Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

mummyslittlebitch    

Rank #3163 on Comments
mummyslittlebitch Avatar Level 306 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Offline
Send mail to mummyslittlebitch Block mummyslittlebitch Invite mummyslittlebitch to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/28/2012
Last Login:8/29/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#3163
Highest Content Rank:#2193
Highest Comment Rank:#609
Content Thumbs: 2098 total,  2189 ,  91
Comment Thumbs: 11416 total,  13244 ,  1828
Content Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 120 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 121 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 54% (54/100)
Level 306 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 307 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:0
Content Views:73047
Times Content Favorited:59 times
Total Comments Made:1870
FJ Points:12755

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 68678
    Thumbs Up 2157 Thumbs Down 87 Total: +2070
    Comments: 145
    Favorites: 57
    Uploaded: 02/05/13
    Riften Riften
  • Views: 2463
    Thumbs Up 20 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +16
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/23/13
    Triple Double Sextbles Triple Double Sextbles
  • Views: 1594
    Thumbs Up 12 Thumbs Down 0 Total: +12
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 03/17/13
    She has heard you She has heard you

latest user's comments

#107 - "I had taken the words out of his mouth . . . an… 3 hours ago on Story Time +1
#35 - It looks fine. It's black text with white outline and further …  [+] (1 new reply) 17 hours ago on Worst Job 2 + The... +6
User avatar #37 - devilofscience (16 hours ago) [-]
He didn't say hard to read he said hard on the eyes, i.e. I had no problem reading it but right now my eyes feel a little weird and I'd rather not have to go through that again.
#60 - . . . Anita Sarkeesian is no different. She has no research, o…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/27/2014 on Based jontron. 0
#143 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
Here are the six academic studies I mentioned, to be found at the site I linked in #140:
1. Sexual Priming, Gender Stereotyping, and Likelihood to Sexually Harass: Examining the Cognitive Effects of Playing a Sexually-Explicit Video Game
2. Effects of exposure to sex-stereotyped video game characters on tolerance of sexual harassment
3. Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others
4. The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars
5. The Afterglow of Construct Accessibility: The Behavioral Consequences of Priming Men to View Women as Sexual Objects
6. Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation
Also highly relevant: How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Seeing Through Media Influence by Karen E. Dill, www.amazon.com/How-Fantasy-Becomes-Reality-Influence/dp/0195372085/

That's fine research.
#59 - Watch the video. It's just her commentating over stuff and cha…  [+] (4 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Based jontron. +2
#140 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
Do you, by any chance, happen to know an individual by the name "thunderf00t"..? Go to this page: www.feministfrequency.com/2014/06/women-as-background-decoration-tropes-vs-women/ Click all of the links under "LINKS & RESOURCES". You will find among them an article from "Psychology Today", the highly relevant book "How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Seeing Through Media Influence" by Karen E. Dill (foot refers to it as "just some book"), and after the Kuchera-blog no less than SIX academic studies.

This illustrates the problem people outside our circles have: They don't have a liar spoonfeed bullshit to them. They use their own brain, look with their own eyes. Also, they don't believe that if you can kill NPCs in a game, it's some kind of bug or glitch, they know it's intended by the developers.
#141 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
...continued...

> Videogames may often be tasteless and they may often be sexual and violent.

Yes, yes indeed. And Sarkeesian is criticising the way women are depicted and treated. There is nothing wrong about that, she is not making that up, it's a fact, and if you give a shit, you should just say "I give a shit" or if you like that, "I like that". But to say she would be dishonest and could not be taken seriously, you're either dishonest or misinformed, and in both cases cannot be taken seriously.
User avatar #60 - mummyslittlebitch (08/27/2014) [-]
. . . Anita Sarkeesian is no different. She has no research, or facts to back up her claims. What she has are shocking images and clips that she has clumsily edited together and then talked over dramatically. She doesn't care about context. She doesn't even care if the game is set as a period piece or in some other setting that might be violent or unpleasant.

Anita Sarkeesian does not care about freedom of expression. She doesn't care about much of anything except finding a way to fit the whole world into her narrow ideology.
#143 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
Here are the six academic studies I mentioned, to be found at the site I linked in #140:
1. Sexual Priming, Gender Stereotyping, and Likelihood to Sexually Harass: Examining the Cognitive Effects of Playing a Sexually-Explicit Video Game
2. Effects of exposure to sex-stereotyped video game characters on tolerance of sexual harassment
3. Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others
4. The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars
5. The Afterglow of Construct Accessibility: The Behavioral Consequences of Priming Men to View Women as Sexual Objects
6. Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation
Also highly relevant: How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Seeing Through Media Influence by Karen E. Dill, www.amazon.com/How-Fantasy-Becomes-Reality-Influence/dp/0195372085/

That's fine research.
#23 - Picture 08/27/2014 on She knows how to ride 0
#38 - Have a pity green thumb 08/27/2014 on Based jontron. +1
#36 - DUDE. An old friend of mine just posted this video on facebook…  [+] (8 new replies) 08/27/2014 on Based jontron. +12
User avatar #51 - raynagrimm (08/27/2014) [-]
it's starting to become like westboro baptist. like its a new (shitty) religion
im not saying all religion is bad,
but this is like a SJW+femanazi inquisition
#48 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
People just don't know that Sarkeesian's stuff is just a collection of lies. So they actually look at the videos, listen to what's being said and process that with their own mind and own reason. Instead of telling them "hey, don't take this seriously" and "hey, this is dishonest", you should tell them to spend 2 hours per day on FJ and sites alike, have their brain spammed with anti-feminist-slogans and give up thinking for themselves.

I'm still working on it, though, not totally there yet. Could you help me out and tell me a couple of things from the video that are dishonest and cannot be taken seriously..?
User avatar #59 - mummyslittlebitch (08/27/2014) [-]
Watch the video. It's just her commentating over stuff and characterizing it to draw her own version of what's happening, and talking like it's immutable fact. I'll just post what I posted on fb:

She went out of her way to kill random NPCs who happened to be women and then talked about the tantalizing invitation to violate women specifically designed by the developers. Really, she just sucks at playing videogames, and then commentated over footage of it to instill outrage. Apart from GTA V perhaps (and it's GTA; you know what you're getting into when you play it), murdering scantily clad female NPCs is not incentivized in games. There is definitely a lot of sexualization of women in videogames. There is definitely a lot of violence in videogames. Without the violence there wouldn't be much to do in the videogame. There is certainly a cross-over of those two. What there is not, is a deliberate fetishization of death. Anita Sarkeesian and her ilk make a living by manufacturing outrage and drawing easy lines between things to purport their ideology.

Videogames may often be tasteless and they may often be sexual and violent. They are not indicative of reality, and I can't believe people still have to stress that. There was Tipper Gore in the 80s trying to censor music, the media trying to blame suicide on death metal, Columbine on videogames, and every school shooting ever since, blah blah blah. It never adds up. It's always refuted by hard facts and common sense. The news media, and other people who make their money off of never ceasing to talk about stuff, like to create sensationalism . . .
#140 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
Do you, by any chance, happen to know an individual by the name "thunderf00t"..? Go to this page: www.feministfrequency.com/2014/06/women-as-background-decoration-tropes-vs-women/ Click all of the links under "LINKS & RESOURCES". You will find among them an article from "Psychology Today", the highly relevant book "How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Seeing Through Media Influence" by Karen E. Dill (foot refers to it as "just some book"), and after the Kuchera-blog no less than SIX academic studies.

This illustrates the problem people outside our circles have: They don't have a liar spoonfeed bullshit to them. They use their own brain, look with their own eyes. Also, they don't believe that if you can kill NPCs in a game, it's some kind of bug or glitch, they know it's intended by the developers.
#141 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
...continued...

> Videogames may often be tasteless and they may often be sexual and violent.

Yes, yes indeed. And Sarkeesian is criticising the way women are depicted and treated. There is nothing wrong about that, she is not making that up, it's a fact, and if you give a shit, you should just say "I give a shit" or if you like that, "I like that". But to say she would be dishonest and could not be taken seriously, you're either dishonest or misinformed, and in both cases cannot be taken seriously.
User avatar #60 - mummyslittlebitch (08/27/2014) [-]
. . . Anita Sarkeesian is no different. She has no research, or facts to back up her claims. What she has are shocking images and clips that she has clumsily edited together and then talked over dramatically. She doesn't care about context. She doesn't even care if the game is set as a period piece or in some other setting that might be violent or unpleasant.

Anita Sarkeesian does not care about freedom of expression. She doesn't care about much of anything except finding a way to fit the whole world into her narrow ideology.
#143 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
Here are the six academic studies I mentioned, to be found at the site I linked in #140:
1. Sexual Priming, Gender Stereotyping, and Likelihood to Sexually Harass: Examining the Cognitive Effects of Playing a Sexually-Explicit Video Game
2. Effects of exposure to sex-stereotyped video game characters on tolerance of sexual harassment
3. Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others
4. The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars
5. The Afterglow of Construct Accessibility: The Behavioral Consequences of Priming Men to View Women as Sexual Objects
6. Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation
Also highly relevant: How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Seeing Through Media Influence by Karen E. Dill, www.amazon.com/How-Fantasy-Becomes-Reality-Influence/dp/0195372085/

That's fine research.
#41 - thecrayzeeman (08/27/2014) [-]
There is no use in fighting zealots. They're too far up their own ass to realize they're infact wrong.
#67 - These stories are so ******* fake I can't even . …  [+] (3 new replies) 08/26/2014 on A short story about CARLOS -7
#105 - mossjesus (08/26/2014) [-]
pretty much exactly this happened to me like two weeks ago,not as much blood and shit,but thats cuz i nipped it in the bud with a lawyer
User avatar #91 - solarisofcelestia (08/26/2014) [-]
That thumb was out of mercy.
User avatar #86 - garyhasmorebadges (08/26/2014) [-]
no u
#149 - Dorms at a high school? What?  [+] (1 new reply) 08/26/2014 on Feminazi story part 1 -2
User avatar #159 - ninjahitman (08/26/2014) [-]
He said his parents live overseas, so I'm guessing that's why he lives in a dorm.
#97 - Picture 08/26/2014 on Trigger Warning 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe 4chan
Join Subscribe skyrim
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #10 - wickkles (08/20/2014) [-]
Hey, **** you guy.
User avatar #9 - Byte (06/25/2014) [-]
Moose boldly holds
ground. SUV acquires
fresh retread fur patch.
User avatar #7 - darksideofthebeast (05/27/2014) [-]
Get ready for colored text, faget
User avatar #6 - nought (05/27/2014) [-]
nice comments
#4 - anonymous (09/24/2013) [-]
******* faggot
#8 to #4 - anonymous (06/08/2014) [-]
xdf
 Friends (0)