Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:2/18/2010
Last Login:10/06/2015
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#444
Highest Content Rank:#2335
Highest Comment Rank:#76
Content Thumbs: 915 total,  1197 ,  282
Comment Thumbs: 68874 total,  80182 ,  11308
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 82 Content: Srs Business → Level 83 Content: Srs Business
Comment Level Progress: 87.2% (872/1000)
Level 358 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 359 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Content Views:32889
Times Content Favorited:63 times
Total Comments Made:14469
FJ Points:25300
Favorite Tags: Bacon (5) | lol (5) | comic (3) | Pokemon (3) | the (3) | alchemicfreak (2) | College (2) | funny (2) | game (2) | math (2) | nicolas cage (2) | Sammich (2) | sex (2)

latest user's comments

#209 - You don't understand how bullying works. They're sociopathic.… 16 minutes ago on Happy Birthday 0
#148 - Do I know you? Because you seem so prescribed to the … 10/04/2015 on A Priest Ridicules Creationist 0
#98 - I'm pretty sure I know what fallacies will be happening at any… 10/04/2015 on A Priest Ridicules Creationist 0
#50 - Oh sure, but I say the same ******* thing and I get to … 10/04/2015 on A Priest Ridicules Creationist +2
#49 - 90% of the people on this site don't even know what it means. …  [+] (7 new replies) 10/04/2015 on A Priest Ridicules Creationist +1
User avatar #113 - vortexrain (10/04/2015) [-]
Quit strawmanning.
#57 - lordraine (10/04/2015) [-]
If they aren't guilty of that particular fallacy, it would be a strawman, actually. You sure you're getting your fallacies correct, or are you actually strawmanning and not able to see it?
User avatar #98 - lolollo (10/04/2015) [-]
I'm pretty sure I know what fallacies will be happening at any given moment, considering I'll explicitly explain them in detail.

The problem is that in order for people to acknowledge those fallacies, they'd have to admit they were making them, which no one wants to do. So even if its perfectly explained to them, they have a vested interest to still deny it ever happened in their argument.
User avatar #83 - testaburger (10/04/2015) [-]
I'm pretty sure you're using a straw man there.
User avatar #80 - spearpwi (10/04/2015) [-]
No, a straw man is arguing against a point which hasn't been made. You can argue against a fallacy that hasn't been made, but it doesn't hold exclusivity.

Now, depending on how badly I read in to your comment, I may have actually gone dun a straw man just then...but I don't think I have...
#130 - lordraine (10/04/2015) [-]
No. A strawman is when someone exaggerates or alters someone else's statement or argument and then attacks the new, exaggerated position.

I haven't strawmanned anyone. However, lolollo may very well have, what with his hyperbolic statement that 90% of the people on this site don't know what it means and will call you out on it for doing something as "simple" as pointing out a fallacy.

My point was that if someone is not actually guilty of a fallacy, but he believes they are and points it out, then he is, in fact, guilting of strawmanning himself, because he is assigning a fallacy to them they are not guilty of and then attacking their argument from that perspective. That would be a strawman.

The rebuttal he provided, "they don't admit it even if you explain it because they don't want to be wrong," is true, but it proves nothing in regards to his innocence, because he could easily be guilty of it himself right now.
#148 - lolollo (10/04/2015) [-]
Do I know you?

Because you seem so prescribed to the idea that I've done something that you just described me doing something with goes against what you just described the fallacy to be.

Or were you one of the many people who I've seen making ridiculously illogical claims and then hiding behind the straw man argument when called out on it?
#65 - Yeah...I vaguely remember remember...how there were exactly no… 10/03/2015 on Fucked up +1
#175 - Ate there people assuming people want guns to be banned? Beca… 10/03/2015 on /k/'s reaction to the shooting 0
#213 - His point was probably that he had direct control over his pro… 10/03/2015 on Q&A from a (retired) drug... 0
#193 - "Profiting off of someone's addiction!" Wel…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/02/2015 on Q&A from a (retired) drug... +1
User avatar #194 - slapchoppin (10/02/2015) [-]
my problem isn't him doing it its him trying to justify it with "well other people are doing it too"

and cocaine is definitely worse than alcohol and video games
User avatar #213 - lolollo (10/03/2015) [-]
His point was probably that he had direct control over his product, so he knew his product was only going to be thendrug as opposed to his drug + formaldehyde or some other shit.

And that's not a justification for having started it in the first place, its justification for having done it at all. Sure, he could've just "not", but then those other problems he noted wouldn't have been any different. And he would have " not" just to appease some random guy on the internet
#50 - Parenting is a relationship between reinforcement, and punishm… 10/02/2015 on Parenting 0


Total unique items point value: 1300 / Total items point value: 5880


Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #52 - lolollo (09/27/2015) [-]
You act as though I can't get the last word in a petty fight. You know nothing.
#53 to #52 - homebased (09/27/2015) [-]

Communism 2016, aMiRiTe?
User avatar #54 to #53 - lolollo (09/27/2015) [-]
There isnt a communist candidate in the running for 2016.
#50 - kez (01/23/2015) [-]
User avatar #49 - gugek (12/30/2014) [-]
Hey! Good afternoon. I hope the rest of your day is awesome and tomorrow is freaking fantastic!
User avatar #41 - bible ONLINE (12/09/2014) [-]
You seem like a decent person. Just keep being awesome, be kind to others and try to be as kind as plausible to others and I assure it will come back around to you.
User avatar #39 - thelizardqueen ONLINE (10/14/2014) [-]
HAHAHAH now that i am your friend i have one for sure
User avatar #38 - nuclearnacho (09/15/2014) [-]
I know you're probably tired as hell of this by now, but reading the comment thread from on whether or not that one post was racist raised some questions, one of which I'm very curious about.

If you were given a bowl of spaghetti, and the option to use either a fork or a pair of chopsticks, which would you pick?
User avatar #34 - tomahawkkit (09/14/2014) [-]
oh **** niger what are you doing
User avatar #35 to #34 - lolollo (09/14/2014) [-]
Referring to what?
User avatar #36 to #35 - tomahawkkit (09/14/2014) [-]
User avatar #37 to #36 - lolollo (09/14/2014) [-]
I thought if I named a country after them, they'd be drawn to it...
User avatar #33 - icheatjews (04/20/2014) [-]

These faggots must be stopped... Join the cause

Do it for the kids
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #31 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #30 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #29 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (03/08/2014) [-]
User avatar #26 - thechosentroll (01/09/2014) [-]
Did my comment that you replied to just disappear?
User avatar #27 to #26 - lolollo (01/09/2014) [-]
The whole content disappeared.
User avatar #28 to #27 - thechosentroll (01/09/2014) [-]
#25 - extooso has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #23 - extooso (10/24/2013) [-]
casprizzle wehn you read this i want you to know that i love you <3 casprizzle
#22 - khl (05/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #20 to #19 - lolollo (11/23/2012) [-]
Thank you.

Honestly I don't have anything against girls being geeks...I just hate attention whores.

That and all of this **** about relationships is starting to sound whiny.
User avatar #21 to #20 - whitenerdy ONLINE (11/23/2012) [-]
The phrase "Tits or gtfo" was originally used for situations like this, when a female used her dominance though her gender to make other people seek her attention.

And yeah, the comic where she promoted that it's hard for her to get boys when she was horny, or when she made a comic about how Europe have a low attention span and called it "European style!" that really rustled my jimmied beyond my normal infuriated level.
#17 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#18 to #18 - anon (12/28/2011) [-]
#13 - zetaroxos **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #14 to #14 - lolollo (12/19/2011) [-]

Thank you.
User avatar #4 - Crownowa (12/17/2011) [-]
One positive thing of our conversation was finding a flaw in the system go figure. Just remember that sleep if for the weak ;)
User avatar #5 to #5 - lolollo (12/17/2011) [-]
God **** all. You may want to know you're getting asstons of red thumbs on the conversation we had last night.

Sometimes I hate this site.
User avatar #7 to #6 - Crownowa (12/18/2011) [-]
I just realized that if I got a **** load of thumbs down then they must have all thumbed you up! Congrats. It looks like we really amused people.
User avatar #8 to #8 - lolollo (12/18/2011) [-]
I know, it's just that some comments I make to try and be funny...and some I don't. The conversation we had was the later. It's just now I feel like a douche because apparently I have a fanbase.
User avatar #9 to #9 - Crownowa (12/18/2011) [-]
Haha don't be. It's not like I come on this site to actually try and prove a point or to act myself or find friends to add on facebook. I treat it as a filtered version of 4chan. I've only recently started taking the approach I had with you to see how people react and it caused a ********* . I'll remember it for later when I find something amusing to comment on again.
User avatar #10 to #10 - lolollo (12/18/2011) [-]
I feel less bad now, I'm in a discussion with (several) someone over how exactly females get friendzoned if the guys are the ones who initiate the "relationship" possibility and getting flack for it. Do you know? I wondering exactly how a girl gets friendzoned. Does she have to be the one to ask for the relationship? I can imagine the random comment made by the guy, but how often does that happen?
User avatar #11 to #11 - Crownowa (12/18/2011) [-]
No need to feel bad at all. It's like feeling bad for not being able to get 4chan to count to 10 :) Interesting. Usually it would be the person asking for a relationship who get friendzoned. Unless we say that someone's general comments friendzone someone else before there is even a chance of asking for a relationship. But if a man asks a woman for a relationship, if she says yes, then wouldn't they start dating? If they/he/she "just want to be friends" later then that's not friendzoning. There are times when someone asks another out but actually has no intention of dating (perhaps the person has been dared or has a bet or just wants to troll the other person) and then puts the person in the friendzone after the agreement of starting a relationship. I don't see that happening often though, usually the let-down is something much worse that friendzoning.
User avatar #12 to #12 - lolollo (12/18/2011) [-]
Ok thank you. At least you didn't just repeat "she's ugly" like everyone did when I asked the general populous. I know this site has the average education of a sophomore, but even 8th graders learn the difference between "why" and "how".
User avatar #15 to #13 - Crownowa (12/21/2011) [-]
Ha well I find it easier to stop and be logical than to try and make **** up to get on people's nerves, especially when its such a clearcut question as that :) Oddly enough, I had a course about Modes of Reasoning that could have asked similar questions. You may enjoy that kind of course.
User avatar #16 to #16 - lolollo (12/21/2011) [-]
If one pops up here, I'll look into it.
User avatar #6 to #6 - Crownowa (12/18/2011) [-]
I saw that and I don't care. It's easy for me to get them back. I don't care about thumbs anymore, I just say whatever I want to say. Seems like I keep getting a following of people who hates my guts.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)