x
Click to expand

nathanbiggs

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/03/2011
Last Login:5/03/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2739
Highest Content Rank:#6115
Highest Comment Rank:#660
Content Thumbs: 112 total,  193 ,  81
Comment Thumbs: 8468 total,  10707 ,  2239
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 9 Content: New Here → Level 10 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 72% (72/100)
Level 277 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 278 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:0
Content Views:16492
Times Content Favorited:33 times
Total Comments Made:2267
FJ Points:7896

Funny Pictures

YouTube Videos

latest user's comments

#216 - >posting this on FJ 8 hours ago on The Boa 0
#188 - > You have done absolutely nothing to show that you aren't … 05/01/2015 on HOW TO PLAY BATTLEFRONT 2... 0
#182 - I want Bloodborne on PC just so I wouldn't have to deal with t… 05/01/2015 on Wow calm down, man 0
#28 - >Shinji >having a sweet deal kek 05/01/2015 on worst girl +4
#176 - >I would also like to point out the flaw in your logic &quo…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/01/2015 on HOW TO PLAY BATTLEFRONT 2... 0
User avatar #181 - reaperssprint (05/01/2015) [-]
Whatever you say. You have done absolutely nothing to show that you aren't crying over something that you know very little about because it isn't every little thing you wanted from the start. Here in the real world people wait until they have enough information to actually form an opinion before doing so.

But if you choose to be mindless because you have yet to grow up, then do so. Those of us who actually think before throwing a hissy fit will be glad to wait until we see gameplay. Have fun hating life there bud, sure you must be a hoot to be around.
User avatar #188 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
> You have done absolutely nothing to show that you aren't crying over something that you know very little about because it isn't every little thing you wanted from the start
I'm complaining about what we currently know and what we can assume, if my assumption prove incorrect, guess what? I'll admit that I was wrong and move forward happier knowing that I was wrong.

> Here in the real world people wait until they have enough information to actually form an opinion before doing so.
>But if you choose to be mindless because you have yet to grow up, then do so.
There you go again, on your high horse

>Those of us who actually think before throwing a hissy fit will be glad to wait until we see gameplay.
And I've already stated, gameplay can only carry a game so far. It is one of the most important parts, yes, but without everything else the game will fall flat on its face

>Have fun hating life there bud, sure you must be a hoot to be around.
You don't have to hate life to realize that this industry is prone to disappointments.
#185 - fellatio (05/01/2015) [-]
and Ad hominem, great way to win an arguement. use a logical fallacy. They haven't shown us game play unless you go to the link i posted which is just battlefield. I point out what the previous entries into a series had, many different things. Then I point out what has been confimed to be absent from the game. Now if we take a step back and look at this logically we have

BF1 comes out - great game with a bunch of stuff
BF2 comes out - even better with fixes to the game and adds more!
EA confirms 80% of the things in BF2 will not be in the game with 5% to come out as DLC
EA does not publish any gameplay besides pre rendered cutscenes.

So if we know that there is alot missing from the game, and they refuse to publish any gameplay that is not pre rendered.... why shouldn't we point out their bullshit?
User avatar #187 - reaperssprint (05/01/2015) [-]
I'm not trying to win an argument. Nobody can win "this argument" because there is no argument to be had. There is no gameplay of the game and little information released on it. The only thing close argument here is that people like you are nothing more than mindless idiots who have no patience.

Good bye, and good luck trying to make it through life with that brain of yours.
#169 - A reboot can still be compared to its predecessor, we already …  [+] (7 new replies) 05/01/2015 on HOW TO PLAY BATTLEFRONT 2... 0
User avatar #170 - reaperssprint (05/01/2015) [-]
First off, several times you have proved my point of "nothing more than assumptions".
Here:" DICE has only said "more than 8", if they were confident they would have said much more than that. The vagueness of the comment is worrying"
Here:"If we're talking about stuff like Galactic conquest/Instant action/etc. I don't see how that information has been skewed. It's entirely correct to say that the actual number of game modes is lower than that of BF2, until DICE specifies otherwise, if they even will"
I would also like to point out the flaw in your logic "It's entirely correct to say that the actual number of game modes is lower than that of BF2, until DICE specifies otherwise". This is just stupid to put it bluntly, again completely proving the assumption stupidity.

The vehicles bit was said by the author of that article, NOT Dice, NOT EA, but the author. Dice and Ea have already confirmed that the vehicles will be pilot-able (with the exception of AT-Ats) and free to use along the maps. The authors comment was literally just trying to make his writing sound better, they are not going to be killstreaks.

As for AT-ATs, it won't make a difference. Nearly every map that you could rive them in the originals where linear and under constant heavy fire. Putting them on rails isn't going to change anything, they'll still move slowly and in one direction. "Oh no, I can't move slightly to the right or left or sit on top of a base all game."

The game has already been confirmed to include the new sequels to the series, it would be better to assume that there will be NEW heroes from this universe as well.

It won't be the same, the fact that people expected it to be exactly the same is the issue here. It will be a new Battlefront, it will probably be just as fun to play. Dice were not the original developers of the game, they can't go making an exact copy with slight improvements. They are going create a more modern version of the game.

Dice has been handling it fine, the issue is that you have a bunch of nostalgia fags that can't accept that things will change. People seem to forget that many of the people working on this game are huge star wars fans and huge Battlefront fans themselves. That doesn't mean they will make the game exactly the same. Coincidentally, that doesn't automatically make the game bad.
#176 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
>I would also like to point out the flaw in your logic "It's entirely correct to say that the actual number of game modes is lower than that of BF2, until DICE specifies otherwise". This is just stupid to put it bluntly, again completely proving the assumption stupidity.
Why would DICE lead out with cut content? If there truly is this wealth of content that you're assuming is there, why haven't we heard about it yet? Where are the new game modes that'll balance out these cuts? Why should I give DICE the benefit of the doubt? More importantly, why should I give EA the benefit of the doubt? I don't trust these developers/publishers with Battlefront, like most people, so I'm going to assume the worst until they say otherwise. The fact that they still have yet to reveal gameplay does nothing to help ease those worries.

>The vehicles bit was said by the author of that article, NOT Dice, NOT EA, but the author.
Why would an author make something up like that? He wouldn't, there is something that lead him to believe that statement is worthy of including

> Dice and Ea have already confirmed that the vehicles will be pilot-able
Never argued this

> The authors comment was literally just trying to make his writing sound better, they are not going to be killstreaks.
The wording he used was very specific, they are not words someone would use lightly considering how killstreaks can divide a community

>As for AT-ATs, it won't make a difference. Nearly every map that you could rive them in the originals where linear and under constant heavy fire. Putting them on rails isn't going to change anything, they'll still move slowly and in one direction. "Oh no, I can't move slightly to the right or left or sit on top of a base all game."
So, because you experience something one way that means everyone has to experience it the same way? If it was so linear in the old games, then why even put it on rails? Why take control away from the player for no good reason? Why are options a bad thing now?

>The game has already been confirmed to include the new sequels to the series, it would be better to assume that there will be NEW heroes from this universe as well.
Do these new heroes outnumber the old ones? Would it have killed DICE to include the prequel as well and instead of cutting content, build upon the content they already had?

>It won't be the same, the fact that people expected it to be exactly the same is the issue here
Should people not expect a decent chunk of similarities between 2 games in a series? Don't give me the "b-but it's a reboot!" shit, that doesn't excuse it. If someone rebooted the Halo series I would still expect things like Custom Games and Forge to be a part of it because of how integral they are to the experience for me. The same can be said here for the different cut game modes

> It will be a new Battlefront, it will probably be just as fun to play
Nice assumptions you're making there

>They are going create a more modern version of the game.
"Modernization" of games is something that never turns out well, considering 9 times out of 10 the developers just look at the popular trends and follow those.

>Dice has been handling it fine,
Nope, DICE's comments on Reddit have just shown them blatantly ignoring the problems people have with confirmed cut game modes

>the issue is that you have a bunch of nostalgia fags that can't accept that things will change.
Christ, people are okay with change when it is good change. Obviously people don't see cut content and lower scale as good changes, and who could blame them?


>that youtube vide
It's just 11 minutes of Rooster Teeth saying "t-that doesn't matter anyway! Why do you care if it's cut/the scale has been lowered!". It's almost shill-tier level
User avatar #181 - reaperssprint (05/01/2015) [-]
Whatever you say. You have done absolutely nothing to show that you aren't crying over something that you know very little about because it isn't every little thing you wanted from the start. Here in the real world people wait until they have enough information to actually form an opinion before doing so.

But if you choose to be mindless because you have yet to grow up, then do so. Those of us who actually think before throwing a hissy fit will be glad to wait until we see gameplay. Have fun hating life there bud, sure you must be a hoot to be around.
User avatar #188 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
> You have done absolutely nothing to show that you aren't crying over something that you know very little about because it isn't every little thing you wanted from the start
I'm complaining about what we currently know and what we can assume, if my assumption prove incorrect, guess what? I'll admit that I was wrong and move forward happier knowing that I was wrong.

> Here in the real world people wait until they have enough information to actually form an opinion before doing so.
>But if you choose to be mindless because you have yet to grow up, then do so.
There you go again, on your high horse

>Those of us who actually think before throwing a hissy fit will be glad to wait until we see gameplay.
And I've already stated, gameplay can only carry a game so far. It is one of the most important parts, yes, but without everything else the game will fall flat on its face

>Have fun hating life there bud, sure you must be a hoot to be around.
You don't have to hate life to realize that this industry is prone to disappointments.
#185 - fellatio (05/01/2015) [-]
and Ad hominem, great way to win an arguement. use a logical fallacy. They haven't shown us game play unless you go to the link i posted which is just battlefield. I point out what the previous entries into a series had, many different things. Then I point out what has been confimed to be absent from the game. Now if we take a step back and look at this logically we have

BF1 comes out - great game with a bunch of stuff
BF2 comes out - even better with fixes to the game and adds more!
EA confirms 80% of the things in BF2 will not be in the game with 5% to come out as DLC
EA does not publish any gameplay besides pre rendered cutscenes.

So if we know that there is alot missing from the game, and they refuse to publish any gameplay that is not pre rendered.... why shouldn't we point out their bullshit?
User avatar #187 - reaperssprint (05/01/2015) [-]
I'm not trying to win an argument. Nobody can win "this argument" because there is no argument to be had. There is no gameplay of the game and little information released on it. The only thing close argument here is that people like you are nothing more than mindless idiots who have no patience.

Good bye, and good luck trying to make it through life with that brain of yours.
#142 - You're making the assumption that those are made specifically … 05/01/2015 on HOW TO PLAY BATTLEFRONT 2... 0
#136 - Alright, so if development costs so much then why are video ga…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/01/2015 on HOW TO PLAY BATTLEFRONT 2... 0
User avatar #138 - sketchE (05/01/2015) [-]
games dlc subscriptions. all the things people on this site like to bitch about but gladly participate in
User avatar #142 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
You're making the assumption that those are made specifically because the company is struggling to scrape by with a profit, which is a leap of logic that doesn't hold true for the majority.
#133 - The market has gotten larger, making it easy to offset the hig…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/01/2015 on HOW TO PLAY BATTLEFRONT 2... 0
User avatar #134 - sketchE (05/01/2015) [-]
yes theres inflation and other things but the point is we are really lucky we arent payign so much more for games. NES games were 50 a game. switching to cds dropped costs and allowed better games but that requires bigger teamsand so much more
User avatar #136 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
Alright, so if development costs so much then why are video game companies reporting record breaking profits? Obviously video games are still massively profitable or these budgets would have crashed by now. You keep talking about how development costs are higher, but have yet to show how that correlates to lower developer profits.
User avatar #138 - sketchE (05/01/2015) [-]
games dlc subscriptions. all the things people on this site like to bitch about but gladly participate in
User avatar #142 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
You're making the assumption that those are made specifically because the company is struggling to scrape by with a profit, which is a leap of logic that doesn't hold true for the majority.
#130 - Alright, the PS2's sales just help my point.  [+] (6 new replies) 05/01/2015 on HOW TO PLAY BATTLEFRONT 2... 0
User avatar #131 - sketchE (05/01/2015) [-]
and since the ps2 game production costs have tripled yet we pay roughly the same amount for a game
User avatar #133 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
The market has gotten larger, making it easy to offset the higher production costs. There are more variables in this equation than just production costs.
User avatar #134 - sketchE (05/01/2015) [-]
yes theres inflation and other things but the point is we are really lucky we arent payign so much more for games. NES games were 50 a game. switching to cds dropped costs and allowed better games but that requires bigger teamsand so much more
User avatar #136 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
Alright, so if development costs so much then why are video game companies reporting record breaking profits? Obviously video games are still massively profitable or these budgets would have crashed by now. You keep talking about how development costs are higher, but have yet to show how that correlates to lower developer profits.
User avatar #138 - sketchE (05/01/2015) [-]
games dlc subscriptions. all the things people on this site like to bitch about but gladly participate in
User avatar #142 - nathanbiggs (05/01/2015) [-]
You're making the assumption that those are made specifically because the company is struggling to scrape by with a profit, which is a leap of logic that doesn't hold true for the majority.

user's channels

Join Subscribe animemanga

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1500
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #9 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
stickied by nathanbiggs
**** you
#13 - jackmaccone ONLINE (11/01/2014) [-]
hey, sorry to ambush you that hard but i saw in a content that you own a xbox one too.    
 I wanted to ask that you can maybe accept my friends request on xbox so we can play together
hey, sorry to ambush you that hard but i saw in a content that you own a xbox one too.
I wanted to ask that you can maybe accept my friends request on xbox so we can play together
User avatar #14 to #13 - nathanbiggs (11/01/2014) [-]
Yea, why not. What's your gamertag?
User avatar #15 to #14 - jackmaccone ONLINE (11/01/2014) [-]
JackMaccone
User avatar #16 to #15 - nathanbiggs (11/01/2014) [-]
Alright, I just added you.
#8 - angryturnip (02/05/2012) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image posted in comment #560 at Trolling 2 **
**angryturnip rolled a random image posted in comment #560 at Trolling 2 **
#4 - angryturnip (09/14/2011) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image** <--- You.
#5 to #4 - angryturnip (09/14/2011) [-]
**angryturnip rolled a random image** That made no sense. Let's try it again.
#3 - angryturnip (09/03/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #2 - igotsunshineinabag (07/09/2011) [-]
its onnnn
User avatar #1 - angryturnip (06/07/2011) [-]
I popped your profile comments cherry, ho.
 Friends (0)