Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

kingoshark

Rank #12624 on Comments
kingoshark Avatar Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to kingoshark Block kingoshark Invite kingoshark to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:11/10/2011
Last Login:12/16/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#12624
Highest Content Rank:#2380
Highest Comment Rank:#4403
Content Thumbs: 4633 total,  5230 ,  597
Comment Thumbs: 1341 total,  1430 ,  89
Content Level Progress: 3% (3/100)
Level 146 Content: Faptastic → Level 147 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 40% (40/100)
Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:136897
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:253
FJ Points:5916

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

latest user's comments

#5 - Picture 10/29/2014 on (untitled) +28
#543 - But is the future economically viable and/or mass producible?  [+] (1 new reply) 10/26/2014 on Hopefully not unpopular here 0
User avatar #544 - rainbowrush (10/26/2014) [-]
Mass producing most of it isn't possible, atm. We can get much more clean energy than the world needs, though. The main problem with high efficiency solar panels is low efficiency solar panels.
#532 - In the end I think we have to approach it correctly. Should we…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/26/2014 on Hopefully not unpopular here 0
User avatar #540 - rainbowrush (10/26/2014) [-]
The future is here. We're just not using it.
User avatar #543 - kingoshark (10/26/2014) [-]
But is the future economically viable and/or mass producible?
User avatar #544 - rainbowrush (10/26/2014) [-]
Mass producing most of it isn't possible, atm. We can get much more clean energy than the world needs, though. The main problem with high efficiency solar panels is low efficiency solar panels.
#452 - And squibles 10/25/2014 on Hopefully not unpopular here 0
#445 - Work for Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory 1. Weldseams are …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/25/2014 on Hopefully not unpopular here +9
User avatar #452 - kingoshark (10/25/2014) [-]
And squibles
#72 - I work in the Nuclear industry myself and have a pretty deep u…  [+] (18 new replies) 10/25/2014 on Hopefully not unpopular here +12
User avatar #505 - rainbowrush (10/26/2014) [-]
The problem, I find, is that people think they know shit about other options, when they don't. Take solar power, for instance. You have both high efficiency panels, and low efficiency ones. People only argue about the low efficiency ones,. Not only that, because of the popularity in low efficiency ones, not enough high efficiency ones are made, or worked on. Solar power can easily provide enough power to the whole world.

Water power is also really good, with the only drawback being location dependent.

Thorium and fusion are of course the dreams, though there are countless other ways to harness unimaginable amounts of energy.
User avatar #532 - kingoshark (10/26/2014) [-]
In the end I think we have to approach it correctly. Should we abandon a perfectly good technology based on the fact that something better will come along? Should we have gone straight from horse drawn carriages to flying cars and accepted nothing else because flying cars would be "so much better than wheeled ones"? Working to develop the future is a must, but ignoring the gifts of the present out of fear bred through ignorance is only going to inhibit our shot at a brighter future.
User avatar #540 - rainbowrush (10/26/2014) [-]
The future is here. We're just not using it.
User avatar #543 - kingoshark (10/26/2014) [-]
But is the future economically viable and/or mass producible?
User avatar #544 - rainbowrush (10/26/2014) [-]
Mass producing most of it isn't possible, atm. We can get much more clean energy than the world needs, though. The main problem with high efficiency solar panels is low efficiency solar panels.
#343 - firesky (10/25/2014) [-]
I openly admit I'm no fan of nuclear power. In spite of improving efficiency and security (maybe not in France www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/nuclear-reaction/greenpeace-activists-occupy-frances-fessenhei/blog/48557/ ) a lot the past couple of decades it's still alarming, that there's worldwide still no appropriate repository for highly radioactive material after ~60 years. I'm actually awaiting us copying Futurama and sending that shit into space (alltough it's high mass could be a problem here)
And because of greed also current repositories can be dangerous (Asse in Germany, or Mailuu-Suu in Russia)

Nuclear plants are still better than coal plants imo, but I fear we still underestimate the consequences mankind could face in a couple of decades or centuries. Therefore I think we should look for new technologies and improvements in allready known ones. Water (if not damaging the ecosystem), Biomass, Wind, Sun, Fusion,...
There sure are some possibilities.
User avatar #194 - Kairyuka (10/25/2014) [-]
The best argument against modern nuclear power projects is the waste left behind. If it's just dangerous junk that has to be put in a dump somewhere it's kind of a problem...
#95 - kanedam (10/25/2014) [-]
sure. of course i like to talk to someone who is in that field.
let me ask a few questions:

which power plant do you work at?
where do you work? (country if you cant tell which power plant exactly)
How did you overcome the problem of not being able to check the weldseam inside the tanks?
How did you overcome the problems with the concrete and steel acting strangely because of the high radiation over long periods?
What kind of redundancy level do you use? (3times, 5 times, 10times? how many redundant systems are there?)
How man leaks have happened in the history of the plant you work at?
How much material has leaked?
How many minor systemfailures have happened in the history of the power plant?
What kind of civil-protection plans are there in case of a serious emergency, and who exactly is in charge of putting them in action?
What do you do with the waste material? in detail (recycle? store? how, where, when, how long, how much does it cost?)
How much funding/subventions does the power plant or the company get from the gov? (also includes tax cuts)
How long have you been working in the power plant?
What exactly is your position?
How long has your training been?
How often do you use workers that are officially working for different companies to avoid having to deal with the radiation-accumulation of workers?

I'm really curious and like to hear about that kind of stuff. great to find someone who's so open to talk about it!
User avatar #445 - kingoshark (10/25/2014) [-]
Work for Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory
1. Weldseams are certified several times an checked periodically at certain intervals. We have an approximation of when the weldseam will fail and we replace it at least 10 years before the earliest possible failure.
2. Neutron embrittlement of metals and concrete is very well understood and we ensure that the stresses that could potentially cause any sort of failure will never be met. We take the most conservative estimates for the worst case scenario and make that the boundary to never be crossed.
3. At least 2 automatic failsafes, with numerous alarms and warnings before the failsafes are ever used. If a failsafe goes off, people are losing their jobs for letting it hit that point.
4-6. I work more in the research, development, and implementation portions, but from what I've seen there have been no accidents that have caused more exposure than the average person receives in a year due to the decay of Radon-222.
7. Since the three mile island incident, the department of Energy is largely responsible for ensuring proper protocol is followed in the event of an accident, and would inform the governor of what actions should be taken to minimize damage.
8. Newest method of dealing with was is phosphate glass. Here's a link to the methods describing the process: www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-14251.pdf
9. I haven't seen the exact numbers, but I know that corners don't get cut. The paranoia is real.
10. Been in the field for >20 years.
11. Management and research. Started as an operator.
12. Working as an operator is >2 of incredibly intense training, before even getting near a reactor.
13. Never an issue. People in plants get exposed to less radiation than lifeguards.
calling people who were curious: ieatpaste atomschlumpf kanedam
User avatar #452 - kingoshark (10/25/2014) [-]
And squibles
User avatar #224 - atomschlumpf (10/25/2014) [-]
Same as ieatpaste, I would like to get mentioned once he answers, please
User avatar #220 - necrophyxia (10/25/2014) [-]
I can't answer these questions for him, because I've never worked at a civilian plant. but I was a Nuke in the Navy, and I can say in the something like 50 years we've had the nuclear program in the Navy we haven't had a single radioactive incident. Nothing worthy of even a bit of worry. Even in Japan where Nuclear power is shunned like ebolaids carriers, we're allowed not only to be in their ports but have extended stays there with out nuclear vessels.

In short, my best contribution in this is to do a little research on the Nuclear Navy to see where the nuclear power field might be going rather than where it is today. As of now, Civilian plants are no where near as safe but I feel that in just a few decades they will be up to par or possibly even better.

TL : DR I'm down for Nuclear power, but the Civilian world needs to do some catching up before anyone will be ready for it to be what is has the potential to be
#252 - dhumbassckids (10/25/2014) [-]
I'm currently in DEP and my rate is Nuke anything important you can tell me about school or fleet life? I know that school isn't the easiest thing but I auto-qualified so I should be smart enough to pass if I work hard. Also I heard that everyone treats Nukes like shit because of the few that act like /b/-tier autist.
User avatar #277 - necrophyxia (10/25/2014) [-]
Feel free to ask away about anything else you might be curious about. I'll answer it all to the best of my ability

But the number one thing to remember: Every galley in the Navy is the best galley in the Navy.
User avatar #273 - necrophyxia (10/25/2014) [-]
Yes the school is hard, but yes you can do it if you work hard. Protip: git gud at hands on learning and book learning. They're gonna be all you do in the hardest parts of the school

Yes people hate nukes because of uppity nerds. You'll see why when you're in school, but don't fret because the cool guys always get recognition regardless of rate.

Prepare to do looooooots of waiting in between sections of your schooling. Indoc, T-Track, and Grad hold can be anywhere from one month to six months each depending on your rate. Mechanics wait the longest but have the shortest A-school

Fleet life and prototype can both be compared to boring, kill and fetch quests in an MMO. Find a qual you want to do, read up on it over and over until you memorize everything you think is important. Take your knowledge to a qualified sailor dictated by said qual and test your knowledge. This is where the hands on learning/ book learning comes in. All you will have to study is the physical layout of the ship itself and the many many many many many big ass manuals that will be available to you. You either get a signature, or yelled at and have to go learn some other things. Rinse and repeat about 300 times and you'll be qualified.

Welcome to your taste of hell that will make you feel like a goddamned superhero once you're done
User avatar #120 - ieatpaste (10/25/2014) [-]
please mention me if this gets answered i am also interested
#121 - kanedam (10/25/2014) [-]
#84 - squiblles (10/25/2014) [-]
please go on. I'm SUPER interested. not sarcastic
#53 - Uncensored because I love you.  [+] (3 new replies) 10/21/2014 on Porn 16 +8
#65 - mysticprophecy has deleted their comment.
User avatar #64 - mysticprophecy (10/21/2014) [-]
Thanks!
User avatar #55 - pinecest (10/21/2014) [-]
I love you.

Have some pinecest.

tinyurl.com/knczk2r
tinyurl.com/nuvsczc
tinyurl.com/pemjgaw (long loader, super HD)
#129 - Division 058. got out last January. 10/18/2014 on Anon's Boot Camp Experience 0
#49 - The training is worth it, if just for the experience. Depe… 10/11/2014 on Farewell, FunnyJunk 0
#38 - Hey bub, active duty Nuke here. Here's some tips: 1. D…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/11/2014 on Farewell, FunnyJunk 0
User avatar #42 - spacefield (10/11/2014) [-]
10. Yeah I've seen through some of my recruiters BS. But he really hasn't talked it up too much. He just told me stuff I already knew or could have found out.

I ask only because of your pic related. Are you a submariner? [If not, ignore the following]
Is it worth the training which I have heard is hell?
And how much leave do you get as a submariner? I've heard it's more than if I were on a carrier for example.
User avatar #49 - kingoshark (10/11/2014) [-]
The training is worth it, if just for the experience.
Depends on the ship. You go boomer, you get plenty of leave, but not much in the way of seeing the world. Fast attacks and Guided missiles get less leave (Taking little to no leave over 2-3 years isn't unheard of). And the final possibility is being on the Spec Ops boat. You're in port for maybe 10 days out of the year. But you get to do cool shit. And the training isn't too hellish, you get used to it. Being a diver can be tough if you aren't into pt i guess.
[ 57 Total ]

user's channels

Join Subscribe morbid-channel

user's friends

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)