Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu


Rank #956 on Subscribers
no avatar Level 206 Comments: Comedic Genius
Send mail to madoc Block madoc Invite madoc to be your friend
Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:12/09/2011
Last Login:10/20/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#13151
Highest Content Rank:#1148
Highest Comment Rank:#5976
Content Thumbs: 4066 total,  4911 ,  845
Comment Thumbs: 1121 total,  1733 ,  612
Content Level Progress: 48% (48/100)
Level 137 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 138 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 206 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 207 Comments: Comedic Genius
Content Views:248747
Times Content Favorited:172 times
Total Comments Made:719
FJ Points:4799

Sort by:

funny text/links

Sort by:

funny pictures

  • Views: 43765
    Thumbs Up 2084 Thumbs Down 200 Total: +1884
    Comments: 495
    Favorites: 113
    Uploaded: 07/14/12
    Steamsale Steamsale
  • Views: 2028
    Thumbs Up 27 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +21
    Comments: 60
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 03/17/12
    Christian youtuber - really? Christian youtuber - really?
  • Views: 1551
    Thumbs Up 18 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +16
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 7
    Uploaded: 02/10/13
    Trolls Trolls
Sort by:

youtube videos

Sort by:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#83 - With current medication, if taken properly, a person with HIV … 09/26/2014 on This gotta be a joke 0
#21 - Source on this? For science...  [+] (27 new replies) 09/24/2014 on (untitled) +3
User avatar #101 - doldis (09/24/2014) [-]
Like dndexplain said, the artist is Oyster, and I believe the source is this exhentai.org/g/668544/21c0cdb00a/
User avatar #102 - lordgeneral (09/24/2014) [-]
I will forever get a sad panda on that site
User avatar #34 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
artist is oyster. theglaw.
#22 - theglaw (09/24/2014) [-]
Hell if I know man.
User avatar #35 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
source for this is called geiger counter.
User avatar #70 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
I find it difficult to trust you now that I know you know of such things. I'm conflicted as fuck.
User avatar #71 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
I had to look up the first one. I know of the second because of a friend.
User avatar #72 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
That is one fucked up friend...
User avatar #73 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
I don't question people's fetishes unless they're going out and doing this shit irl
User avatar #89 - playercz (09/24/2014) [-]
well said
User avatar #74 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
Nor do I, but there are people with mental illnesses who find this stuff and could possibly act on it. I'm not saying it is a direct promoter of such child abuse, but it certainly doesn't help prevention at all from what I've seen.
User avatar #76 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
I am not psychexplain but I doubt there's an overwhelming correlation between loli manga and actual aggressive pedophilia.

my little 'fan club' will probably go wild with this, but it doesn't matter to me.
It's the Grand Theft Auto argument all over again. if you play a videogame where you beat people's heads in with baseball bats, chances are you don't think it's okay to beat people's heads in with baseball bats.
User avatar #80 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
Yeah, I totally get that logic. What I'm saying is that in the event that somebody views it, there is a very minimal chance depending on their brain as to how they react to it in such a negative way. 99% of people will use it purely for sexual fetish purposes, but when it comes down to mental illnesses and easily influenced people without that sense of reason, this doesn't exactly tell them to do not do so. People with mental illnesses browse and peruse the internet all the time, and loli manga in no way helps prevent it, but can promote it. Of course, they should be supervised if they're doing it, but you can't tell me that viewing that won't influence the easy susceptible mentally ill. Their numbers are rather low on the internet, but there's no way in hell you can tell me that it can actually have the adverse effect and make them realize how inappropriate it is.
User avatar #82 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
So it should have a negative reaction because of the small populace that will suffer from it? I'm not saying that aggressive pedophilia is okay, or that rape is acceptable - and yes, it should be prevented - but it's exactly like what SJW are trying to do to videogames. "some videogamers are sexist, let's attack all videogamers and change all videogames"
There are pedophiles out there that want nothing more than to be normal, functioning members of society. If fapping to a few pictures before bed keeps them sane, so be it.
User avatar #83 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
But I'm not saying that at all. What I'm saying is that it can affect a minority of people in society, but it shouldn't be banned or stopped simply because it has become a sexual fetish. I understand there are pedophiles, and I've had nasty reactions because I think they should be given therapy instead of locked up or abused like everyone else thinks, but I'm not saying this stuff should be taken down. My simple point was that this section of manga or hentai or whatever the fuck its called does not benefit rape prevention or abuse prevention in the slightest from how I see it. I don't take interest in the sexual fetish itself, but there isn't a single way in which it stops sexual abuse of children. Those that would see it and act such things out probably would do so with or without this kind of pornography and those that wouldn't might find an interest in it but wouldn't act on that at all.

To summarise, there isn't a correlation between the number of children abused and the increase in interest of this section of manga. It doesn't prevent it, but doesn't promote it. It doesn't promote because people who might consider it are mentally ill anyways and would have acted with or without it and people who won't don't need this to influence their decisions since they understand the problems with it.
User avatar #84 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
not that I'm trying to start any fights, but why exactly should pedophiles get treatment? It's not a disease.
User avatar #86 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
Because, like disturbed thoughts, they might need therapy because they feel it helps them come to terms with their issue and become functioning members of society. People think that they should be estranged because they have a sexual attraction to children, but the way I see it, its just a reaction. They might have inappropriate thoughts, but through therapy, they can learn to wash away those bad thoughts and try to overcome this situation. Of course, that's only if they feel they need help. As long as they don't act on their sexual interests, then I don't see a problem with it. I would, if I was a parent, feel uncomfortable with them around, but with therapy, they can overcome this sexual attraction and become more appropriate society members. Better than throwing them in prison and allowing them to be sexually abused even if they didn't abuse a child in the first place.
User avatar #87 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
what do you believe about consensual pedophilic relationships? are the people who are in said relationships deranged?
User avatar #90 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
I don't approve of such things at all. If a child is before the onset of puberty, there is no way in hell that they should be having a relationship with a fully grown adult. In your case, where they're at a later stage of puberty, and the age of consent is acceptable, then it isn't a problem, but any age before puberty means the child is viable to pressure and should not be in that relationship because there is potential for the other person to take advantage. I'm taking this from the definition of pedophilia. If you're talking about a late teenager, as we have already covered before when I defended your romantic interest, a late pubescent teen is NOT pedophilia, regardless of what the law says or the dictionary. The words are literal and pedophilia does not change at the point of consent to apply to teenagers and pubescent children.
User avatar #92 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
I'm not so much a pedophile as I am in love with her specifically.

that aside, what of children just entering puberty. are they exempt?
User avatar #99 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
I was using the age of consent to justify my opinion. If they meet the age of consent, I think it's acceptable. One year beneath is OK for a beginning relationship in my eyes and anything beneath it is off-limits for a consensual pedophilia relationship.
User avatar #100 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
fair enough.
User avatar #97 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
Explain how? Your first sentence said something and I replied, then you asked about if children just entering puberty are exempt from the subject at hand, which was consensual pedophilia. What's the problem, or are you just going to sass me because I didn't interpret your vague question to the level you wanted?
User avatar #98 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
wasn't sassing. I simply asked of children who were entering puberty were exempt from your rules. you said something about the age of consent
User avatar #93 - sciencexplain (09/24/2014) [-]
No, you're not a pedophile at all. Don't say you are. She's not pre-pubescent, so it isn't pedophilia. There's nothing wrong with your situation, lots of men and women are attracted to late teens. It's common, because it's sexual attraction based on the fact that they are nearing readiness for reproduction.

Any child under the legal age of consent by a fair number should not have relationships with adults. It's not appropriate. I believe that at about 15, the idea of a relationship with an adult is suitable, but should not be acted on. Once they reach the age of consent, they're free to do as they wish. 13 or below? I don't believe adult relationships are appropriate for them.
User avatar #94 - dndxplain (09/24/2014) [-]
not what I asked
#79 - Building in the wilderness  [+] (2 new replies) 09/21/2014 on CoD players play Dark Souls +22
User avatar #116 - dezzka (09/21/2014) [-]
Construct in the Thicket
User avatar #214 - yips (09/25/2014) [-]
Gazebo in the Marsh
#32 - But did he though...?  [+] (1 new reply) 09/20/2014 on Best teaching method +1
User avatar #37 - Fabianz (09/20/2014) [-]
Rule 1 of game of thrones: Unless their head has been hacked off they aren't dead. And even then it's still a guess thanks to Qyburn
#80 - Sure, but some humans (they tested it on pilots) can pick up o… 09/19/2014 on Flip it gifs 0
#22 - Your eyes don't see in frames per second.  [+] (2 new replies) 09/18/2014 on Flip it gifs 0
User avatar #50 - hydraetis (09/18/2014) [-]
Tons of people still greatly exaggerate the extent to which eyes can go.
#80 - madoc (09/19/2014) [-]
Sure, but some humans (they tested it on pilots) can pick up on a change in the image when one frame in over 200 was different from the others (all 200 or so images were shown in one second where one contained a plane and the rest were a blue sky).
#98 - Firedrive is their new domain. 09/13/2014 on my favorite part 0
#114 - I'm sure I've seen a post somewhere about not believing stuff …  [+] (1 new reply) 09/10/2014 on The future of america,... 0
User avatar #123 - thatoneiranianguy (09/10/2014) [-]
Because a simple Google search of the name Nick Olivas will unveil all of the world's secrets.


#26 - It has more to do with preservation of energy. Since a cactus … 09/10/2014 on blossom +3
#52 - *Sigh* I am what other people would call a nerd. Or, following… 09/08/2014 on "nerds" 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe bendingtime
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 325 / Total items point value: 325

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - smokingman (07/20/2014) [-]
Don't you post anymore?
#4 to #3 - madoc (07/21/2014) [-]
Might post more this week actually.
#5 to #4 - smokingman (07/21/2014) [-]
aw lawdy
aw lawdy
User avatar #2 - Ramcool (07/07/2014) [-]
Damn girl you are so ******* sexy and hot! I love your pictures ;) I cant wait to see more of them and Can I see a picture of ur boyfriends cock inside your pussy
 Friends (0)