Upload
Login or register

marinepenguin

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 20
Date Signed Up:1/24/2011
Last Login:7/24/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4480
Highest Content Rank:#647
Highest Comment Rank:#862
Content Thumbs: 11852 total,  13142 ,  1290
Comment Thumbs: 18108 total,  20830 ,  2722
Content Level Progress: 74% (74/100)
Level 206 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 207 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 31.8% (318/1000)
Level 313 Comments: Wizard → Level 314 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:5
Content Views:419495
Times Content Favorited:1126 times
Total Comments Made:15498
FJ Points:5890
Favorite Tags: facebook (3) | shit (3) | dont (2) | Gay (2) | is (2) | You (2)

latest user's comments

#30 - Saying that trump needs to tell his supporters that violence i…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/08/2016 on We need an intervention +1
User avatar
#34 - failtolawl (06/08/2016) [-]
Well if it makes your argument better then sure, that's what it means. Because to any rational person, it means that they will stop being violent if he asks, not that he is responsible for it starting.
#46140 - Picture 06/08/2016 on Fitness - muscle and... 0
#46138 - EZ curl bars are dope though bro 06/08/2016 on Fitness - muscle and... 0
#8 - “If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock …  [+] (4 new replies) 06/08/2016 on We need an intervention +29
#55 - anon (06/09/2016) [-]
that's fucking ridiculous, Trump supporters deserve the violence they get, and violent action against them should be encouraged. the same cannot be said for fellow Bernie supporters, we deserve compensation and apologies for standing up against oppression
#78 - fjkabob (06/09/2016) [-]
User avatar
#59 - turtlewithashotgun (06/09/2016) [-]
just gonna keep you at 0 for that bait
#62 - anon (06/09/2016) [-]
But he's anon, so it doesn't matter.
#5 - >Trump should take responsibility for his voters actions …  [+] (11 new replies) 06/08/2016 on We need an intervention +86
User avatar
#27 - failtolawl (06/08/2016) [-]
"Trump should take responsibility for his voters actions "

He didn't say that. Not even remotely.
#75 - anon (06/09/2016) [-]
He said its Trump's responsibility to stop the violence from his supporters. How the fuck is that not even close?
User avatar
#76 - failtolawl (06/09/2016) [-]
"responsibility"

What second was that word used?
User avatar
#30 - marinepenguin (06/08/2016) [-]
Saying that trump needs to tell his supporters that violence is not acceptable in a political environment, referencing the individuals who hit protesters, is implying that Trump is responsible for the violence and his supporters action.
User avatar
#34 - failtolawl (06/08/2016) [-]
Well if it makes your argument better then sure, that's what it means. Because to any rational person, it means that they will stop being violent if he asks, not that he is responsible for it starting.
#7 - anon (06/08/2016) [-]
Bernie was replying to the fact that Trump offered to pay the legal fees for a supporter who started a fight... So it's slightly different.
User avatar
#8 - marinepenguin (06/08/2016) [-]
“If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously,” Trump said. “Just knock the hell — I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise. I promise.”

As in, a response to already increasingly violent protesters. Personally as we've seen these constant protests against trump become more physical as time goes on, Trump saying that he'll pay legal fees for people willing to defend themselves and fight back is no problem to me.

Regardless, they're asking Trump about condoning violence when his supporters aren't the ones initiating it. There have been a few instances of Trump supporters punching protesters for little to no reason, which is wrong. But we've been seeing Bernie supporters riot and even recently assault Trump supporters en masse outside of rallies.

It's a ridiculous question, and ridiculous response considering the circumstances
#55 - anon (06/09/2016) [-]
that's fucking ridiculous, Trump supporters deserve the violence they get, and violent action against them should be encouraged. the same cannot be said for fellow Bernie supporters, we deserve compensation and apologies for standing up against oppression
#78 - fjkabob (06/09/2016) [-]
User avatar
#59 - turtlewithashotgun (06/09/2016) [-]
just gonna keep you at 0 for that bait
#62 - anon (06/09/2016) [-]
But he's anon, so it doesn't matter.
#46120 - That's definitely a decent start. 06/07/2016 on Fitness - muscle and... 0
#118398 - I'm very much on the fence with abortion, because I believe in…  [+] (16 new replies) 06/07/2016 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar
#118401 - PopcornViking (06/07/2016) [-]
its because

if you support abortion, youer anti-persuit of life
and if youre against abortion, youre anti-persuit of happiness
User avatar
#118406 - unforgivensoul (06/07/2016) [-]
Do you support abortion anytime before birth?
User avatar
#118407 - PopcornViking (06/07/2016) [-]
I think third term abortions should be socially frowned upon
But should still be legal
#118408 - unforgivensoul (06/07/2016) [-]
So you're literally telling me you think an abortion at 7 or 8 months should be legal...?
User avatar
#118409 - PopcornViking (06/07/2016) [-]
did I trigger you?

should I expect to be blocked now?
User avatar
#118413 - unforgivensoul (06/07/2016) [-]
Why are you refusing to answer the question?
User avatar
#118414 - PopcornViking (06/07/2016) [-]
cause I already answered it?
User avatar
#118415 - unforgivensoul (06/07/2016) [-]
I just don't understand...like are you trolling or something? How on Earth could you think its morally ok to kill an 8 month old baby in the womb? How on Earth is that not morally reprehensible? That's literally cold blooded murder.
#118425 - anon (06/07/2016) [-]
proxying this hard
User avatar
#118422 - PopcornViking (06/07/2016) [-]
The majority of people who get abortions are poor
The parents or parent leads a shitty life
and they most likely can barely afford to take care of themselves let alone a child
Some times desperate last minute decisions need to be made
A fetus also has almost no sentience yet
And in my personal opinion, the pursuit of happiness takes precedence in this situation

If you think its premeditated murder, then ok you can think that
#118529 - anon (06/09/2016) [-]
Ill be waiting for a reply
-lulz
#118428 - shekelnator (06/07/2016) [-]
i lost my respect of you. commit seppuku
User avatar
#118427 - rokkarokkaali (06/07/2016) [-]
can't poor people just adoption
#118426 - unforgivensoul (06/07/2016) [-]
>The majority of people who get abortions are poor
You know that's literally a lie right?
www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2008

>The parents or parent leads a shitty life and they most likely can barely afford to take care of themselves let alone a child. Some times desperate last minute decisions need to be made

That's completely irrelevant, you just used what is epitome of the most emotional argument. There is something called responsibility, even though most women who get abortions aren't even poor, that doesn't excuse it just because they are. Do you know how much of an incredibly dangerous precedent such an idea sets? Like are you even bothering to think, I'm having a hard time believing you're actually serious. We live in a society where your own actions have consequence, a baby should not have to pay its life because of the sheer idiocy of a mother who just found out at 8 months that she wants an abortion. That's absolutely insane. Not a single person on this board would back you up on this except maybe mixednuts.

>A fetus also has almost no sentience yet
You do realize by 8 months a baby can survive on its own and is ready for birth right? Like at that point the life is an actual baby, its the size of a baby. You would be literally killing a slightly smaller version of a baby except it has the umbilical cord still hooked and its wet. This is basically the only difference, you're admitting to the fact that you are ok with killing babies. You do realize that right?
#118417 - anon (06/07/2016) [-]
said the kike
User avatar
#118399 - theism (06/07/2016) [-]
I agree.
#118392 - Okay, I wanted to make sure. Because that "for" sent…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/07/2016 on Politics - politics news,... +1
User avatar
#118395 - thumbfortrump (06/07/2016) [-]
Me too. I loved how he took her by surprise and forced her to give a clear answer.
#46117 - The stretching was very slight and mainly as a way to gauge wh… 06/07/2016 on Fitness - muscle and... +1
#118390 - Did she really just admit that she was for the eradication of …  [+] (3 new replies) 06/07/2016 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar
#118391 - thumbfortrump (06/07/2016) [-]
She basically admitted it yeah. The leader of Hamas said he was happy the jews are gathered in Israel, so he won't have to hunt them down globally, basically meaning that if they were scattered, and he had the means, he would kill them all.

He asks her if she's for or against Hamas right after, to which she answers yes. I'm sure some liberal would try and twist this, but objectively she supports an organisation that wishes to exterminate jews.
User avatar
#118392 - marinepenguin (06/07/2016) [-]
Okay, I wanted to make sure. Because that "for" sent a shiver down me when I heard it.
User avatar
#118395 - thumbfortrump (06/07/2016) [-]
Me too. I loved how he took her by surprise and forced her to give a clear answer.