Upload
Login or register

monkeybrains

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:8/06/2010
Location:New Jersey
Stats
Comment Ranking:#1763
Highest Content Rank:#437
Highest Comment Rank:#377
Content Thumbs: 23216 total,  26175 ,  2959
Comment Thumbs: 27528 total,  29020 ,  1492
Content Level Progress: 9.9% (99/1000)
Level 222 Content: Mind Blower → Level 223 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 88% (880/1000)
Level 323 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:9
Content Views:907292
Times Content Favorited:2772 times
Total Comments Made:3821
FJ Points:45835

Text Posts

  • Views: 81123
    Thumbs Up 3919 Thumbs Down 166 Total: +3753
    Comments: 573
    Favorites: 480
    Uploaded: 12/27/11
    Full of Ordinary People Full of Ordinary People
  • Views: 48741
    Thumbs Up 1930 Thumbs Down 68 Total: +1862
    Comments: 115
    Favorites: 121
    Uploaded: 12/27/11
    Hard Times Hard Times
  • Views: 51479
    Thumbs Up 1730 Thumbs Down 139 Total: +1591
    Comments: 165
    Favorites: 377
    Uploaded: 12/27/11
    wat wat
  • Views: 59816
    Thumbs Up 1949 Thumbs Down 390 Total: +1559
    Comments: 94
    Favorites: 100
    Uploaded: 07/20/12
    Zombies! Zombies!
  • Views: 50828
    Thumbs Up 1623 Thumbs Down 148 Total: +1475
    Comments: 222
    Favorites: 75
    Uploaded: 12/27/11
    Yes It Does Yes It Does
  • Views: 39304
    Thumbs Up 1508 Thumbs Down 76 Total: +1432
    Comments: 61
    Favorites: 91
    Uploaded: 12/06/12
    Buzz Buzz Buzz Buzz
First2[ 7 ]

HD Gifs / WebMs

  • Views: 10511
    Thumbs Up 120 Thumbs Down 34 Total: +86
    Comments: 19
    Favorites: 23
    Uploaded: 07/22/15
    Mind Break Mind Break
First2[ 7 ]
  • Views: 50070
    Thumbs Up 1907 Thumbs Down 235 Total: +1672
    Comments: 231
    Favorites: 179
    Uploaded: 06/05/12
    How an AK-47 fires. How an AK-47 fires.
  • Views: 45805
    Thumbs Up 827 Thumbs Down 97 Total: +730
    Comments: 136
    Favorites: 41
    Uploaded: 02/18/13
    Tokyo Drifting Tokyo Drifting
  • Views: 33023
    Thumbs Up 728 Thumbs Down 103 Total: +625
    Comments: 136
    Favorites: 67
    Uploaded: 01/08/13
    When I showed my friends Katawa Shoujo When I showed my friends Katawa...
  • Views: 1295
    Thumbs Up 28 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +21
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 07/14/11
    GENIUS GENIUS
First2[ 7 ]

latest user's comments

#32 - Music source on the 3rd one?  [+] (1 reply) 22 hours ago on Maymaytrix #4 0
User avatar
#69 - valigar (18 hours ago) [-]
Rome Total War
#85 - SUPLEX CITY  [+] (3 replies) 09/28/2016 on I just like pulling levers +14
User avatar
#94 - sullykid (09/28/2016) [-]
sauce?
User avatar
#121 - aerius (09/28/2016) [-]
symphogear season 3
#89 - exceeding (09/28/2016) [-]
EVERYBODY IS GONNA GET SMASHED
#16 - There's a military term known as a force multiplier. Objects o…  [+] (1 reply) 09/27/2016 on Epic Fights. +25
User avatar
#76 - donatelo (09/27/2016) [-]
this is also substantiated by the fact that sauran considered gondor and minis tirith some of the bigger/stronger threats strongholds
#4 - Korean War ain't over. Vietnam was a political loss but we won…  [+] (46 replies) 09/25/2016 on nam +88
User avatar
#58 - vladi (09/25/2016) [-]
The goal in Vietnam was to keep the North from taken over the whole country. And we all know how that went. Ergo, loss for the Ameicans. Military isn't the only way to win a war y'know.
#82 - toohntown (09/25/2016) [-]
I would still classify it as a political loss as he said since the US pulled out not because of north vietnam but because of a large movement from within the US
User avatar
#98 - vladi (09/26/2016) [-]
A loss is a loss bro.
#40 - thenelly (09/25/2016) [-]
I would have to say due to not being there to conquer but to kill certain people we won. Completely demolished the standing army of Iraq and Afghanistan till all that was left were hit and runs. If we wanted total war we would just glass the place, but that's not what it was about.
User avatar
#26 - natobro (09/25/2016) [-]
Grenada?
User avatar
#13 - herecomesjohnny (09/25/2016) [-]
you can't rate the afghanistan conflict before it's even over
#10 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
maybe the reason you won the "military battles" was because your opponents were literally rice farmes armed with hand-me-down guns whereas the US had fucking tanks, ships and airforces.

you can easily compare the incompetence of the US military from back then to their incompetence in the middle east today..
seriously, you've been in the middle east for over a decade and you still haven't won and your enemies are literally sand niggers who worship a pedophile, what the absolute fuck is taking you so long!?...
even world war 2 didn't last that long.
#61 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
Yep the NVA and VC were just dirt farmers with guns made out of ply wood and lead pipes. Totally not a nation armed and trained by foriegn interests in the area.
User avatar
#68 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
still nowhere near the prowess the USA was capable of mustering.
#70 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
>I am retarded and don't understand how warfare works
You know we couldn't bring the full force of the entire US military to vietnam if we wanted to right? The infastructure isn't there and the type of warfare wouldn't allow for the usage of what our military was currenty designed around doing (defending europe against possible Russian attack). Bringing the entire force of the US military into vietnam would have escalated the war into what happened with Korea. IF we for whatever reason wanted to commit political suicide we did have the capability to glass every city in north vietnam.

And as is we left with our mission complete. North and South Vietnam had a peace treaty and we war was over in 1973. The issue is that when the North broke the treaty in 1975 our new president was a pussy and refused to hold up our end and return to defend the South.

If you really think that the US lost engagements and battles regularly in Vietnam then you probably need to reread whatever history book you have for why we didn't continue it, it wasn't due to any lack of ability to destroy them (see Tet Offensive).
User avatar
#73 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
that's a pretty defeatist attitude you're displaying there.. i am seeing excuses as to why its apparently impossible to invade a country like Vietnam despite being a super power like America, but i see no actual reasons why that is so.

and don't give me that "guardian of Europe" bullshit.
you just wanted to make sure that if Europe fell, you'd get to control whatever's left of it.

when i read all the defeatist rhetoric that you post here, it looks to me more and more like you shouldn't even have gone in there in the first place... which begs the question; why did you go in there?... because muh communism?... what was the reason?
#76 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
What fucking defeatist attitude? We wipeed the floor with them from a military perspective. We shouldn't have gone into it for the reason that the Soviets shouldn't have gone into Afghanistan and the Romans shouldn't have gone into Britian. These are repeating trends with powerful nations will go into a war against a technically disadvantaged nation then lose politically despite demolishing them militarily due to low moral.

What do you mean no guardian of Europe shit? Even if we are just there to make sure we get land in case of a war we still have to have a significant portion of our military dedicated purely to that defense and unable to be deployed to Vietnam.

All you posted is questions wanting more explaination without any actual counterpoint of your own. And you know why we went into the war, to secure a ally within south east Asia where we had none. Why would we ever let an ideology that is currently on the brink of full nuclear war with us grow larger if we can stop it?
User avatar
#78 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
"what defeatist attitude?"

>You know we couldn't bring the full force of the entire US military to vietnam if we wanted to right?
>The infastructure isn't there and the type of warfare wouldn't allow for the usage of what our military was currenty designed around doing
>Bringing the entire force of the US military into vietnam would have escalated the war into what happened with Korea
>If you really think that the US lost engagements and battles regularly in Vietnam then you probably need to reread whatever history book you have for why we didn't continue it, it wasn't due to any lack of ability to destroy them

All of this.

You wiped the floor with them?... you guys ended up retreating from there, claiming victory without actually winning, how the fuck does that make sense?...

"These are repeating trends with powerful nations will go into a war against a technically disadvantaged nation then lose politically despite demolishing them militarily due to low moral. "

So what you're saying here... is that the handicapped kid in class ended up beating you chads while they were using crutches?

"Why would we ever let an ideology that is currently on the brink of full nuclear war with us grow larger if we can stop it?"

because, as evidence suggests; you couldn't stop it. because you didn't actually defeat them

#80 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
Forcing a peace treaty in 1973 isn't victory? When we pulled out the war was over.

You seem to retarded to understand asymetric warfare and how difficult it is to wage jungle warfare against a much more driven insurgent force.

If you want to call 58000 dead to over a million enemies killed and a peace treaty forced a lose then I don't know what you want as a victory.
User avatar
#85 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
a complete takeover will do... as far as my understanding goes, that was the intention from the start, wasn't it?... that failed, and you took whatever scraps you could pick up from your complete failure and called it a victory "guess we'll have to settle for piece guys" *whole room goes "awwwww" in disappointment*

we all know you're very unhappy with the results you got in nam. i mean for crying out loud if you're trying to hide how butthurt you are that you didn't actually defeat them then you're doing a terrible job at it... i mean look at your old conservatives, they constantly moan and complain that you 'could have done better in vietnam' trying to justify another invasion like some alzheimer patient would... i mean come on dude, its pretty god damn obvious that no american politicians who are also war mongers are satisfied with the outcome.
#63 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
Definitely had no tanks.
User avatar
#75 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
sigh alright, they had some tanks... given to them by China and Russia, but like i said, they had nowhere near the arsenal that the US had at its disposal.

if you guys had been smart about it you could have just starved them out by dropping the napalm on their forests and farms instead of on the people who lived there... you could have blocked all the trade routes... you could have defeated them with minimal losses if you just used the good old "we'll smoke em' out" tactic, but you chose the "gunz blazing" tactic instead.

people get desperate when they are hungry, and there is no way they could have gotten around your front lines if you just secured the bottleneck on the northern border, plopped some vessels into the eastern sea and just camped out on their western front, interrupting as many of their very miniscule supply caravans while you wait for their surrender.

but sure what do i know about war, i guess i should stfu and let the professionals who never won a real war do the warfare and go back to my lego blocks.
#83 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
Name the war that you are responible for winning. If you can't do that at least name some of the books on warfare that you have read. I've read plenty of literature on this topic and I'm pretty sure you haven't considering you don't know that US doctrine usually ment bombing everything until the enemy position is nothing but a hellscape before even trying to move infantry in.
User avatar
#87 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
pardon me, i forgot to mention i am from Denmark in the first place... forget about the google thing i said...

now this being said, of course some of those 60 wars we lost, and we lost them hard.
but hey, after 1200 years we're still around... my country has literally existed for a whole millennia whereas yours is barely 250 years old.. respect your elders.
User avatar
#86 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
phhheuuuuwe where to begin... you know what, since you're too lazy to use google i'll go ahead and do it for you
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_Denmark

here is a list of no less than 60 wars Denmark has participated in since the viking ages, and guess what: we won most of them... but you can read up on that yourself.
#88 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
I didn't say a war that your country has won. Why would I care what other people did. I want a war that you have won. The highest rated college of war in the world is in my country but you don't see me claiming to know more about war because of that. I read books and learned from reading on the topic not from where I was born.

I don't care about any nations military history I want to know what makes you think you know the first thing about warfare. What books have you read? Where were you educated? Did you serve as an officer in your military? Which one of Denmarks wars did you win seeing as you claim to know war just because of where you were born.
User avatar
#97 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
alright, now you're bordering downright immaturity.

"I didn't say a war that your country has won. Why would I care what other people did. I want a war that you have won."

i am not dignifying that retarded statement with an answer.

"The highest rated college of war in the world is in my country"

in the modern era, yea... throughout history as a whole?? keep dreaming son.

"but you don't see me claiming to know more about war because of that."

i am fairly sure everyone can scroll up a few comments and see you do exactly that... i can probably quote you if you want to further embarrass yourself. but you'll have to ask nicely as frankly i don't want to go through this wall of text-thread just to prove a point when everyone including yourself are free to do so without my help.

"I read books and learned from reading on the topic not from where I was born."

where do you get the idea that i think my knowledge about warfare is superior based on where i live?? never made such a claim and i don't recall giving that impression until you specifically asked me which countries i (or rather my host country) had won throughout the years... when gave you a source with a list of 60 examples you totally backpeddled and went full retard, as displayed above.

"I don't care about any nations military history I want to know what makes you think you know the first thing about warfare."

gaming... lots and lots of gaming... strategy games to be specific... History lessons... traveling... being red-pilled af.... and smaller details like 1200 years of experience in the category.. but what do i know right? my country doesn't currently have a super strong military so i have nothing to say on the matter.

why do you think you know the first or last thing about warfare?? i answered that same question, you should too... anything else would be hypocrisy.

"What books have you read? Where were you educated? Did you serve as an officer in your military? Which one of Denmarks wars did you win seeing as you claim to know war just because of where you were born."

1. None, zero, nill... but i still know a decent bit about warfare throughout history as a whole... i know what the franks did, i know what the saxons did, i know what the vikings did, i know what the saracens and crusaders did, i know what the goths did, i know what the romans did, i know what the gauls did, i know what the berbers, moors and frisians did among many others, and that's just the medieval part of history mind you, i certainly have knowledge about more 'modern wars' too but my main curiosity was with the medieval time period... "but Jaggsauce!" i hear you say "how could you possibly know anything about warfare without reading any books on the matter?"
Well we live in a wonderful period in human history... a period where information can be obtained through other means than just books, i don't know if you've noticed this.

2. self-taught (not claiming to be an open lexicon on the matter though, so hold your horses mate.. even the best historians can't know all details of all wars and not be wrong from time to time)

3. Yeah i served as an officer until i could get out of military service and do things that actually interested me for a job (i know it sounds weird, but i am not particularly interested in living the soldier's life)... nothing huge really.

4. that question is not gonna be dignified with an answer because you're being silly, but on that same account; which wars did YOU personally win, champ?

5. i am not claiming to know everything based on the place i was born, i was merely pointing out that my country is over a millennia old, very small, and still in existence so we must have done something right.



#64 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
Or planes.
#65 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
Or even regulars at all.
#66 - dyelfagget (09/25/2016) [-]
Just dirt farmers.
#57 - anon (09/25/2016) [-]
Chinese troops were killed too man
User avatar
#38 - anthonyd (09/25/2016) [-]
Nigga, our opponents had tanks, and helos, and anti-air missiles, and Mig-21s, and brand new Type 56 rifles.
User avatar
#17 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Its taking that long becasue its a guerilla fight, if it was a war between nation states Murica would flop them in a month tops.
Same reason why vietnam was a shitshow, noone seems to know how to effectively fight guerilla forces.
User avatar
#18 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
you could learn a thing or two from the nazies and soviets then.
they'd never let this stand even for a year, let alone over a decade, bordering 15 years.
User avatar
#19 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Might be because that genocide is rather frowned apon.
User avatar
#20 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
oh yeah??
tell that to your jew overlords because they literally practice ethnic cleansing as we speak, and the USA supports and encourages them in that effort.

also, if you're referring to the holocaust then fuck you for buying into that horseshit lie.
User avatar
#21 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Oh sorry i forgot i was in /funnypol/
User avatar
#44 - pirateseatcarrots (09/25/2016) [-]
Didn't seem to bother the U.S much in Cambodia.
User avatar
#45 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Im not familiar with cambodia, details?
User avatar
#49 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Damm talk about a carpet bombing.
#22 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
oh shit, you referenced a place on the internet commonly known for its infestation of degenerates and trolls.
i must be a stormfront faggot and the fact you point that out means you win the argument!
fucking Goyim, here have a jewgle, it can mimic your american government!
User avatar
#23 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Alright fair enough that made me laugh a bit.
But since /pol/ is so commonly infested by trolls and "degenerates" then why did you say the same they do, if you say the same as the trolls then you become the trolls.
Also what is stormfront?
User avatar
#24 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
could it be because these "trolls" you speak of aren't actually trolling, but just woke af?
hands down i have never been on reddit, 4chan, 9gag or wherever this "pol" place is located, but if they share some of my points of view it tells me they're just informed and know their shit... when i said "trolls and degenerates" i was talking about the fucktards who join the clusterfuck posing as extremist nazis for shits and giggles - effectively misrepresenting the 'real nazis' in there who are just tired as fuck of rapefugees, jews and globalism in general.

all those people you see calling for exterminations and genocide are actually the trolls, whereas people who don't give a shit about Hitler and white pride but are just concerned with the things i mentioned above are the non-trolls.

you know how a movement can be utterly fucking corrupt to the core?
look at BLM
look at feminism
hell, look at MLP faggots... even they have been infiltrated by trolls who pretend to be pedophiles and other disgusting shit just to get a response from people of the community they claim to be a part of (the MLP fags who take the fandom seriously, that is)
User avatar
#27 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Ah, a moderate nazi. never thought that possible honestly
I've never visited reddit or 4chan either, no reason to, but i certainly agree that "infiltration" of these groups is blatant, just like all groups will contain idiots. i avoid groups as a result since i dont want to be holding the same flag as someone with shit on their hands
I do however not agree with the whole jewish conspiracy and globalism being the antichrist, im tired of refugees aswell and would like to see the intake reduced.
BTW what is "woke", im not particularly hip with the kids so these slangs fly over my head
User avatar
#30 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
maybe i should have used the term "red-pilled"... "woke" is what the googles say when they talk about being informed or "red-pilled"
User avatar
#31 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
Sorry mate i have to ask again, what does "red-pilled" mean?
User avatar
#37 - jaggsauce (09/25/2016) [-]
Blue Pill or Red Pill  The Matrix 29 Movie CLIP 1999 HD

being red-pilled means you are aware of reality, and more informed on things as opposed to the average media-consuming pleb who just swallow whatever convenient 'truth' the world offers to them.

its a little hard to explain for someone with my poor vocabulary.
#35 - jaggsauce has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#36 - mrshrapnel (09/25/2016) [-]
I have yes, i think i see it now.
Enlightening someone to the not necessary real world.
User avatar
#5 - monkeybrains (09/25/2016) [-]
#123 - I like how the snow always makes the street lights brighter. W…  [+] (1 reply) 09/23/2016 on Winter +3
#134 - turbanmasher (09/23/2016) [-]
We just got LED bulbs installed in our street lights, I'm interested to see how they look in the snow.