Upload
Login or register

kuchikirukia

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/17/2011
Last Login:7/01/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#26561
Highest Content Rank:#7727
Highest Comment Rank:#420
Content Thumbs: 463 total,  929 ,  466
Comment Thumbs: 15873 total,  24717 ,  8844
Content Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 47 Content: Sammich eater → Level 48 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 97.3% (973/1000)
Level 314 Comments: Wizard → Level 315 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:3
Content Views:67101
Times Content Favorited:121 times
Total Comments Made:6214
FJ Points:15660

Text Posts

First2[ 7 ]
  • Views: 10280
    Thumbs Up 213 Thumbs Down 16 Total: +197
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 63
    Uploaded: 01/17/12
    Nostalgia Nostalgia
  • Views: 4689
    Thumbs Up 87 Thumbs Down 12 Total: +75
    Comments: 9
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 05/27/12
    Oh kitty Oh kitty
  • Views: 4092
    Thumbs Up 52 Thumbs Down 18 Total: +34
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 06/02/12
    Clever title. (don't look at desc) Clever title. (don't look at desc)

latest user's comments

#14 - You forgot your hashtag #gamergate 7 minutes ago on Robot overhears female... +1
#9 - When you're making **** up that even Judicial Watch isn't saying... 17 hours ago on Guns In Istanbul Terror... 0
#6 - It's a 24/7 propaganda site. Prove it's the 1 in 1000 that is…  [+] (14 new replies) 06/29/2016 on Media Ignores Left Wing... -48
User avatar
#48 - ognetol (06/30/2016) [-]
a guy with moonman for an avatar replying to you says enough about his biased-ness and reliability about this subject

don't worry, you're one of the good ones.


User avatar
#37 - yunch (06/30/2016) [-]
Don't bother, mate. OP is far right. End of story.
#13 - deadmice (06/30/2016) [-]
#10 - gamestumps (06/29/2016) [-]
Any reporting is propaganda to some extent. It's impossible to write an article while ignoring all of your own personal biases, sometimes it can even be done unconsciously. The news you're interested in is also entirely influenced by your own biases. If something doesn't necessarily support your personal views then you are going to be less interested in it. At least Breitbart is honest about this and doesn't pretend to be unbiased. And they usually site entirely credible information, like they did in this article.

The VCP is also supposedly unbiased, and released a study on guns www.vpc.org/studies/justifiable15.pdf that clearly shows that firearms are used way more often in self-defense than people think. But then they draw their own conclusions by saying that only a small percentage of gun owners ever use their guns for self defense, so guns are therefore pretty much useless in their view. Which is a kind of stupid and clearly biased conclusion to make.

I could give hundreds of examples, but I leave it up to you to wake up and realize how to do your own research and formulate your own opinions instead of dismissing something because you don't like who's reporting it.
User avatar
#7 - cockassunited (06/29/2016) [-]
They cited their source for the report, and the crime statistics that are open for the public and those figures have been quoted by numerous other left wing media entities, they just simply played down the left wing violence aspect.

If you have any proof that the report cited was false, or the crime statistics, please provide said proof. Otherwise quit bitching and fuck off.
#41 - kanyesfishsticks (06/30/2016) [-]
I'm not saying this particular story is necessarily false, but breitbart is about as credible as gawker
#22 - kellorkleft (06/30/2016) [-]
These are the guys who also "cited sources" saying Norway deporting 300 immigrants dropped their crime by 70%, even though applying basic common sense and five minutes of research would show that it was full of so many hole that is was essentially lying.
The problem is that you guys have convenient memory loss, and gladly forget anything that would detract the trustworthiness of a voice that exists purely to validate your shit opinions so that they feel less shit.
User avatar
#27 - cockassunited (06/30/2016) [-]
I take that to mean you don't have any proof. You know the rest of the drill.
#94 - kanyesfishsticks (5 hours ago) [-]
If a crazy person told me aliens were invading, I wouldn't feel the need to prove him wrong.
User avatar
#95 - cockassunited (5 hours ago) [-]
The resources are available to be proven wrong. This wasn't anything egregious, this is easily verifiable crime stats and a report.

I'm saying if someone writes a story that really isn't that out there, and provides all their sources, it's ridiculous to go HURR BRIETBART instead of you know, proving them wrong. I get if they were like "absolute proof hillary has an enourmous cock," but that's not the case.
#96 - kanyesfishsticks (4 hours ago) [-]
They lost their credibility. That's on them, not me.
Even the national enquirer has a true story once in a while, but I won't be bothered to disprove every article just to find a needle in the haystack that's actually true. If it's a true story, find it from a credible source.
User avatar
#20 - peanutsaurusrex (06/30/2016) [-]
They cited their source for the report, and the crime statistics that are open for the public and those figures have been quoted by numerous other left wing media entities, they just simply played down the left wing violence aspect.

If you have any proof that the report cited was false, or the crime statistics, please provide said proof. Otherwise quit bitching and fuck off.
#26 - xXMAQXx (06/30/2016) [-]
User avatar
#19 - liftshertail (06/30/2016) [-]
I usually find that because breirbart has a right wing bias, they tend to be spot on with their fact checking or they'll get torn apart by all the other media outlets and critics.
#4 - >breitbart  [+] (28 new replies) 06/29/2016 on Media Ignores Left Wing... -31
User avatar
#85 - flameblaze (06/30/2016) [-]
It's ironic that you're getting thumbed down and saying all sources are biased when if someone sourced Huffington Post to make an point, they would make the same argument
#83 - dentaldjinn (06/30/2016) [-]
I've seen enough stories from Brietbart that were outright proven false to never take them seriously again. That this guy is getting so many downthumbs just proves FJ has turned into into mini /pol/.
User avatar
#79 - kayzl (06/30/2016) [-]
>those people are giving one side of the story so I can do it too!

Downvote me all your want niggers. If you actually cared about nonpartisan reporting you wouldn't get your news from breitbart.
#40 - masterboll (06/30/2016) [-]
dont worry, youre only being thumbed down by OPs bum buddies. im certain that OP is one of those faggots that constantly promotes far right content to increase sympathy for neo nazis.

fagbart is well known for supporting the far right, even when it means presenting misleading information.
#70 - krygas (06/30/2016) [-]
OYYYYYYYYYY VEYYYYY
M-MUH NAZIES, GOY
User avatar
#60 - ihateeverybodytoo (06/30/2016) [-]
umm... Breitbart was raised by Jewish parents so fuck off with that shit
User avatar
#71 - masterboll (06/30/2016) [-]
people go to great lengths for publicity.

try hard enough, you can find homophobic gays, islamophobic muslims, transphobic trannies and anti-semitic jews.

far right, pro-white propaganda being carried out by a jewish person makes it ironic, not necessarily worth believing
User avatar
#72 - ihateeverybodytoo (06/30/2016) [-]
derp...
User avatar
#47 - crutos (06/30/2016) [-]
Many other news outlets are also known for supporting the regressive left, even if that mean presenting misleading information. It goes both ways.
#55 - masterboll (06/30/2016) [-]
thats like comparing one piece of shit to another

the only difference is that we dont see much support for the regressive left on here, so we dont need to point it out as much
#28 - dawnartemis (06/30/2016) [-]
No form of news is truly safe from the authors influence.
It all comes down to you & how you see things.
User avatar
#5 - ihateeverybodytoo (06/29/2016) [-]
Can you show how it's false then?
User avatar
#6 - kuchikirukia (06/29/2016) [-]
It's a 24/7 propaganda site. Prove it's the 1 in 1000 that isn't pure spin.
User avatar
#48 - ognetol (06/30/2016) [-]
a guy with moonman for an avatar replying to you says enough about his biased-ness and reliability about this subject

don't worry, you're one of the good ones.


User avatar
#37 - yunch (06/30/2016) [-]
Don't bother, mate. OP is far right. End of story.
#13 - deadmice (06/30/2016) [-]
#10 - gamestumps (06/29/2016) [-]
Any reporting is propaganda to some extent. It's impossible to write an article while ignoring all of your own personal biases, sometimes it can even be done unconsciously. The news you're interested in is also entirely influenced by your own biases. If something doesn't necessarily support your personal views then you are going to be less interested in it. At least Breitbart is honest about this and doesn't pretend to be unbiased. And they usually site entirely credible information, like they did in this article.

The VCP is also supposedly unbiased, and released a study on guns www.vpc.org/studies/justifiable15.pdf that clearly shows that firearms are used way more often in self-defense than people think. But then they draw their own conclusions by saying that only a small percentage of gun owners ever use their guns for self defense, so guns are therefore pretty much useless in their view. Which is a kind of stupid and clearly biased conclusion to make.

I could give hundreds of examples, but I leave it up to you to wake up and realize how to do your own research and formulate your own opinions instead of dismissing something because you don't like who's reporting it.
User avatar
#7 - cockassunited (06/29/2016) [-]
They cited their source for the report, and the crime statistics that are open for the public and those figures have been quoted by numerous other left wing media entities, they just simply played down the left wing violence aspect.

If you have any proof that the report cited was false, or the crime statistics, please provide said proof. Otherwise quit bitching and fuck off.
#41 - kanyesfishsticks (06/30/2016) [-]
I'm not saying this particular story is necessarily false, but breitbart is about as credible as gawker
#22 - kellorkleft (06/30/2016) [-]
These are the guys who also "cited sources" saying Norway deporting 300 immigrants dropped their crime by 70%, even though applying basic common sense and five minutes of research would show that it was full of so many hole that is was essentially lying.
The problem is that you guys have convenient memory loss, and gladly forget anything that would detract the trustworthiness of a voice that exists purely to validate your shit opinions so that they feel less shit.
User avatar
#27 - cockassunited (06/30/2016) [-]
I take that to mean you don't have any proof. You know the rest of the drill.
#94 - kanyesfishsticks (5 hours ago) [-]
If a crazy person told me aliens were invading, I wouldn't feel the need to prove him wrong.
User avatar
#95 - cockassunited (5 hours ago) [-]
The resources are available to be proven wrong. This wasn't anything egregious, this is easily verifiable crime stats and a report.

I'm saying if someone writes a story that really isn't that out there, and provides all their sources, it's ridiculous to go HURR BRIETBART instead of you know, proving them wrong. I get if they were like "absolute proof hillary has an enourmous cock," but that's not the case.
#96 - kanyesfishsticks (4 hours ago) [-]
They lost their credibility. That's on them, not me.
Even the national enquirer has a true story once in a while, but I won't be bothered to disprove every article just to find a needle in the haystack that's actually true. If it's a true story, find it from a credible source.
User avatar
#20 - peanutsaurusrex (06/30/2016) [-]
They cited their source for the report, and the crime statistics that are open for the public and those figures have been quoted by numerous other left wing media entities, they just simply played down the left wing violence aspect.

If you have any proof that the report cited was false, or the crime statistics, please provide said proof. Otherwise quit bitching and fuck off.
#26 - xXMAQXx (06/30/2016) [-]
User avatar
#19 - liftshertail (06/30/2016) [-]
I usually find that because breirbart has a right wing bias, they tend to be spot on with their fact checking or they'll get torn apart by all the other media outlets and critics.
#82 - If you were aware you couldn't do it without active hate. It … 06/29/2016 on Hate Speech 0
#38 - And once again someone thinks racism means "unquestioning…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/28/2016 on Hate Speech -4
#43 - anon (06/28/2016) [-]
unquestioningly hating everyone of a race is racism, but it's not the only way racism works. Racism is simply treating someone different based on their race, or treating one race different from others.
There is no "without awareness" you fucking retard.
User avatar
#82 - kuchikirukia (06/29/2016) [-]
If you were aware you couldn't do it without active hate. It would be a judgement which is then modified, not one that comes from skewed premises.
Active hate is easier to deal with than someone who is under the impression their biased judgement is coming to correct conclusions. They at least have a coherent philosophy.
User avatar
#42 - blackhoofs (06/28/2016) [-]
I don't know if this is a smart or a dumb comment
#3 - Picture 06/27/2016 on /a/, and the animemanga... +1
#118 - It would if you gave them the link.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/21/2016 on The Japanese Have Invaded... 0
User avatar
#120 - billycakes (06/21/2016) [-]
Thanks for the explanation Rukia.
#105 - Someone just set it up to pull videos directly off dailymotion…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/21/2016 on The Japanese Have Invaded... +1
User avatar
#110 - billycakes (06/21/2016) [-]
So this wouldn't appear on other people's computers if they tried to access the site?
User avatar
#118 - kuchikirukia (06/21/2016) [-]
It would if you gave them the link.
User avatar
#120 - billycakes (06/21/2016) [-]
Thanks for the explanation Rukia.
#32 - You need to read the definition, since you obviously didn't th… 06/21/2016 on /mu/ figures it out -4

user's friends