Rank #20604 on CommentsLevel 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
OfflineSend mail to misterbatman Block misterbatman Invite misterbatman to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||11/15/2012|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#1349|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#5827|
|Content Thumbs:||5480 total, 6300 , 820|
|Comment Thumbs:||863 total, 1358 , 495|
|Content Level Progress:|| 66% (66/100) |
Level 148 Content: Faptastic → Level 149 Content: Faptastic
|Comment Level Progress:|| 80% (8/10) |
Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 175 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
|Times Content Favorited:||291 times|
|Total Comments Made:||419|
|Favorite Tags:||The Game (18) | OP (6) | Pokemon (3) | Hitler (2) | murder (2)|
latest user's comments
|#64 - Not if they were halfway skilled. Makashi is hard-countered by… [+] (4 new replies)||12/01/2014 on For all of you silly gooses||0|
#92 - misterbatman (12/01/2014) [-]
I specifically said that it was hard countered by a FV user with a crossguard. I can testify to that with real-world experience using kendo and German-style longsword fencing techniques (the inspiration for Djem So) against a skilled foil fencer/Wudang fencer (the inspiration for Makashi). Without a crossguard, a Makashi user takes an equally skilled Djem So user 8/10 times; with a crossguard, however, the Djem So user gets a nearly insurmountable advantage with the ability to catch and manipulate the other fighter's saber, turning the advantage to the Djem-So user.
|#63 - If you're even halfway skilled, you never touch the crossguard…||12/01/2014 on For all of you silly gooses||0|
|#62 - Cortosis weave, ************ [+] (1 new reply)||12/01/2014 on For all of you silly gooses||0|
#110 - johnnyiscool (12/01/2014) [-]
Okay, so the problem with that is that I can't recall that ever being mentioned in the movies. The lightsabers in the previous films clearly aren't made of it, considering lightsabers are cut in half like once per film. It's perfectly fine if that's what the new one is made of, but that material hasn't been introduced in the any of the films, at least not from what I can remember.
|#61 - Cortosis weave, ************||12/01/2014 on For all of you silly gooses||0|
|#62 - Never fired SCAR, but they look pretty sweet. [+] (3 new replies)||12/01/2014 on The sexiest gif I've ever seen||0|
|#59 - They're okay. They have nothing on the M16 or pic related, though. [+] (14 new replies)||12/01/2014 on The sexiest gif I've ever seen||0|
#120 - bazda (12/01/2014) [-]
I would say the AK is the best of the three, all things considered. M1 isn't really "modern" so I wouldn't really even compare the two.
AK is just so simple and so reliable. Not to mention battle proven by dozens of countries since 1947. More effective round, little to no maintenance required, runs well dirty, no ammo picky-ness, at around $500-$600 for a top of the line Bulgarian model. Compare to an ar where the bare minimum for the most basic model is around $600, on up to well past $1200 if you have more money than sense.
#65 - misterbatman (12/01/2014) [-]
The AK is a durable, reliable bastard, but I prefer the feel of the M16 (and I'm a better shot with it). The M1 Garand is a different animal altogether, and for a serious marksman it's a much better weapon than the AK or the M16. There's a reason Patton called it "the greatest implement of war ever made".
|#54 - ljxjlos Here you go, you freedomless kraut ****. [+] (5 new replies)||12/01/2014 on Racism||0|
#85 - misterbatman (12/01/2014) [-]
So being presented with evidence of responsible gun-owning adults exercising their rights to defend the life and property of another doesn't even make you reconsider your views in the slightest?
I'll reiterate: you're a freedomless kraut shit, and I hope I get the chance to fuck your shit personally if you guys start another World War.
#87 - misterbatman (12/01/2014) [-]
Niggers are gonna nig whether civilians can own guns or not. The rioters aren't using guns, they're using tanks of gasoline and sledgehammers to wreak their niggardry on St. Louis. If there were stricter gun control in place here, these fine people would not be any better armed than the rioting thugs and they would be ineffective at guarding the place from the slavering hordes of looters.
|#58 - **** yeah, 'pubs.||12/01/2014 on Step up your game, 1956||0|
|#52 - Only similar gifs, for my benefit as much for anyone else.||12/01/2014 on The sexiest gif I've ever seen||+2|
|#50 - You claim our document is outdated, and I'll agree. There are … [+] (4 new replies)||12/01/2014 on The sexiest gif I've ever seen||+2|
#143 - ljxjlos (12/01/2014) [-]
Also: Freedom itself is pretty much a myth. In a society like ours, with as many people on the earth as we have, it´s pretty much impossibkle to "be free". Back in the past, with 1/1000 as many people....maybe, freedom was a thing back then, when people did not have to interact with each other at such a big scale. But the more people have to interact, the more rules we have and the more rules we have, the less freedom. It´s not nice, but that´s how it is. That´s, by the way, pretty much the reason why many people deem their governments "tyrannical", too - the more people, the more international contact and interaction, the more rules. And as our world grows more intervined and multinational, the more rules are needed to keep it working - that´s how overly law-restricted societies come into existance.
#154 - misterbatman (12/01/2014) [-]
This is actually pretty much spot on, I can't argue with your thesis here. Regardless, there are human rights that are inalienable, and they are inalienable as long as there are people who believe in them fervently enough that they are willing to fight for them. If I am willing to bear arms (and die) in defense of my right to bear arms, then that right has not been taken from me, and I never lose it. As Epicurus so famously put: "Death means nothing to me, for when I am, Death has not yet come; and when Death comes, I am no longer." When I'm dead, I lose all my rights as a human anyway, so it doesn't matter that I died defending my rights.
#142 - ljxjlos (12/01/2014) [-]
If you really think that your guns are for protecting yourself against the government, you´re lying to yourself. There are two possibilities in case the government actually turns tyrannical:
a) the military isn´t on their side: In this case, the government will fail, nothing will happen and you´ll life savely even without your weapons - no to mention that no government would turn tyrannical without the support of the military.
b) the military IS on the side of the government and those who oppose are slaughtered while trying to fight against Battle-Helicopters, highly trained operatives, airplane-carriers, fighting jets, etc, etc with handguns.
In the atomic age, "safety from the government" is a myth. If you think your government is tyrannical or bad, become a politician. That´s how you change things. Or well, that how you may try to change things.
"I for one feel significantly safer knowing there are other mature, armed adults nearby." - Well, have fun with that, I´ll just stay here and feel safe because there are no mass shootings, gun-wielding niggers as opposed to black men or armed incesteous Rednecks around here and because our police are actually mentally trained on being stable enough to not shoot people.
#149 - misterbatman (12/01/2014) [-]
You're a weak, frail kraut bastard, and at the end of the day you'll see that your dependence on your government and your faith in your "mentally trained" SS police force is misplaced.
Pic fucking related.