Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

krobeles    

Rank #2033 on Comments
krobeles Avatar Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Online
Send mail to krobeles Block krobeles Invite krobeles to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:8/08/2012
Last Login:11/27/2014
Location:Denmark
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2033
Highest Content Rank:#2711
Highest Comment Rank:#1055
Content Thumbs: 1631 total,  1915 ,  284
Comment Thumbs: 4162 total,  8701 ,  4539
Content Level Progress: 30% (30/100)
Level 116 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 5% (5/100)
Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:100847
Times Content Favorited:72 times
Total Comments Made:3257
FJ Points:5168
Favorite Tags: fucking (2) | shit (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 64186
    Thumbs Up 1586 Thumbs Down 99 Total: +1487
    Comments: 70
    Favorites: 62
    Uploaded: 04/14/13
    Hey Bro. Hey Bro.
  • Views: 10557
    Thumbs Up 152 Thumbs Down 71 Total: +81
    Comments: 10
    Favorites: 8
    Uploaded: 09/19/12
    Unicorn-Supremacy Unicorn-Supremacy
  • Views: 13319
    Thumbs Up 94 Thumbs Down 59 Total: +35
    Comments: 37
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 03/06/13
    Too much? Too much?
  • Views: 4439
    Thumbs Up 31 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +30
    Comments: 13
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/04/12
    Scumbag Eldrazi Scumbag Eldrazi
  • Views: 1375
    Thumbs Up 8 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +7
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 10/23/13
    Am i gonna get banned nao, admin? Am i gonna get banned nao, admin?
  • Views: 5707
    Thumbs Up 37 Thumbs Down 33 Total: +4
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 09/13/12
    Silly women! Silly women!
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#31 - Yes, pleanty. Those are commercials. If you take them seriousl… 5 minutes ago on a nice break between sjws... +1
#23 - If people are easily enough persuaded, so that the media …  [+] (1 new reply) 1 hour ago on a nice break between sjws... 0
#33 - milvus (56 seconds ago) [-]
Even the most basic commercials leave a slight amount of psychological impact in almost anyones mind, even if people actively ignore them, it is not as easy as saying "dumb people are dump I am much better hurr durr". No one is able to control their own subconsious which every commercial is targeting, this is just a fact.
#16 - Seriously. Where are people hearing these things?! People keep…  [+] (8 new replies) 1 hour ago on a nice break between sjws... -1
#30 - milvus (6 minutes ago) [-]
Did you ever saw a commercial?
User avatar #31 - krobeles (5 minutes ago) [-]
Yes, pleanty. Those are commercials. If you take them seriously, you're a fucking idiot.
#24 - Womens Study Major (54 minutes ago) [-]
People are rarely told,
People are shown this things.
And it's by far more effective and that is in itself far more scary.
We don't even notice 90% of the marketing that marketing throws at us.
But enough sticks so that products can be sold.
And yes, ironically enough I once worked in marketing, hated it.
#20 - Womens Study Major (1 hour ago) [-]
Goes to show it's working then eh?
User avatar #19 - FAILtim (1 hour ago) [-]
It's from a movie called : darude - sandstorm Detachment
User avatar #17 - tridentrooster (1 hour ago) [-]
Good point. Maybe they aren't exactly said but entrenched in society; like someone interpreting a model in the media as a threat to their own appearance.
User avatar #23 - krobeles (1 hour ago) [-]
If people are easily enough persuaded, so that the media bullshit has any impact on them what-so-ever, then I say good riddance to those folk.
If a fucking commercial is enough to give them self esteem issues, they have much bigger issues than being fat.
#33 - milvus (56 seconds ago) [-]
Even the most basic commercials leave a slight amount of psychological impact in almost anyones mind, even if people actively ignore them, it is not as easy as saying "dumb people are dump I am much better hurr durr". No one is able to control their own subconsious which every commercial is targeting, this is just a fact.
#35 - So...we agree? You're just trying to seem smarmy by picking at…  [+] (1 new reply) 4 hours ago on Heh 0
#36 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
#33 - Its not a logical issue, since its status as "alive"…  [+] (3 new replies) 4 hours ago on Heh 0
#34 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
yeah, nah. That's not how it works.
I already agreed with the point that it's mostly emotional issue, but, i'm repeating myself here, i was not talking about you. we were not takling about others. I said it was alive, you said it was irrelevant to others, which is irrelevant to me
User avatar #35 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
So...we agree? You're just trying to seem smarmy by picking at slights, then?
#36 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
#29 - This isn't a biological issue. Neither is it a logical issue, …  [+] (5 new replies) 4 hours ago on Heh 0
#32 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
it is a biological issue. i said it was alive, which was a biological point, not emotional.
It is also logical to kill people with dawn's syndrom, but people don't do it, because of emotions
User avatar #33 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
Its not a logical issue, since its status as "alive" in the eyes of biology isn't the question. The pro-abortion people dont care if its technically alive, and the anti-abortion people dont care either if its alive. Its status as "alive" isn't whats preventing the anti-abortion crowd from seeing reason.
Therefor, we cannot apply such logical reasoning to this issue, because logical arguements wont be heeded by anyone, and they're thusly devoid of all meaning since nobody will ever listen to them.
#34 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
yeah, nah. That's not how it works.
I already agreed with the point that it's mostly emotional issue, but, i'm repeating myself here, i was not talking about you. we were not takling about others. I said it was alive, you said it was irrelevant to others, which is irrelevant to me
User avatar #35 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
So...we agree? You're just trying to seem smarmy by picking at slights, then?
#36 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
#23 - Define "Live". It certainly hasn't been born, doesn'…  [+] (7 new replies) 6 hours ago on Heh -1
#26 - stalini (5 hours ago) [-]
depends how fast it is aborted. But in all definitions of "live" according to biology, unborn human is live.
User avatar #29 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
This isn't a biological issue. Neither is it a logical issue, its an emotional and subjective one. The logical choise, is to have the thing aborted and be done with it, before it destroys the mothers life.
We cannot apply any kind of logically derived reasoning to this issue, unless we conclude the above. Its the only logical stand point that has merit.

Thats why I asked him what his definition was.
#32 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
it is a biological issue. i said it was alive, which was a biological point, not emotional.
It is also logical to kill people with dawn's syndrom, but people don't do it, because of emotions
User avatar #33 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
Its not a logical issue, since its status as "alive" in the eyes of biology isn't the question. The pro-abortion people dont care if its technically alive, and the anti-abortion people dont care either if its alive. Its status as "alive" isn't whats preventing the anti-abortion crowd from seeing reason.
Therefor, we cannot apply such logical reasoning to this issue, because logical arguements wont be heeded by anyone, and they're thusly devoid of all meaning since nobody will ever listen to them.
#34 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
yeah, nah. That's not how it works.
I already agreed with the point that it's mostly emotional issue, but, i'm repeating myself here, i was not talking about you. we were not takling about others. I said it was alive, you said it was irrelevant to others, which is irrelevant to me
User avatar #35 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
So...we agree? You're just trying to seem smarmy by picking at slights, then?
#36 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
#13 - Why. Does baby-death bother you? Implying a fet…  [+] (10 new replies) 10 hours ago on Heh 0
#22 - stalini (6 hours ago) [-]
It's still a live being.
#23 - krobeles (6 hours ago) [-]
Define "Live". It certainly hasn't been born, doesn't have its own life support system and would in no way be able to survive outside its host organism.
For all intends and purposes its little more than a tumor or parasite, by the time its aborted.
#26 - stalini (5 hours ago) [-]
depends how fast it is aborted. But in all definitions of "live" according to biology, unborn human is live.
User avatar #29 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
This isn't a biological issue. Neither is it a logical issue, its an emotional and subjective one. The logical choise, is to have the thing aborted and be done with it, before it destroys the mothers life.
We cannot apply any kind of logically derived reasoning to this issue, unless we conclude the above. Its the only logical stand point that has merit.

Thats why I asked him what his definition was.
#32 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
it is a biological issue. i said it was alive, which was a biological point, not emotional.
It is also logical to kill people with dawn's syndrom, but people don't do it, because of emotions
User avatar #33 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
Its not a logical issue, since its status as "alive" in the eyes of biology isn't the question. The pro-abortion people dont care if its technically alive, and the anti-abortion people dont care either if its alive. Its status as "alive" isn't whats preventing the anti-abortion crowd from seeing reason.
Therefor, we cannot apply such logical reasoning to this issue, because logical arguements wont be heeded by anyone, and they're thusly devoid of all meaning since nobody will ever listen to them.
#34 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
yeah, nah. That's not how it works.
I already agreed with the point that it's mostly emotional issue, but, i'm repeating myself here, i was not talking about you. we were not takling about others. I said it was alive, you said it was irrelevant to others, which is irrelevant to me
User avatar #35 - krobeles (4 hours ago) [-]
So...we agree? You're just trying to seem smarmy by picking at slights, then?
#36 - stalini (4 hours ago) [-]
User avatar #21 - littleliz (6 hours ago) [-]
it doesnt bother me but it made me a tiny bit sad
#74 - I agree with this notion. I too used to be an autistic pocket-… 12 hours ago on its that easy +1
#65 - Wait! I'm just getting all oiled up! You cant leeeavee mee! Wh… 15 hours ago on Feminism effect 09:11 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe fucking-art
Join Subscribe fucking-mtg
Join Subscribe lol-channel
Join Subscribe morbid-channel
Join Subscribe nostalgia
Join Subscribe ponytime
Join Subscribe school-shootings
Join Subscribe skyrim

user's friends

User avatar noobtankz    
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2250

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #62 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
Now you wanna be civil?! Where did that come from? Fine, we'll have a discussion.

Women have to fear death too. Like, usually the fear of rape comes with the fear of death. And you can argue what you did when it comes to gangs messing with guys on the street, but that's the same for women by other women. Like, I know some girls who get messed with by the Latin Kings because they're Hispanic girls. I do not see how these issues even out. Maybe quantitatively, but not when it comes to the level of danger and effect. But if they did (and please clarify for me with legitimate examples), these issues have one thing in common: notions of masculinity, whether it be inter-gendered or intra-gendered. Those guys that beat you up started messing you because they thought you looked like a faggot. That's a hierarchy of sex right there: straight males have the right to attack homosexual males in an attempt to display their masculinity. Men are affected negatively by notions of masculinity also, but the effect of masculinity on males is seen more in the male treatment of women. And these notions of masculinity, while also in part perpetuated by women, are largely and more easily perpetuated by men. This is why feminism is here, and this is why women are more affected than men: men are taught masculinity, which shapes them as people and shapes their treatment of women, which leads to women taking more of the damage than men.

This is not creating a culture of victims. This is giving people something tangible to fight against. Naming a common cause of this type of gendered violence allows the fight to be fought more realistically. Naming a more specific root of a problem is more effective than just generalizing everything because violence is born and molded in different ways.

You're right about more women being accepted into universities, but when it comes to professional studies (law school, med school, etc.) less women are being accepted.

Hold on. I'm not done.
User avatar #63 to #62 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
A flaw of feminism is that there is not enough discussion on the oppression faced by people experiencing the intersectionality of being minority and a woman. That's in part why womanism was born, but many feminists incorporate intersectionality into their beliefs.

And that story about your mom? One success story doesn't mean equality. Many of the women in my family immigrated from Mexico and became pregnant as teenagers. Many of the women in my family were also raped or molested. My grandmother was beaten by her husband, and many of the women in my family and in this culture are expected to stay in the house and fulfill their roles as women. This isn't just limited to my family, it's everywhere. These issues do exist.
User avatar #64 to #63 - krobeles ONLINE (08/30/2014) [-]
Alright, lets try something alittle different.
We can agree that women face some issues, yes? We can also agree that men face some issues, yes? We can furthermore agree that they share a number of common issues and that atleast a few of them share a common cause? If we can agree on this, why are we having this discussion in the frame of womens issues and why is the movement called Feminism?

To a degree, I agree with you on the masculinity thing. I have this skirt that I think I love just lovely in, but I rarely find it aproriate to wear that, because I know what people will think of a dude in a skirt. And thats sort of my issue with the feminist movement. I am not saying that women dont face issues and I am not saying the issues they do face are allways insignificant. But forming a humanitarian movement which attacks a grand social problem, but to face solely on the issues faced by one gender, is subtle sexism in and of itself.

Its also important to note that assholes and idiots will always exist. I see alot of these feminists attacking the "How not to get raped" things, with stupid ******** like "Dont teach women not to get raped, teach not to rape!", which is just silly.
We could apply this logic to common acts and thievery and see it fall apart. "Dont tell me to lock my door, tell thieves not to rob my house!". It is true that thieves and thugs never have the right to rob/rape you, but if you dont take steps to pretend and desentavise them from doing so, then you automatically forfiet a small part of your right to complain.
And in that same regard, I dont go around spouting ******** like "Teach people not to assault men people in skirts with long hair!", I just accept that such savage behavior is inherent in some particularily nasty people, and find ways to prevent it myself. I own a few weapons in my home, and I know a basic few things of self defence.

I dont believe that feminism gives women "something tangible to fight against". It provides a nebulous threat of the ominous "Patriarchy" and "Male-opression" to fight against. Since the easily explained (very dumbed down) cause this is white males, you suddenly have alot of these women who feel disenfranchised and run-down, who suddenly find something to point at and go "Thats the cause of all my problems!". Since they've forgotten to mention that the thing they're fighting against hurts all parts of society equally, these women never really stop to consider if perhaps they're attacking the problem from the wrong angle or if they're attacking the wrong people.

Just as you say that one success story doesn't a trend make, I dont feel like your family experience is anymore valid an example. Rot festers in places in which it is not cleaned out, and if there has been an unfortunate trend in your family of abuse, then it is a given that it will continue unless someone makes an effort to cut out the rot.

Ultimately, what I said about feminism not not attacking the right issues can be linked to this. If what you claim happened to your family is the general trend amongst Mexican/African famillies, then that is a serious problem which needs to taken care of. However, it seems to me that the general feminist movement are far more interested in applying their efforts towards comparatively harmless videogames and TV-shows, which are totally and entirely insignificant in comparison to actual family abuse and rape.

This leads me to believe that the new feminist movement isn't really about equality, but rather just a fandom-esque circlejerk in which its members are more concerned with the tiny minute issues they might concievably face, rather the actual big and serious issues which actually needs their attention.

Well, to comment on the civil discussion thing, taking a few minutes to play a game of tower defence, and making a conceded effort to appear less of an angry shouty person in order to facillitate more constructive debate, does its thing rather well. Also, I largely view insults and shouty-debates as a form of humor. So long as I'm just trying to trying to get a rail out of people, I insult them. Theres a certain art to a well constructed and imaginative insult, I find. However, if the says or does something that belies the potential for actually interesting debate, its another matter entirely.
User avatar #65 to #64 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
We're having this discussion in the frame of women's issues because it does effect women in a more detrimental way and it *is* more perpetuated by men. I mentioned that men go through oppressions also, like the pressure to be masculine, but many of those pressures are self-perpetuated and the result is displayed in their relationships toward women. And it is called feminism because femininity is not limited to women. It is not subscribed to one gender or sex.

The concept of a humanitarian movement is good in theory, but there's issues in that we wouldn't be able to prevent the perpetuation of oppression without knowing where it comes from. Let's take gangs as an example. A lot of inner city groups are preaching to kids that "violence is bad," something everyone has been hearing for the longest time. However, things like this aren't working. What works instead is legislation that targets poverty and expands opportunity and education, which is keeping kids off the street. We can have a whole anti-violence movement, but fighting violence in general is too grand of a scale to address realistically. Narrowing down oppression allows us to take the fight one step at a time. Not to mention that forming groups like these also give people a sense of community in what they're facing.

Hold on I"m not done
User avatar #66 to #65 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
Okay, honestly with the "don't teach women how to not get raped, teach not to rape" thing, I only agree 50%. Yeah, we do have to put more of the focus in preventing sexual assault on the perpetrator, but we also need to teach everyone how to stay safe and stay away from risky behaviors in a way that doesn't result in someone saying, "well, she was hanging with the wrong crowd, so maybe she wouldn't have gotten raped if she wasn't where she was" or something like that. Victims see enough of a reason to blame themselves without stuff like this being said. And if by "complain" you mean be angry or upset, then you do still have a right to complain, because while steps could have been taken to prevent stuff like this, the perpetrator could have *not* raped the victim. You mention "teach people not to assault men in skirts with long hair." While I am sorry you were assaulted, and while this should NOT have happened to you, there is no trend of men wearing skirts and getting assaulted. There is a big trend of women and men getting raped by males though.

Feminism exists past the internet, past funnyjunk, past 4chan and past tumblr. Don't make the mistake of wrongly labeling a whole group of people because of popular opinion on these websites. True feminists are not attacking anyone. White males are pointed at (not attacked) as a cause because (1) they have the most power in society, and (2) the fact that most don't have to deal with discrimination based on sex, race or gender creates a feeling of disdain in the white male community for these people that are fighting these issues. Honestly, that's how it is. If you're more exposed to racism, you'd care more about ending it. The same goes with sexism. I mean, look at funnyjunk. The largest community here is white, male and straight. Look at how much easier this anti-feminism thing floated compared to a place like tumblr, where a good fraction of the users are female and not white.

Hold on
User avatar #67 to #66 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
I was wary about mentioning my family, but I thought it was okay since I don't know you and you don't know me. I can assure you that these issues are not limited to my family, and please refrain from comparing them to "rot," even if you do see it as fit.

The grand feminist movement is not focused on video games and such. The internet/tumblr feminist movement is. And I definitely wouldn't argue these video games and whatever are harmless. I'm gonna make a cliche argument, but just because it's cliche doesn't mean it's not true: it hurts self esteem. Seeing all these sexy girls in video games, music videos, and everywhere else in the ******* media sucks. Seeing guys drool over those girls also sucks. Women are oversexualized and we're pressured to look like them. It's cliche but it's true.

Feminism is not a circle jerk. I'm just saying feminism concerns more than tumblr and the internet.

Okay now I'm done
User avatar #68 to #67 - krobeles ONLINE (08/30/2014) [-]
The thing about teaching people "not to rape" though, is that that is impossible. As I said, there will allways be assholes, and they know full well that rape is wrong. They just dont care, because they're egotistical asshats.
I was just useing myself as an example (I've never been assaulted while wearing the skirt, actually), of something that would be equally silly.
Of course you still have some right to complain - it is still wrong to rape or assault people regardless of what they wear or how they behave - but you have to admit that the complaint falls alot shorter if the person in question took active steps to put himself/herself in harms way to begin with?
You could liken it to a person climbing onto a scaffolding and then falling down and breaks both legs. Is it regrettable that the person fell and broke both legs? Yes. Was it rather expected, based on circumstance and the poor safety measure the person had set up? Yes.

I am not so sure about the "Feminism exists past the internet"-thing. Of course it is reasonable to assume that there is the odd feminist every now and again, but on a grander scale, the only people I've ever met who claimed themselves feminists is two girls who associate with the Tumblr crowd on the internet. They're more a physical extension of the internet-Tumblr-feminists than actual feminists. Other than them, I've never anyone who claimed themselves feminist. It might because all of what you've happened is more of an issue in the states, than it is in Denmark, but it still doesn't do much to make me convinced that actual - none-Tumblr - feminists actually exists.
This is why I largely allow the Tumblr-feminists view to be indicative of all feminists. I've never met a non-tumblr feminists in all my 21 years, and I therefor dont really have faith that they exist outside of the internet.

Which is actually another thing I've come to consider. Since many of the Tumblr feminists seem to be American and preoccupised with strictly American issues, I am starting to consider that perhaps America might suffer infinitely more from these issues discriminatory issues than the European countries (Well, Denmark, atleast). But I dont see the Tumblr-feminists treating it as an American problem dispite the fact that it might be a strictly American problem. This comes back to what I mentioned with the feminists being an angry hate-club which're just looking for their next big issue to be offended over. I'm sure that if they stopped for five minutes and looked at some of the silly things they get offended over, they would see how silly it is. Instead though, they're much too busy yelling and shouting angryly at game developers, who had the audacity to make their female character busty.

I wasn't comparing your family to rot. I was comparing the aparent trend of violence and rape to rot. Just because a person commits a rotten action, does not a rotten person make. I actually intended to write something along those lines in my comment, but I must've forgot. Sorry if you took it the wrong way.

As I explained above, I dont think that there really is a true divide between "the grand feminist movement" and the tumblr feminists.
If the video game thing hurts the self esteem of some people, then I honestly think that they those need to grow a spine, sorry to say. There are dudes in video games too, who are insanely buff and masculin beyond anything realistic. The dudes that aren't, are insanely intelligent and sucessful in busness or whatever. Should men be offended at this depiction of dudes?
Thats why we call it fiction. Its not suposed to be taken as seriously as some feminists do and claim other women do as well. Its an idealized version of a woman marketet to a predominantly white male teen audience. What do you think sells well with white teenage dudes? Tits, of course. Its not a question of discrimination or objectification, its a question of marketing. White teenage guys likes tits, so the corporations gives them tits.
Add this to the fact that almost all of my female friends I've asked directly if they feel offended or objectified by fictional works, says they find it silly and of course they dont. I think this problem lies with the self-esteem of the people who complain about it. Its not that these images and materials cause bad self esteem in women, its that these images remind women who allready suffer from bad self esteem, how ****** they feel about themselves. Sorry if this seems a bit cynical; but we cant pander to a group of mentally ill people, who complain about something no person with proper self esteem and self image would find the least bit offensive. The lowest common denominator should not dictate the direction the crowd moves.
This is not to say that I nessesarily condone the way females are portrayed in games and general media. I think they hamstrings themselves, by reducing females in the way they do. This goes for men aswell. No interesting plots are going to arise from a story in which all females are card-board cutouts with latex tits plastered onto, and all males are gruff handsom flawless Adonis wanna-bes who can solve 3rd grade differential equations in their heads while bench pressing 4 times their own weight.
Outside of the detrimental effects to storytelling that it has, I cant view this as anything other than one of those silly null-issues I complain about the feminists being all too keen to focus on, while ignoring the grander problems.

I dont believe that men systematically opress women. Not here in the rest anyway. Those in power opress those not in power. Its been like that forever and it'll likely continue to be like that a long time into the future too. A good bunch of those in power are white males, which is a left-over from a time in which white males did actually opress everyone not white and not male. Non-white non-males just haven't had the chance to bleed up through the molasses-like power structure that we've instituted. Thats not opression, thats just a matter of fact.

I feel like you handicap the conversation by framing it this context, when what you're really complaining about is a grander social problem, not singularily suffered by women. It would be like discussing war casualties as a mens issue, because the majority of soldiers are men. Dont you think the female soldiers would be slightly pissed off, about the fact that they're role and their pains in the army is effectively being ignored?

User avatar #69 to #68 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
See? No. It shouldn't matter if people took "active steps to put themselves in harm's way." We're way to focused on that. If "harm's way" qualifies as being with a man late at night, than that vilifies men way more than anything else. We need to teach people not to rape. And rape is a preventable thing, because the main reason men--and yes, the majority of perpetrators are men--rape is because they want to feel power. Power, of course, is a characteristic of masculinity. The male need to feel power is the male need to feel masculine. Again, the reason this whole feminism thing exists is to fight trends. There is a trend of men who rape. The is a trend of women getting raped. There is a trend of masculinity being pushed by men and there is a trend of men needing to feel power. This is not silly.
The connection to the scaffolding isn't valid because there is no perpetrator. An accident is different than flat out assault. You cannot, by any means, blame a victim like that. No one deserves rape and we shouldn't treat any case as lesser because "she was wearing a skirt too short" or "she was out with the wrong crowd." That's always the first thing people think about--what the girl was doing wrong--rather than why the guy raped her or what he shouldn't have done. And how many times can guys catch themselves doing the same thing with no consequence? Men can be out late at night with women. Men can walk around with no shirt and not be raped. It just happens on a much larger scale with women.

hold on
User avatar #70 to #69 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
A big part of the feminism we're discussing is feminism in America. I can definitely contest that feminism exists outside of the internet. I know many feminists who are not using social networks in their practice at all. There are many thinkers--bell hooks, for example--that are held up to a high standard and that would disagree with the things that the "tumblr feminists" say. If you really aren't exposed to this group and are actually ignorant to it, then how can this part of your argument have a good foundation?

There is a problem with that. You mention a white male audience when it comes to video games, but about half of the gaming audience is women. And women are sexualized more in games, that's just it. I'll take Resident Evil as an example. Leon and Chris have big muscles, yes, but look at the females in the game. Clare is wearing tight clothes and whatever, but what bothers me most is that in every RE games she's in, the camera focuses on her ass and pans up her body at least like 3 times per game. And look at Ada (if you never played these games you should google these characters). She runs around in a ******* long red, sexy dress and high heels in RE4, and it is clear that Leon is caught in a spell because of her. It's always Leon sexualizing her, not the other way around. And the villains in RE. The majority of the male villains are old men, like Salazar in RE4 and Birkin in the Darkside Chronicles--while the female villains are like, almost naked and sexy in a weird monster way. But if you still think that "males are just as sexualized as females," and if you have a problem with it, say something. Don't get mad at other people for saying something they have a problem with by claiming you have a problem with something else--fix it.
And all of this oversexualization is related to MASCULINITY. That's what I've been saying. The oversexualization of men is also related to masculinity and the idea that men can't be heroes unless they're masculine. hold on
User avatar #71 to #70 - lifeisnocabaret (08/30/2014) [-]
These video games enforce these notions of masculinity both ways and in turn enforce notions of power. It's all about the mindset these things perpetuate.

It is oppression because it is a matter of fact. That's how ingrained it is--we believe we can't fight it. You can't say oppression doesn't exist, even in places like America, because there is a type of person that succeeds and there is a type of person that doesn't, and it mostly doesn't boil down to laziness or true inferiority. It's about who's "at risk" to fail and who's not "at risk." Not everyone has equal opportunity and not everyone is born to the same circumstances, and it mostly depends on race, class and gender, and that's why these individual tiers have individual activism groups. We can't just say "well people are always gonna be oppressed" and not do anything about it, because no where in America's history (and hardly anywhere in world history) were white, straight males oppressed. Everyone else was.

For the last part of your argument, again, females are more negatively affected by this. Masculinity is related to power and sex and it is displayed in the male treatment of women. I've addressed this already.
User avatar #42 - revengeforfreeze (11/06/2013) [-]
yYOUS AN BRON?!
User avatar #43 to #42 - krobeles ONLINE (11/06/2013) [-]
ehm, say what now??
User avatar #44 to #43 - revengeforfreeze (11/09/2013) [-]
you're a brony?
User avatar #45 to #44 - krobeles ONLINE (11/09/2013) [-]
I dont identify as one, no.
Why?
User avatar #46 to #45 - revengeforfreeze (11/09/2013) [-]
>joined ponytime
>posted pony content
User avatar #47 to #46 - krobeles ONLINE (11/09/2013) [-]
So? That dosen't make me a brony. That makes a dude who watches My Little Pony.
I recon theres a differance.
User avatar #48 to #47 - revengeforfreeze (11/09/2013) [-]
well okay
i didnt know the difference tbh
User avatar #49 to #48 - krobeles ONLINE (11/09/2013) [-]
Its more of a personal thing, actually.
I view the "Bronies" as the greezy fat neck bearded Otaku-wannabies who attend cons and cosplay girls.
I'm not one of those.
User avatar #51 to #50 - krobeles ONLINE (11/09/2013) [-]
Why'de you ask anyway?
User avatar #52 to #51 - revengeforfreeze (11/09/2013) [-]
don tnkow.
User avatar #53 to #52 - krobeles ONLINE (11/09/2013) [-]
Weeell...Aaalright then..G'day...
#33 - danzeebass **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#32 - warlordvegeta **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #30 - gemleonn (12/21/2012) [-]
Why is it every time I go to someone's profile to call them a ****** , there's always some weird pony **** going on?
#28 - usernameiskill **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#26 - verminator (12/21/2012) [-]
Sup ***** !
User avatar #23 - elitefourkoga (12/21/2012) [-]
You're a ****** , harry.
User avatar #22 - orx (12/21/2012) [-]
This ******** got some kinky **** on his profile.
User avatar #16 - martiini (12/21/2012) [-]
Hey, ****** .
User avatar #15 - orx (12/21/2012) [-]
#12 - zonryu ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
#13 to #12 - zonryu ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
and the last one is of fluttershy as a witch
User avatar #14 to #13 - zonryu ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
good day to you sir
#1 - zonryu ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
#10 to #9 - zonryu ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
here is a color one
User avatar #11 to #10 - zonryu ONLINE (10/26/2012) [-]
BRB i have to do a chore :/
 Friends (0)