Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

jewishcommunazi    

Rank #2274 on Comments
jewishcommunazi Avatar Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Online
Send mail to jewishcommunazi Block jewishcommunazi Invite jewishcommunazi to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 20
Date Signed Up:7/13/2013
Last Login:11/24/2014
Location:Portugal
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7283
Comment Ranking:#2277
Highest Content Rank:#7148
Highest Comment Rank:#1432
Content Thumbs: 24 total,  45 ,  21
Comment Thumbs: 4427 total,  4992 ,  565
Content Level Progress: 38.98% (23/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 73% (73/100)
Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:4189
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:2936
FJ Points:3611

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

  • Views: 718
    Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 9 Total: -6
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/19/14
    Jon Lajoie Jon Lajoie

latest user's comments

#73168 - Post political comics plox. 22 seconds ago on Politics - politics news,... 0
#7 - At first I thought the eyes on the last panel were bacteria or… 34 minutes ago on Prohibition in North Korea 0
#5 - Cell phones not being allowed in the DPRK is false propaganda.… 1 hour ago on Prohibition in North Korea +2
#44 - This is totally not a massive generalization or anything... 12 hours ago on I know the horse is dead... +1
#73044 - I also believe in single-party democratic centralism. 11/21/2014 on Politics - politics news,... 0
#73043 - I believe in collective leadership and the ability to purge co…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/21/2014 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #73044 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I also believe in single-party democratic centralism.
#73036 - I believe in state socialism though, and I think people who co…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/21/2014 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #73037 - kanadetenshi (11/21/2014) [-]
The inherent problem with state ownership of the economy is that there is no reason for the state to stay benevolent and not becoming corrupt. You'd just have to have faith that the state becomes a benevolent dictatorship at best. The thing is when the state holds the monopoly of the economy or property the quality declines massively because the state has no proper reason to innovate or to take care of the land. Companies on the order hand have reasons to innovate and to take care of their private property, because they are pressured by competition in order to survive in the market.

The current state of capitalism can be attributed to keynesian social democrats who try to paradoxically shove in a third way society where we have a free market while also being coerced through socialist elements. It doesn't help that globally this is even worse with toxic unions like the EU and UN who are turning Europe into scrambles. It's why the free market should never be coerced by any authority.
User avatar #73043 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I believe in collective leadership and the ability to purge corrupt and opportunistic leaders. I like one idea from the cultural revolution in which the peasants were encouraged to organize themselves, seek the corrupt politicians and shoot them. A little extreme, but it's not like Mao was the pacifist kind.
User avatar #73044 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I also believe in single-party democratic centralism.
#73020 - "Redistributing the wealth among eachother and commonly o…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/21/2014 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #73021 - kanadetenshi (11/21/2014) [-]
Essentially it really just boils down to the definition of socialism and capitalism. I fully agree with you that it's not that easy to pinpoint either, that's why umbrella terms are generally flawed.

Just like crony capitalism is not true capitalism to free market proponents i can definitely see why state socialism is not true socialism to marxists or libertarian socialists. But as an umbrella term both fall under them.
User avatar #73036 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I believe in state socialism though, and I think people who consider themselves marxists should. The reason I don't think national socialism, social democracy or any third way centrist ideology is 'true' socialism is because of many other aspects rather than the use of state or not.

I'm aware people ideologically capitalist oppose crony capitalism, I just think it's bound to happen as we see in this current stage of global capitalism, along with other things.

It also doesn't help that marxism attributes different meanings to certain concepts that originally meant something else.
User avatar #73037 - kanadetenshi (11/21/2014) [-]
The inherent problem with state ownership of the economy is that there is no reason for the state to stay benevolent and not becoming corrupt. You'd just have to have faith that the state becomes a benevolent dictatorship at best. The thing is when the state holds the monopoly of the economy or property the quality declines massively because the state has no proper reason to innovate or to take care of the land. Companies on the order hand have reasons to innovate and to take care of their private property, because they are pressured by competition in order to survive in the market.

The current state of capitalism can be attributed to keynesian social democrats who try to paradoxically shove in a third way society where we have a free market while also being coerced through socialist elements. It doesn't help that globally this is even worse with toxic unions like the EU and UN who are turning Europe into scrambles. It's why the free market should never be coerced by any authority.
User avatar #73043 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I believe in collective leadership and the ability to purge corrupt and opportunistic leaders. I like one idea from the cultural revolution in which the peasants were encouraged to organize themselves, seek the corrupt politicians and shoot them. A little extreme, but it's not like Mao was the pacifist kind.
User avatar #73044 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I also believe in single-party democratic centralism.
#73017 - Marxism is meritocratic socialism, nazism isn't socialism at a…  [+] (7 new replies) 11/21/2014 on Politics - politics news,... 0
User avatar #73018 - kanadetenshi (11/21/2014) [-]
Redistributing the wealth among eachother and commonly owning property is hardly meritocratic, the individual is not allowed to own the fruit of his labour and therefor merit is not encouraged.

Even if we were to concede that nazism was capitalistic, the fact that it was enforced like you acknowledge is evidence that it's clearly closer to Social Democracy rather than free market since social democrats use government enforcement to control the market where as a free market is entirely opposed to that. They controlled the market price, has ownership on the individual (Volksgemeinschaft) and as such his private property, so they had full social ownership of the means of production, which is the definition of socialism.

Though i would ofcourse not be dishonest and say that Nazism is the same as other forms of socialism, but it's still a form of socialism.
User avatar #73020 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
"Redistributing the wealth among eachother and commonly owning property is hardly meritocratic, the individual is not allowed to own the fruit of his labour and therefor merit is not encouraged."
I didn't say it was, but I think you're making too much of a deal of it, it's not like capitalists redistribute wealth as much as marxists, the difference is that marxism gives the money to the ones who really need it rather than to bailout large companies or banks.

"...so they had full social ownership of the means of production, which is the definition of socialism."
Not at all. I don't deny capitalists generally don't support anything that contradicts the free market, but capitalism is general doesn't imply free market. The definition of socialism is that the working class controls the means of production. This might be through the use of a workers' state, but a fascist state promotes the control of the means of production by the burgeoisie. That completely leaves out the idea that it could ever be a workers' state, especially by marxist standards. By the standards of socialists, national socialism could never be socialism. By the standards of capitalists, it might. I'd consider modern social democracy as capitalism myself aswell.
User avatar #73021 - kanadetenshi (11/21/2014) [-]
Essentially it really just boils down to the definition of socialism and capitalism. I fully agree with you that it's not that easy to pinpoint either, that's why umbrella terms are generally flawed.

Just like crony capitalism is not true capitalism to free market proponents i can definitely see why state socialism is not true socialism to marxists or libertarian socialists. But as an umbrella term both fall under them.
User avatar #73036 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I believe in state socialism though, and I think people who consider themselves marxists should. The reason I don't think national socialism, social democracy or any third way centrist ideology is 'true' socialism is because of many other aspects rather than the use of state or not.

I'm aware people ideologically capitalist oppose crony capitalism, I just think it's bound to happen as we see in this current stage of global capitalism, along with other things.

It also doesn't help that marxism attributes different meanings to certain concepts that originally meant something else.
User avatar #73037 - kanadetenshi (11/21/2014) [-]
The inherent problem with state ownership of the economy is that there is no reason for the state to stay benevolent and not becoming corrupt. You'd just have to have faith that the state becomes a benevolent dictatorship at best. The thing is when the state holds the monopoly of the economy or property the quality declines massively because the state has no proper reason to innovate or to take care of the land. Companies on the order hand have reasons to innovate and to take care of their private property, because they are pressured by competition in order to survive in the market.

The current state of capitalism can be attributed to keynesian social democrats who try to paradoxically shove in a third way society where we have a free market while also being coerced through socialist elements. It doesn't help that globally this is even worse with toxic unions like the EU and UN who are turning Europe into scrambles. It's why the free market should never be coerced by any authority.
User avatar #73043 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I believe in collective leadership and the ability to purge corrupt and opportunistic leaders. I like one idea from the cultural revolution in which the peasants were encouraged to organize themselves, seek the corrupt politicians and shoot them. A little extreme, but it's not like Mao was the pacifist kind.
User avatar #73044 - jewishcommunazi (11/21/2014) [-]
I also believe in single-party democratic centralism.
#28 - Maybe, I always assume that being overweight and being obese a…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/21/2014 on Obesity 0
User avatar #29 - krobeles (11/21/2014) [-]
I always just figured that obese was like Fat^2. Its inconvinient to call somebody "Super Fat", so instead, you use obese.
And personally, I think the kid can stand to lose some weight.
User avatar #60 - cheatman (11/21/2014) [-]
You know somat. when I was in college, there was this little shit lord who was a couple years younger than me, and he'd always talk smack about my size. Now, I won't lie or tone it down, I am fat, and I do NOT have a healthy diet, but after a while of this kid talking shit I said to him 'alright then, I want you to start running, cos I'm gonna chase ya. I'll even give ya a head start'. He laughs, but he does it anyway, decides to climb over a fence to make a show of it. After 5 seconds, I take off after him, jump straight over the fence and even after he shits himself and starts sprinting as fast as he could, I still managed to run him down.

TLDR; Just because a guy has some fat on him, doesn't mean he's going to have problems. It's the monstrous landwhales on mobility scooters who've got issues.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1011 / Total items point value: 3012

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Latest users (1): jewishcommunazi, anonymous(1).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#22 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
i demand you remove the nazi from your name

you have 3 seconds to comply before i give you 1 red thumb on one of your comments at random
#24 to #23 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
Is it even possible to change the name like that?
Is it even possible to change the name like that?
#25 to #24 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
i wish, if it was id go back to yourgaylol instead of using this bastardized name
User avatar #27 to #25 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
I'd go back to Commiejewnazi.
User avatar #20 - gugek (10/23/2014) [-]
Hey i hope your day is going well. Have a great night and a fantastic morning tomorrow!
User avatar #21 to #20 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (10/28/2014) [-]
The **** do you want faggot? jk bby.
#19 to #18 - syrianassassin (07/30/2014) [-]
u ******* yid. cant even tell the whole ****
#14 - evilhomer ONLINE (06/21/2014) [-]
User avatar #7 - teoragnar (03/01/2014) [-]
Weren't there a lot more socialists on /politics/?
User avatar #11 to #7 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (03/03/2014) [-]
By the way, what's your political position?
User avatar #12 to #11 - teoragnar (03/03/2014) [-]
Hard to say, I find neither Libertarianism, Communism and Fascism appealing simply because of religious reasons, but I guess I'd go with left democracy, like social democrats.
#9 to #7 - valeriya (03/01/2014) [-]
I'm here whenever, I won't post in a topic I can remember discussing, I'm too busy with life to post as much as I'd like. I don't mind it but circle jerks are quite boring.
User avatar #8 to #7 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (03/01/2014) [-]
Yes. Oxan used to be a regular, now we barely comes here. His friend Naxo only came for a while, Arisaka appears only from time to time as usual, Valeriya doesn't come as often as before (I think) but still does, same for Levchenko (now Koveck), Feelythefeel hasn't stopped coming, it seems (and neither have I). I think I'm still missing a few.
#10 to #8 - Womens Study Major (03/02/2014) [-]
Lev got banned again...
www.funnyjunk.com/user/koveck
User avatar #4 - schnizel ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
You are a good liar, tbh who tought y how to lie?
User avatar #5 to #4 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
Nobody. Some guy said he'd teach me, but he was lying.
User avatar #6 to #5 - schnizel ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
: D
#3 - stenchschleifs (10/06/2013) [-]
Your name, it amuses me.
 Friends (0)