Upload
Login or register

lordzixx

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:5/03/2011
Last Login:7/18/2016
Location:Canada
Stats
Content Thumbs: 20 total,  73 ,  53
Comment Thumbs: 4060 total,  4731 ,  671
Content Level Progress: 40.67% (24/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 56.99% (57/100)
Level 240 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 241 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:0
Content Views:2930
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:1155
FJ Points:4635

latest user's comments

#135 - Picture  [+] (2 replies) 02/22/2013 on as if... +2
#156 - spoogle (02/22/2013) [-]
#238 - lordzixx (02/22/2013) [-]
just saved that from another post
#633 - and if you're not talking about that G= 6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2 …  [+] (2 replies) 02/22/2013 on planet and shit 0
User avatar
#641 - annogram (02/22/2013) [-]
that is incorrect too it's N/kg for gravitational feild strength
User avatar
#642 - annogram (02/22/2013) [-]
basically it's the force at the front which is wrong unless you're calling gravitational ACCELERATION Fg which i don't know why you would on a linier text site.

what i'm getting is Force*gravitational field strength=G*mass/radius^2 but i get what you mean now so don't worry
#632 - I threw in the m/s^2 because I like thinking about objects acc…  [+] (3 replies) 02/22/2013 on planet and shit 0
User avatar
#633 - lordzixx (02/22/2013) [-]
and if you're not talking about that G= 6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2 it works out in the end
User avatar
#641 - annogram (02/22/2013) [-]
that is incorrect too it's N/kg for gravitational feild strength
User avatar
#642 - annogram (02/22/2013) [-]
basically it's the force at the front which is wrong unless you're calling gravitational ACCELERATION Fg which i don't know why you would on a linier text site.

what i'm getting is Force*gravitational field strength=G*mass/radius^2 but i get what you mean now so don't worry
#271 - **** I just did the same thing as you did xD but I said r=1.75…  [+] (1 reply) 02/21/2013 on planet and shit +1
User avatar
#276 - xathrix (02/21/2013) [-]
I still thumbed your post. And I played around (as I said down there somewhere) and got closer to about 1.9 times the gravity if the density is similar.
#264 - So I just nerded out alittle bit and had to figure out the gra…  [+] (5 replies) 02/21/2013 on planet and shit +1
User avatar
#369 - annogram (02/21/2013) [-]
your formula's not valid check your units
User avatar
#632 - lordzixx (02/22/2013) [-]
I threw in the m/s^2 because I like thinking about objects accelerating
User avatar
#633 - lordzixx (02/22/2013) [-]
and if you're not talking about that G= 6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2 it works out in the end
User avatar
#641 - annogram (02/22/2013) [-]
that is incorrect too it's N/kg for gravitational feild strength
User avatar
#642 - annogram (02/22/2013) [-]
basically it's the force at the front which is wrong unless you're calling gravitational ACCELERATION Fg which i don't know why you would on a linier text site.

what i'm getting is Force*gravitational field strength=G*mass/radius^2 but i get what you mean now so don't worry
#58 - Picture  [+] (2 replies) 02/18/2013 on Things Gwar Does That We Love 0
#59 - thragtusk (02/18/2013) [-]
#62 - lordzixx (02/18/2013) [-]