Upload
Login or register

neoexdeath

Last status update:
-
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:2/09/2011
Location:Malfeas
Stats
Comment Ranking:#1563
Highest Content Rank:#469
Highest Comment Rank:#83
Content Thumbs: 28154 total,  34327 ,  6173
Comment Thumbs: 66264 total,  77026 ,  10762
Content Level Progress: 59.6% (596/1000)
Level 226 Content: Mind Blower → Level 227 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 73.6% (736/1000)
Level 362 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 363 Comments: FJ Noble
Subscribers:12
Content Views:1234431
Times Content Favorited:1982 times
Total Comments Made:17581
FJ Points:43019
Favorite Tags: OC (5) | sex (3) | simpsons (3) | and (2) | black (2) | canada (2) | evolution (2) | fucking (2) | he (2) | in (2) | is (2) | Masturbate (2) | niggers (2) | Not (2) | of (2) | pig (2) | skyrim (2) | spiderbro (2) | team fortress (2) | the (2)
I mostly wander around, view funny content, and post whatever comments I can. These, vary in quality, but I've reached a respectable level with just comments. Odds are if you look through my comments, you'll find something to garner a chuckle. My advice to newcomers is if you want to make good OC. Start with a good character you can post here and share the antics thereof. For good comments...just give yourself to the moment bro...Pretty deep from a mustachioed Cheeto, huh?

latest user's comments

#9 - If you're so smart, how come you're so old at age 30  [+] (2 replies) 09/23/2016 on Please Be Merciful Ep. 03 -4
User avatar
#17 - shaddyz (09/23/2016) [-]
if you really wanna know, ge was cursed
#12 - greatgranpapy (09/23/2016) [-]
#34 - Your link is the result of one city councilman being a prat, a…  [+] (1 reply) 09/22/2016 on HUN GOV REDPILLING NATION +2
User avatar
#47 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'll put it simply for you, primarily because we aren't really going to be changing each other's minds from what I've seen so far. The media is biased, all of it. Anything that's politicized in any way, even if it can be reported purely objectively, is intentionally skewed to support one view or the other. You can take enough time to argue just about any event or occurrence as being proof of something completely unrelated. What we can say is verifiable is the actions and beliefs of the more devout Muslims, who are anti-alcohol, anti-women's rights, anti-Western ideal. Not all Muslims hold fast to these beliefs, sure, but enough do that it's a serious issue, and it's one that's increasingly impossible to be informed about in an objective manner. Everything from names, races, motivations, etc, is all being obscured, twisted, and otherwise altered so that every event can be seen to support any position. I base my opinions one what little I can glean to be objective fact in this quagmire of other's opinions and falsities. It's as simple as that.
Also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentrification
#2 - Picture  [+] (6 replies) 09/22/2016 on Nexa Goplyir Nitl Kagniv +147
#22 - levvy (09/22/2016) [-]
Poland is cucked - They blamed the fog on Russia and said it killed Kaczynski.

You are fucking rats of the Slavic people <3
User avatar
#64 - cantexplain (09/23/2016) [-]
No, it's his twin brother that did that. Yup prime minister and president were twins at one point. Than one of them died in Smolensk. The other one won't shut up about it and it's been like 5 years. More important people died, since the election was around the corner and he had a replacement who lost the election despite the pity card. Now his party is back at it, they even made a movie that is totally definetly not funded by government, the investor is private and we cannot know anything about him and force kids to go see a propaganda that wants to make us believe Russians crashed the plane from 1890's that shouldn't have half of our government inside in the first place
#47 - hpcghia (09/23/2016) [-]
#40 - anon (09/23/2016) [-]
#26 - anon (09/22/2016) [-]
how about you make non bait comments sometimes to confuse the community
#29 - steindor (09/22/2016) [-]
He just did.
#31 - Well that's interesting, but according to this ( ) they got a…  [+] (3 replies) 09/22/2016 on HUN GOV REDPILLING NATION -3
User avatar
#33 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
As mentioned earlier, such places don't really get any official or mainstream recognition. Ghettos are always an issue to be dealt with, this particular problem is that the Muslim ghettos are filled with intentionally self-exclusionary people who are ideologically motivated to push out people who aren't like them, and to try and spread as much as possible at the same time.
globalnews.ca/news/2185359/toronto-man-denied-subsidized-housing-for-not-being-muslim/
User avatar
#34 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Your link is the result of one city councilman being a prat, and its getting recognition and attention so it can be dealt with. Unfortunately, your statements are lacking any actual verification and weight to them beyond hearsay and secondhand rumors. As a result, I simply don't find your argument to be credible, whereas Snopes goes into detail about their argument.

As for your statement about Muslim Ghettos, the same could be said of particularly impoverished inner city neighborhoods here. It doesn't seem to be an issue with Muslims, as much as it is with people being insular and withdrawing into the familiar.
User avatar
#47 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'll put it simply for you, primarily because we aren't really going to be changing each other's minds from what I've seen so far. The media is biased, all of it. Anything that's politicized in any way, even if it can be reported purely objectively, is intentionally skewed to support one view or the other. You can take enough time to argue just about any event or occurrence as being proof of something completely unrelated. What we can say is verifiable is the actions and beliefs of the more devout Muslims, who are anti-alcohol, anti-women's rights, anti-Western ideal. Not all Muslims hold fast to these beliefs, sure, but enough do that it's a serious issue, and it's one that's increasingly impossible to be informed about in an objective manner. Everything from names, races, motivations, etc, is all being obscured, twisted, and otherwise altered so that every event can be seen to support any position. I base my opinions one what little I can glean to be objective fact in this quagmire of other's opinions and falsities. It's as simple as that.
Also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentrification
#2 - Picture 09/22/2016 on marge +22
#27 - Well I'm sorry, but I'm just not finding any evidence of that.…  [+] (9 replies) 09/22/2016 on HUN GOV REDPILLING NATION -2
User avatar
#121 - masterboll (09/22/2016) [-]
>fagbart
>incredibly biased right wing trash
User avatar
#147 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
Well what you do propose? CNN may as well be Huffinton Post at this point.
#40 - arreatface (09/22/2016) [-]
as pointed by neoex breitbart is one of the most biased news sources, it's funny that you called out Snopes for the same thing earlier.
It's also quite obvious that you are trying to redpill people into believing things about countries that you don't know from first hand.
I know for a fact that these no-go zones are bullshit, because I live in one of them.
And theres a lot of muslim people around, but never heard of the "sharia controlled zones", never seen 'muslim only' on HLMs low income buildings or any of the shit I've seen your kind talk about.
The police is intervening in every areas, and not selecting based on some concentration of muslim criteria like you seem to believe.

Seriously stop gobbling all you read online, if you know one thing for a fact its that its never as bad as the media makes it out to be. Well, great scoop, breitbart, snopes or the guardian ARE ALSO MEDIA
unbelievable, isnt it ? They will always be biased in a way or the other, so please in the future try to take your informations with a grain of salt.
User avatar
#48 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'm well aware that Breitbart is biased, I've never claimed otherwise. If anything I'd argue all modern media is inherently biased to a degree that's rarely seen outside authoritarian dictatorships, with the difference being that there are multiple different potential biases. The media is skewing things one way or the other, you just seem to be blind to one of the views being pushed on you through the media too. I go out of my way to get media from as many different sources as possible, just so I can compare the same story and pick out what actually is true (ie both sides report).

You argue that you've never personally seen a No-Go zone, but I've heard people in England claim they have seen it, so in such an anecdotal case, I'd listen to the majority of people making the claims, IE that there are such zones, or areas that come close to matching the descriptions of these zones.
User avatar
#31 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Well that's interesting, but according to this ( www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/06/muslim-vigilantes-jailed-sharia-law-attacks-london ) they got arrested by the very cops who supposedly are unable or unwilling to do anything about them.

And if you take a look here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitive_urban_zone ) you'll note that "Sensitive Urban Zones" in France are essentially their term for Ghettos and impoverished areas. In other words, its not a term used to describe 'no go' areas, rather a trouble spot that needs immediate attention and civil planning to deal with. Seems to me if the police where afraid to go into these places, they wouldn't be so high on the priority list.

Finally, I wish to state that Breitbart is not exactly the most accurate or unbiased of sites, and we'll just leave it at that to keep things dignified for the moment.
User avatar
#33 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
As mentioned earlier, such places don't really get any official or mainstream recognition. Ghettos are always an issue to be dealt with, this particular problem is that the Muslim ghettos are filled with intentionally self-exclusionary people who are ideologically motivated to push out people who aren't like them, and to try and spread as much as possible at the same time.
globalnews.ca/news/2185359/toronto-man-denied-subsidized-housing-for-not-being-muslim/
User avatar
#34 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Your link is the result of one city councilman being a prat, and its getting recognition and attention so it can be dealt with. Unfortunately, your statements are lacking any actual verification and weight to them beyond hearsay and secondhand rumors. As a result, I simply don't find your argument to be credible, whereas Snopes goes into detail about their argument.

As for your statement about Muslim Ghettos, the same could be said of particularly impoverished inner city neighborhoods here. It doesn't seem to be an issue with Muslims, as much as it is with people being insular and withdrawing into the familiar.
User avatar
#47 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'll put it simply for you, primarily because we aren't really going to be changing each other's minds from what I've seen so far. The media is biased, all of it. Anything that's politicized in any way, even if it can be reported purely objectively, is intentionally skewed to support one view or the other. You can take enough time to argue just about any event or occurrence as being proof of something completely unrelated. What we can say is verifiable is the actions and beliefs of the more devout Muslims, who are anti-alcohol, anti-women's rights, anti-Western ideal. Not all Muslims hold fast to these beliefs, sure, but enough do that it's a serious issue, and it's one that's increasingly impossible to be informed about in an objective manner. Everything from names, races, motivations, etc, is all being obscured, twisted, and otherwise altered so that every event can be seen to support any position. I base my opinions one what little I can glean to be objective fact in this quagmire of other's opinions and falsities. It's as simple as that.
Also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentrification
#22 - Just read the article, it lays everything out and explains it …  [+] (11 replies) 09/22/2016 on HUN GOV REDPILLING NATION +1
#26 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
Bonus points for ginger Muslim. The places aren't officially recognized, and no authorities will admit to them, but there are neighbourhoods where police refuse to go since the Muslim groups control them so tightly, in part by pushing out or forcing the (at least superficial) conversion of all non-muslims.
User avatar
#27 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Well I'm sorry, but I'm just not finding any evidence of that. If you have proof of this being a thing, preferably not from the daily mail, I'd like a look at it...But other then that it seems to simply not be a thing
User avatar
#121 - masterboll (09/22/2016) [-]
>fagbart
>incredibly biased right wing trash
User avatar
#147 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
Well what you do propose? CNN may as well be Huffinton Post at this point.
#40 - arreatface (09/22/2016) [-]
as pointed by neoex breitbart is one of the most biased news sources, it's funny that you called out Snopes for the same thing earlier.
It's also quite obvious that you are trying to redpill people into believing things about countries that you don't know from first hand.
I know for a fact that these no-go zones are bullshit, because I live in one of them.
And theres a lot of muslim people around, but never heard of the "sharia controlled zones", never seen 'muslim only' on HLMs low income buildings or any of the shit I've seen your kind talk about.
The police is intervening in every areas, and not selecting based on some concentration of muslim criteria like you seem to believe.

Seriously stop gobbling all you read online, if you know one thing for a fact its that its never as bad as the media makes it out to be. Well, great scoop, breitbart, snopes or the guardian ARE ALSO MEDIA
unbelievable, isnt it ? They will always be biased in a way or the other, so please in the future try to take your informations with a grain of salt.
User avatar
#48 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'm well aware that Breitbart is biased, I've never claimed otherwise. If anything I'd argue all modern media is inherently biased to a degree that's rarely seen outside authoritarian dictatorships, with the difference being that there are multiple different potential biases. The media is skewing things one way or the other, you just seem to be blind to one of the views being pushed on you through the media too. I go out of my way to get media from as many different sources as possible, just so I can compare the same story and pick out what actually is true (ie both sides report).

You argue that you've never personally seen a No-Go zone, but I've heard people in England claim they have seen it, so in such an anecdotal case, I'd listen to the majority of people making the claims, IE that there are such zones, or areas that come close to matching the descriptions of these zones.
User avatar
#31 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Well that's interesting, but according to this ( www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/06/muslim-vigilantes-jailed-sharia-law-attacks-london ) they got arrested by the very cops who supposedly are unable or unwilling to do anything about them.

And if you take a look here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitive_urban_zone ) you'll note that "Sensitive Urban Zones" in France are essentially their term for Ghettos and impoverished areas. In other words, its not a term used to describe 'no go' areas, rather a trouble spot that needs immediate attention and civil planning to deal with. Seems to me if the police where afraid to go into these places, they wouldn't be so high on the priority list.

Finally, I wish to state that Breitbart is not exactly the most accurate or unbiased of sites, and we'll just leave it at that to keep things dignified for the moment.
User avatar
#33 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
As mentioned earlier, such places don't really get any official or mainstream recognition. Ghettos are always an issue to be dealt with, this particular problem is that the Muslim ghettos are filled with intentionally self-exclusionary people who are ideologically motivated to push out people who aren't like them, and to try and spread as much as possible at the same time.
globalnews.ca/news/2185359/toronto-man-denied-subsidized-housing-for-not-being-muslim/
User avatar
#34 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Your link is the result of one city councilman being a prat, and its getting recognition and attention so it can be dealt with. Unfortunately, your statements are lacking any actual verification and weight to them beyond hearsay and secondhand rumors. As a result, I simply don't find your argument to be credible, whereas Snopes goes into detail about their argument.

As for your statement about Muslim Ghettos, the same could be said of particularly impoverished inner city neighborhoods here. It doesn't seem to be an issue with Muslims, as much as it is with people being insular and withdrawing into the familiar.
User avatar
#47 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'll put it simply for you, primarily because we aren't really going to be changing each other's minds from what I've seen so far. The media is biased, all of it. Anything that's politicized in any way, even if it can be reported purely objectively, is intentionally skewed to support one view or the other. You can take enough time to argue just about any event or occurrence as being proof of something completely unrelated. What we can say is verifiable is the actions and beliefs of the more devout Muslims, who are anti-alcohol, anti-women's rights, anti-Western ideal. Not all Muslims hold fast to these beliefs, sure, but enough do that it's a serious issue, and it's one that's increasingly impossible to be informed about in an objective manner. Everything from names, races, motivations, etc, is all being obscured, twisted, and otherwise altered so that every event can be seen to support any position. I base my opinions one what little I can glean to be objective fact in this quagmire of other's opinions and falsities. It's as simple as that.
Also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentrification
#20 - Picture  [+] (19 replies) 09/22/2016 on HUN GOV REDPILLING NATION -4
#112 - notagainpls (09/22/2016) [-]
Okay, I read the article.
tl;dr version: No-go zones exist, just not formally with signs and all that. You will notice when you enter one but it is not recognized as a no-go zone by the government.

I now invite you to visit Molenbeek in Brussels. To spice things up a little, wear a cross necklace and show some white skin. I bet the people will love you the moment they see you.
User avatar
#36 - platinumaltaria (09/22/2016) [-]
Britfag here, can confirm they are bullshit. They weren't even made up by us, it's a foreign thing.
#179 - inept (09/23/2016) [-]
There's loads of videos/pics proving it if you look for them..

On the Brexit debate (The one with Boris Johnson and Andrea Leadsom) a 'British' middle-easterner complained about how his home is now a no-go zone..

If even Asians are complaining about it must be a pretty big problem...
User avatar
#77 - ihateeverybodytoo (09/22/2016) [-]
Muslim Mob chases cops from No Go Zones in UK

What's going on here?
User avatar
#97 - platinumaltaria (09/22/2016) [-]
I've no idea. But I live here, so they must be some real quiet muslim zones.
#119 - masterboll (09/22/2016) [-]
kek

Islamophobic turds have been claiming that the areas i live in are also "no go zones"
User avatar
#21 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
>Snopes
>Not incredibly biased left wing trash
User avatar
#22 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Just read the article, it lays everything out and explains it rather concisely
#26 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
Bonus points for ginger Muslim. The places aren't officially recognized, and no authorities will admit to them, but there are neighbourhoods where police refuse to go since the Muslim groups control them so tightly, in part by pushing out or forcing the (at least superficial) conversion of all non-muslims.
User avatar
#27 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Well I'm sorry, but I'm just not finding any evidence of that. If you have proof of this being a thing, preferably not from the daily mail, I'd like a look at it...But other then that it seems to simply not be a thing
User avatar
#121 - masterboll (09/22/2016) [-]
>fagbart
>incredibly biased right wing trash
User avatar
#147 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
Well what you do propose? CNN may as well be Huffinton Post at this point.
#40 - arreatface (09/22/2016) [-]
as pointed by neoex breitbart is one of the most biased news sources, it's funny that you called out Snopes for the same thing earlier.
It's also quite obvious that you are trying to redpill people into believing things about countries that you don't know from first hand.
I know for a fact that these no-go zones are bullshit, because I live in one of them.
And theres a lot of muslim people around, but never heard of the "sharia controlled zones", never seen 'muslim only' on HLMs low income buildings or any of the shit I've seen your kind talk about.
The police is intervening in every areas, and not selecting based on some concentration of muslim criteria like you seem to believe.

Seriously stop gobbling all you read online, if you know one thing for a fact its that its never as bad as the media makes it out to be. Well, great scoop, breitbart, snopes or the guardian ARE ALSO MEDIA
unbelievable, isnt it ? They will always be biased in a way or the other, so please in the future try to take your informations with a grain of salt.
User avatar
#48 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'm well aware that Breitbart is biased, I've never claimed otherwise. If anything I'd argue all modern media is inherently biased to a degree that's rarely seen outside authoritarian dictatorships, with the difference being that there are multiple different potential biases. The media is skewing things one way or the other, you just seem to be blind to one of the views being pushed on you through the media too. I go out of my way to get media from as many different sources as possible, just so I can compare the same story and pick out what actually is true (ie both sides report).

You argue that you've never personally seen a No-Go zone, but I've heard people in England claim they have seen it, so in such an anecdotal case, I'd listen to the majority of people making the claims, IE that there are such zones, or areas that come close to matching the descriptions of these zones.
User avatar
#31 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Well that's interesting, but according to this ( www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/06/muslim-vigilantes-jailed-sharia-law-attacks-london ) they got arrested by the very cops who supposedly are unable or unwilling to do anything about them.

And if you take a look here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitive_urban_zone ) you'll note that "Sensitive Urban Zones" in France are essentially their term for Ghettos and impoverished areas. In other words, its not a term used to describe 'no go' areas, rather a trouble spot that needs immediate attention and civil planning to deal with. Seems to me if the police where afraid to go into these places, they wouldn't be so high on the priority list.

Finally, I wish to state that Breitbart is not exactly the most accurate or unbiased of sites, and we'll just leave it at that to keep things dignified for the moment.
User avatar
#33 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
As mentioned earlier, such places don't really get any official or mainstream recognition. Ghettos are always an issue to be dealt with, this particular problem is that the Muslim ghettos are filled with intentionally self-exclusionary people who are ideologically motivated to push out people who aren't like them, and to try and spread as much as possible at the same time.
globalnews.ca/news/2185359/toronto-man-denied-subsidized-housing-for-not-being-muslim/
User avatar
#34 - neoexdeath (09/22/2016) [-]
Your link is the result of one city councilman being a prat, and its getting recognition and attention so it can be dealt with. Unfortunately, your statements are lacking any actual verification and weight to them beyond hearsay and secondhand rumors. As a result, I simply don't find your argument to be credible, whereas Snopes goes into detail about their argument.

As for your statement about Muslim Ghettos, the same could be said of particularly impoverished inner city neighborhoods here. It doesn't seem to be an issue with Muslims, as much as it is with people being insular and withdrawing into the familiar.
User avatar
#47 - icedmantwo (09/22/2016) [-]
I'll put it simply for you, primarily because we aren't really going to be changing each other's minds from what I've seen so far. The media is biased, all of it. Anything that's politicized in any way, even if it can be reported purely objectively, is intentionally skewed to support one view or the other. You can take enough time to argue just about any event or occurrence as being proof of something completely unrelated. What we can say is verifiable is the actions and beliefs of the more devout Muslims, who are anti-alcohol, anti-women's rights, anti-Western ideal. Not all Muslims hold fast to these beliefs, sure, but enough do that it's a serious issue, and it's one that's increasingly impossible to be informed about in an objective manner. Everything from names, races, motivations, etc, is all being obscured, twisted, and otherwise altered so that every event can be seen to support any position. I base my opinions one what little I can glean to be objective fact in this quagmire of other's opinions and falsities. It's as simple as that.
Also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentrification