Login or register


Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Facebook Profile: Joel Wallick
Youtube Channel: Jettaelas94
Steam Profile: Jettaelas714
Consoles Owned: Xbox 360, PC, Nintendo DS
Video Games Played: Pokemon, Skyrim, Diablo III, RockBand, The Sims, Mass Effect
X-box Gamertag: Jettaelas714
Interests: Cinema, Gaming, Reading
Date Signed Up:6/13/2012
Last Login:6/26/2013
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 1145 total,  1350 ,  205
Comment Thumbs: 3091 total,  3333 ,  242
Content Level Progress: 90% (45/50)
Level 110 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 111 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 90% (90/100)
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Content Views:72593
Times Content Favorited:66 times
Total Comments Made:574
FJ Points:4294

latest user's comments

#16 - They can settle their differences and become one big Dakota!  [+] (1 new reply) 11/09/2012 on 53 states +5
User avatar
#50 - fuckinfuckinfuck (11/09/2012) [-]
I read that in the voice of the Canadian principal from Fairly Oddparents.
#6 - Well there are women on the show too. 11/09/2012 on Tough Job +8
#20 - Oh no the internet is leaking!  [+] (1 new reply) 11/08/2012 on Latin +22
#29 - iluvmoney (11/08/2012) [-]
is still* leaking

this shit has been out there since forever
#36 - You are a dickhead. If you can't be friends with someone with … 11/08/2012 on Meanwhile on Facebook 0
#105 - Me three! I'm going to college at Bowling Green State Univers… 11/06/2012 on I Matter! +4
#102 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 11/06/2012 on Punchline +13
User avatar
#105 - lifeanddeath (11/06/2012) [-]
.3. oh.
#54 - He also controls dynamics and style, plus if something goes wr… 11/06/2012 on so THAT is how it works. 0
#50 - For future reference: hypocrites*  [+] (1 new reply) 11/05/2012 on That Guy.... +4
User avatar
#68 - anttumi (11/05/2012) [-]
Ooooooh... thats what it was ;D
I dont use "hypocrites" that often
#90 - I agree, with a better actor the movies could have been a lot …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/04/2012 on my response to the avengers... 0
User avatar
#94 - beatmasterz (11/08/2012) [-]
"From my point of view the jedi are evil!"
"Then you are lost!"

I cringed at the awfulness of those lines.
#48 - Episode 1 has some cool moments (the pod race for example), bu…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/04/2012 on my response to the avengers... +2
User avatar
#80 - Himynameisjacob (11/04/2012) [-]
I personally just think it's Hayden Christensen's acting.
I like his look, but not his acting one bit. It's just... unnatural. He has a weird way of expressing emotion, and his vocal inflection sounds so fake.
User avatar
#90 - jettaelas (11/04/2012) [-]
I agree, with a better actor the movies could have been a lot better, but the dialogue was still pretty bad.
User avatar
#94 - beatmasterz (11/08/2012) [-]
"From my point of view the jedi are evil!"
"Then you are lost!"

I cringed at the awfulness of those lines.
User avatar
#52 - trollololing (11/04/2012) [-]
But in Episode 2, Obi's adventure was pretty badass.
#44 - I'm not too worried... Disney just put out the new Muppet movi… 11/04/2012 on my response to the avengers... 0
#6 - I wash my blacks and whites together with a color catcher. Works fine. 10/31/2012 on My wife and kids 0
#3 - I believe this is the "I declare bankruptcy!" scene  [+] (1 new reply) 10/31/2012 on True Story +5
#7 - BroadSword (10/31/2012) [-]
#44 - MFW I live in Ohio and all this cold, wind and rain/sleet isn'… 10/31/2012 on My face when I live in Texas 0
#43 - Comment deleted 10/31/2012 on My face when I live in Texas 0
#36 - Actually on iPhone you can switch it so the gray is you and gr…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/30/2012 on Mom burn +1
User avatar
#38 - jinxter (10/30/2012) [-]
thank you.
#65 - I love fractals 10/29/2012 on Zooming in +5
#118 - This guy. 10/29/2012 on Tits Mcgee is not here 0
#80 - =) It's all just that people take everything the bible says ou…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/29/2012 on Tits Mcgee is not here +1
User avatar
#89 - shiifter (10/29/2012) [-]
True, but people are going to take two cookies out of the cookie jar sometimes, even though they shouldn't. Just because something is going to happen, doesn't mean we should approve of it.
#96 - anon (10/29/2012) [-]
fair enough but just because someone took two cookies from the jar doesn't mean that we have to take cookies away from everyone.
User avatar
#118 - jettaelas (10/29/2012) [-]
This guy.
#74 - I'm a fairly devout Christian and I'm also strongly Pro-Choice…  [+] (18 new replies) 10/29/2012 on Tits Mcgee is not here 0
User avatar
#77 - schlickchick (10/29/2012) [-]
Sorry, I should have been more specific. The Catholic Church is having like a big uprising right now about it. I'm Pro-Life and extremely Pro-gay marriage. It enrages me when they talk about homosexual marriage as being wrong! They say god made a women and man.. he made them to make a family as for reproductive purposes. It has been proven that love and reproductivity is not something that needs each other... :P But sorry for the confusion! Didn't mean to speak for all!
#111 - bunkerman (10/29/2012) [-]
The Christian Religion is entitled to have religious marriage heterosexual only just as every homosexual couple is entitled to a marriage through the state.

In the eyes of the Catholic faith, marriage is a vocation [ex: a role in the church, similar to being a priest] where it's you're responsibility to make kids. Pretty simple. If you can't make kids, then the job really isn't for you.

This is exactly the same as applying for a position in a company/at a business. If you can't cook, then you probably shouldn't apply to be a chef and go for something better suited to your talents. Sure, it isn't fair that you weren't born with cooking talents, but life isn't fair.

Also, just for the record, I am missing some of the finer points in this argument, and I am completely pro-gay marriage. I just understand the reasoning behind it in the Catholic Church. If you don't like the fact that you can't get married religiously, pick another religion. Simple as that.
#100 - arkfire (10/29/2012) [-]
Leviticus 18:22 "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."
Now I bet you're thinking that since it's in Leviticus it doesn't apply to us today right?
Well that is incorrect because this chapter of the Bible is moral laws not just civil laws.
User avatar
#103 - nilocrules (10/29/2012) [-]
Okay, so one question: how is it that one thing that is "detestable" in Leviticus is still relevant, but pretty much nothing else is? For example, Leviticus also states (among other things),
“‘Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material." (19:19)
“‘Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard." (19:27)
“‘Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves." (19:28)

Are these still relevant? Because by your definition they are, and a lot of people are going to be put to death/cut off from their people.
#108 - kingkaga (10/29/2012) [-]
They're metaphorical.
The 'not wearing mixed materials' is to represent how our attitude should be towards God. Not to be partial, or half, but to full-heartedly serve him, using 100% of what we have to offer.

As for the other two, the verses also mentioned that our bodies are like temples. To honor God, not meant to be defiled.
I doubt the first one had a literal meaning, possibly just meant "Don't mutilate what you naturally have.". The second was likely to be both a literal and metaphorical meaning, once again, not to defile our bodies, because they're meant to be temples for God's spirit that rests in those who accept it.
User avatar
#120 - jakefenris (10/29/2012) [-]
So your god was only being metaphorical in the second half of Leviticus and didn't really mean it, but your interpretation of "lay not with a man" is completely true and should be taken literally? How did you come to this conclusion? And what gives you the authority to say what is and what isn't true or metaphorical?
#124 - kingkaga (10/29/2012) [-]
No. Those were just my theories, inferred from the words 'doubt' and 'possibly'. You also would've saw that I mentioned that there were -both- direct and metaphorical meanings. If it's something as plain, simple, and easy to understand as "Don't sleep with other men", or even stuff like the Ten Commandments, then they're highly likely to be direct commands.

If it sounds absurd, confusing, contradicting, or possibly hard to understand like the verses about mixed fabrics, it's likely to be metaphorical.

My authority comes from God, and by the fact that I believe his Word and everything in it 100%.
User avatar
#127 - jakefenris (10/29/2012) [-]
The moment you interpret something you place your own thoughts onto it and shape X with those thoughts and preconceived notions. I could claim I interpreted Y to mean a=b but the fact of the matter is a doesn't equal b
#129 - kingkaga (10/29/2012) [-]
No. I didn't just pull the opinions out of my head to make it what I wanted to say.
I got the idea from verses such as John 14:15, Proverbs 3:5-6, John 6:38-40, and many others that speak along the lines of following God and his will, which is in his word.

I also came to the conclusion based on James 2:10 and Matthew 5:17, that pretty much stated that God's law is, and will always stand. Leviticus is a book of law.
User avatar
#132 - jakefenris (10/29/2012) [-]
INTERPRET (verb) 1. make sense of; assign a meaning to 2. give an interpretation or explanation to 3. give an interpretation or rendition of

When you interpret something you come to your own conclusions. Would that mean you are morally obligated to stone a woman who is misbehaving? Are you morally obligated to strike a child for the same? Were you to ever be accused of rape would you buy her from her father?
#136 - kingkaga (10/29/2012) [-]
As I say a second time, I made the conclusions based off several other sources inside the Bible. It wasn't an interpretation made on my own, personal thoughts.

1st question - no.
Jesus himself makes it very clear in John 8:7-9 that sinners(all humans) are in absolutely NO position to put another human to death because of their sin.

2nd question - If by 'strike' you mean 'discipline', then yes. Children are unable to learn right and wrong by reason and persuasion. The only way they can be taught the concept is through discipline. While there is a fine line between discipline and abuse, physical discipline is the best way a child learns, as I've personally seen through several of my friends in the way they raise their kids.

3rd question - No. Besides, the verse was talking about consensual sex, it's odd how so many people try to take it out of context as rape.

(Also--Try not to thumbs down another person during a personal argument. It makes you look really immature and unprofessional.)
#139 - jakefenris (10/29/2012) [-]
1# Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged from Israel. Deuteronomy 17:12
Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put to death. Exodus 21:15
All who curse their father or mother must be put to death. They are guilty of a capital offense. Leviticus 20:9
Of course Jesus said people shouldn't kill, but the bible is of course the word of god:
Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God." 2 Peter 20-21
2# was already passed over in the above quotes.
3# If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her. Deuteronomy 22:28-29
If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife. Deuteronomy 22:23-24
(I didn't waste my time thumbing you down) You may want to check those quotes I offered up for you. They're the literal word of god after all.
#140 - kingkaga (10/29/2012) [-]
#1 - You need to take into consideration that there's a difference between public humiliation and torture(stoning), and a just punishment given by law officials.
Surprisingly, law is put in place to protect the well-being of others. If someone is openly committing crimes, and rejecting the consequences of it, as the verse above states, they clearly give no regard to the law, meaning they give no regard to the well-being of others, and will be a danger to society.

As for the coincidences about the parents, the verses did -not- state that it was for small children who are still under the care of their parents, because a hit from a child likely isn't going to hurt or be of any importance whatsoever. But if an adult, who still has their parents, tries to harm them, it's going to cause a serious problem, seeing how during this time, the Hebrews were in a critical state, having just escaped from captivity in Egypt. They needed strong family ties, not have their communications and ties be destroyed from the inside.

And @ the verses about 2 peter, that's exactly what I said
I'll say it a third time. I did NOT come to the verses based on my own personal opinions. I inferred it from several other sources directly inside the Bible, which as the verse states, is under the influence of God.

#3, if you read further, you'd see that the whole commands are for the man to take responsibility for his own actions.
Deuteronomy 22:29: "He shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives."
Once again, the verse is telling men to take responsibility for his own action, not to leave a girl he hurt by herself.
(And yes, you did thumb me down, because typically, when a person on FJ watches an argument, they thumbs UP the person they agree with, and DOWN on the person they disagree with. Your comments are not thumbed up, because you can't thumb your own comments. Don't lie)
#104 - arkfire (10/29/2012) [-]
As I said Chapter 18 is moral laws not just civil laws which means they are still relevant.
#80 - jettaelas (10/29/2012) [-]
=) It's all just that people take everything the bible says out of context, especially when arguing their points against gay marriage.

As far as pro-choice vs. pro-life I just don't bring religion into that at all. I just feel that the government shouldn't be telling women what to do. Also, if we make all abortions illegal, then there will just be people performing it on themselves with rusty coathangers rather than from a professional doctor.
User avatar
#89 - shiifter (10/29/2012) [-]
True, but people are going to take two cookies out of the cookie jar sometimes, even though they shouldn't. Just because something is going to happen, doesn't mean we should approve of it.
#96 - anon (10/29/2012) [-]
fair enough but just because someone took two cookies from the jar doesn't mean that we have to take cookies away from everyone.
User avatar
#118 - jettaelas (10/29/2012) [-]
This guy.
#86 - I believe you are thinking of Freakonomics  [+] (1 new reply) 10/29/2012 on fucking strawberries! 0
User avatar
#102 - zxmongoose (10/29/2012) [-]
I'm reading that right now, it's so good
#59 - You can tell it's Bobby Moynihan, and then you can h… 10/28/2012 on Opening a jump-scare link... +2
#4 - I was sad when I found out this was actually from an SNL skit 10/28/2012 on Opening a jump-scare link... +6
#33 - You know.... it's not just Christians that believe in a God right? 10/28/2012 on Christian logic 0
#29 - Can't we all just respect one another? Pic related, i…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/28/2012 on Liberal hypocrits +22
#153 - fyaq has deleted their comment.
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (5)
Anonymous comments allowed.
5 comments displayed.
#4 - legitturtle **User deleted account**
has deleted their comment [-]
#5 to #4 - jettaelas (08/07/2012) [-]
Well thanks!
#1 - gelflingchey (07/29/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 to #1 - jettaelas (07/29/2012) [-]
#3 to #2 - gelflingchey (07/29/2012) [-]