Login or register


Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/21/2011
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2902
Comment Ranking:#31
Highest Content Rank:#1351
Highest Comment Rank:#22
Content Thumbs: 1989 total,  2222 ,  233
Comment Thumbs: 120179 total,  129649 ,  9470
Content Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 116 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 2.6% (26/1000)
Level 387 Comments: Arch Mage → Level 388 Comments: Arch Mage
Content Views:115990
Times Content Favorited:119 times
Total Comments Made:8416
FJ Points:87661
Favorite Tags: Space (2)

  • Views: 37717
    Thumbs Up 824 Thumbs Down 62 Total: +762
    Comments: 249
    Favorites: 36
    Uploaded: 08/06/15
    Can't stump the Trump Can't stump the Trump
  • Views: 28478
    Thumbs Up 583 Thumbs Down 35 Total: +548
    Comments: 55
    Favorites: 50
    Uploaded: 12/06/13
    Our planet is neat sometimes Our planet is neat sometimes
  • Views: 18737
    Thumbs Up 383 Thumbs Down 23 Total: +360
    Comments: 118
    Favorites: 14
    Uploaded: 07/28/15
    Revolutionary rocket engine Revolutionary rocket engine
  • Views: 3772
    Thumbs Up 118 Thumbs Down 15 Total: +103
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 8
    Uploaded: 04/16/12
    Badwolf Badwolf
  • Views: 2423
    Thumbs Up 33 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +25
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 02/06/12
    Reposters Reposters
  • Views: 1578
    Thumbs Up 31 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +22
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/05/12
    Transit of venus Transit of venus

HD Gifs / WebMs

latest user's comments

#1 - I will be forever annoyed that my online nick is associated wi…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/27/2016 on Codeine crazy +6
User avatar
#5 - SuperSixONE (05/28/2016) [-]
Come to terms with it and become a themed account
#2 - chunkybutters (05/27/2016) [-]
#2 - Teacher fundamentally misunderstands pieces here. 2 pieces = 1…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/27/2016 on When your teacher is stupid af +321
#135 - rousingloki (05/28/2016) [-]
I always hated word problems myself, and this is one where the phrasing actually fucked with me pretty hard.
#110 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
teacher most likely didn't read it and only checked the numbers, because it is more likely to be a lazy fuck than an idiot as a teacher
User avatar
#71 - cptsweatpants (05/28/2016) [-]
I'd just write it off as the teacher never sawing a piece of wood in their entire life.
User avatar
#43 - thelizardlord (05/28/2016) [-]
Marine should do some other job if it takes her 10 mins to cut a blank, you do it in less than five tops.
User avatar
#56 - thelastamerican (05/28/2016) [-]
That really depends on a lot of factors. How precise does the cut have to be? What tools is she working with? Is she a member in a union? Gotta consider all the details.
User avatar
#60 - thelizardlord (05/28/2016) [-]
This is true.
#33 - whiterabbitradio has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#10 - ImmortalBaconEater (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm guessing they had another problem that was very similar they did in class that taught the concept of "if it took 10 minutes to do 2 it takes 5 to do 1" and when the teacher was grading she just assumed it was the same. It's a dumb mistake but one anyone could make.
#6 - anon (05/27/2016) [-]
Perhaps in her head the first cut goes vertical and the second cut goes horizontal which would be half the length, assuming the board was a square.
#146 - anon (05/29/2016) [-]
That's what I'm thinking too. That being said though, that makes the question stupid because you're relying on someone else imagining the same board and the same places to cut as you, which is simply absurd for a test which is factually based.
#98 - themilkshakiest (05/28/2016) [-]
But... then you would have cut it into 4 pieces...
You can't saw it horizontally all the way AND vertically all the way and come out with 3 pieces.
#8 - notwalkingwaffles (05/28/2016) [-]
**notwalkingwaffles used "*roll picture*"**
**notwalkingwaffles rolled image**
That's actually a valid point. The longer the distance she has to draw the saw, the longer it would take.
#59 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
If we allow for different size planks then why not simply pick any corner and cut of a infinitesimal small part twice. Would take practically 0 time.
User avatar
#67 - notwalkingwaffles (05/28/2016) [-]
Yeah it's a poorly phrased assignment.
#13 - Glitched (05/28/2016) [-]
The second cut would take more time then.

She did say board and in the picture provided the saw is cutting the smallest area.
So a second cut with the same board and saw would be twice as much time.
But cutting from a different angle would take even more time because there is a greater amount of wood to cut.
User avatar
#17 - notwalkingwaffles (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh shit yeah, you're right. We're supposed to infer from the picture that she cuts it that way. Still, the teacher is a tard.
#18 - Glitched (05/28/2016) [-]
I usually am.
User avatar
#16 - notwalkingwaffles (05/28/2016) [-]
Well, if you have a square (I use X'es for shits and giggles):
and we separate it into
we have two rectangles of the same length but half the width of the original square.

if I then cut it like this:
X | X
I'd only have to cut through half the amount of board on the second cut, and thus the total time would be 1.5 times the amount of time it would take me to make the first cut.
#19 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
It's not a square, it's got a picture of like a square beam and handsaw
#70 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
A beam isn't a board.
#2 - But what's he gonna do in 5 years after everything has failed?  [+] (3 new replies) 05/27/2016 on That's stupid, Jack +8
#15 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
Worldwide communism and very smallscale communism are the only two that are viable.

Worldwide and you don't lack any resources
User avatar
#30 - captainfuckitall (05/28/2016) [-]
Then EVERYONE can suffer!
#14 - xierthard (05/28/2016) [-]
Presumably what every other citizen is doing because with it being a worldwide thing we could probably forego it being a Stalinist Communist state.
#9 - Europe's wrath would be terrible, and it's retribution swift. …  [+] (77 new replies) 05/27/2016 on Holy shit I live in The... +9
User avatar
#53 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
Worded my response poorly but no, Europe will not bring any retribution. They will cry, and continue to convert to islam.
#77 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
You're clearly not from Europe
User avatar
#83 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
This is true. If I were, I would be freaking out, especially after the EU claimed they will prevent any government electing an anti-migrant leadership from exercising their own sovreignty.
User avatar
#93 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
yeah we dont want a trump for many reasons (primary because it does way too much dmg to our society
User avatar
#94 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
He would be your salvation, by example. Good luck if another globalist takes office, WW3 will be on your doorstep
User avatar
#95 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
explain how he would be "our Salvation"
User avatar
#96 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
He would improve US relations with Russia, which would make them less eager to make a moneygrab on the deaths of Europeans, while asserting the rejection of globalism as policy, encouraging further nationalist sentiment in Europe, restoring the will of the people to break from the EU, the worst mistake Europe ever made, and end their continuous import of people who are ideologically incompatible with western civilization.
User avatar
#98 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
holy shit is that what you really belive?

Dropping of the Eu would mean HUGE economical issues


User avatar
#99 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
That is the propaganda, and swapping economies from globalist failure to a slower but successful nationalist model wlll have an initial drop. Better that then the gradual decline and death of Europe
#100 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
ive heard enough
User avatar
#101 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
Fair enough, those are my opinions. Have a good one!
#75 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
keep beliving that buddy
User avatar
#80 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
Let me put it this way: I hope I'm wrong. I hope I'm super, super wrong. Good luck Europe
User avatar
#82 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
you are not from europe are you?
User avatar
#85 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
top getting your information from pol, and then youll see the world as it should
User avatar
#86 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
What I said there is fact, and I got it from reading the statement firsthand. As for military capability, you need only examine GDP spent on military of every European country combined, then remember that a larger force than all of that put together, of Americans, stands between Europe and Russia.
User avatar
#87 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
why would russia ever attack us? we dont have a great military because we make sure that everyone is economicly bound to us
User avatar
#88 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
.... The content was discussing a scenario wherein Russia nukes the Faroe islands.
User avatar
#89 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
and then we stop all economic process to rusia and watch them die a horrible slow death, while most civilians rise up to hold them back as long as we can
User avatar
#90 - teranin (05/28/2016) [-]
You realize that sanctions only work against a force not currently invading, and acquiring your resources, correct?
User avatar
#92 - shaddyz (05/28/2016) [-]
yes, thats why i said most civilian would rise up to hold them back
#52 - teranin has deleted their comment.
#45 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
It's kinda pathetic that this site will go to great lengths to show how superior whites and white culture is
And at the same time keep sprouting off on how weak and cowardice the whitest continent in the world is.
User avatar
#11 - mephiblis (05/27/2016) [-]

Europe can't do shit. Dominatrix US is the only thing holding back anyone with a nutsack from conquering the whole cuckdom.
#28 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
Yeah Europe is so weak
It's not like we colonized most of the world while still fighting each other.
User avatar
#29 - mephiblis (05/28/2016) [-]
Ye? So did Italy(Rome) at one point, but remind me how well they did in their past 2 wars?
User avatar
#30 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
No, Rome conquered the Mediterranean
And they haven't been a military superpower for centuries
France, Germany and the UK all have.
User avatar
#31 - mephiblis (05/28/2016) [-]
Germany doesn't even have ammo for it's (few) troops.


UK and French soldiers are less than 25% of Ruskie numbers, less than 5% if you consider reserve troops.

Not to mention the yuge difference in vehicles, planes and ships (though ships aren't really a russian forte).

Then again, not everyone would join the (hypotetical) war. And some would join on the Russian side.

I mean for christ sake, next to the Russians, the roaches have the biggest army on the continent, by a long shot.
User avatar
#65 - thesecretbear (05/28/2016) [-]
Western Euros might not have any fight in them, but they have money, and Eastern Euros do have the fight.
If it came down to a NATO war, it would be drone srikes and funding from the west, while eastern Euroes fought it, and it would still end in, at best for russia, a stalemate. At worst it would be an occupation of western territories.
User avatar
#110 - mephiblis (05/28/2016) [-]
Eastern Euros would be half and half, at best. I don't think it would play out like that but then again, i'm just spouting my bullshit, i might be completely wrong but then again, might not be.
#49 - skebaba (05/28/2016) [-]
Tell them that if they do that, then we'll nuke an equal amount of land from them. Equal Exchange.
User avatar
#58 - mephiblis (05/28/2016) [-]
France has 200, UK has 200, Russia has 8k+ nukes. Ya can't. And i can't tell em shit, i'm not Russian. Nor do i care, tbh.
User avatar
#32 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
And they would be unable to fund their army in a prolonged conflict, plus Europe is more than just France Germany and the UK. And very few would join Russia, and the ones who would would be East Europeans, who also have huge financial problems.
#50 - skebaba (05/28/2016) [-]
Not all East Europeans would. Some have grudges against Russia because USSR.
User avatar
#51 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
That's why I said very few.
User avatar
#33 - mephiblis (05/28/2016) [-]
Yah you also have such military juggernauts such as Belgium, and Swedenmalia...
And it doesn't need to be a prolonged conflict and in fact, it wouldn't be. And unlike most European countires, it has military production infrastructure and resources and oil/gas reserves, all which are things that European countries don't have.

The British can't build ships (which was their advantage in the past) without US help, can't build planes at all, have a tiny production of Challenger 2s and small arms/ammunition. Even their missiles and nukes are provided by the US.

The Germans have the Leopard, which is a pretty good MBT, definitively top 3 world wide. But they have like 20 of those (hyperbole). Also, their armed forces in general are at a bare minimum.

The French do make their own shit, including nukes. But again, in small quantities which aren't enough even now. If you remember, they ordered 3 ships from the Russians a couple of years ago (but dropped the order a month before it was due because of US pressure, which now makes them dubious customers to other nations at best).

Til about oh 3-4 years ago, Ukraine was listed as the 5th or 6th country in Europe (by military power). Now it's Africa-tier.

And then you have to remember, that most EU countries have enemies within and a huge populace percentage that have 0 nationalism in their blood which means that at best, they wouldn't fight.
User avatar
#48 - phawsy (05/28/2016) [-]
Not to mention at least 25% of europe isn't even european anymore, once a war starts they will just hop along back home or to another continent
User avatar
#46 - kinginthenorth (05/28/2016) [-]
While Belgium isn't a military juggernaut, it's an economic juggernaut and it's got a lot of infrastructure to support it all. We may have been Germany's doormat in both wars, but we held off a much better force that was 10x as large while being generally unprepared ourselves. Didn't do it for very long though.

Nationalism in europe is also complicated because some countries are all about the EU, while some support just their country but not the EU. Both of these will go to war if the EU is to be attacked though.
User avatar
#34 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
If you think nationalism is the only reason to defend your country from a foreign power you're delusional. I really hope you didn't seriously mean that.

A civil war against a foreign power will generally do wonders in shrinking your military power, can't really see what that has to do with anything.

I think you're confusing "isn't" with "can't". Both UK and Germany have some great engineers, I doubt they would be unable to build war machines.
And all of these nations, along with the rest of Europe, would escalate their military power instantly if it ever came to a military conflict. Russia is at peak capacity, they can't really increase their military capacity.

And excluding the European Russian population
We outnumber them 4 to 1.
User avatar
#59 - mephiblis (05/28/2016) [-]
You're calling me delusional but you're the one that can't face the facts. Maybe you think i'm a russia-boo but believe me when i say i'm not. I just look at the facts. There's a reason they're trying to get the roaches into NATO and the EU and believe me when i say it's not all about love.
User avatar
#81 - theruinedsage (05/28/2016) [-]
You may look at the facts
But you have no capability to interpret them.

Your looks on who will fight during an invasion alone proves that.
User avatar
#111 - mephiblis (05/28/2016) [-]
I don't think it is. The set rules (of the very hypotetical scenario) were Russia vs Europeans (mostly west, probably not all) and nukes are NOT out of the question. US excluded from the conflict.

In this scenario, Russia wins hands down. Of course, they couldn't sustain any occupied territories except some small enclaves and the like. But with nukes, EU armed forces stand 0 chance man.
User avatar
#19 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
If you mean that all of the European Union couldn't defeat Russia, then you're a fool. They have a GDP comparable to Italy.
User avatar
#55 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Aren't we talking about military? Not GDP?
User avatar
#109 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
In the opening phases of a war, current standing military power is important, yes. But as the war drags on, your GDP will determine how much military you can continue to produce, and how much your economy can support. The entire economy of the EU can produce and maintain VASTLY more military power than Russia's, even if Russia currently has a large current standing army.
User avatar
#113 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Also, doesn't the EU rely on Russia for their oil? EU wouldn't be able to fuel their war machine.
User avatar
#114 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
It wouldn't be that hard to switch over purchasing oil from the UAE, USA, and Canada. Especially if the Republicans control the US government and frakking is allowed to continue unfettered.
User avatar
#115 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
The US isn't even self sufficient in oil production, while Canada and the UAE is, it's not as easy as you think to switch oil imports, you'd need to either build pipelines, or transport it by sea, which isn't the safest or efficient method considering there would be a war going on.
User avatar
#116 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
And I still think you overestimate exactly how powerful Russia is. It's large, and it has a large military, but having all the oil in the world still wouldn't change just how poor they are.
User avatar
#117 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While their GDP is considerably less than the EU, they still have an oil monopoly in Europe, which would tip things in their favor in case of a war.
#118 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
But Oil is still not the only factor in war. The EU has over 500 million inhabitants, while Russia only has 150 million. Population matters intensely in times of war. In addition, while Russia does make up 28% of EU Oil imports, which is a large amount, it is not all. It is not even a third. The EU war machine with 28% less oil could still easily shitstomp the Russians.
User avatar
#121 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Also, considering which countries make up the EU's oil importers, Russia could cut off the imports by force.
User avatar
#122 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Most of them, not all, but most.
#120 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While the EU has a larger population, Russia has more reserve personnel, and even with oil imports, most EU countries wouldn't be able to have all their military equipment active at once, even if they are, an absence of Russian imports would severely effect their ability to. Now since I am autistic, I made an excel chart that shows numbers between Russia and the EU, I subtracted 28% from all EU numbers, and it considerably tipped the favor to Russia.
Source on numbers: www.globalfirepower.com/
#119 - videogamehippey has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#123 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
I disagree with your science here on a few points
1. Although Russia makes up 28% of Oil Imports to the EU, that is simply how the market exists in its current forms. There is nothing stopping the EU from importing more oil from its other partners at a higher price.
2. Russia's economy also is based largely on imports/exports with the EU. The EU's economy would still be strong without Russia. The reverse, however, is largely unlikely.
3. I can't tell if you did this here, but 28% oil reduction should have no effect on personnel.
4. Again, although Russia has a larger standing army, the industrial and economic superiority of the EU tips the scales far into their favor in a prolonged engagement.
User avatar
#124 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
1: From which partners? The US, hard to see that happening considering Russia could just sink any ships coming to EU waters.
2: I'm pretty sure no imports from Russia would hurt the EU significantly, oil is very important for an economy. Plus, the Russia gets medicine and agricultural products from the EU. And Russia can rely on China for more imports.
3: I didn't reduce it for personnel, that would be stupid.
4: You'd need oil to power factories, and you'd need factories to produce more ammunition, weapons, tanks, aircraft etc. And the EU couldn't win in a prolonged engagement, again, they'd run out of oil.
User avatar
#125 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
1. Should the Russians sink a US ship bringing oil to Europe, US enters the war. Scenario over.
2."EU exports to Russia are dominated by machinery and transport equipment, chemicals, medecines and agricultural products" All important for winning a war.
3. Just checking.
4. Combustible fuels, which includes Oil and Coal, make up about 50% of energy generation in Europe. I dont know what fraction of that is Oil (presumably a small amount of Oil based factories could be converted to Coal factories), but again, a reduction of 28%, while sizable, is not game-breaking
User avatar
#126 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
The US isn't even self-sufficient in oil production, so I don't see them importing oil to anyone anytime soon.
User avatar
#127 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
You're the one who brought up the US. I was just arguing against that point.

I guess my main point here is that Oil is not everything in winning a war. Its important, but not the sole factor. Russia's economy is tiny compared to the rest of Europe. Beyond reserve military personnel there is also manpower reserves, and Europe has that in spades as well.
User avatar
#128 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Numbers isn't everything, Russia has more tanks, tank destroyers, artillery pieces, multiple rocket launch systems, attack aircraft and attack helicopters than the EU. I still don't see who would supply the EU's oil considering Russia could forcefully cut off the oil from any countries in the Middle East or Africa.
User avatar
#129 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Which would then bring those countries into the war, stacking the numbers even more into the EU's favor. And you're just assuming that Russia could cut off those supply lines with no say from the EU. It would be a fight, not something Russia could just do.
User avatar
#135 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I'm not saying that Russia would win the war, I'm just saying that any war would be indecisive, and the the EU wouldn't "easily shit-stomp the Russians", while Russia wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Europe, the EU wouldn't be able to invade and occupy Russia either, that's damn near impossible. There'd be no winning on any side.
User avatar
#136 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh. Well then I think we're done here. I thought you were arguing for a Russian victory.

There are many variables in war. To say that Europe would shit-storm them was a bit of Hyperbole. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Europe, but you are correct in that it is a far from sure thing.
User avatar
#133 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
While Russia does have a weaker economy, their military equipment is cheaper overall, while an F-22 would cost around $150 million USD, a Russian fighter jet of similar quality would cost only around $50 million USD. And while economy is important, it isn't decisive, look at what happened in Vietnam, and the Soviet-Afghanistan.
User avatar
#134 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Again, Russia having a "Weaker Economy" is a VAST understatement. A russian jet may cost a third of what a western one does, but the EU's economy is nine times the size.

The reason the US lost in Vietnam is because we weren't willing to continue to escalate the engagement (correctly, IMO). But if the US wanted to win the war enough, they could have. I can't speak to Soviet-Afghanistan, but that was a very complicated situation in any case.
User avatar
#131 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
Plus, I don't see countries like Nigeria and Saudi Arabia being much of a problem for Russia.
User avatar
#130 - videogamehippey (05/28/2016) [-]
I think the war would start off with the invasion of Europe, due to Russia's larger army at the beginning of the war, and while they're there they can just cut the oil pipelines, I don't see how a nation could play that as an attack on them. Plus, most of the imports are from the middle east, Russia could just go through the Balkans and cut them.
User avatar
#132 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Clearly I can't convince you of the importance of Economic strength, but I'll just leave you with this.
Russia has a GDP of about 2.1 Trillion.
The EU has a GDP of 18.5 Trillion.
That is the measure of the economic disparity. That is the measure of Europe's ability to produce. Cut it by 28%, you still have 13 Trillion. Cut it by 50%, you still have 9 Trillion. Cut it by 75%, and the EU's economy is still more than TWICE the size of Russia's. They would fall to pieces.
#20 - amuzen (05/28/2016) [-]
I don't understand, Italy is part of the European Union and it's not even the nation with the highest GDP in the EU.
User avatar
#21 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
That's my point. All of the EU combined could easily shit on Russia.
#22 - amuzen (05/28/2016) [-]
I mean yeah I agree with that I was just wondering why you think Italy's GDP is comparable to the EU's. Or why Italy was even mentioned for that matter.
User avatar
#23 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
I meant Italy has a GDP comparable to Russia. And I used Italy because that's the example that was used when I first heard the argument.
#25 - amuzen (05/28/2016) [-]
Oooooh ok I misinterpreted they as still talking about the EU and didn't realize you switched to talking about Russia. hooray words.
User avatar
#24 - Endofzeeworld (05/28/2016) [-]
Or rather, Russia has a GDP comparable to Italy.
#14 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
Nice use of buzzwords.
#2 - Picture 05/27/2016 on Eye-opening experience +54
#10 - I can't find out much from before, but after was mostly a few … 05/27/2016 on KEK +1
#245 - ****** can't handle someone questioning his neofascist regime …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/27/2016 on Milo And Depaul +1
User avatar
#314 - infernis (05/29/2016) [-]
Nigga is so far gone, even /pol/ would consider him an extremist.
#7 - Just saying. Getting a DUI doesn't automatically make you a t…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/27/2016 on KEK +1
#8 - mayoroftownsville (05/27/2016) [-]
I'm pointing out his hypocrisy, not implying his guilt.
User avatar
#10 - lean (05/27/2016) [-]
I can't find out much from before, but after was mostly a few speeding tickets and a domestic dispute that was dropped. I don't think he's a saint but his rap sheet isn't exactly street cred worthy.

3 arrests in 10 years, one a minor plead down when he was 21, one heresay about throwing a bottle, and Trayvon. I have 2 arrests, both waived down to fines. (buying alcohol underage and reckless endangerment, driving. 95% bs from some idiot in a prius who felt "threatened")
#5 - unrelated incidents or proceedings are inadmissible in court.  [+] (5 new replies) 05/27/2016 on KEK +2
User avatar
#14 - knarlyfish (05/27/2016) [-]
In my country it can be considered an aggravating factor in sentencing. It has no place in determining guilt, however once it is determined that the accused is guilty having multiple serious infractions would probably lead to a longer sentence.
#6 - mayoroftownsville (05/27/2016) [-]
Well good golly gosh, it's a good thing you stopped me before I filed the paperwork
User avatar
#7 - lean (05/27/2016) [-]
Just saying. Getting a DUI doesn't automatically make you a terrorist or a bank robber.
#8 - mayoroftownsville (05/27/2016) [-]
I'm pointing out his hypocrisy, not implying his guilt.
User avatar
#10 - lean (05/27/2016) [-]
I can't find out much from before, but after was mostly a few speeding tickets and a domestic dispute that was dropped. I don't think he's a saint but his rap sheet isn't exactly street cred worthy.

3 arrests in 10 years, one a minor plead down when he was 21, one heresay about throwing a bottle, and Trayvon. I have 2 arrests, both waived down to fines. (buying alcohol underage and reckless endangerment, driving. 95% bs from some idiot in a prius who felt "threatened")
#5 - Americans raising a big fuss about **** that doesn't apply to …  [+] (38 new replies) 05/27/2016 on /pol/ack does the laundry +469
User avatar
#226 - shadowkingdr (05/28/2016) [-]
ITs what happens when you have really bad schools
im not even kidding
#205 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
Its really stupid. I am half-african and don't live in the US. I don't give a crap about my race. it is never even on my mind. America gets mad about so much petty shit
User avatar
#161 - iridium (05/28/2016) [-]
Haven't we been actually saying people should be doing that?

How often do you hear someone say "why aren't feminists complaining about what's happening in China or the Middle East instead of what's happening here?" Cause I hear it quite a bit.
User avatar
#150 - enlightednatzie (05/28/2016) [-]
The chinese government execute 1 million people per year and a comercial that makes fun of black people makes it to tye news...
#130 - bigjd (05/28/2016) [-]
Im pretty sure this commercial was first witnessed by someone who was NOT offended but quickly realized how offensive it could theoretically be. They then posted it as bait amongst tumbltards and old facebook hippies, just to see what reaction they could get. "WoAh GuIsE!!1! Check out the super racist Chi-coms!"
#120 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
americans.. brits.. canadians.. australians
they all fucking do it now
User avatar
#83 - catburglarpenis (05/28/2016) [-]
Why are we so obsessed with races?! Did you even SEE The Boston Bombing?!!
#75 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
But white americans complaining about muslims in eurpoe is okay. Hmm.
User avatar
#199 - acemrhawk (05/28/2016) [-]
I love FJ. Thumbing down someone pointing out your double standards while you whine about double standards of people disagreeing with you all the time.
User avatar
#122 - blackscienceman (05/28/2016) [-]
Yeah we tend to take issue with people who's sworn mission is to kill everyone
User avatar
#172 - guillem (05/28/2016) [-]
Ah, yes, because that's what all Muslims want!
Some of them do, but there are plenty (I'd even say most of them) who don't. Yet, that doesn't seem to matter.
User avatar
#174 - blackscienceman (05/28/2016) [-]
Comparing the ISIS riddled "refugees" to any other group of muslims is like crying "DAS RACIS" at condemnation of mass gang violence.
User avatar
#203 - guillem (05/28/2016) [-]
You assume that refugees are riddled with ISIS militants, but you have no grounds to make such assumptions. And please, refrain of sharing Breitbart articles saying they found an ISIS militant trying to get into Europe, as that would prove my point (that ISIS militants get caught before sneaking into Europe). If refugees were mostly terrorists they wouldn't be let in, no country wants that to happen. Terrorism in Europe has been perpetrated by muslim citizens that were born here, not refugees fleeing ISIS.

The statement you said is simply not an accurate depiction of reality.
User avatar
#204 - blackscienceman (05/28/2016) [-]
You're right, the consistent mass violence and the heightened bombings are the result of a bunch of peaceful, innocent souls who just want to get away from the bad men.
User avatar
#213 - guillem (05/28/2016) [-]
The bombings were carried out by European Muslims, not refugees, and that is an undeniable fact as of today. On the other hand, a bunch of incidents (most of which happen to be between the refugees, by the way) don't mean there has been a "consistant mass violence". If we were to believe the media, one would think today is one of the most violent periods of mankind, since it is riddled with tragic stories, however it is quite the opposite, and we may be living the golden age of peace and security (at least in the Western World, that is). Just because a bunch of mediatic aggressions hit the news doesn't mean there has been an increase in mass violence (which doesn't seem to be the case), nor that most refugees are violent. You hear about of bunch of violents, but you don't hear about the thousands that aren't.
User avatar
#78 - canichaikait (05/28/2016) [-]
Oh, and Muslim isn't a fucking race.
User avatar
#189 - knightdiaz (05/28/2016) [-]
But Muslim Isnt a race, its a religion, but same thing applies. I personally hate the religion, not the majority of people that have that religion. But then again, who dont I hate in this world. You're god damn right Hitler. He is our savior, Jews did 9/11, tsk tsk tsk...
#212 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
The worst thing my muslim mom had ever done is genuinely believe the jews did 911.

#216 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
If she's a good women then why don't you do her the favor of convincing her to leave her mess up religion.
#196 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
believe me religion doesnt have anything to do with them being degenerate. the just chose a religiion best fitting to them. they were the way theya are right now way before muhammad.
User avatar
#193 - canichaikait (05/28/2016) [-]
That's what I just said?!?!?!
#115 - skorchy (05/28/2016) [-]
You're right.
it's a mistake
#94 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
Highly irrelevant, it falls under the same categories of prejudice.
#184 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
My barber and haircutter is muslim. I use pomade, and joked that it was lard based. That piece of slime actually had the audacity to get mad and ruin my haircut. I think he did it on purpose. Something about irrelevant beliefs.
#176 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
Found the SJW
User avatar
#98 - canichaikait (05/28/2016) [-]
To hate all Muslims is. We're just really upset at a bunch of things that have been committed by Muslims and those that commend their actions. We're more upset at the authority that allows such things to occur without taking action. I hate Black Lives Matter protesters. I love All lives Matter activists. Am I racist against blacks? No. I just hate hypocrisy.
User avatar
#77 - canichaikait (05/28/2016) [-]
We ain't fucking complaining about Muslims making funny commercials in Europe, now are we?
User avatar
#73 - Jenisist (05/28/2016) [-]
Bruh the post with the link to the article was posted by an Australian
#62 - thearcher (05/28/2016) [-]
Because you're still a stroppy teenager of a country
User avatar
#96 - ayumu (05/28/2016) [-]
I mean you're not wrong
We aren't even 300 years old
#220 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
I always wonder if it's us that's young considering Europe implodes all at once every 50 years.
#93 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
We have the oldest continuous government/constitution in the world.

User avatar
#162 - daniboyi (05/28/2016) [-]
"Constitution of San Marino, 1600"
"United States Constitution, 1788"
Excuse me?
If you are going to post source, at least be true to it.
#137 - anon (05/28/2016) [-]
kids these days
User avatar
#61 - ILIEKPEPSEE (05/28/2016) [-]
Progressives LOOOOVE to get mad and raise hell in other people's stead. They say they're doing it for the greater good, but are really just using these people they "defend" as a shield to push their agendas.
#52 - moetron has deleted their comment.
User avatar
#8 - itssakamoto (05/27/2016) [-]
Cause they always last in races
User avatar
#9 - bombadealar (05/27/2016) [-]
Cause they fat
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (15)
Anonymous comments allowed.
13 comments displayed.
#32 - yugureyowane ONLINE (03/29/2016) [-]
I'd love to hear more about your ol' pal Phil. Please make a post about it, and I will thumb.
#31 - legitimately (03/29/2016) [-]
Subscribing for Phil content, make it happen
#30 - rayeightk (01/12/2016) [-]
#28 - parti (11/20/2015) [-]
where you from lil nig?
#29 to #28 - lean (11/20/2015) [-]
#27 - harbydeath (07/29/2015) [-]
if you like sciencey stuff, check out this article, its one of my faves.

#26 - Skrufymunky (06/12/2015) [-]
Thank you for your words of wisdom on this post.
It's refreshing to see informative comments against this sort of annoying liberal stuff. Not saying liberal's are bad, just it usually appears that the end users are not aware of the side effects / consequences involved with some of this stuff.

Anyway, keep up the good work.
#16 - bigbuttjackson (04/17/2015) [-]
Nice text colour
#17 to #16 - lean (04/17/2015) [-]
right back at you
#14 - gugek (12/18/2014) [-]
Good evening! I hope your day is going well and that you have a fantastic day tomorrow!
#15 to #14 - lean (12/18/2014) [-]
Hey thanks bro.
#13 - soundofwinter (06/20/2014) [-]
**** you