Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

malkotay    

Rank #1031 on Comments
malkotay Avatar Level 271 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Offline
Send mail to malkotay Block malkotay Invite malkotay to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/14/2012
Last Login:10/23/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7494
Comment Ranking:#1031
Highest Content Rank:#508
Highest Comment Rank:#950
Content Thumbs: 14830 total,  16534 ,  1704
Comment Thumbs: 8050 total,  8575 ,  525
Content Level Progress: 65.8% (658/1000)
Level 214 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 48% (48/100)
Level 271 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 272 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:3
Content Views:506882
Times Content Favorited:1037 times
Total Comments Made:1159
FJ Points:21863
Favorite Tags: word (2)

latest user's comments

#107 - hehe 10/23/2014 on Tentacle Grape +1
#30 - the hound doesn't like it 10/21/2014 on Fuck Yo Pancake, Bitch! +1
#53 - real slim black people please stand up 10/21/2014 on The More You Know 0
#151 - Let's not forget the brave men who stick their swords in the c…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/19/2014 on Tumbr Posts - Period Edition! +4
User avatar #169 - itembox (10/19/2014) [-]
This is why shower sex exists.
#68 - a= d^2x/dt^2 , v(f)-v(i) is only for average acceleration 10/17/2014 on nerds 0
#29 - so to make it absolutely correct we write F(m,x(t))=…  [+] (11 new replies) 10/16/2014 on nerds 0
User avatar #66 - gdikodiak (10/17/2014) [-]
yes. your formula is the most explicit and sexier possible.
User avatar #34 - ninjaroo (10/16/2014) [-]
Well, no. You simplify an equation as much as possible and if you don't know the variables you figure them out separately.

F = m*a
m = m(at rest)*(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)
a = (v(f)-v(i)) / t
User avatar #68 - malkotay (10/17/2014) [-]
a= d^2x/dt^2 , v(f)-v(i) is only for average acceleration
User avatar #67 - gdikodiak (10/17/2014) [-]
i get what you are sayng. you use the most simplified version of the formula and calculate apart the values. that leads to a result that is correct, but the formula is still formally wrong.

your method is valid when limited to calculation and and engeneering, but a theoretical physicist could never use your sintax. the most correct form is the one malkotay wrote.
when doing mathematical models, a formula must be formally correct. is not enoug that you know that 'm' can be calculated with relativistic mass. you have at least to write the dependence from v -> m(v) .

btw, i really appriciate how people here is being nice and polite.


User avatar #39 - psyachu (10/16/2014) [-]
Why can't I have a debate with someone in this type of manner? Last debate I had, the dude was a total douche.
User avatar #36 - pepperoni (10/16/2014) [-]
Ah but you are wrong in one aspect. it should be Net Force.
User avatar #38 - ninjaroo (10/16/2014) [-]
Acceleration is a vector, force is a vector. When applying an acceleration in a uniform direction, there's no need to state that it's the net force, since there's only one variable. If we had to apply three dimensional motion to figure out the direction of the acceleration/force, then yes, you'd say net force.
User avatar #42 - pepperoni (10/16/2014) [-]
Also the situations you would use that in are very limited.
User avatar #40 - pepperoni (10/16/2014) [-]
I understand that but I just say that because when I was young, our advanced Physics teacher had a joke that if we ever mentioned newtons second law without the Net Force he would chuck what ever he was holding at us.
User avatar #43 - ninjaroo (10/16/2014) [-]
Probably got something to do with the universe essentially never being as simple as a uniform acceleration in a single direction with no opposing forces.
User avatar #44 - pepperoni (10/16/2014) [-]
Like I said in comment 42 heh
#60 - that's 41 years, couldn't you just wait  [+] (4 new replies) 10/16/2014 on Sherlock 0
#61 - deathdna (10/16/2014) [-]
It's actually 41.6 years, but no, we could not wait. He ran a little stolen iFag operation back in high school, and the buyer was on the way, so we had to restore it anyway.
User avatar #94 - capslockrage (10/16/2014) [-]
Wow he sounded like a cunt.
#116 - deathdna (10/17/2014) [-]
No the actually funny thing about it is, my friend was completely unaware of the fact that these iPod were stolen. He's incredibly kind, and a good person, but he was very, very, VERY sheltered as a child. Naturally he became a computer geek and learned how to repair broken iPod screens. So when this black kid from school learned that my friend could repair them, he would steal iPods from other classmates and bring them to him to get new screens (because who the fuck is gonna buy a scratched up iPod?) So this kid is telling my buddy that his friends need their iPods repaired. He would pay for the screen and ad few bucks for my bud and then would resell them for a ton of money. It wasn't really his operation but I doubt the kid would have made as much money reselling without my friend. I really believe he had no clue until I told him what was going, after that he never repaired another iPod again.
User avatar #75 - fuzzyballs (10/16/2014) [-]
43.52 years
#11 - when she finds out you cheated on her  [+] (3 new replies) 10/16/2014 on Desc. +22
#12 - anonasuser (10/16/2014) [-]
asshole*
User avatar #24 - azumeow (10/16/2014) [-]
Faggot*
#47 - xxxsonic fanxxx (10/17/2014) [-]
Triggered*
#8 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 10/15/2014 on Feely feel feeleroo +81
#27 - thebaseballexpert (10/15/2014) [-]
#16 - jjvoodoo (10/15/2014) [-]
#38 - still better loot than TESO 10/14/2014 on Forty keks 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2350

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)