Rank #2920 on CommentsLevel 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
OfflineSend mail to jedisquirrel Block jedisquirrel Invite jedisquirrel to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||5/18/2011|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#9138|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#214|
|Content Thumbs:||567 total, 756 , 189|
|Comment Thumbs:||24393 total, 25801 , 1408|
|Content Level Progress:|| 60% (6/10) |
Level 56 Content: Sammich eater → Level 57 Content: Sammich eater
|Comment Level Progress:|| 18.5% (185/1000) |
Level 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 325 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
|Times Content Favorited:||17 times|
|Total Comments Made:||2497|
|Favorite Tags:||a (6) | Pokemon (5) | your (4) | boy (3) | emerald (3) | named (3) | sue (3) | aint (2) | comment (2) | delicious (2) | easy (2) | Flame (2) | for (2) | fuck (2) | fuck tags (2) | geico (2) | i (2) | KFC (2) | kipper (2) | Life (2)|
- Views: 2992fucking anons, how do they work?
78 6 Total: +72
- Views: 2446Sue's pokemon journey chapter 2
59 8 Total: +51
- Views: 1117Sue's pokemon journey
41 3 Total: +38
- Views: 1568lesbians
38 12 Total: +26
- Views: 2649McDonalds sign
21 2 Total: +19
- Views: 758Great ninjas
21 3 Total: +18
latest user's comments
|#1 - Picture [+] (36 new replies)||08/24/2016 on odd man out||+240|
#40 - anon (12 hours ago) [-]
Look at his name
low int vault dweller
#17 - anon (16 hours ago) [-]
#15 - anon (16 hours ago) [-]
>We love hitler because he holocausted, even though we believe he didn't
>We love rich people unless they're rich people because rich people are fucking jew asshole globalists
>We love the free market unless it's the free market because fucking globalists ruining everything god dammit
I could go on
#46 - anon (12 hours ago) [-]
right wing, left wing, blah blah thats storys they tell stupid people..literally people who go to vote
#25 - anon (14 hours ago) [-]
You make no sense at all.
#16 - lean (16 hours ago) [-]
Good try, faggot.
>Nazism is as much or more left wing than right. So strike one
>This isn't even a point. Jews like Soros who manipulate governments to short sell currencies and make billions off the misfortunes of others are complete shit. There is no contradiction there. Besides, it is not the role of the rich to support the poor by any moral reasoning.
>Globalism by the definition of governments are international trade laws that by nature restrict the free market. No capitalist conservative is against a global market, we are against a governing body manipulating the market (EX: China subsidizing US exports to reduce US competition)
Go read a fucking book once you little bitch.
#47 - anon (12 hours ago) [-]
nazism what lmfao... u know it means national socialism and by that the holcaust is the definition of right winged
the worst thing is that supid peple like u who actually think they are smart
#29 - anon (13 hours ago) [-]
Not the same anon, but just my two cents:
>Agreed on the first point.
> It's in the best interest of the rich to grant the poor an opportunity to better themselves instead of actively keeping them under their thumb, as if it gets bad enough, they WILL revolt, and there is nothing in this world that's more dangerous than a man with nothing to lose and the whole world to win (plus the fact that no amount of money makes you bulletproof). That being said the cauveat is that the rich should help the poor to help THEMSELVES, not just give them shit for free and make them dependent on handouts (which is something that the left doesn't seem to understand).
>Agreed on this point, though corporations shipping their jobs oversees to places where their workers are literally slaves are just as guilty for the problems with globalism.
#30 - lean (13 hours ago) [-]
Giving handouts to the poor over incentives to improve their financial situation doesn't work. I would argue that the best thing a wealthy business owner can do is offer fair wages and benefits for as many people that can keep said business healthy.
Mandating through government a wealth redistribution scheme based on need is morally reprehensible.
#31 - anon (13 hours ago) [-]
The idea is a hand-up, not a hand-out. I'm talking about shit like vocational training a lot of people can't get hired these days due to lack of experience or training, but you can't get either of them without work, creating a vicious cycle , not welfare checks.
#64 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
Of course not, easy votes their way.
#9 - anon (17 hours ago) [-]
#5 - anon (18 hours ago) [-]
Sounds about right,
|#11 - Picture||08/24/2016 on dat ahoge face||+7|
|#1 - Picture||08/24/2016 on Rormy Wovals Tiflams||0|
|#4 - Picture||08/24/2016 on wall||0|
|#2 - Picture||08/24/2016 on identification||+37|
|#1 - Picture||08/24/2016 on getting hair done||+16|
|#2 - Picture [+] (2 new replies)||08/24/2016 on nipple||0|
#6 - anon (19 hours ago) [-]
|#1 - Picture||08/24/2016 on debate||+45|
|#5 - Picture||08/24/2016 on all alone there pal||+14|
|#1 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||08/24/2016 on virgins||-5|