Click to expand
Rank #12377 on CommentsLevel 228 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to mrsexmuffins Block mrsexmuffins Invite mrsexmuffins to be your friend flag avatar
|Last status update:|| |
|Consoles Owned:||PC, Xbox, 3DS|
|Date Signed Up:||1/31/2013|
|Funnyjunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#6293|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#1955|
|Content Thumbs:||60 total, 92 , 32|
|Comment Thumbs:||3093 total, 3393 , 300|
|Content Level Progress:|| 83.05% (49/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 31% (31/100) |
Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
|Times Content Favorited:||3 times|
|Total Comments Made:||818|
latest user's comments
|#27 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||03/28/2015 on Shaving||+1|
|#827 - thank u advice man||03/28/2015 on Mods cheer you up!||0|
|#826 - Picture||03/28/2015 on Mods cheer you up!||+1|
|#706 - I've already jacked off twice today and I wont be able to get … [+] (6 new replies)||03/27/2015 on Mods cheer you up!||0|
|#242 - Just giving my two cents here, but from a vegetarians point of… [+] (10 new replies)||03/24/2015 on Vegan||+11|
#269 - sirowlington (03/24/2015) [-]
Let me add something to that. From a food chain perspective, we are actually well below tigers, sharks and a number of other apex predators. Without some serious weaponry that was developed over the course of dozens of generations, we would stand little chance against them.
But hey, props for presenting your opinion in a non-dickwad way. That might actually get people to think. Some vegans are just so vicious about it... I don't think anyone wants to let themselves be convinced by_ them_.
#276 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/24/2015) [-]
#280 - sirowlington (03/24/2015) [-]
Sure we do. And we certainly have the capacity to make all those apex predators extinct if we would desire so.
But put a naked man and a naked tiger somewhere out into the wilderness. Who eats who? Without our weapons and the labor previous generations, individually, humans are quite weak. Count all the people you have ever met in your life. How many of them know how to make a bow or spear? To make a fire without modern firemaking tools? To find food, even if we're not being hunted? Sure, the current state humanity has developed into has given us power. But we depend on it entirely.
#289 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/24/2015) [-]
Not only that, but humans are social hunters, not solitary like tigers. If you pit a single wolf versus a buffalo then it will probably get its shit kicked in and die while a pack of wolves would take down that same buffalo without much issue. Humans are the same way; we use our superior intelligence and group tactics to take down prey, so you took out another part of the equation that makes us such efficient hunters compared to the rest of the world's predators.
#291 - sirowlington (03/24/2015) [-]
Pointless? I'm just making a comparison with the conditions of what naturally is a part of the body. Survival of the fittest, which within the parameters of my comparison, is a one on one confrontation.
Something as simple as an asteroid impact could wipe out most life on earth's surface and yet microbes living on geothermal energy at the seafloor would survive. That would make them the better species. You're rather quick to jump to the conclusion that I'm not good at thinking. I don't think we're operating on the same wavelength here.
#336 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/25/2015) [-]
>Survival of the fittest, which within the parameters of my comparison, is a one on one confrontation.
Well that's all well and good, but that's not how natural selection through survival of the fittest works in the slightest. You can't change the definition of the term just to suit your own argument.
You are not good at thinking. You may be intelligent, but you lack the capacity to actually examine your own erroneous argument to see how painfully flawed it is, which means that you have poor reasoning ability. You are saying that a species of relatively weak social pack hunters which use intelligence to overcome their prey/opponents is inferior to a powerful, solitary hunter when in a one on one contest with the former stripped of their tools that are integral to their success as a species. It's true, but it's not an accurate comparison. If you remove the bacteria from that thermal vent to a nice sunny meadow then they would all die and the species would go extinct. Would that make us the better species in that case? No, because we removed them from the situation in which they had their unique advantage, just as you tossing a lone, naked, unarmed human against a tiger would be removed from their advantage. Are you seeing how dumb this is now?
#284 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/24/2015) [-]
|#85 - You're saying guitars shouldn't sound like that because that's… [+] (2 new replies)||03/22/2015 on good morning sinners||+1|
|#119 - I love Bo Burnham||03/12/2015 on This shit makes me sick||0|
|#310 - **** man I was about to go jack off. I fear I may …||03/11/2015 on Yeah art||0|
|#7 - Well, you did||02/28/2015 on real life cinderella||0|
|#99 - Picture||02/28/2015 on She's cute||+5|