Upload
Login or register

konysugandanbitch

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/26/2012
Last Login:9/28/2016
Location:Norway ME
Stats
Content Ranking:#4284
Comment Ranking:#6090
Highest Content Rank:#3205
Highest Comment Rank:#2199
Content Thumbs: 775 total,  1098 ,  323
Comment Thumbs: 5320 total,  6339 ,  1019
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 62 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 63 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 62% (62/100)
Level 241 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 242 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:0
Content Views:108321
Times Content Favorited:70 times
Total Comments Made:2606
FJ Points:4798
Favorite Tags: Art (3) | fuck (3) | OC (3) | pixel (3) | blue (2) | Call of duty (2) | COD (2) | free (2) | Guns (2) | Hulk (2) | lantern (2) | she (2) | too (2) | torch (2) | vault (2) | xbox one (2)
You wanna know something, ask.

Text Posts

HD Gifs / WebMs

  • Views: 26567
    Thumbs Up 563 Thumbs Down 77 Total: +486
    Comments: 180
    Favorites: 52
    Uploaded: 11/24/14
    Looking for gifs? Looking for gifs?
  • Views: 587
    Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 4 Total: -1
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 01/18/14
    Hello! Hello!

latest user's comments

#189 - It depends, Advanced Warfare was dead after a year on console,…  [+] (1 reply) 09/16/2016 on DLC 0
User avatar
#193 - TheBobby (09/16/2016) [-]
I think it depends on the type of games you play too. I've always been drawn to Halo, Battlefield, GTA, more mainstream-y type games. The servers on these types of games go on for years and years because they are so popular. Games like evolved and titanfall are naturally going to die out very quickly because they are "trendy" games that are cool for a little bit and then die out. They don't have as big of a fan base as Halo, for example. I could definitely see how someone who prefers fallout, bioshock, any fantasy game, etc would prefer single player over multiplayer games though.
#178 - And then after a year or two hardly anyone plays and eventuall…  [+] (6 replies) 09/16/2016 on DLC +5
User avatar
#181 - TheBobby (09/16/2016) [-]
Any decent game will be playable for at least three or four years online. Besides, even if it does only last a year, that's still 12x longer than the month (most times week) it takes to beat virtually any single player game.
#228 - izayasonnen (09/16/2016) [-]
Bethesda games are my way of getting months of single gameplay.
User avatar
#189 - konysugandanbitch (09/16/2016) [-]
It depends, Advanced Warfare was dead after a year on console, but I do understand PC servers stay decently filled. It's just that those multiplayer only games never last. Evolved, Titanfall, games like that don't seem to last long, but they are great and I like them, it's just when the players move on what are you left with? And also while you can beat almost any single player game in a day or two, you can go back, unlock things you missed, or play for nostalgic reasons. In the end they'll make what they want but at least adding offline bots to a multiplayer game is always a good idea.
User avatar
#193 - TheBobby (09/16/2016) [-]
I think it depends on the type of games you play too. I've always been drawn to Halo, Battlefield, GTA, more mainstream-y type games. The servers on these types of games go on for years and years because they are so popular. Games like evolved and titanfall are naturally going to die out very quickly because they are "trendy" games that are cool for a little bit and then die out. They don't have as big of a fan base as Halo, for example. I could definitely see how someone who prefers fallout, bioshock, any fantasy game, etc would prefer single player over multiplayer games though.
#185 - vajuji (09/16/2016) [-]
But then you can play the game again even if the servers are down, I still play Star Wars Republic Commando even though online is dead
User avatar
#191 - TheBobby (09/16/2016) [-]
There are certainly older games that I still play single player because they are amazing games, but you'd have a hard time playing those same missions over and over every day for a few years. There are certain online games that don't leave my disc tray for almost a year at times because it's different every game you play.
#262 - But, it is, by definition. It's not bad, it just describes the…  [+] (1 reply) 08/12/2016 on Kids 0
#276 - hotpiss (08/12/2016) [-]
>Yes, we get more stuff, because we have a child, another human being who can't fend for themselves

don't have kids if you can't afford to have kids.

>to not be able to get benefits when people without children can would be weird and wrong.

People who do not have kids do not have access to benefits granted to people who have kids. You're entitled to all the benefits that the childless are.

>Also how does that contribute to climate change?

You don't see how bringing in another useless (for at least 18 years) human into an already overpopulated planet affects climate change?

>I personally don't want those aids, but because of personal decision and poor ones at that, I don't have much of an option.

see first point.

>Also I pay taxes too and take care of the kid, so... yeah, that means something I think.

Yes, you do, but you take much much more than the childless. Not saying that your child should be neglected, just puts a little dent into the selfishness in choosing sleep over a child argument.

just move to mormon country
#260 - Well if you adopt you can't really abort them. You can still k…  [+] (1 reply) 08/12/2016 on Kids 0
#278 - hotpiss (08/12/2016) [-]
wanna buy some baby parts? I gots 4 legs (i think they're legs) and a urethra.
#256 - I didn't say any reason for it is selfish, I said an argument …  [+] (1 reply) 08/12/2016 on Kids 0
#285 - empirennn (08/12/2016) [-]
**empirennn used "*roll picture*"**
**empirennn rolled image**I know you didn't say any reason was selfish, I did.

So your opinion is that one bring greater joy than the other, which is exactly the point the OP made but on a different side.

#184 - I don't personally care who does or does not want children, an…  [+] (7 replies) 08/12/2016 on Kids +3
User avatar
#289 - nudybooty (08/13/2016) [-]
How is it selfish saying you like your sleep or something like that? I know people that work their asses off and enjoy every little bit of sleep that get. I think it's selfish to assume "oh this person gets sleep and I don't. They are an asshole"
#220 - hotpiss (08/12/2016) [-]
I want kids but I'm just addicted to abortions.
User avatar
#260 - konysugandanbitch (08/12/2016) [-]
Well if you adopt you can't really abort them. You can still kill them but it's less legal than abortion.
#278 - hotpiss (08/12/2016) [-]
wanna buy some baby parts? I gots 4 legs (i think they're legs) and a urethra.
#199 - empirennn (08/12/2016) [-]
**empirennn used "*roll picture*"**
**empirennn rolled image**Any decision to have kids or not is selfish by definition so...kind of a redundant point to make.

I think the point of not wanting kids due to the hassle and limited freedom that comes with being a parent is a 100% legitimate point.

But then again, I'm also making a point that saying something is good or bad(agree/disagree) is not worth anything to anybody unless you explain yourself.
User avatar
#256 - konysugandanbitch (08/12/2016) [-]
I didn't say any reason for it is selfish, I said an argument against it based on how much sleep you'll get is selfish. And again that's not a bad thing, no one wants to wake up multiple times throughout the night, but it is still a selfish and poor stance.

Yes, those are legitimate albeit sometimes selfish reasons. And again, being selfish is not an inherently bad thing, it's just a way to define a certain action or motive. I want to build a gaming rig because I'm sick of console and it's bullshit, but with my child coming soon I can't drop $600-$700 on a good rig at the moment and it'll take a while before I can. Is that a selfish argument? Yes. Am I a bad person for it? No.

All I'm saying is that for someone to not want a kid because they want to sleep in is just not a point I can really accept as the argument. I want to sleep in too, and I'm going to spend a lot of time when I want to be sleeping taking care of him, but a child brings a kind of joy and feelings you just don't get from anything else.

Again if someone just has no desire in having a kid, not a problem, don't have one it can be a headache, just don't use the amount of sleep you'll get as an argument because that's the last thing that matters when you're having a child.
#285 - empirennn (08/12/2016) [-]
**empirennn used "*roll picture*"**
**empirennn rolled image**I know you didn't say any reason was selfish, I did.

So your opinion is that one bring greater joy than the other, which is exactly the point the OP made but on a different side.

#179 - I guess she must only do this on the weekends, or she doesn't …  [+] (3 replies) 08/12/2016 on Kids -1
#219 - hotpiss (08/12/2016) [-]
selfish? bullshit mate.

Tell me who claims more benefits from the government, parents or the childless. Tell me who uses more social services, parents and their kids or the childless. Having a child is also one of the single biggest ways a human can contribute to climate change.

So we're sorry if our selfish sleeping offends you while your kid gets financial aid from the taxes we contribute towards. if you like kids so much why don't you marry them
User avatar
#262 - konysugandanbitch (08/12/2016) [-]
But, it is, by definition. It's not bad, it just describes the action or motive behind it.

Yes, we get more stuff, because we have a child, another human being who can't fend for themselves, to not be able to get benefits when people without children can would be weird and wrong. Also how does that contribute to climate change? I mean if we didn't have children and we all died out then that would solve the problem, but I don't see that plan going beyond paper anytime soon. Well actually those SJW's seem to hate men and probably won't have children, so there may be hope yet!

You sleeping isn't offensive, it would be weird if it was. I personally don't want those aids, but because of personal decision and poor ones at that, I don't have much of an option. Also I pay taxes too and take care of the kid, so... yeah, that means something I think. Dude, like what the fuck dude, no one was supposed to know! My girlfriends gonna kill me if she finds out, I'm not in the Middle East I can't just do that shit dude, I gotta keep it on the DL.
#276 - hotpiss (08/12/2016) [-]
>Yes, we get more stuff, because we have a child, another human being who can't fend for themselves

don't have kids if you can't afford to have kids.

>to not be able to get benefits when people without children can would be weird and wrong.

People who do not have kids do not have access to benefits granted to people who have kids. You're entitled to all the benefits that the childless are.

>Also how does that contribute to climate change?

You don't see how bringing in another useless (for at least 18 years) human into an already overpopulated planet affects climate change?

>I personally don't want those aids, but because of personal decision and poor ones at that, I don't have much of an option.

see first point.

>Also I pay taxes too and take care of the kid, so... yeah, that means something I think.

Yes, you do, but you take much much more than the childless. Not saying that your child should be neglected, just puts a little dent into the selfishness in choosing sleep over a child argument.

just move to mormon country