, and if they had to go down for some strange reason, why did they start to go on a tour in the 130% gravity on foot, and waste time, if the robot could have rolled out, collect the debris and come back to ship in 20 seconds?
#105 - leadtroll (11/20/2014) [-]
mfw science
User avatar #103 - talldude (11/20/2014) [-]
No, Gargantua was a spinning super-massive black hole, not a neutron star. Kip Thorne himself designed the planet and the black hole so that the science would be correct.
User avatar #92 - capslockrage (11/20/2014) [-]
I really don't think the exact accuracy of their ideas really matters that much, i think the only part that truly counts is that their general ideas are physically possible, in which case they were.

And for the spinning the space craft I think it more along the lines of extremely unlikely rather than impossible, and they didn't slow down the main craft, they just put their small one into a spin to match its speed.
User avatar #132 - durkadurka (11/20/2014) [-]
For the spinning he's saying that the craft will only spin about the docking port if the center of gravity is in line with it. If not the docking port will travel in a circle around the spacecraft's center of gravity when spinning

You could say that losing that part of the spacecraft happened to move the center of gravity in line with the docking port, but that'd mean the thing was initially designed with an off-center center of gravity.

It's also unlikely that the explosion would only spin the craft about one axis, but again not impossible.
#35 - 7.8/10 too much water otheerwise perfect score.  [+] (1 new reply) 11/19/2014 on Hit me +23
#86 - Womens Study Major (11/19/2014) [-]
That was the most bullshit review ive ever seen in my life
#131 - **** You. 11/16/2014 on I thought FJ might like this 0
#49 - Neutrality flavored sauce: 11/15/2014 on Adam Sandler +1
#40 - Nah he's totally right dude, we should only have dogs who unde… 11/11/2014 on Think fast. +1
#3 - Not free ones, now hand over those numbers faggot. 11/10/2014 on Seems legit. +5
#73 - I like it but it could have been beter if you said, "With… 11/08/2014 on A girl with something extra 0
#33 - 99% percent of video games stole from sci-fi writers so we sho… 11/06/2014 on Rekt 0
#6 - Her face says, "Pokemon" but, her eyes say, "Be…  [+] (8 new replies) 11/04/2014 on Jigglykirby +193
User avatar #31 - majormayor (11/05/2014) [-]
Don't you mean "Jigglypuff?"
#11 - darthblam (11/04/2014) [-]
MFW I'm come across Jigglypuff porn..
And no, not anthro kind of stuff, like.. still as a little ball. How does anyone find that sexually attractive?
I've also seen Kirby... shit's fucked up, bruh.
#45 - furiousmarshmellow (11/05/2014) [-]
>Sylveon porn
#44 - furiousmarshmellow has deleted their comment.
#21 - justaredshirt (11/04/2014) [-]
Damn it, Darthblam. Now you got me curious.

(one Google image search later)

Meh. I've seen worse stuff.
User avatar #22 - darthblam (11/04/2014) [-]
Well yeah, it's not the worst I've seen, but it's still bad shit.
User avatar #19 - platinuminfernape (11/04/2014) [-]
Got a link?
#20 - darthblam (11/04/2014) [-]

user's channels

Join Subscribe corgi-time
Join Subscribe fucking-science
Join Subscribe fucking-scrubs
Join Subscribe minceraft

user's friends

User avatar camgon    
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)