Upload
Login or register

marinepenguin

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:1/24/2011
Last Login:9/28/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#5058
Highest Content Rank:#647
Highest Comment Rank:#862
Content Thumbs: 11853 total,  13143 ,  1290
Comment Thumbs: 18529 total,  21282 ,  2753
Content Level Progress: 75% (75/100)
Level 206 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 207 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 73.9% (739/1000)
Level 313 Comments: Wizard → Level 314 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:5
Content Views:419708
Times Content Favorited:1122 times
Total Comments Made:16194
FJ Points:5988
Favorite Tags: facebook (3) | shit (3) | dont (2) | Gay (2) | is (2) | You (2)

latest user's comments

#126676 - Lol  [+] (3 replies) 09/15/2016 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar
#126681 - pebar (09/15/2016) [-]
Hillary bans maternity leave
feminists everywhere rejoice
women are empowered
equality is achieved
User avatar
#126682 - marinepenguin (09/15/2016) [-]
What are your thoughts on maternity leave by the way? Do you think the government should mandate businesses to give female employees paid leave for childcare? Or that government should tax the general populace to pay for such a benefit? Do you think there is a net gain in having government mandated maternity leave?
#126679 - valeriya (09/15/2016) [-]
See this is why I hate the new left.
#126622 - That's debatable. Though I would agree that it's close. What I…  [+] (4 replies) 09/14/2016 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar
#126627 - redandgreen (09/14/2016) [-]
I don't see Hillary, as much as I dislike her, looking to infringe free speech and freedom of religion (policies toward Muslim Americans), trial by jury (military tribunals for alleged terrorists), introduce 'cruel and unusual punishment' (he supports torture), proposing extra-judicial killing of civilians (proposed murder of terrorist's families)etc. etc.

The works thing I've seen of her is she apparently voted to prevent people on the no-fly list from purchasing firearms. I have issue with a no-fly list if people on it haven't been convicted of a crime but I have no issue with preventing them purchasing firearms as a condition, if they're legitimately on there.

Those governments almost always ended up there because of a significant level of popular support for a party which created an 'other' to demonise as the cause of the problems of the majority. Sound familiar?
I'm not saying he will become 'Hitler' etc. but look at his policies. They really should make you uncomfortable if you're pro-freedom and worry about an overly strong security state trampling on rights.
User avatar
#126653 - marinepenguin (09/15/2016) [-]
First of all torture has been used for intelligence purposes on our enemies by nearly every President, especially off the public scene. They don't have the right of American citizens, especially when they are enemies of the American people. Trump also never said he was going to kill the terrorists families, just that they are going to be targeted for punishments. He never specifically said he wanted to kill them.

Hillary expressly is against the 2nd Amendment for American individuals and I believe she wants to dismantle the 5th. The no-fly list option is terrible because there is no process regarding being put on the list, which would violate the 5th amendment like I stated. So you'd be made aware that your rights are wing taken away and would have to sue the government to get them back.

"Those governments almost always ended up there because of a significant level of popular support for a party which created an 'other' to demonise as the cause of the problems of the majority. Sound familiar?"
Introducing gaining political control 101, blame all your problems on the other parties and their supporters. This happens extremely often everywhere, throughout time. Difference was these nations sort of killed them when they had the chance.

Part of Trump's policy does concern me and we've talked about this a dozen times. But if you have me choose between 4-8 more years of what Obama has done, and 4-8 years of someone who's dismantling the mainstream media, renewing American patriotism and wanting stricter border control, I'm going to vote for the former every time.
#126652 - figatron (09/15/2016) [-]
there have been people on no fly lists everywhere from congressmen and senators to business officials. it's not an exhaustive list with only threats to national security on it and it's not subject to due process
User avatar
#126632 - redandgreen (09/14/2016) [-]
*worst
#126610 - Tfw big authoritarian governments killed 150 million people at…  [+] (11 replies) 09/14/2016 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#126649 - anon (09/14/2016) [-]
>I hate big authoritarian governments
>Votes Trump

WEW
#126620 - anon (09/14/2016) [-]
I'm 100% for pop control btw... they should have resisted, go to hell with some goddamn dignity
User avatar
#126619 - redandgreen (09/14/2016) [-]
You know Trump is more authoritarian than Clinton, right?
User avatar
#126622 - marinepenguin (09/14/2016) [-]
That's debatable. Though I would agree that it's close. What I meant by authoritarian was one person having an extreme amount of power, in which the socialist, fascist and communist groups were especially privy to.
User avatar
#126627 - redandgreen (09/14/2016) [-]
I don't see Hillary, as much as I dislike her, looking to infringe free speech and freedom of religion (policies toward Muslim Americans), trial by jury (military tribunals for alleged terrorists), introduce 'cruel and unusual punishment' (he supports torture), proposing extra-judicial killing of civilians (proposed murder of terrorist's families)etc. etc.

The works thing I've seen of her is she apparently voted to prevent people on the no-fly list from purchasing firearms. I have issue with a no-fly list if people on it haven't been convicted of a crime but I have no issue with preventing them purchasing firearms as a condition, if they're legitimately on there.

Those governments almost always ended up there because of a significant level of popular support for a party which created an 'other' to demonise as the cause of the problems of the majority. Sound familiar?
I'm not saying he will become 'Hitler' etc. but look at his policies. They really should make you uncomfortable if you're pro-freedom and worry about an overly strong security state trampling on rights.
User avatar
#126653 - marinepenguin (09/15/2016) [-]
First of all torture has been used for intelligence purposes on our enemies by nearly every President, especially off the public scene. They don't have the right of American citizens, especially when they are enemies of the American people. Trump also never said he was going to kill the terrorists families, just that they are going to be targeted for punishments. He never specifically said he wanted to kill them.

Hillary expressly is against the 2nd Amendment for American individuals and I believe she wants to dismantle the 5th. The no-fly list option is terrible because there is no process regarding being put on the list, which would violate the 5th amendment like I stated. So you'd be made aware that your rights are wing taken away and would have to sue the government to get them back.

"Those governments almost always ended up there because of a significant level of popular support for a party which created an 'other' to demonise as the cause of the problems of the majority. Sound familiar?"
Introducing gaining political control 101, blame all your problems on the other parties and their supporters. This happens extremely often everywhere, throughout time. Difference was these nations sort of killed them when they had the chance.

Part of Trump's policy does concern me and we've talked about this a dozen times. But if you have me choose between 4-8 more years of what Obama has done, and 4-8 years of someone who's dismantling the mainstream media, renewing American patriotism and wanting stricter border control, I'm going to vote for the former every time.
#126652 - figatron (09/15/2016) [-]
there have been people on no fly lists everywhere from congressmen and senators to business officials. it's not an exhaustive list with only threats to national security on it and it's not subject to due process
User avatar
#126632 - redandgreen (09/14/2016) [-]
*worst
#126621 - anon (09/14/2016) [-]
He's also more pro american... I want illegals gone black white yellow brown... GTFO
User avatar
#126623 - redandgreen (09/14/2016) [-]
Authoritarianism seems pretty un-American to me.
#126612 - anon (09/14/2016) [-]
Don't give a motherfuck, usually people get the leader they deserve, or one the CIA puts in