Upload
Login or register

killerkost

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/29/2011
Last Login:5/30/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5343
Comment Ranking:#5542
Highest Content Rank:#5342
Highest Comment Rank:#5472
Content Thumbs: 12 total,  14 ,  2
Comment Thumbs: 1248 total,  1996 ,  748
Content Level Progress: 25.42% (15/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 199 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 200 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1580
Total Comments Made:323
FJ Points:1006

  • Views: 1576
    Thumbs Up 14 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +12
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/24/16
    Hold the door Hold the door

latest user's comments

#22 - Man I hate this debate. I get it that people want to own guns.…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/20/2016 on Hunting With An AR-15 +4
User avatar
#42 - thepizzadevourer (05/21/2016) [-]
>if you want free speech, bring a better argument then "there was an amendment that was written over 200 years ago"
>if you want the right of habeas corpus, bring a better argument then "there was an amendment that was written over 200 years ago"
>if you want freedom of religion, bring a better argument then "there was an amendment that was written over 200 years ago"

You see why this is dangerous? These laws were put in place to protect freedoms. They are already in place. The onus is not on the pro-gun people to "prove" why they need gun rights. It's on the anti-gun people do demonstrate why those rights are no longer needed, and to amend the laws to reflect that. And so far, they've failed to do that.
User avatar
#36 - useroftheLOLZ (05/21/2016) [-]
Okay?

Should we apply the same to fucking free speech, the right to a fair and speedy trial, police being unable to do whatever they want, black rights and so forth?

Its a fucking constitutional right. What more do you need? It was written for self defense from powers both foreign and domestic.
#50 - Jowi (05/21/2016) [-]
Except America has foregone the right to a fair trial on numerous occasions. Look at G-mo for a start.

No government in the world intends to be bound by any rule it makes. Your constitution has been changed multiple times. The 2nd Amendment was a change to your constitution and Amendments have been appealed before.
The right to bear arms will only last as long as there is a strong lobby for it. It is not some holy gift given to you that will last forever
User avatar
#35 - Ripsometime (05/21/2016) [-]
When people make a proper argument using the second amendment, they state why the second amendment was created and try to relate it to how we live today.

But I agree that most people who use it as an argument are like "hurr durr guns should not be illegal because they are legal mate".
#15 - Mirin that form 05/20/2016 on Don't forget leg day +15
#30 - > lol implying I have sex but yeah the last time I…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/20/2016 on Anon races in bed +2
User avatar
#32 - shaddyz (05/20/2016) [-]
maybe fuck the living then?
#25 - Now I'm all for giving a woman an orgasm but lets be honest: n…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/20/2016 on Anon races in bed -1
#31 - shiftyscent (05/20/2016) [-]
I've had sex with women where I never nutted, they all seemed to feel just as terrible about it as I do if I can't make their clam pop.
User avatar
#26 - pallmallhero (05/20/2016) [-]
If that is you perception of sex, then you are having sex with the wrong kind of people.
Though your point might be somewhat true during casual hookups, but even then I think girls like to do their part and make you cum.
But if you are in a intimate relationship with a girl you love, then she will equally care about your pleasure as much as you do about hers.
User avatar
#30 - killerkost (05/20/2016) [-]
> lol implying I have sex

but yeah the last time I had sex it felt like necrophilia
User avatar
#32 - shaddyz (05/20/2016) [-]
maybe fuck the living then?
#28 - 200 pouds? wtf *****. thats like 95kg which is not that much. … 05/19/2016 on /b/ decides whether a... +14
#167 - So what exactly is bad about it? You use free education at a m…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/19/2016 on Hillary Snapchat 0
User avatar
#263 - shaddyz (05/21/2016) [-]
thats assuming you like what you are doing and do not want to change
#103 - Well, its because christian people still yell that "homos… 05/04/2016 on OhShitSon +2
#35 - "Hello, 911? yeah there is this ***** about to eat a dawg… 05/02/2016 on What a snitch +19
#141 - There is a difference between stanting for something officiall…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/25/2016 on Its over lads -2
User avatar
#167 - izdubar (04/25/2016) [-]
If you don't have evidence, you don't have an argument dangus.
User avatar
#194 - sircontagious (04/25/2016) [-]
this interview is over
#143 - thatsnotumor (04/25/2016) [-]
"U must suck at conversations!" Says the man who can hardly type a legible sentence worth a damn. I can see why you get mad when I ask for evidence, since clearly that isn't your strongpoint. Really? OCB papers were misused, so trump is... actually, I have no fucking idea what you were trying to say. All those drugs must have melted your brain. And I was actually pretty specific about WHY he was wrong. "You poor bastard wouldn't even know what to do" yeah right. Providing evidence is where a good conversation STARTS. It gives you something to talk about and helps both parties to actually ACHIEVE something.
#128 - You do know that a protest isn't a candidate debate where ever…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/24/2016 on Its over lads -2
#134 - thatsnotumor (04/24/2016) [-]
How is it "100% true" again? You also provide no evidence. Nationalism isn't racism. And as I said, giving a platform to racists requires actually giving a platform to racists and their ideology. It requires outright support for their actions. Otherwise the same argument could be applied to shopping malls.
User avatar
#141 - killerkost (04/25/2016) [-]
There is a difference between stanting for something officially and creating something by public association. Take OCB papers for example. They were never specifically intended to be used for smoking pot, yet by the public they are pritty much exclusively used for exactly that.

Also you must suck at conversations in general if your go to counter argument is always "provide evidence". You probably use that shit so often that once someone hits you with evidence you poor bastard wouldn't even know what to do.
User avatar
#167 - izdubar (04/25/2016) [-]
If you don't have evidence, you don't have an argument dangus.
User avatar
#194 - sircontagious (04/25/2016) [-]
this interview is over
#143 - thatsnotumor (04/25/2016) [-]
"U must suck at conversations!" Says the man who can hardly type a legible sentence worth a damn. I can see why you get mad when I ask for evidence, since clearly that isn't your strongpoint. Really? OCB papers were misused, so trump is... actually, I have no fucking idea what you were trying to say. All those drugs must have melted your brain. And I was actually pretty specific about WHY he was wrong. "You poor bastard wouldn't even know what to do" yeah right. Providing evidence is where a good conversation STARTS. It gives you something to talk about and helps both parties to actually ACHIEVE something.
[ 320 Total ]
Refresh Comments (0)
Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!