Upload
Login or register

nathanbiggs

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:6/03/2011
Last Login:9/28/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#7455
Highest Content Rank:#6115
Highest Comment Rank:#660
Content Thumbs: 109 total,  193 ,  84
Comment Thumbs: 10725 total,  14850 ,  4125
Content Level Progress: 20% (1/5)
Level 9 Content: New Here → Level 10 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 90% (90/100)
Level 294 Comments: Post Master → Level 295 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:0
Content Views:16594
Times Content Favorited:32 times
Total Comments Made:3668
FJ Points:9638

latest user's comments

#87 - My consistency is fine :^)  [+] (1 reply) 10 hours ago on team fucker 2 +2
#89 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
That's not what she said.
#85 - You need to work on your b8  [+] (3 replies) 10 hours ago on team fucker 2 +2
#86 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
You need to work on your consistency.
User avatar
#87 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
My consistency is fine :^)
#89 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
That's not what she said.
#83 - >make a claim >ask someone else to prove you wrong …  [+] (5 replies) 10 hours ago on team fucker 2 +1
#84 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
"but to say the population is "way, way down" is just false."


Is it now?
User avatar
#85 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
You need to work on your b8
#86 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
You need to work on your consistency.
User avatar
#87 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
My consistency is fine :^)
#89 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
That's not what she said.
#74 - But he has no proof for that. Multiplayer games populations d…  [+] (8 replies) 11 hours ago on team fucker 2 +2
#82 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
Then prove it.
User avatar
#83 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
>make a claim
>ask someone else to prove you wrong

That's not how burden of proof works fam
#84 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
"but to say the population is "way, way down" is just false."


Is it now?
User avatar
#85 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
You need to work on your b8
#86 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
You need to work on your consistency.
User avatar
#87 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
My consistency is fine :^)
#89 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
That's not what she said.
User avatar
#76 - StickyTissueLoLz (11 hours ago) [-]
Hey, I'm just the messenger m8. He could be right, you could be right, I dunno. I don't even have the game.
#1492339 - >sonyggers are this deluded Wew lad  [+] (1 reply) 11 hours ago on Video Games 0
User avatar
#1492340 - beroty (11 hours ago) [-]
it's a joke
#68 - Uh, no? It's been $40 since release, it's a much better game …  [+] (2 replies) 11 hours ago on team fucker 2 +1
User avatar
#69 - larrisawsome (11 hours ago) [-]
I never said that it was worth less because it was online multiplayer game douche bag, and it WAS 60 dollars at a lot of retail store on release, and I know this because I bought it for 60 fucking dollars from the walmart. No need to get your panties in twist, christ.
User avatar
#72 - nathanbiggs (11 hours ago) [-]
The PC version has always been $40 on Battle.net , it's only consolecucks that had to pay $60.
#65 - It's $40, not $60. It's well worth that price tag.  [+] (4 replies) 11 hours ago on team fucker 2 0
User avatar
#67 - larrisawsome (11 hours ago) [-]
it's dropped price, but most places are selling for around 49.99 on consoles and sometimes PC (obvious scalping) still pricey for a online multiplayer only game. Not saying it isn't worth the price, but comparatively... eh....
User avatar
#68 - nathanbiggs (11 hours ago) [-]
Uh, no? It's been $40 since release, it's a much better game than TF2 and worth the price tag even at $60. Just saying "oh it's an online multiplayer game so that means it's worth less" is stupid, too.
User avatar
#69 - larrisawsome (11 hours ago) [-]
I never said that it was worth less because it was online multiplayer game douche bag, and it WAS 60 dollars at a lot of retail store on release, and I know this because I bought it for 60 fucking dollars from the walmart. No need to get your panties in twist, christ.
User avatar
#72 - nathanbiggs (11 hours ago) [-]
The PC version has always been $40 on Battle.net , it's only consolecucks that had to pay $60.
#56 - >i'm not enjoying it that means no one else is either! …  [+] (10 replies) 12 hours ago on team fucker 2 +4
User avatar
#73 - StickyTissueLoLz (11 hours ago) [-]
I don't think he's claiming anything about liking or disliking it. He's just saying that the player base and community activity has been going down dramatically.
User avatar
#74 - nathanbiggs (11 hours ago) [-]
But he has no proof for that. Multiplayer games populations drop as time goes on, yes, but to say the population is "way, way down" is just false.
#82 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
Then prove it.
User avatar
#83 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
>make a claim
>ask someone else to prove you wrong

That's not how burden of proof works fam
#84 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
"but to say the population is "way, way down" is just false."


Is it now?
User avatar
#85 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
You need to work on your b8
#86 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
You need to work on your consistency.
User avatar
#87 - nathanbiggs (10 hours ago) [-]
My consistency is fine :^)
#89 - empirennn (10 hours ago) [-]
That's not what she said.
User avatar
#76 - StickyTissueLoLz (11 hours ago) [-]
Hey, I'm just the messenger m8. He could be right, you could be right, I dunno. I don't even have the game.
#55 - >Overwatch is expensive What  [+] (7 replies) 12 hours ago on team fucker 2 +1
User avatar
#64 - larrisawsome (11 hours ago) [-]
full 60 dollar retail price vs free or hell most online multiplayer only games have a 20 or 30 dollar price tag.
#66 - anon (11 hours ago) [-]
its only $40 on pc
User avatar
#65 - nathanbiggs (11 hours ago) [-]
It's $40, not $60. It's well worth that price tag.
User avatar
#67 - larrisawsome (11 hours ago) [-]
it's dropped price, but most places are selling for around 49.99 on consoles and sometimes PC (obvious scalping) still pricey for a online multiplayer only game. Not saying it isn't worth the price, but comparatively... eh....
User avatar
#68 - nathanbiggs (11 hours ago) [-]
Uh, no? It's been $40 since release, it's a much better game than TF2 and worth the price tag even at $60. Just saying "oh it's an online multiplayer game so that means it's worth less" is stupid, too.
User avatar
#69 - larrisawsome (11 hours ago) [-]
I never said that it was worth less because it was online multiplayer game douche bag, and it WAS 60 dollars at a lot of retail store on release, and I know this because I bought it for 60 fucking dollars from the walmart. No need to get your panties in twist, christ.
User avatar
#72 - nathanbiggs (11 hours ago) [-]
The PC version has always been $40 on Battle.net , it's only consolecucks that had to pay $60.