Upload
Login or register

jasonthedragon

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/20/2011
Last Login:9/27/2016
Location:Germany
Stats
Content Ranking:#2229
Comment Ranking:#18428
Highest Content Rank:#2278
Highest Comment Rank:#1351
Content Thumbs: 3746 total,  4272 ,  526
Comment Thumbs: 5342 total,  6194 ,  852
Content Level Progress: 92% (92/100)
Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 136 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 32% (32/100)
Level 252 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:2
Content Views:177118
Times Content Favorited:216 times
Total Comments Made:1113
FJ Points:8871

latest user's comments

#60 - We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am no…  [+] (2 replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? 0
User avatar
#334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar
#63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#47 - i think the image of satan as the lord of hell - which you won…  [+] (5 replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? -1
User avatar
#283 - jasonthedragon (02/26/2014) [-]
which kind of asshole thumbed that down?
User avatar
#50 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
I don't see how what you're saying is relevant to the situation. perhaps if the quote spoke of Ahraman instead of Satan, then you could place the point and image as the Evil being a ruler, but the simple fact remains, which i already stated, the source material is the Christian bible, and thus following, Satan is not the ruler of hell.
User avatar
#60 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am not mistaken. that means, that there are thousands of ways you can look and interpret this story - there is no right or wrong. so if someone wants to give the story a twist in this or that direction it is - fine! and correct as everything else. and i just like the perspective voiced in my quote better than the other one. and just to repeat what i have already written: there is no clearly defined Satan/ Devil in the bible. He is characterized in various ways and they are all as legitimate as any other.
User avatar
#334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar
#63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#45 - Depends on the fanfiction you are into  [+] (7 replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? 0
User avatar
#46 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
Even if you're referring to the Bible as fanfiction, it would still be the source material of all other branching literature and arts of the image of hell and heaven, thus making it prudent to point out that Satan is still bound in hell, and not the ruler. Besides the original post image is Mark Twain speaking directly about the Satan from the source material, so we must assume that is the basis of the facts.
User avatar
#47 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
i think the image of satan as the lord of hell - which you won't find in the oldest parts of the bible - is rather influenced from zoroastrianism. and pointing to paradise lost for mine.
User avatar
#283 - jasonthedragon (02/26/2014) [-]
which kind of asshole thumbed that down?
User avatar
#50 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
I don't see how what you're saying is relevant to the situation. perhaps if the quote spoke of Ahraman instead of Satan, then you could place the point and image as the Evil being a ruler, but the simple fact remains, which i already stated, the source material is the Christian bible, and thus following, Satan is not the ruler of hell.
User avatar
#60 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am not mistaken. that means, that there are thousands of ways you can look and interpret this story - there is no right or wrong. so if someone wants to give the story a twist in this or that direction it is - fine! and correct as everything else. and i just like the perspective voiced in my quote better than the other one. and just to repeat what i have already written: there is no clearly defined Satan/ Devil in the bible. He is characterized in various ways and they are all as legitimate as any other.
User avatar
#334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar
#63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#38 - "Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven" John…  [+] (9 replies) 02/25/2014 on Do you have more of these ? 0
User avatar
#44 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
But then again Satan doesn't reign in hell. Hell is a prison that he is trapped and bound in.
User avatar
#45 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
Depends on the fanfiction you are into
User avatar
#46 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
Even if you're referring to the Bible as fanfiction, it would still be the source material of all other branching literature and arts of the image of hell and heaven, thus making it prudent to point out that Satan is still bound in hell, and not the ruler. Besides the original post image is Mark Twain speaking directly about the Satan from the source material, so we must assume that is the basis of the facts.
User avatar
#47 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
i think the image of satan as the lord of hell - which you won't find in the oldest parts of the bible - is rather influenced from zoroastrianism. and pointing to paradise lost for mine.
User avatar
#283 - jasonthedragon (02/26/2014) [-]
which kind of asshole thumbed that down?
User avatar
#50 - ispn (02/25/2014) [-]
I don't see how what you're saying is relevant to the situation. perhaps if the quote spoke of Ahraman instead of Satan, then you could place the point and image as the Evil being a ruler, but the simple fact remains, which i already stated, the source material is the Christian bible, and thus following, Satan is not the ruler of hell.
User avatar
#60 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
We both agree, that there is no such thing as satan if i am not mistaken. that means, that there are thousands of ways you can look and interpret this story - there is no right or wrong. so if someone wants to give the story a twist in this or that direction it is - fine! and correct as everything else. and i just like the perspective voiced in my quote better than the other one. and just to repeat what i have already written: there is no clearly defined Satan/ Devil in the bible. He is characterized in various ways and they are all as legitimate as any other.
User avatar
#334 - ispn (02/27/2014) [-]
Again, you are mistaken, I do have a belief that Satan is real, and regardless of fiction or fact the source material is still the basis of the person/demon, so we must secede the original is the most accurate. You can hold whatever view you want, but John Milton's Paradise Lost is meant to be the imagine of Satan from the Bible, but unfortunately the bible does say quite clearly in fact that Satan is a prisoner in hell and not a ruler. Like whatever imagine you want, but that doesn't make it right. Pretty sure the Nazi's thought Hitler was a pretty great dude
User avatar
#63 - jasonthedragon (02/25/2014) [-]
btw: It is Ahriman or Aŋra Mainiiu or whatever, but not Ahraman.
#3 - the germany-thing is ********  [+] (1 reply) 02/23/2014 on Country Political Parties -1
#51 - hereiamanonymous (02/24/2014) [-]
unfortunately, yes :/

Germany is a capitalist "democracy". Politicians dont even know what communism and socialism is(well, like most of all germans).
#55 - That is great!  [+] (1 reply) 02/19/2014 on The Galactic empire +33
User avatar
#173 - hammarhead (02/20/2014) [-]
shit thats right on
#139 - And still I am waiting for BF3....  [+] (2 replies) 02/04/2014 on When I'm depressed +1
User avatar
#147 - angelusprimus (02/04/2014) [-]
New Battlefront is coming but its a reboot not a sequel.
User avatar
#152 - clyfon (02/04/2014) [-]
who cares a vamped up battlefront better than none WOOHOO