Click to expand
Rank #15119 on CommentsLevel 228 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to mrevitcartta Block mrevitcartta Invite mrevitcartta to be your friend flag avatar
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||10/08/2011|
|Funnyjunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#881|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#3077|
|Content Thumbs:||6660 total, 7183 , 523|
|Comment Thumbs:||3150 total, 4513 , 1363|
|Content Level Progress:|| 59% (59/100) |
Level 166 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 167 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
|Comment Level Progress:|| 56% (56/100) |
Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
|Times Content Favorited:||364 times|
|Total Comments Made:||1543|
- Views: 47559The Conch has Spoken!
2885 142 Total: +2743
- Views: 37382Truth.
1970 71 Total: +1899
- Views: 11018Phil. . .
553 17 Total: +536
- Views: 15751Please make this movie
511 41 Total: +470
- Views: 11925Wow. just wow.
330 20 Total: +310
- Views: 2280Highschool reunions rule!
77 1 Total: +76
- Views: 1242Summary of the entire bible in 2...
19 5 Total: +14
- Views: 997Quadruplets
7 4 Total: +3
- Views: 684Cruel Cruel moon. . .
4 1 Total: +3
- Views: 590One sick SOB
4 2 Total: +2
- Views: 634Anyone remember this?
5 7 Total: -2
latest user's comments
|#28 - The worst that ever happened to me was during my first job as …||7 hours ago on A prestigious field||0|
|#49 - I really hope you aren't implying that we shouldn't have laws … [+] (1 new reply)||19 hours ago on Injecting 420 Marijuanas||+1|
#73 - lean (18 hours ago) [-]
There are different classifications of laws. If you want to stick a needle in your arm- go for it. where it becomes wrong morally is if you want to stick one in my arm. Prohibiting the sale and possession of drugs is purely a scare/ control tactic. They believe that fear of being caught is enough to dissuade people from trying drugs. Not true. On top of that, drug laws almost unilaterally affect the poor much harder than people of means. How often do you hear of celebrities, even those outspoken against drug laws, getting caught/ punished/ imprisoned?
Anyway- some laws are in place to protect others' rights, and some laws are in place to control yours. Plus it is a double standard that I can go to a bar and drain my bank account every day until I die of liver failure, but I can't bump a line off a stripper's ass in my own home.
|#46 - Snoop did an interview on SiriusXM Backspin and they were talk…||19 hours ago on Injecting 420 Marijuanas||+2|
|#19 - Worse than unsolicited dick pics? Imagine waking up one mornin… [+] (26 new replies)||03/02/2015 on Tumblr comp 11||+5|
#79 - anonexplains (21 hours ago) [-]
She's mass distributing it. Sure they sent it to her, but spreading it is illegal as fuck
#132 - twofreegerbils (17 hours ago) [-]
>and you assume the exact opposite with absolutely 0 proof
>you are not as intelligent as you (quite obviously) think you are
>you're not even acknowledging the fact that what he did was far worse
Why are you wasting my time? Felonies are felonies, no matter the justification or whether or not they are deserved.
#133 - therealfell (17 hours ago) [-]
of course, it's ALL irrelevant right
all of it
throw the girl (child) in jail for doing what children do.
ignore the actions of the boy because boys will be boys
in fact, you're wasting your own time
you chose to reply to me
you chose to keep replying
you have a way of blaming the wrong people, don't you
#134 - twofreegerbils (17 hours ago) [-]
>throw the girl (child) in jail for doing what children do.
What the children do? What's that? Keep nude pictures of her and use them to extort her?
I don't remember reading anything about that. Maybe you know more about this situation than I do?
If you commit a felony then you will go to jail for a felony if you're prosecuted. IT IS COMPLETELY. ABSOLUTELY. UNEQUIVOCALLY. IRRELEVANT whether or not the boys were committing a felony by sending her the pictures in the first place, SOLICITED OR UNSOLICITED. IRRELEVANT.
She independently chose to keep them and catalog them (possession of child pornography), send them to other people (distribution of child pornography), and use them as blackmail to get other boys to do what she wants (extortion).
Get it in your head, you fucking degenerate. And learn how to communicate, you type like you're 11 years old.
#135 - therealfell (17 hours ago) [-]
to be quite honest, I don't see how keeping a text sent to you would be considered a felony
"oh, I was holding onto it as proof that HE sent it to ME without me asking for it"
there. bam. not illegal.
she didn't send them to other people in the sense that she was sending them to her friends and shit. she literally just sent them to the guy's family. to show them what he's done. not so illegal. he's the one distributing child pornography.
it doesn't matter if it's his dick, he's committing a crime.
#136 - twofreegerbils (17 hours ago) [-]
>it doesn't matter if it's his dick, he's committing a crime.
I love how you continue to conveniently ignore the fact that she is extorting her peers, which is still illegal, even if nothing else she did regarding child pornography is illegal.
>to be quite honest, I don't see how keeping a text sent to you would be considered a felony
It wouldn't be, but it sounds to me like she is saving these photos or keeping them secure somehow. Also cataloged with the name of the sender, somehow. If this was not the case, then that would mean she has 70+ open text conversations on her phone. Plus, the pictures will automatically delete after a certain period of time on most phones.
There is a possibility that could be the case, but I see it as highly unlikely. It can't be proven either way.
But on the much more likely scenario where she is saving the pictures, then it is possession of child pornography. For example. If someone sends you an email with CP in it, you have done nothing wrong. Until you save the CP to your hard drive to keep.
But, lets say she didn't save the pictures. She's still committing extortion. And you are still ignoring this fact.
|#17 - I dont get the papa smurf one. [+] (2 new replies)||03/02/2015 on Tumblr comp 11||+10|
|#128 - People acknowledge Frank Zappa is a twat though. A cool twat, … [+] (1 new reply)||03/02/2015 on Mahatma Gandhi (OC)||0|
|#106 - Just as scary: Home with company and the toilet seats warm.||03/02/2015 on Short horror stories||+1|
|#16 - I never followed Dragon Ball or anything about it, I want to w… [+] (6 new replies)||02/28/2015 on Dragon Ball Comp: Goku||0|
#32 - aggronlover (03/02/2015) [-]
Other than the manga canonical Battle of Gods, the only movies that can be placed in the timeline are the first Cooler movie, the first Broly movie and the Bojack movie. These don't outright contradict the manga and could be considered canon to the anime series alone In fact, one Daishenzuu issue considered Cooler's movie Canon . They are an enjoyable watch, so give it a try
#30 - anonexplains (02/28/2015) [-]
most of the movies are like filler that have no real placement in the DBZ timeline
|#187 - Well, I wish I hadnt seen the pony scat one. But to be honest …||02/26/2015 on Cringe Comp 7: Return of...||0|
|#45 - Where can I watch the anime? [+] (1 new reply)||02/26/2015 on When people call Anime...||0|