Upload
Login or register

mrtwilightsparkle

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:12/16/2011
Last Login:9/20/2016
Stats
Content Thumbs: 762 total,  919 ,  157
Comment Thumbs: 3608 total,  4526 ,  918
Content Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 63 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 64 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 6% (6/100)
Level 232 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Content Views:50603
Times Content Favorited:24 times
Total Comments Made:1458
FJ Points:3872

latest user's comments

#22 - Please don't curse yourself with that show. The book series wa…  [+] (4 replies) 07/16/2014 on Thank you so much 0
User avatar
#63 - hydraetis (07/16/2014) [-]
I thought the show was great
User avatar
#108 - mrtwilightsparkle (07/17/2014) [-]
It's kinda like Eragon. It's alright when you watch it, but then you read the books and cringe.
User avatar
#24 - thingexplain (07/16/2014) [-]
Actually, it's "Wizard's First Rule."
User avatar
#107 - mrtwilightsparkle (07/17/2014) [-]
Oh, thanks. haven't read the books for a few years.
#23 - Note how all of these women could still be seen as attractive,…  [+] (1 reply) 07/16/2014 on yes +1
User avatar
#32 - novus (07/16/2014) [-]
You are right for sure. I think though that it's more about different (healthy) body types should be found attractive, as every person has a different skeletal size. Morbidly obese people are not at a healthy weight. Healthy people should ideally be attractive, regardless of their skeletal size, because mate selection should be about overall health.

If you notice in the picture, although some girls are thicker than others, none are thicker than their frame should dictate.
#445 - For future reference, I would suggest not overthinking a joke …  [+] (1 reply) 07/16/2014 on God 0
User avatar
#446 - revanmal (07/16/2014) [-]
Doesn't strike me as much of a joke so much as an inspirational thing.
#23 - Are you going for a giggle comment here, or are you going for …  [+] (3 replies) 07/15/2014 on God +4
User avatar
#189 - revanmal (07/15/2014) [-]
I'm pointing out the obvious logical problem in this picture. If God's goal is to protect this guy, then he failed. An omnipotent deity would be able to block every rock, no matter what. The fact that he apologizes also means it was a mistake, and God is supposed to be perfect and not make mistakes.

This cartoon is flawed on a logical level, regardless of any religious leanings one might have.
User avatar
#445 - mrtwilightsparkle (07/16/2014) [-]
For future reference, I would suggest not overthinking a joke to that degree.
User avatar
#446 - revanmal (07/16/2014) [-]
Doesn't strike me as much of a joke so much as an inspirational thing.