Upload
Login or register

magmaseraph

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:9/30/2011
Stats
Content Ranking:#6431
Comment Ranking:#20410
Highest Content Rank:#1558
Highest Comment Rank:#8103
Content Thumbs: 2158 total,  2307 ,  149
Comment Thumbs: 270 total,  303 ,  33
Content Level Progress: 85% (85/100)
Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 40% (2/5)
Level 117 Comments: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Comments: Funny Junkie
Subscribers:0
Content Views:92417
Times Content Favorited:243 times
Total Comments Made:183
FJ Points:1989

latest user's comments

#191 - Ok you're right, he's black. But I still stand by the fact tha…  [+] (1 reply) 2 hours ago on HP 0
User avatar
#202 - schnizel (32 minutes ago) [-]
> But I still stand by the fact that enough breeding could produce a white child.
One drop rule, but you'll have to breed him 10 generations in with pure whites.
>And that two dark skinned people can produce children with skin lighter than the both of them.
>still talking with shades
I think you mean negroids, but that is only if they're albinos or have non-negroid ancestry.
#185 - True, but it's just easier to classify people based on what th…  [+] (2 replies) 2 hours ago on HP 0
User avatar
#186 - schnizel (2 hours ago) [-]
Or you could go, Caucasian, Mongoloid, Negroid, Dravidian, etc.?
#190 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
People could do that. But to the uninitiated it's just easier to call people white, asian, black, indian etc.

It might not be accurate, but people do and say what's easier for them.
#183 - That's because whenever you have a dark enough skin tone and a…  [+] (3 replies) 3 hours ago on HP 0
User avatar
#187 - schnizel (2 hours ago) [-]
So, the Negroid genes are dominant, that's why he's black.
#191 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
Ok you're right, he's black. But I still stand by the fact that enough breeding could produce a white child. And that two dark skinned people can produce children with skin lighter than the both of them.
User avatar
#202 - schnizel (32 minutes ago) [-]
> But I still stand by the fact that enough breeding could produce a white child.
One drop rule, but you'll have to breed him 10 generations in with pure whites.
>And that two dark skinned people can produce children with skin lighter than the both of them.
>still talking with shades
I think you mean negroids, but that is only if they're albinos or have non-negroid ancestry.
#179 - Are you saying that they wouldn't always come out mixed or are…  [+] (4 replies) 3 hours ago on HP 0
User avatar
#181 - schnizel (3 hours ago) [-]
Dark skinned people and light skinned people are subjective definitions of races, that's a bad thing to put in that sort of filter.
#185 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
True, but it's just easier to classify people based on what they look like.
User avatar
#186 - schnizel (2 hours ago) [-]
Or you could go, Caucasian, Mongoloid, Negroid, Dravidian, etc.?
#190 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
People could do that. But to the uninitiated it's just easier to call people white, asian, black, indian etc.

It might not be accurate, but people do and say what's easier for them.
#177 - He's mixed.  [+] (5 replies) 3 hours ago on HP 0
User avatar
#180 - schnizel (3 hours ago) [-]
And yet people still call him black.
#183 - magmaseraph (3 hours ago) [-]
That's because whenever you have a dark enough skin tone and and black ancestry is close enough, people call you black. It's just easier.
User avatar
#187 - schnizel (2 hours ago) [-]
So, the Negroid genes are dominant, that's why he's black.
#191 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
Ok you're right, he's black. But I still stand by the fact that enough breeding could produce a white child. And that two dark skinned people can produce children with skin lighter than the both of them.
User avatar
#202 - schnizel (32 minutes ago) [-]
> But I still stand by the fact that enough breeding could produce a white child.
One drop rule, but you'll have to breed him 10 generations in with pure whites.
>And that two dark skinned people can produce children with skin lighter than the both of them.
>still talking with shades
I think you mean negroids, but that is only if they're albinos or have non-negroid ancestry.
#165 - Um no. They always end up mixed. Even if the black guy's genes…  [+] (13 replies) 4 hours ago on HP -3
User avatar
#176 - schnizel (3 hours ago) [-]
Is Obama black?
#177 - magmaseraph (3 hours ago) [-]
He's mixed.
User avatar
#180 - schnizel (3 hours ago) [-]
And yet people still call him black.
#183 - magmaseraph (3 hours ago) [-]
That's because whenever you have a dark enough skin tone and and black ancestry is close enough, people call you black. It's just easier.
User avatar
#187 - schnizel (2 hours ago) [-]
So, the Negroid genes are dominant, that's why he's black.
#191 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
Ok you're right, he's black. But I still stand by the fact that enough breeding could produce a white child. And that two dark skinned people can produce children with skin lighter than the both of them.
User avatar
#202 - schnizel (32 minutes ago) [-]
> But I still stand by the fact that enough breeding could produce a white child.
One drop rule, but you'll have to breed him 10 generations in with pure whites.
>And that two dark skinned people can produce children with skin lighter than the both of them.
>still talking with shades
I think you mean negroids, but that is only if they're albinos or have non-negroid ancestry.
User avatar
#169 - elsenortamatoe (4 hours ago) [-]
No, they wouldn't. Dark skin is a dominate homogeneous allele
#179 - magmaseraph (3 hours ago) [-]
Are you saying that they wouldn't always come out mixed or are you saying that to dark skinned people can't produce a light-skinned child?
User avatar
#181 - schnizel (3 hours ago) [-]
Dark skinned people and light skinned people are subjective definitions of races, that's a bad thing to put in that sort of filter.
#185 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
True, but it's just easier to classify people based on what they look like.
User avatar
#186 - schnizel (2 hours ago) [-]
Or you could go, Caucasian, Mongoloid, Negroid, Dravidian, etc.?
#190 - magmaseraph (2 hours ago) [-]
People could do that. But to the uninitiated it's just easier to call people white, asian, black, indian etc.

It might not be accurate, but people do and say what's easier for them.
[ 183 Total ]