Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

kingoshark    

Rank #6153 on Content
kingoshark Avatar Level 186 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Offline
Send mail to kingoshark Block kingoshark Invite kingoshark to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:11/10/2011
Last Login:7/24/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#6153
Comment Ranking:#21677
Highest Content Rank:#2380
Highest Comment Rank:#7848
Content Thumbs: 4627 total,  5224 ,  597
Comment Thumbs: 874 total,  948 ,  74
Content Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 145 Content: Faptastic → Level 146 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 186 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 187 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Subscribers:0
Content Views:135979
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:225
FJ Points:5538

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#12 - Their sub fleet is entirely diesel. Diesel submarines in moder… 07/17/2014 on Cake pls. 0
#82 - Misread that as a sub description. Nvm the liquid propelle… 07/17/2014 on Damn Commies 0
#81 - That first missile says that they have encountered numerous pr… 07/17/2014 on Damn Commies 0
#78 - Correction, the Trident I are out of commission. Only Trident … 07/16/2014 on Damn Commies 0
#77 - You are looking at the entirely wrong nuclear weapons. Those a…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/16/2014 on Damn Commies 0
#80 - sylaz (07/17/2014) [-]
Nope those are ICBM which are launched from silo's, which still beat the Americans.

But let's go look at the Russian SLBM.
Here's the latest one en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava
Which beat the American in both range and warheads.
Then we have this one: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-29RMU2_Layner
Which also happen to beat the American at the same points.

But then again it's not really a mystery why they are so much behind.
Given how busy they been in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the whole war on terror thingy. And then we have the money pits like the F-22 and F-35..

And on another note: Check out these awesome slogans haha









User avatar #82 - kingoshark (07/17/2014) [-]
Misread that as a sub description.
Nvm the liquid propellent comment.
User avatar #81 - kingoshark (07/17/2014) [-]
That first missile says that they have encountered numerous problems with launching systems. Although honestly they probably have the kinks worked out by now. Odd that the Layner is liquid fueled. Seems counter productive. And the Ohio class subs are on the way out within the next few years. And that sub also carries half the number of warheads.
User avatar #78 - kingoshark (07/16/2014) [-]
Correction, the Trident I are out of commission. Only Trident II's are active atm.
#67 - It's not about numbers, its about the total destructive force.  [+] (6 new replies) 07/16/2014 on Damn Commies 0
#71 - sylaz (07/16/2014) [-]
Well even by that the states still lose..
US forces :en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minuteman_III#Minuteman-III_.28LGM-30G.29

Russia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-24
#77 - kingoshark (07/16/2014) [-]
You are looking at the entirely wrong nuclear weapons. Those are Air force nukes. An entirely different program than the Naval Nuclear weapons.
These are the nuclear weapons that the SSBN's carry.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_II
Seriously, did you google "weakest USA nuclear weapons" to inflate your point?
#80 - sylaz (07/17/2014) [-]
Nope those are ICBM which are launched from silo's, which still beat the Americans.

But let's go look at the Russian SLBM.
Here's the latest one en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava
Which beat the American in both range and warheads.
Then we have this one: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-29RMU2_Layner
Which also happen to beat the American at the same points.

But then again it's not really a mystery why they are so much behind.
Given how busy they been in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the whole war on terror thingy. And then we have the money pits like the F-22 and F-35..

And on another note: Check out these awesome slogans haha









User avatar #82 - kingoshark (07/17/2014) [-]
Misread that as a sub description.
Nvm the liquid propellent comment.
User avatar #81 - kingoshark (07/17/2014) [-]
That first missile says that they have encountered numerous problems with launching systems. Although honestly they probably have the kinks worked out by now. Odd that the Layner is liquid fueled. Seems counter productive. And the Ohio class subs are on the way out within the next few years. And that sub also carries half the number of warheads.
User avatar #78 - kingoshark (07/16/2014) [-]
Correction, the Trident I are out of commission. Only Trident II's are active atm.
#43 - Interesting fact about Nuclear Weapon power standings. A singl…  [+] (9 new replies) 07/16/2014 on Damn Commies -1
#58 - sylaz (07/16/2014) [-]
User avatar #67 - kingoshark (07/16/2014) [-]
It's not about numbers, its about the total destructive force.
#71 - sylaz (07/16/2014) [-]
Well even by that the states still lose..
US forces :en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minuteman_III#Minuteman-III_.28LGM-30G.29

Russia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-24
#77 - kingoshark (07/16/2014) [-]
You are looking at the entirely wrong nuclear weapons. Those are Air force nukes. An entirely different program than the Naval Nuclear weapons.
These are the nuclear weapons that the SSBN's carry.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_II
Seriously, did you google "weakest USA nuclear weapons" to inflate your point?
#80 - sylaz (07/17/2014) [-]
Nope those are ICBM which are launched from silo's, which still beat the Americans.

But let's go look at the Russian SLBM.
Here's the latest one en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava
Which beat the American in both range and warheads.
Then we have this one: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-29RMU2_Layner
Which also happen to beat the American at the same points.

But then again it's not really a mystery why they are so much behind.
Given how busy they been in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the whole war on terror thingy. And then we have the money pits like the F-22 and F-35..

And on another note: Check out these awesome slogans haha









User avatar #82 - kingoshark (07/17/2014) [-]
Misread that as a sub description.
Nvm the liquid propellent comment.
User avatar #81 - kingoshark (07/17/2014) [-]
That first missile says that they have encountered numerous problems with launching systems. Although honestly they probably have the kinks worked out by now. Odd that the Layner is liquid fueled. Seems counter productive. And the Ohio class subs are on the way out within the next few years. And that sub also carries half the number of warheads.
User avatar #78 - kingoshark (07/16/2014) [-]
Correction, the Trident I are out of commission. Only Trident II's are active atm.
#53 - anonymous (07/16/2014) [-]
Bullshit. Russia is the leading nuclear power, and the French and British also have these subs.
#89 - Read it for the plot  [+] (1 new reply) 07/10/2014 on You know it's true +2
User avatar #91 - deadguyseven (07/10/2014) [-]
i seem to not have all my crying pictures, but goddamnit man, i love you for this.
#16 - Reminds me of this 06/20/2014 on We are one +2
#188 - This sort of shit is exactly why I'm waiting until I'm done wi… 06/12/2014 on war feels 0
[ 29 Total ]

user's channels

Join Subscribe morbid-channel

user's friends

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)