x
Click to expand

neoncookie

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
X-box Gamertag: Skegwin
Date Signed Up:12/26/2010
Last Login:6/29/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5658
Comment Ranking:#10226
Highest Content Rank:#1775
Highest Comment Rank:#1196
Content Thumbs: 2041 total,  2482 ,  441
Comment Thumbs: 8022 total,  9472 ,  1450
Content Level Progress: 4% (4/100)
Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 56.99% (57/100)
Level 276 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 277 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:6
Content Views:105958
Times Content Favorited:178 times
Total Comments Made:2679
FJ Points:9816
Favorite Tags: the (6) | game (5) | a (2) | admin (2) | Have (2)
If you stand for nothing you will fall for anything

latest user's comments

#53 - i know that, just that expanded pretty damn fast 05/31/2012 on Fire Science +3
#51 - im not a science wizz here but im guessing the air in the tire…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Fire Science 0
User avatar #52 - dragontaming (05/31/2012) [-]
You are correct. Things expand when exposed to heat
User avatar #53 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
i know that, just that expanded pretty damn fast
#191 - you should give him another chance just for this book, its fli… 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man +1
#189 - Have you read Cell by Stephen King? 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man 0
#187 - yeah i was going for all liquids i guess would carry the drug,… 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man +1
#180 - it just seems more logical to me  [+] (2 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man +1
User avatar #186 - samjstapes (05/31/2012) [-]
It does make sense, however would saliva carry traces of the drug to get into the victims blood, and it would have to be an incredibly powerful drug as the concentration would slowly decrease from person to person.
User avatar #187 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
yeah i was going for all liquids i guess would carry the drug, i thought of it as like the radiation meter on fallout, where the concentration slowly rises. I think thats better as well cause then if you just get bit once your not fucked, its like radiation were it has to build up to take effect. And yeah the drug would have to be insanely strong, to make you trip forever lol
#179 - haha thanks, i just think it seems more logical  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man +1
User avatar #183 - Penguinsarebeast (05/31/2012) [-]
It does....mind blowing (:
#172 - So, ive been thinking about this whole zombie shenanigans. Wha…  [+] (9 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man +8
User avatar #198 - secondtimearound (06/01/2012) [-]
That actually is definitely a more likely and/or believable reason for "zombies". The whole concept of the man-eating undead beings is just too comical, in a sense that it is only something you would read about in a fictional book/movie/game etc.

If your theory were to be true, then we may be able to prevent "apocalypses" from happening-rid the earth of such drugs. But the thing is, if your theory were to be true, then...in order for such a disease to spread, there would have to be a large amount of bites in order for the disease to run through your bloodstream. It would be difficult for the disease to spread, because if every victim were to end up like the homeless man, then...will there ever be a victim who would be able to survive and spread the disease?

(btw: a side topic if you're interested....what do you think was the REAL reason that 'zombie' attacked the homeless man? I honestly don't think LSD alone could have caused such a face-hungry urge.)
User avatar #199 - neoncookie (06/01/2012) [-]
well we all know drug trips give you insane munchies, haha i dont know to be honest, you ?
User avatar #176 - Penguinsarebeast (05/31/2012) [-]
wow......just wow. You are...amazing!!!!! (: I love new ideas and this may be the next trend of thought
User avatar #179 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
haha thanks, i just think it seems more logical
User avatar #183 - Penguinsarebeast (05/31/2012) [-]
It does....mind blowing (:
User avatar #175 - samjstapes (05/31/2012) [-]
You just blew my mind.
User avatar #180 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
it just seems more logical to me
User avatar #186 - samjstapes (05/31/2012) [-]
It does make sense, however would saliva carry traces of the drug to get into the victims blood, and it would have to be an incredibly powerful drug as the concentration would slowly decrease from person to person.
User avatar #187 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
yeah i was going for all liquids i guess would carry the drug, i thought of it as like the radiation meter on fallout, where the concentration slowly rises. I think thats better as well cause then if you just get bit once your not fucked, its like radiation were it has to build up to take effect. And yeah the drug would have to be insanely strong, to make you trip forever lol
#167 - if it was airborne we wouldnt stand a chance 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man 0
#163 - they will have to kill him though, you know so the infection d… 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man 0
#161 - i heard they were both gay i think 05/31/2012 on Florida Zombie Man +1
#38 - FJ logic, slow-mo = sicence 05/31/2012 on Boom, Headshot! +4
#22 - seriously seeing all this space stuff makes me wonder in awe a… 05/31/2012 on Fucking Galaxies, How do... +4
#24 - time to level up my perks 05/31/2012 on Star Formation +3
#24 - it really bugs me when people do that stifled sneeze thing, we… 05/31/2012 on How I Sneeze -2
#33 - im not insinuating that hiroshima and nagasaki were just reven… 05/31/2012 on Door -3
#31 - i agree it is, just i cant help think of it as revenge/retaliation  [+] (19 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Door -16
User avatar #57 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
Without doing much research it does seem that way; however, the nuke seemed to be the only solution to ending the war without invading.
#90 - baconmaybebacon (05/31/2012) [-]
I agree it was necessary for a nuke do be dropped but it's kind of fucking low to hit a city and not a military installment. And for fucks sake if you're going to do it do it right hit tokyo if you're going to bring civilians into the war like a little bitch.
User avatar #198 - theaceofthespade (06/01/2012) [-]
Hiroshima had a high concentration of troops, military facilities and military factories that had not yet been subject to significant damage.

Nagasaki was a major shipbuilding city and a large military port.
User avatar #94 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
Unit 731. Japan invaded China and brutally slaughtered or performed morbid experiments on over 20 million Chinese and Russian civilians. Japan was playing dirty before The United States was even bought into the war.
I'm sorry if you're Japanese, I'm not saying Japanese are evil.
#193 - baconmaybebacon (06/01/2012) [-]
Two wrongs don't make a right
User avatar #129 - Chuckaholic (05/31/2012) [-]
That doesn't justify it. Do you commit genocide on innocent germans because of what the third Reich did? Of course not. Yes the japanese military was savage but that shouldn't justify the death of thousands of innocent civillians.
User avatar #155 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
Killing germans today wouldn't justify the holocaust; however, killing germans during war-time would. If nuking two cities is the only way to end one of the worst wars in history then by all means go ahead.
User avatar #157 - Chuckaholic (05/31/2012) [-]
So murdering innocent german civillians during the second world war is justifiable because of the holocaust. You're fucked up. The civillians did nothing in the holocaust yet you think it' okay to kill millions, that puts you on their level.
User avatar #160 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
It's a war, nations bomb other nations to force them into submission all the time. It just so happened that the US invented a new type of bomb to force their enemy into submission. What the United states did on the 6th and 9th of August 1945 was completely necessary.
User avatar #167 - Chuckaholic (05/31/2012) [-]
I was saying you can't justify it by stating that the japanese did horrid things, you have to justify it on other terms, I'm not saying it wasn't necessary, I'm saying that the japanese had fucked up experiments in other countries doesn't justify it.
User avatar #170 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
It's true. You cannot justify the killing of tens of thousands of people in any way. But we need to realize that it was completely necessary. The Manhattan project was the only solution to the persistent Japanese.
Btw, do people hate americans? it seems everyone on this site goes out of their way to make them look like ignorant war mongering pigs.
User avatar #173 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
I don't know. I think the bombs were necessary just that the justification you used at first was not valid. It potentially prevented more deaths although those figures are guesstimates. I think that people like to pick on other countries and as there are a lot of Americans it's funny for some people. I mean I laugh at jokes against my own country but some people are stupid or seriously misinformed.
User avatar #177 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
these aren't jokes though. These are hateful insults in the comments. If i were american i would be rather offended, as a kiwi i can say i'm disgusted at the ignorance and lack of thought in these comments.
User avatar #179 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
Yeah, I'm part Aussie and sometimes you just have to be a bit thick skinned and let things slide so they don't escalate you know.
User avatar #181 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
If you let things slide then they just gain momentum...
User avatar #183 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
If you ignore something on the internet it will stop eventually. If you fight it it can grow quickly.
User avatar #186 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
i guess you're right. I hate letting people run off with a negative impression of nations and people though.
User avatar #187 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
Yeah I agree, but if I don't want abuse directed my way I try to ignore it. Sometimes I can't help it though and end up arguing :p, can be fun, can be annoying, depends on the IQ of the person
User avatar #190 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
or common sense.
#27 - i think that while discussing the descion to nuke hiroshima, a…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Door -4
User avatar #32 - RequieminMortis (05/31/2012) [-]
By 1945, the U.S. was beyond the "let's get revenge for Pearl Harbor" stage and was just trying to get the war over with as quickly as possible. The nukes were part of that decision, because the alternative was an invasion that would've extended the war for another year or two and would have caused tens of millions of casualties.

The Doolittle Raid was our revenge for Pearl Harbor, and it was also our way of showing Japan that they weren't as invincible as they thought they were. The people today who claim we nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki as revenge for Pearl Harbor are either uninformed about history, or are just plain idiots.
User avatar #33 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
im not insinuating that hiroshima and nagasaki were just revenge attacks, i know america wanted to end the war and fast. I just think the revenge aspect might have came into the desicion
#22 - american army logic, they bomb us and destroy a harbour, lets …  [+] (28 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Door +3
User avatar #29 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
it was a war. nuking two small cities is like a good way to end a war, no?
User avatar #31 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
i agree it is, just i cant help think of it as revenge/retaliation
User avatar #57 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
Without doing much research it does seem that way; however, the nuke seemed to be the only solution to ending the war without invading.
#90 - baconmaybebacon (05/31/2012) [-]
I agree it was necessary for a nuke do be dropped but it's kind of fucking low to hit a city and not a military installment. And for fucks sake if you're going to do it do it right hit tokyo if you're going to bring civilians into the war like a little bitch.
User avatar #198 - theaceofthespade (06/01/2012) [-]
Hiroshima had a high concentration of troops, military facilities and military factories that had not yet been subject to significant damage.

Nagasaki was a major shipbuilding city and a large military port.
User avatar #94 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
Unit 731. Japan invaded China and brutally slaughtered or performed morbid experiments on over 20 million Chinese and Russian civilians. Japan was playing dirty before The United States was even bought into the war.
I'm sorry if you're Japanese, I'm not saying Japanese are evil.
#193 - baconmaybebacon (06/01/2012) [-]
Two wrongs don't make a right
User avatar #129 - Chuckaholic (05/31/2012) [-]
That doesn't justify it. Do you commit genocide on innocent germans because of what the third Reich did? Of course not. Yes the japanese military was savage but that shouldn't justify the death of thousands of innocent civillians.
User avatar #155 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
Killing germans today wouldn't justify the holocaust; however, killing germans during war-time would. If nuking two cities is the only way to end one of the worst wars in history then by all means go ahead.
User avatar #157 - Chuckaholic (05/31/2012) [-]
So murdering innocent german civillians during the second world war is justifiable because of the holocaust. You're fucked up. The civillians did nothing in the holocaust yet you think it' okay to kill millions, that puts you on their level.
User avatar #160 - bossdelainternet (05/31/2012) [-]
It's a war, nations bomb other nations to force them into submission all the time. It just so happened that the US invented a new type of bomb to force their enemy into submission. What the United states did on the 6th and 9th of August 1945 was completely necessary.
User avatar #167 - Chuckaholic (05/31/2012) [-]
I was saying you can't justify it by stating that the japanese did horrid things, you have to justify it on other terms, I'm not saying it wasn't necessary, I'm saying that the japanese had fucked up experiments in other countries doesn't justify it.
User avatar #170 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
It's true. You cannot justify the killing of tens of thousands of people in any way. But we need to realize that it was completely necessary. The Manhattan project was the only solution to the persistent Japanese.
Btw, do people hate americans? it seems everyone on this site goes out of their way to make them look like ignorant war mongering pigs.
User avatar #173 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
I don't know. I think the bombs were necessary just that the justification you used at first was not valid. It potentially prevented more deaths although those figures are guesstimates. I think that people like to pick on other countries and as there are a lot of Americans it's funny for some people. I mean I laugh at jokes against my own country but some people are stupid or seriously misinformed.
User avatar #177 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
these aren't jokes though. These are hateful insults in the comments. If i were american i would be rather offended, as a kiwi i can say i'm disgusted at the ignorance and lack of thought in these comments.
User avatar #179 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
Yeah, I'm part Aussie and sometimes you just have to be a bit thick skinned and let things slide so they don't escalate you know.
User avatar #181 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
If you let things slide then they just gain momentum...
User avatar #183 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
If you ignore something on the internet it will stop eventually. If you fight it it can grow quickly.
User avatar #186 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
i guess you're right. I hate letting people run off with a negative impression of nations and people though.
User avatar #187 - Chuckaholic (06/01/2012) [-]
Yeah I agree, but if I don't want abuse directed my way I try to ignore it. Sometimes I can't help it though and end up arguing :p, can be fun, can be annoying, depends on the IQ of the person
User avatar #190 - bossdelainternet (06/01/2012) [-]
or common sense.
#25 - RequieminMortis (05/31/2012) [-]
> implying that the nukes were our revenge for Pearl Harbor, and not the Doolittle Raid
#56 - sumakabob has deleted their comment.
User avatar #196 - RequieminMortis (06/01/2012) [-]
Exactly. Like I said below, the options were "nuke them and hope they surrender", or "launch an invasion that would have extended the war and killed tens of millions".
#199 - sumakabob has deleted their comment.
User avatar #27 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
i think that while discussing the descion to nuke hiroshima, an argument for doing it would have been pearl harbour. Myabe im wrong but i think its likely it was an argument for
User avatar #32 - RequieminMortis (05/31/2012) [-]
By 1945, the U.S. was beyond the "let's get revenge for Pearl Harbor" stage and was just trying to get the war over with as quickly as possible. The nukes were part of that decision, because the alternative was an invasion that would've extended the war for another year or two and would have caused tens of millions of casualties.

The Doolittle Raid was our revenge for Pearl Harbor, and it was also our way of showing Japan that they weren't as invincible as they thought they were. The people today who claim we nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki as revenge for Pearl Harbor are either uninformed about history, or are just plain idiots.
User avatar #33 - neoncookie (05/31/2012) [-]
im not insinuating that hiroshima and nagasaki were just revenge attacks, i know america wanted to end the war and fast. I just think the revenge aspect might have came into the desicion
#45 - one of my favourite gags in AD, other one is where stan builds… 05/31/2012 on When my gf tells me she's... +1
#48 - a balding man with a creepy rape moustache ? 05/31/2012 on Dad quick, kill it ! -7
#29 - whats with all the slow-mo on funnyjunk lately ? 05/31/2012 on Wine Spilling Out of Broken... +2
#94 - not a chemical reaction but cool never the less, it looks like… 05/31/2012 on Chemical reaction. +1
#18 - so now we are getting stuff after facebook? i saw this earlier…  [+] (7 new replies) 05/31/2012 on Fixed it -9
#49 - Kabutops (05/31/2012) [-]
and im pretty sure whoever posted it on facebook also got it from somewhere else
User avatar #27 - Awesomecarrot (05/31/2012) [-]
to*
User avatar #65 - glichguy (05/31/2012) [-]
too*
#82 - HellzReap (05/31/2012) [-]
Try again.
User avatar #83 - glichguy (05/31/2012) [-]
I am pretty sure mine is the correct term, too means also or aswell and to is... well frankly I don't know how to describe that one.
#84 - HellzReap (05/31/2012) [-]
"so now we are getting stuff after facebook? i saw this earlier there, whats the internet coming too ?"

"*To"

To: A fucking preposition.
#93 - glichguy (05/31/2012) [-]
Oh my god Im retarded....Sorry I thought it was referring to the comment with peter griffin, in saying that, the word too, would be correct.
#50 - that is one really shiny desk 05/31/2012 on Slicing Mercury Bead +2

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #34 - comininhot (05/09/2012) [-]
UNDEAD!
User avatar #33 - MountainDewMe (04/19/2012) [-]
HU Solider!
User avatar #31 - sammymariee (03/19/2012) [-]
I saw your avatar on a comment and orgasmed :D
User avatar #29 - professionalnazi (03/05/2012) [-]
Holy **** HU SOLDIER!!
User avatar #30 to #30 - professionalnazi (03/05/2012) [-]
btw add me. i sent a request like 5 months ago
User avatar #28 - emocupcake (03/05/2012) [-]
oh look a undead soldier :3
User avatar #27 - sarahlovesyuhall (02/26/2012) [-]
Hollywood Undead is amazing. I run a fanpage on Facebook(Like a faggot. LOL.)
User avatar #14 - goddesswhaleious (02/22/2012) [-]
I love your avatar :D I <3 hollywood undead :)
User avatar #15 to #15 - neoncookie (02/22/2012) [-]
haha is that why you added me ? :)
User avatar #16 to #16 - goddesswhaleious (02/22/2012) [-]
Yepp:) Anyone who loves HU is amazing :D
#17 to #17 - neoncookie (02/22/2012) [-]
cheers man, or are you a girl. Im not sure cause of your avatar
User avatar #18 to #18 - goddesswhaleious (02/22/2012) [-]
Haha yes I am a girl:L
User avatar #19 to #19 - neoncookie (02/22/2012) [-]
Thanks :) dont wanna sound like a total internet noob but what does that face ':L' mean
User avatar #20 to #20 - goddesswhaleious (02/22/2012) [-]
Its just a laughing face used on such things as Msn :)
User avatar #21 to #21 - neoncookie (02/22/2012) [-]
yeah a few of my friends used it and i was just like wat ?
Not everyday you find a girl who likes HU and FJ
User avatar #22 to #22 - goddesswhaleious (02/22/2012) [-]
Yeah I don't really know any other girls who like both of them either :)
User avatar #23 to #23 - neoncookie (02/22/2012) [-]
only 2 of my friends of a whole even go on FJ, and im pretty sure everyone else would be scared by it
User avatar #24 to #24 - goddesswhaleious (02/22/2012) [-]
Yeah only one of my friends does & only one of my friends likes HU too..everyone else must have awful tastes:L
User avatar #25 to #25 - neoncookie (02/23/2012) [-]
haha have you heard of skrillex ? everyone in my school loves him hes ****
User avatar #26 to #26 - goddesswhaleious (02/24/2012) [-]
Yeah I have, I don't like him..I don't like that kind of music really
User avatar #2 - Marker ONLINE (01/14/2012) [-]
Nice avatar. HU FTW!
User avatar #3 to #3 - neoncookie (01/14/2012) [-]
cheers man
User avatar #4 to #4 - Marker ONLINE (01/14/2012) [-]
One thing I don't understand is the fan rivalry. I get that Deuce got kicked out, but seriously, is a fanwar really needed? I think both lead singers are great. The only flaw is that Deuce never did **** live, he mostly used recordings and lip syncing.
User avatar #5 to #5 - neoncookie (01/14/2012) [-]
your only the second person i have talked to who thinks both are great, only problem i have is i do think that they have become a bit more mainstreamed since deuce left, like since danny they only make what people wanna hear
User avatar #6 to #6 - Marker ONLINE (01/14/2012) [-]
I want more songs like Undead, Young, and Tendencies: Epic, battle songs. Those are awesome.
User avatar #7 to #7 - neoncookie (01/14/2012) [-]
my favs are young, sell your soul and levitate...are those 3 you said your favourites ?
User avatar #8 to #8 - Marker ONLINE (01/14/2012) [-]
They're among them. I also like City, and the Castle Reinholder Remix of Everywhere I Go, much better than the original.
User avatar #9 to #9 - neoncookie (01/14/2012) [-]
everyone like city but i dont :/
User avatar #10 to #10 - Marker ONLINE (01/14/2012) [-]
Ever heard El Urgencia? Great song.
User avatar #11 to #11 - neoncookie (01/14/2012) [-]
by HU ?
User avatar #12 to #12 - Marker ONLINE (01/14/2012) [-]
Look up the Desperate Measures album. It has three songs not on any other album, three covers, the Everywhere I Go remix I mentioned earlier, and 7 live songs.
User avatar #13 to #13 - neoncookie (01/15/2012) [-]
will at some point but ive got exams so im under heavy revision...lucky to get on here for a while
 Friends (0)