Upload
Login or register

jusbox

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:4/30/2012
Last Login:8/30/2016
Location:Norway
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2394
Comment Ranking:#4773
Highest Content Rank:#2166
Highest Comment Rank:#4750
Content Thumbs: 682 total,  744 ,  62
Comment Thumbs: 1304 total,  1577 ,  273
Content Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 53 Content: Sammich eater → Level 54 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 88% (88/100)
Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:39149
Times Content Favorited:56 times
Total Comments Made:412
FJ Points:1743
I am me. Me is great.

  • Views: 25672
    Thumbs Up 519 Thumbs Down 25 Total: +494
    Comments: 65
    Favorites: 46
    Uploaded: 10/03/15
    Roll a dBeautiful Roll a dBeautiful

latest user's comments

#50 - Perfect girl 10/10 08/29/2016 on Woodworking for women 0
#10 - The validity of this "expiriment" is without a doubt… 08/29/2016 on It's Ok To Hit Muslim Women +4
#1 - Good. You should hate yourself you ******* weeb. 08/28/2016 on I hate myself for not... +10
#95 - ******* bitch. I don't know the aftermath of this, but that ki…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/24/2016 on Police brutality never ends +1
User avatar
#102 - notwalkingwaffles (08/24/2016) [-]
It's a legitimate attempt at instigating a riot.
#143 - Oh, no I don't need all of them. 3-4 should be fine. 08/22/2016 on Rekt 0
#35 - Sources please  [+] (2 new replies) 08/22/2016 on Rekt +4
User avatar
#37 - ruba (08/22/2016) [-]
...I am really not gonna gather every single debunked claim of evidence of jesus just to prove myself to a random git on funnyjunk.

You find empirical, well-sourced evidence of jesus of nazareth ever being born and then come back.

Oh, and the Turin Shroud is a fake. It was carbon dated to being made between 1290 and 1360, not to mention it is one of the over 40 alleged burial cloths of Christ.
User avatar
#143 - jusbox (08/22/2016) [-]
Oh, no I don't need all of them. 3-4 should be fine.
#13 - Aw yeah, ************* Jethro Tull 08/21/2016 on The Kelpie 0
#5 - Well, I mean, Jesus was an actual dude running around being ni…  [+] (21 new replies) 08/21/2016 on Rekt -7
#7 - ruba (08/21/2016) [-]
The majority of claims of Jesus ever existing in the first place have been debunked or revealed to be revisionist forgeries.
User avatar
#59 - minish (08/22/2016) [-]
The things like 'His knucklebones' and all that stuff, sure.

But the Tacitus and Sustonius writings, as well as those of Josephus and Luke (He was a doctor) are testament to a well known figure called Christ in those days.
User avatar
#60 - ruba (08/22/2016) [-]
If they get carbon dated and turn out to be from anywhere near that period I might consider their credibility

>>#37
User avatar
#65 - minish (08/22/2016) [-]
This is the Tacitus writings link for Wikipedia (which is the most layman's version, it also has the references below).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Christ#Authenticity_and_historical_value
User avatar
#66 - ruba (08/22/2016) [-]
>>#63
User avatar
#62 - minish (08/22/2016) [-]
What, carbon date the major writings that tell us about the Caesars?

I'm pretty sure 90% of the scientific community at least, not to mention most historians, agree those sources are all valid (The Gospel of Luke is questioned because it also got put in the Bible, which immediately vetoes it's validity nowadays, but his other writings and work are definitely valid)
User avatar
#63 - ruba (08/22/2016) [-]
Yes, actually.

Find the original manuscript and carbon date it.

As to an existing debunk:
www.truthbeknown.com/pliny.htm
User avatar
#67 - minish (08/22/2016) [-]
In response to the post made, the claims made are slightly off, and incorrectly worded in places.

'Christians' were present in Nero's time, as they were gentile or roman followers of Christ, and they had no other name. Messianic Jews, on the other hand, were referred to as Jews, and still are today mostly.

Also the presence of the word 'Christ' in an imperial document isn't off at all. Roman documents used the claimed titles of usurpers and traitors to show why they were being (usually killed) in the first place. Pilate and other documents refer to Jesus as Christ because he had no other defining descriptor (Jesus was a common name) other than the fact he was from Nazareth. All Imperial records use two names when describing people (e.g. with consuls) and using two for Christ is no exception.
User avatar
#68 - minish (08/22/2016) [-]
Also, the fact he never refers to it again is proof for it's validity, not against. If the passage were forged, along with the annals, then the Christ and Christians would have been made more prevalent throughout, instead of the single passage in question.
User avatar
#35 - jusbox (08/22/2016) [-]
Sources please
User avatar
#37 - ruba (08/22/2016) [-]
...I am really not gonna gather every single debunked claim of evidence of jesus just to prove myself to a random git on funnyjunk.

You find empirical, well-sourced evidence of jesus of nazareth ever being born and then come back.

Oh, and the Turin Shroud is a fake. It was carbon dated to being made between 1290 and 1360, not to mention it is one of the over 40 alleged burial cloths of Christ.
User avatar
#143 - jusbox (08/22/2016) [-]
Oh, no I don't need all of them. 3-4 should be fine.
User avatar
#14 - magmon (08/22/2016) [-]
The tomb of a Buddhist monk in India, which is adorned with a sculpture of the man within and possesses scars inlaid in his feet (offset, as though one puncture through feet layered over one another) and hands, tends to disagree with you. Sure, it could have just been a dude who happened to have been brutally crucified, but I like to go with the idea that this Buddhist was "Jesus", just a simple man spreading the philosophies of the Buddha, who was embellished more and more over time.
User avatar
#45 - boneblast (08/22/2016) [-]
I mean, it's not like Rome crucified people for even really small-time crimes and shit.
User avatar
#34 - ruba (08/22/2016) [-]
He could have been like the alleged description of jesus, but I strongly doubt he was anything other than just "a random dude that got fucked up for spreading buddhism".
#29 - vajuji (08/22/2016) [-]
Pics or it didn't happen
#16 - justanordinarydude (08/22/2016) [-]
**justanordinarydude used "*roll picture*"**
**justanordinarydude rolled image**Why the fuck would Jesus's tomb be in India?
User avatar
#17 - magmon (08/22/2016) [-]
Because he was a traveling monk, as was common in that day. Wandering, preaching the road to enlightenment to those who would listen. Many of Jesus' teachings are seemingly Buddhist in origin, which is aided by this find and associated theory.
#19 - justanordinarydude (08/22/2016) [-]
**justanordinarydude used "*roll picture*"**
**justanordinarydude rolled image**Fuck, it's already hard enough to prove that Jesus even existed, but now you want to say that he was a wondering monk who ended up dead in India? Prove it.
User avatar
#154 - magmon (08/24/2016) [-]
Look into the tomb. I have a documentary saved somewhere if you'd like a link.
User avatar
#57 - kabutoxking (08/22/2016) [-]
which berserk movie is that if anyone knows
#13 - Can still steal everything inside the car. 08/19/2016 on When your son is a Dumbass 0
#1083 - WoW and Overwatch. So, Titan I guess? 08/19/2016 on Best Game? 0