x
Click to expand

jasonthedragon

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/20/2011
Last Login:5/03/2015
Location:Germany
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#8790
Highest Content Rank:#2278
Highest Comment Rank:#1351
Content Thumbs: 3505 total,  3966 ,  461
Comment Thumbs: 5332 total,  6176 ,  844
Content Level Progress: 39% (39/100)
Level 134 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 24% (24/100)
Level 252 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:2
Content Views:169457
Times Content Favorited:217 times
Total Comments Made:1102
FJ Points:8707

latest user's comments

#60 - We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am no…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? 0
User avatar #334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar #63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#47 - i think the image of satan as the lord of hell - which you won…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? -1
User avatar #283 - jasonthedragon (02/26/2014) [-]
which kind of asshole thumbed that down?
User avatar #50 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
I don't see how what you're saying is relevant to the situation. perhaps if the quote spoke of Ahraman instead of Satan, then you could place the point and image as the Evil being a ruler, but the simple fact remains, which i already stated, the source material is the Christian bible, and thus following, Satan is not the ruler of hell.
User avatar #60 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am not mistaken. that means, that there are thousands of ways you can look and interpret this story - there is no right or wrong. so if someone wants to give the story a twist in this or that direction it is - fine! and correct as everything else. and i just like the perspective voiced in my quote better than the other one. and just to repeat what i have already written: there is no clearly defined Satan/ Devil in the bible. He is characterized in various ways and they are all as legitimate as any other.
User avatar #334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar #63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#45 - Depends on the fanfiction you are into  [+] (7 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? 0
User avatar #46 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
Even if you're referring to the Bible as fanfiction, it would still be the source material of all other branching literature and arts of the image of hell and heaven, thus making it prudent to point out that Satan is still bound in hell, and not the ruler. Besides the original post image is Mark Twain speaking directly about the Satan from the source material, so we must assume that is the basis of the facts.
User avatar #47 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
i think the image of satan as the lord of hell - which you won't find in the oldest parts of the bible - is rather influenced from zoroastrianism. and pointing to paradise lost for mine.
User avatar #283 - jasonthedragon (02/26/2014) [-]
which kind of asshole thumbed that down?
User avatar #50 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
I don't see how what you're saying is relevant to the situation. perhaps if the quote spoke of Ahraman instead of Satan, then you could place the point and image as the Evil being a ruler, but the simple fact remains, which i already stated, the source material is the Christian bible, and thus following, Satan is not the ruler of hell.
User avatar #60 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am not mistaken. that means, that there are thousands of ways you can look and interpret this story - there is no right or wrong. so if someone wants to give the story a twist in this or that direction it is - fine! and correct as everything else. and i just like the perspective voiced in my quote better than the other one. and just to repeat what i have already written: there is no clearly defined Satan/ Devil in the bible. He is characterized in various ways and they are all as legitimate as any other.
User avatar #334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar #63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#38 - "Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven" John…  [+] (9 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? 0
User avatar #44 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
But then again Satan doesn't reign in hell. Hell is a prison that he is trapped and bound in.
User avatar #45 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
Depends on the fanfiction you are into
User avatar #46 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
Even if you're referring to the Bible as fanfiction, it would still be the source material of all other branching literature and arts of the image of hell and heaven, thus making it prudent to point out that Satan is still bound in hell, and not the ruler. Besides the original post image is Mark Twain speaking directly about the Satan from the source material, so we must assume that is the basis of the facts.
User avatar #47 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
i think the image of satan as the lord of hell - which you won't find in the oldest parts of the bible - is rather influenced from zoroastrianism. and pointing to paradise lost for mine.
User avatar #283 - jasonthedragon (02/26/2014) [-]
which kind of asshole thumbed that down?
User avatar #50 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
I don't see how what you're saying is relevant to the situation. perhaps if the quote spoke of Ahraman instead of Satan, then you could place the point and image as the Evil being a ruler, but the simple fact remains, which i already stated, the source material is the Christian bible, and thus following, Satan is not the ruler of hell.
User avatar #60 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am not mistaken. that means, that there are thousands of ways you can look and interpret this story - there is no right or wrong. so if someone wants to give the story a twist in this or that direction it is - fine! and correct as everything else. and i just like the perspective voiced in my quote better than the other one. and just to repeat what i have already written: there is no clearly defined Satan/ Devil in the bible. He is characterized in various ways and they are all as legitimate as any other.
User avatar #334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar #63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#3 - the germany-thing is ********  [+] (1 new reply) 02/23/2014 on Country Political Parties -1
#51 - hereiamanonymous (02/24/2014) [-]
unfortunately, yes :/

Germany is a capitalist "democracy". Politicians dont even know what communism and socialism is(well, like most of all germans).
#55 - That is great!  [+] (1 new reply) 02/19/2014 on The Galactic empire +33
User avatar #173 - hammarhead (02/20/2014) [-]
shit thats right on
#20 - Picture 02/12/2014 on Jessica, u got 2 try dizzz!! +1
#139 - And still I am waiting for BF3....  [+] (2 new replies) 02/04/2014 on When I'm depressed +1
#147 - angelusprimus (02/04/2014) [-]
New Battlefront is coming but its a reboot not a sequel.
User avatar #152 - clyfon (02/04/2014) [-]
who cares a vamped up battlefront better than none WOOHOO
#7 - The last one is priceless. 02/03/2014 on Black People Tired Of Your... 0
#16 - Comment deleted 02/03/2014 on this glass.. -1
#3 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 01/30/2014 on Dammit Sheen +6
User avatar #5 - tonyredgrave (01/30/2014) [-]
He totally saved their asses in that Opera.
User avatar #4 - donttasemebro (01/30/2014) [-]
NO... IT'S " I DO CA CA CA CA CA CA COCAINE!"
#19 - What about Twin Peaks? 01/28/2014 on popular in states -1
#17 - Picture 01/25/2014 on The Compact Fact (OC) +1
#9 - they also have shops in England  [+] (9 new replies) 01/17/2014 on top this +2
User avatar #12 - potrsr (01/17/2014) [-]
all over Europe. For americans, similar to wallmart
User avatar #17 - guerkchen (01/17/2014) [-]
yeah but walmart is 20 times bigger
User avatar #34 - baaltomekk (01/17/2014) [-]
On the other hand, Walmart tried to get on the german market some years ago. After about one year they sold all shops and left the german market completely
User avatar #18 - potrsr (01/17/2014) [-]
i said similar not same. Similar as that its in lots of countries in Europe like Wallmart is in every(or majority of USA) state
#16 - Cyraxx (01/17/2014) [-]
Europen Wallmart = Tesco
#20 - uhmwhatyousay (01/17/2014) [-]
British Walmart = Asda considering Walmart own Asda.
#14 - elaxx (01/17/2014) [-]
Czech Rep. also reporting in.
#35 - rollmania (01/17/2014) [-]
User avatar #13 - ledd (01/17/2014) [-]
Yep, even in Poland.
#1 - Picture 01/16/2014 on Ganja can change the world 0
#18 - I hope that's how the idiot feels who invented this **** .....  [+] (1 new reply) 01/14/2014 on Mountain Dew -10
User avatar #22 - RaciallyDiverse (01/14/2014) [-]
protip: i've never seen a positive reaction to this gif.
#1 - Your stuff is really the best content on this site at the moment  [+] (1 new reply) 01/12/2014 on The quest for NSFW part6 0
User avatar #2 - pickedforprofanity (01/12/2014) [-]
To be honest that doesn't bode well for the site.
But thank you.
#5 - The thing about "enemy aircraft"... it was…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/12/2014 on people just want to start shit +9
#69 - cabbagemayhem (01/13/2014) [-]
"They're one of the few military weapons with almost zero risk of collateral damage."

There have been 22 airliners shot down in the history of aviation either intentionally or by accident, averaging about three per decade since 1940.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airliner_shootdown_incidents
#104 - Ken M (01/13/2014) [-]
"almost" try making a perfect machine.
#108 - cabbagemayhem (01/13/2014) [-]
The Patriot, in particular, can and does protect major cities in the Middle East from long-range missile attacks that threaten people in their own homes. The protester's sign should read, "This machine stops machines that kill innocent people."
User avatar #7 - roninneko (01/12/2014) [-]
Well, seeing as DC is a no-fly zone anyway, the odds of it shooting something it isn't supposed to are somewhere between slim and nil.
#42 - Picture 01/09/2014 on I need these because reasons +2
#18 - those faces......... 01/08/2014 on Our Millennial Generation 0
#27 - Most of the Austrians wanted it. Pic highly related....  [+] (1 new reply) 01/07/2014 on this is some tough allied shit +14
User avatar #56 - hopkinator (01/07/2014) [-]
icht still anschluss zeit
#26 - Comment deleted 01/07/2014 on this is some tough allied shit 0
#30 - Except for communists, antifascists, homosexuals, jehova's wit…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/15/2013 on Nazi Wonder Weapons PART 5 +2
User avatar #31 - newsuperyoshi (12/15/2013) [-]
He didn't include those in his master race, as he decided they were mentally impaired.
User avatar #51 - thepastryistrue (12/15/2013) [-]
Those that did not follow the idea of the Third Reich and those who weren't willing to subordinate themselves and every of their actions under the will of the Führer were equally excluded from the Nazi ideal of a master race. "His people" were only a very small group in the German population. Just think of the purge in the Knight of the Long Knives: In 1934, the heads of the NSDAP ordered the assassination of a whole lot of leading members of the SA, a division of the NSDAP itself. They were "his people", and still Hitler ordered their assassination.
The NSDAP (and Hitler) was not a party that upheld the idea of an ideal master race so much, as an idea of mere control and power, like every other system that supports a dictatorship.
#24 - "cared for the health of his people" are you doing drugs?  [+] (15 new replies) 12/15/2013 on Nazi Wonder Weapons PART 5 -14
User avatar #148 - shemaledong (12/16/2013) [-]
Hitler was obsessed with the Volksgesundheit.
The simple logic is, healthy people make better soldiers.
At the end of the war, the SS was the owner of all mineral water sources.
User avatar #32 - captainfuckitall (12/15/2013) [-]
Jeez, how much propaganda have YOU been swallowing?

Hitler loved his people very much and was absolutely devoted to them and his country, that's WHY he did what he did. Good gods, even in his treatment of himself (no smoking, no drinking, vegetarian) he did so because he considered himself property of his people and thus he needed to be as healthy as possible for them. He was easily one of the most empathetic leaders of his time, even choosing to spend his holidays with his soldiers rather than in the comfort of his own home.
#186 - Ken M (12/16/2013) [-]
So jews aren't people?
#188 - wroughten (12/16/2013) [-]
no... duh
User avatar #187 - captainfuckitall (12/16/2013) [-]
Not "his" people, no. And that's not a very bold statement either considering many jews at the time prior to WW2 would have agreed.
User avatar #149 - shemaledong (12/16/2013) [-]
Hitler didn`t give a shit about his people. He was a Psychopath. That means he had no empathy whatsoever. Psychopaths can make you like them very much. In his case, people stil feel affiliated to him up to date, ignoring his deeds completly.
A good example on how much he cared for his people is the "Volkssturm".
At the end of the war everybody, even seniors were sent to fight trained allied soldiers with insufficient weapons and training. If they refused, they were shot Hitler knew they would die, but he thought the german people were unworthy to live, since they lost the war which deemed them weak.
User avatar #176 - captainfuckitall (12/16/2013) [-]
That's true, except for the fact that it wasn't.

He wasn't a Psychopath, he loved animals, his mother, he was very devoted to his friends, and doting on his own personal workers.

And no, he didn't think they were "unworthy to live" because they lost.

I have no idea where you're pulling this information from, but it's wrong. Perhaps you should do more research than watching movies specifically meant to dehumanize him, yes?
User avatar #52 - thepastryistrue (12/15/2013) [-]
You're misinformed in some points here: 1. Hitler did not smoke to be a leading example. There are more non-smokers out there then smokers and it's not a challenge to be a non-smoker, it's the regular case. 2. Hitler was not a vegetarian. This is something that has been said by historians in the post-war era to show Hitler to be somehow 'abnormal'. Being a vegetarian was not accepted back then like it is today. Heck, they even wrote about him being sexually driven towards his mother, towards his jewish housemaiden and most likely to be a masochist and a clandestine homosexual. There was no evidence whatsoever to proove these 'accusations'.
And, most importantly: 3. He did not actually considered himself to be the property of his people. The will of the people cristallises in the person of the Führer. Thus the Führer is the people and the people is the Führer. That was the idea, not some kind of possession.
User avatar #63 - commontroll (12/15/2013) [-]
This was the 30s. EVERYBODY smoked back then. Other than that I have no comments.
User avatar #61 - captainfuckitall (12/15/2013) [-]
While it may be true that there are more non-smokers than smokers now and it is easier to be a non-smoker, he said multiple times that he had to live a long time for his people and not smoking was one of the things he detailed as best. Thus it could be said he DID not smoke for his health, thus for his people (and he was offered to do so when fighting in WW1, and gods know he probably could have used some then).

Regarding Vegetarianism, we may both be half right: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler_and_vegetarianism

On the third one, I'm not so sure. What you say sounds convincing, but Hitler himself was also very patriotic and dedicated to his country and people. And I heard many times that he considered himself "belonging" to Germany. In any case I suppose I will do more research regarding the matter.
User avatar #28 - newsuperyoshi (12/15/2013) [-]
His people. But those people included exclusively members of the 'master race' that were German.
User avatar #30 - jasonthedragon (12/15/2013) [-]
Except for communists, antifascists, homosexuals, jehova's wittneses, pacifists....
User avatar #31 - newsuperyoshi (12/15/2013) [-]
He didn't include those in his master race, as he decided they were mentally impaired.
User avatar #51 - thepastryistrue (12/15/2013) [-]
Those that did not follow the idea of the Third Reich and those who weren't willing to subordinate themselves and every of their actions under the will of the Führer were equally excluded from the Nazi ideal of a master race. "His people" were only a very small group in the German population. Just think of the purge in the Knight of the Long Knives: In 1934, the heads of the NSDAP ordered the assassination of a whole lot of leading members of the SA, a division of the NSDAP itself. They were "his people", and still Hitler ordered their assassination.
The NSDAP (and Hitler) was not a party that upheld the idea of an ideal master race so much, as an idea of mere control and power, like every other system that supports a dictatorship.
User avatar #26 - akho (12/15/2013) [-]
His

Can't stress that word enough.
#70 - Juan Gimenez! (Sorry, I like traditional comics better, but th…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/06/2013 on Such Detail, so... +1
User avatar #103 - snowshark (12/06/2013) [-]
I've never had a taste for traditional comics. Everything seems to be a little off with the art style and it seems to lack a lot of the things I like. The biggest factors to me I think are the style not having the same sharpness as manga but most importantly the colour use of colour almost always off to me. I can't say it is the existence of colour in a comic puts me off since I loved the Avatar comics. Instead I think it is the use of colour alongside the shading present.

In comics the colours are usually either extremely vivid or extremely dark and often they appear side-by side for special effect. This probably wouldn't be as jarring to me as it is without the amazing detail put into the characters which somehow makes them all look unappealing to me (uncanny valley, perhaps?)

Compared to manga and it's traditionally black and white, slightly warped design of humans and more selective use of shading (since black and white forces shading to be used differently) along with the sharpness of the lines compared to the more realistic style portrayed in comics (the valley again?) just puts me off. I'd say I dislike the writing too but that is only for the majority of Marvel and DC superhero comics and it doesn't apply to titles not related to those universes. (And a few, like Spidey dying and someone taking over his place and being 100 times better than him at his job, really do stick out to me as being good stories.)

I think, for me at least, comics are too real. There's probably a ton of other factors like line thickness, character design and the like but I think the amount of detail put into the pictures to make them look realistic is as off-putting to me as it is admirable. It is a shame, especially as I know how good the art is yet still dislike it.

Quick question, Teen Titans! Comic/Animation. Which is better?

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2500
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#8 - Ken M (11/26/2013) [-]
#4 - blartonfairweather (02/09/2013) [-]
Hey, dude, what's up?
Hey, dude, what's up?
User avatar #5 to #4 - jasonthedragon (02/10/2013) [-]
hi! not much! :D where are you from?
#6 to #5 - blartonfairweather (02/11/2013) [-]
Ah, well that is good c:   
   
And I'm from Connecticut, how bout you?
Ah, well that is good c:

And I'm from Connecticut, how bout you?
User avatar #7 to #6 - jasonthedragon (08/04/2013) [-]
oh sorry! I'm from Germany
 Friends (0)