x
Click to expand

kgmonell

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 20
Consoles Owned: ps3, 3ds, psvita
Video Games Played: adveentures, shooters, football
PSN: kgmonell
Interests: football, friends, outings
Date Signed Up:5/23/2013
Last Login:5/11/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#26994
Highest Content Rank:#3155
Highest Comment Rank:#6102
Content Thumbs: 542 total,  587 ,  45
Comment Thumbs: 513 total,  535 ,  22
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 47 Content: Sammich eater → Level 48 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 142 Comments: Faptastic → Level 143 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:23
Content Views:39383
Total Comments Made:92
FJ Points:1075

Funny Text/Links

latest user's comments

#494 - to be fair, bisexual actually doesn't necessarily mean attract… 03/26/2015 on tumblr Logic +1
#13 - bridesmaids were originally paid by royalty and were just wome… 03/14/2015 on Something for any upcoming... +8
#201 - Picture 03/13/2015 on super happy murder fun time +2
#17 - im guessing you meant there are two women there? and i know it…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/12/2015 on trying to learn about... 0
User avatar #27 - advice (02/12/2015) [-]
my advice is to find a new horse to beat, as this one is pretty dead
#7 - typical patriarchy to make the one out of four a woman. they h…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/11/2015 on trying to learn about... 0
User avatar #63 - gingeredhead (02/12/2015) [-]
Feminazi
#12 - brutustootus (02/11/2015) [-]
There to wo,en there
User avatar #17 - kgmonell (02/12/2015) [-]
im guessing you meant there are two women there? and i know it was part of the joke about complaining everything is sexist. you should check your replies a little more carefully next time. just my advice
User avatar #27 - advice (02/12/2015) [-]
my advice is to find a new horse to beat, as this one is pretty dead
#29 - batrachians uses everything but the k. 02/10/2015 on Futurama 0
#27 - that would be amazing. so amazing  [+] (1 new reply) 02/10/2015 on Futurama 0
User avatar #28 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
First thing I would tell them to clone would be my own balls

No idea why just
If I see that kind of technology I would want to put my nuts in/on it
#24 - thats entirely your right to be skeptical. it is the nature of…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/10/2015 on Futurama 0
User avatar #26 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
I mean
on the flipside

That would be some shit to see you know?
User avatar #27 - kgmonell (02/10/2015) [-]
that would be amazing. so amazing
User avatar #28 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
First thing I would tell them to clone would be my own balls

No idea why just
If I see that kind of technology I would want to put my nuts in/on it
#22 - its like schrodingers cat. the cat is obviously alive OR dead,…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/10/2015 on Futurama 0
User avatar #23 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
Well

All I know is until I have it displayed to me, and I see someone effectively clone something out of _ only itself_ I'm gonna call BS

Like I'm sorry but it sounds like the fever dream of a delusional schitzophrenic and the best I can do is accept that if I see it, I'll believe it then
User avatar #30 - shove (02/10/2015) [-]
It can't be done in real life. Essentially the crux of the proof is something called the axiom of choice which allows for us to choose an element from every equivalence class of points. We then show that the ball is "paradoxical" X is G-paradoxical if there exists A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bm disjoint and g1, ... gn, h1, ..., hm in G such that X=the union gi(Ai)=the union hi(Bi) for all i, where X is some set and G is an isometry which allows us to conclude the weak Banach-Tarski. However, due to the nature of how we chose the points there is no way to do this in real life, as choice only tells us that we can choose points but not how.
User avatar #24 - kgmonell (02/10/2015) [-]
thats entirely your right to be skeptical. it is the nature of science to be challenged and that is one of the most amazing things about it. it does not silence those who dont believe only comes forward with more reason. i can not explain it to the point you understand, possibly nor could anyone. if we ever unlock the paradox (Which is what it is btw- something that shouldnt be able to happen) then maybe you will believe. or maybe the paradox is just that. an impossibility that for a moment seemed more. who knows?
User avatar #26 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
I mean
on the flipside

That would be some shit to see you know?
User avatar #27 - kgmonell (02/10/2015) [-]
that would be amazing. so amazing
User avatar #28 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
First thing I would tell them to clone would be my own balls

No idea why just
If I see that kind of technology I would want to put my nuts in/on it
#20 - its basically like this: things can be taken apart into a fini…  [+] (8 new replies) 02/10/2015 on Futurama 0
User avatar #21 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
It helped, sort of. I understand the concept, but now I don't understand the concept.

Like, it sounds like bullshit.
User avatar #22 - kgmonell (02/10/2015) [-]
its like schrodingers cat. the cat is obviously alive OR dead, but beause you cant know you treat is as both. in this we assume it must be possible but is not something we can do it is just how the pieces of objects form together
User avatar #23 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
Well

All I know is until I have it displayed to me, and I see someone effectively clone something out of _ only itself_ I'm gonna call BS

Like I'm sorry but it sounds like the fever dream of a delusional schitzophrenic and the best I can do is accept that if I see it, I'll believe it then
User avatar #30 - shove (02/10/2015) [-]
It can't be done in real life. Essentially the crux of the proof is something called the axiom of choice which allows for us to choose an element from every equivalence class of points. We then show that the ball is "paradoxical" X is G-paradoxical if there exists A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bm disjoint and g1, ... gn, h1, ..., hm in G such that X=the union gi(Ai)=the union hi(Bi) for all i, where X is some set and G is an isometry which allows us to conclude the weak Banach-Tarski. However, due to the nature of how we chose the points there is no way to do this in real life, as choice only tells us that we can choose points but not how.
User avatar #24 - kgmonell (02/10/2015) [-]
thats entirely your right to be skeptical. it is the nature of science to be challenged and that is one of the most amazing things about it. it does not silence those who dont believe only comes forward with more reason. i can not explain it to the point you understand, possibly nor could anyone. if we ever unlock the paradox (Which is what it is btw- something that shouldnt be able to happen) then maybe you will believe. or maybe the paradox is just that. an impossibility that for a moment seemed more. who knows?
User avatar #26 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
I mean
on the flipside

That would be some shit to see you know?
User avatar #27 - kgmonell (02/10/2015) [-]
that would be amazing. so amazing
User avatar #28 - captainprincess (02/10/2015) [-]
First thing I would tell them to clone would be my own balls

No idea why just
If I see that kind of technology I would want to put my nuts in/on it
[ 60 Total ]

items

Total unique items point value: 300 / Total items point value: 650
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - DarKAng (12/29/2014) [-]
Hello, how are you.
 Friends (0)