Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

iworkforlaughs    

Rank #20271 on Subscribers
no avatar Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to iworkforlaughs Block iworkforlaughs Invite iworkforlaughs to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/30/2012
Last Login:11/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#23394
Highest Content Rank:#9334
Highest Comment Rank:#3287
Content Thumbs: 566 total,  886 ,  320
Comment Thumbs: 1329 total,  2435 ,  1106
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 56 Content: Sammich eater → Level 57 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 90% (90/100)
Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:3
Content Views:60848
Times Content Favorited:8 times
Total Comments Made:632
FJ Points:1902

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 6770
    Thumbs Up 197 Thumbs Down 24 Total: +173
    Comments: 11
    Favorites: 6
    Uploaded: 06/05/12
    Can i have your autograph Ms. Watson? Can i have your autograph Ms....
  • Views: 1692
    Thumbs Up 29 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +23
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 06/07/12
    E3 2012 E3 2012
  • Views: 1216
    Thumbs Up 25 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +17
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 05/24/12
    Oh Pedobear Oh Pedobear
  • Views: 1249
    Thumbs Up 18 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +13
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/07/12
    spy among us spy among us
  • Views: 1101
    Thumbs Up 24 Thumbs Down 14 Total: +10
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/28/12
    Fuck Yeah Fuck Yeah
  • Views: 1106
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 13 Total: +2
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/11/12
    IronBatman IronBatman
1 2 > [ 9 Funny Pictures Total ]

latest user's comments

#76 - I live in America same job, same pay, same ass whoopin. If yo… 11/22/2014 on just once +2
#79 - I quit I'm using sense and reason and you're just saying words…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/22/2014 on Love this guy 0
#81 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
... Sense and reason? All you've said is "Bayonetta would be great no matter what platform" and "How did Nintendo support it other than money!?!?!?"

Like... How is that sense and reason to you? Also what would a cape do by hanging out of my mouth? That's kinda confusing.

I'm not saying words though, but I feel that you are just either messing with me or skimming over what I'm saying completely.

I said Bayonetta 2 had Nintendo's input on it, not /that/ much but still, and wouldn't exist without Nintendo's support, but I'm ... saying super stupid things? How?
#77 - Supported how, explain to me how nintendo helped develop bayon…  [+] (10 new replies) 11/22/2014 on Love this guy 0
#78 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
... Should I even bother really responding to this? Do you think the game would have been made if Nintendo /didn't/ support it with money?

No, actually, it wouldn't have been made at all since everyone else said 'no.'

They got Nintendo's input on the game and took the entire idea to them. Nintendo is the /reason/ Bayonetta 2 exists, it wouldn't have got the support it needed otherwise. At least not for quite awhile.

Either way, I feel we are getting off the original point. My point is that Nintendo supports this game with their name. It is practically a Nintendo title now.
User avatar #148 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
Everyone else said no? That's a lie. You me to tell me that steam was unwilling to allow Bayonetta to be created? If it was the fact that they simply needed a publisher they could have went to anyone. Maybe Nintendo was just the first to respond. We have no reason to believe that statement to be true and even if it was why should Nintendo be given credit for throwing money Platinums way? The second is almost exactly like the first as far a combat goes so I don't think we can credit Nintendo for doing something new buy funding a sequel.
#149 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Let me rephrase and say everyone they asked said no, then. Because they wanted their game on a console, it was made with a controller in mind. Nintendo wasn't the first to respond, however. They asked to be on Xbox and Playstation again, trying to get a 'partner' for the game so they could make it exactly as they wanted. They didn't just need a place to put it, they needed support to get it done and Nintendo was willing to do that.

I think we can definitely credit them for it because they put in some input and the game wouldn't exist without them, at least not for a long time.
User avatar #150 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
Again, you don't know that for a fact? Nintendo had input, that's probably true but again baseless. I'm saying you have no way of knowing for sure. What we do know for sure is that Bayonetta isn't Nintendo's game. They didn't make it.
#151 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Uh.. I /do/ know that for a fact, actually? I've already pointed out how they did. They didn't put in a /lot/ of input, but they did do that.

Either way, my point wasn't that Nintendo made the game and now it's theirs, I'm saying they fully supported the creation of the game and put their label on it. The creators of the game practically work beside Nintendo now, as do the rest of the employees.

The original point is that despite the claims that Nintendo just wants to do the same thing over and over, they were willing to put Bayonetta, which is completely different from the rest of their games, onto their console and then smack their label and support on it. Again, I was never saying they made it themselves, but they helped its creation.
User avatar #152 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
I still have to disagree. That's like saying that Tomodachi Life proves that Nintendo hates gay people because they released the game.
#153 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
..? I have no idea what you're talking about now. I think you're getting an idea that I'm not saying. Plus, I don't even know if that game was supported by Nintendo. There's a difference between putting it on their console and putting their label on it.

I also have no idea what you mean by Tomodachi Life proving anything...

But we can agree to disagree, though I feel we're still on two different subjects. Something I am saying, or something you're skimming over, seems to make you think I'm saying Nintendo made the game, when I'm only saying they supported its creation fully and put their label on it.
User avatar #154 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure I understand what your saying. I just disagree with you. You seem to think that Nintendo funding Bayonetta means they are willing to do something new, right? I disagree with that. So I drew a comparison to Tomodachi Life.

If Nintendo funding Bayonetta 2 means they are willing to break out of their mold and make new games then Nintendo supporting Tomodachi Life means they are opposed to homosexuality. I don't think either are true, though.

By the way, even if Bayonetta 2 somehow proved Nintendo capable of making something new that wouldn't entirely disprove the statement I made in the first comment. Of course, occasionally they release something that isn't a sequel, remake, HD remaster, or based off an established character or franchise, look at Splatoon. I'm saying they rely far too heavily on those things for their games to the point that if you took it all away they'd be a dead company,
#79 - iworkforlaughs (11/22/2014) [-]
I quit I'm using sense and reason and you're just saying words at this point. Jesus christ you must have a cape hanging out of your mouth because everything you have said has been super stupid.....
#81 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
... Sense and reason? All you've said is "Bayonetta would be great no matter what platform" and "How did Nintendo support it other than money!?!?!?"

Like... How is that sense and reason to you? Also what would a cape do by hanging out of my mouth? That's kinda confusing.

I'm not saying words though, but I feel that you are just either messing with me or skimming over what I'm saying completely.

I said Bayonetta 2 had Nintendo's input on it, not /that/ much but still, and wouldn't exist without Nintendo's support, but I'm ... saying super stupid things? How?
#75 - Sorry, but what you said MAKES my point. The first bayonetta …  [+] (12 new replies) 11/22/2014 on Love this guy 0
#76 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
That's not what I was saying at all. My point is that they support Bayonetta, despite all these claims that they only do the same thing over and over. They supported the creation of this game and put it on their platform, forever putting it under Nintendo's name.

Just as they did with previous games, like Zelda and Mario. They would have been great on any... Well, okay not any. Nintendo pretty much held the whole console thing back then...

But if a new Zelda was made now, it'd be great even on the PS4 or whatever... Unless it was made to only be playable with the Wii U game pad, but I don't see that happening anyways. But Sony themselves wouldn't actually support it. They'd put it on their system, sure, but they don't fund it or have any input on it.

Nintendo did that with Bayonetta. They had input, and they supported it and put their label on it, making it a pseudo-Nintendo game. Not made by 'their' people, but they influenced and supported its creation.
#77 - iworkforlaughs (11/22/2014) [-]
Supported how, explain to me how nintendo helped develop bayonetta other than money????
#78 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
... Should I even bother really responding to this? Do you think the game would have been made if Nintendo /didn't/ support it with money?

No, actually, it wouldn't have been made at all since everyone else said 'no.'

They got Nintendo's input on the game and took the entire idea to them. Nintendo is the /reason/ Bayonetta 2 exists, it wouldn't have got the support it needed otherwise. At least not for quite awhile.

Either way, I feel we are getting off the original point. My point is that Nintendo supports this game with their name. It is practically a Nintendo title now.
User avatar #148 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
Everyone else said no? That's a lie. You me to tell me that steam was unwilling to allow Bayonetta to be created? If it was the fact that they simply needed a publisher they could have went to anyone. Maybe Nintendo was just the first to respond. We have no reason to believe that statement to be true and even if it was why should Nintendo be given credit for throwing money Platinums way? The second is almost exactly like the first as far a combat goes so I don't think we can credit Nintendo for doing something new buy funding a sequel.
#149 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Let me rephrase and say everyone they asked said no, then. Because they wanted their game on a console, it was made with a controller in mind. Nintendo wasn't the first to respond, however. They asked to be on Xbox and Playstation again, trying to get a 'partner' for the game so they could make it exactly as they wanted. They didn't just need a place to put it, they needed support to get it done and Nintendo was willing to do that.

I think we can definitely credit them for it because they put in some input and the game wouldn't exist without them, at least not for a long time.
User avatar #150 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
Again, you don't know that for a fact? Nintendo had input, that's probably true but again baseless. I'm saying you have no way of knowing for sure. What we do know for sure is that Bayonetta isn't Nintendo's game. They didn't make it.
#151 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Uh.. I /do/ know that for a fact, actually? I've already pointed out how they did. They didn't put in a /lot/ of input, but they did do that.

Either way, my point wasn't that Nintendo made the game and now it's theirs, I'm saying they fully supported the creation of the game and put their label on it. The creators of the game practically work beside Nintendo now, as do the rest of the employees.

The original point is that despite the claims that Nintendo just wants to do the same thing over and over, they were willing to put Bayonetta, which is completely different from the rest of their games, onto their console and then smack their label and support on it. Again, I was never saying they made it themselves, but they helped its creation.
User avatar #152 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
I still have to disagree. That's like saying that Tomodachi Life proves that Nintendo hates gay people because they released the game.
#153 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
..? I have no idea what you're talking about now. I think you're getting an idea that I'm not saying. Plus, I don't even know if that game was supported by Nintendo. There's a difference between putting it on their console and putting their label on it.

I also have no idea what you mean by Tomodachi Life proving anything...

But we can agree to disagree, though I feel we're still on two different subjects. Something I am saying, or something you're skimming over, seems to make you think I'm saying Nintendo made the game, when I'm only saying they supported its creation fully and put their label on it.
User avatar #154 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure I understand what your saying. I just disagree with you. You seem to think that Nintendo funding Bayonetta means they are willing to do something new, right? I disagree with that. So I drew a comparison to Tomodachi Life.

If Nintendo funding Bayonetta 2 means they are willing to break out of their mold and make new games then Nintendo supporting Tomodachi Life means they are opposed to homosexuality. I don't think either are true, though.

By the way, even if Bayonetta 2 somehow proved Nintendo capable of making something new that wouldn't entirely disprove the statement I made in the first comment. Of course, occasionally they release something that isn't a sequel, remake, HD remaster, or based off an established character or franchise, look at Splatoon. I'm saying they rely far too heavily on those things for their games to the point that if you took it all away they'd be a dead company,
#79 - iworkforlaughs (11/22/2014) [-]
I quit I'm using sense and reason and you're just saying words at this point. Jesus christ you must have a cape hanging out of your mouth because everything you have said has been super stupid.....
#81 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
... Sense and reason? All you've said is "Bayonetta would be great no matter what platform" and "How did Nintendo support it other than money!?!?!?"

Like... How is that sense and reason to you? Also what would a cape do by hanging out of my mouth? That's kinda confusing.

I'm not saying words though, but I feel that you are just either messing with me or skimming over what I'm saying completely.

I said Bayonetta 2 had Nintendo's input on it, not /that/ much but still, and wouldn't exist without Nintendo's support, but I'm ... saying super stupid things? How?
#70 - There's a difference between making a game and funding it.....  [+] (15 new replies) 11/22/2014 on Love this guy +1
#71 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Very little, I'm afraid.

The thing some people don't seem to understand about how a game being funded works is that the ones funding it approve of it and support it. That's why I don't get why people keep bringing up "Well Sega didn't make it" when discussing how bad Sonic Boom is.

But anywho, Nintendo even said 'Hey, this Link outfit you have for Bayonetta isn't attractive enough. Go ahead and make it show more cleavage" because the creators were trying to censor it to be polite towards Nintendo.

Yes, Nintendo's people who created Mario and many of the so called "nostalgia" games didn't have much to do with the creation of the game, but a majority of them supported it enough to have Nintendo's label put on it.

Point is, yeah they didn't make it, but Bayonetta is a Nintendo only game now and it's likely the creators of it will go on to make even more games for them. I'm pretty sure Wonderful 101 was made by them too, which is a Wii U exclusive.

It's not entirely far-fetched to think Nintendo will support a new or remake of Devil May Cry, though I think that series is done.
#75 - iworkforlaughs (11/22/2014) [-]
Sorry, but what you said MAKES my point. The first bayonetta game was awesome as well, microsoft and sony had little to do with that, same as ninty and they're "involvement" with the creation of bayonetta. Simply saying I'm just saying that this game would've been awesome no matter what platform it was on, it's not like nintendo just has all these creative geniuses working overtime over there.
#76 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
That's not what I was saying at all. My point is that they support Bayonetta, despite all these claims that they only do the same thing over and over. They supported the creation of this game and put it on their platform, forever putting it under Nintendo's name.

Just as they did with previous games, like Zelda and Mario. They would have been great on any... Well, okay not any. Nintendo pretty much held the whole console thing back then...

But if a new Zelda was made now, it'd be great even on the PS4 or whatever... Unless it was made to only be playable with the Wii U game pad, but I don't see that happening anyways. But Sony themselves wouldn't actually support it. They'd put it on their system, sure, but they don't fund it or have any input on it.

Nintendo did that with Bayonetta. They had input, and they supported it and put their label on it, making it a pseudo-Nintendo game. Not made by 'their' people, but they influenced and supported its creation.
#77 - iworkforlaughs (11/22/2014) [-]
Supported how, explain to me how nintendo helped develop bayonetta other than money????
#78 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
... Should I even bother really responding to this? Do you think the game would have been made if Nintendo /didn't/ support it with money?

No, actually, it wouldn't have been made at all since everyone else said 'no.'

They got Nintendo's input on the game and took the entire idea to them. Nintendo is the /reason/ Bayonetta 2 exists, it wouldn't have got the support it needed otherwise. At least not for quite awhile.

Either way, I feel we are getting off the original point. My point is that Nintendo supports this game with their name. It is practically a Nintendo title now.
User avatar #148 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
Everyone else said no? That's a lie. You me to tell me that steam was unwilling to allow Bayonetta to be created? If it was the fact that they simply needed a publisher they could have went to anyone. Maybe Nintendo was just the first to respond. We have no reason to believe that statement to be true and even if it was why should Nintendo be given credit for throwing money Platinums way? The second is almost exactly like the first as far a combat goes so I don't think we can credit Nintendo for doing something new buy funding a sequel.
#149 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Let me rephrase and say everyone they asked said no, then. Because they wanted their game on a console, it was made with a controller in mind. Nintendo wasn't the first to respond, however. They asked to be on Xbox and Playstation again, trying to get a 'partner' for the game so they could make it exactly as they wanted. They didn't just need a place to put it, they needed support to get it done and Nintendo was willing to do that.

I think we can definitely credit them for it because they put in some input and the game wouldn't exist without them, at least not for a long time.
User avatar #150 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
Again, you don't know that for a fact? Nintendo had input, that's probably true but again baseless. I'm saying you have no way of knowing for sure. What we do know for sure is that Bayonetta isn't Nintendo's game. They didn't make it.
#151 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Uh.. I /do/ know that for a fact, actually? I've already pointed out how they did. They didn't put in a /lot/ of input, but they did do that.

Either way, my point wasn't that Nintendo made the game and now it's theirs, I'm saying they fully supported the creation of the game and put their label on it. The creators of the game practically work beside Nintendo now, as do the rest of the employees.

The original point is that despite the claims that Nintendo just wants to do the same thing over and over, they were willing to put Bayonetta, which is completely different from the rest of their games, onto their console and then smack their label and support on it. Again, I was never saying they made it themselves, but they helped its creation.
User avatar #152 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
I still have to disagree. That's like saying that Tomodachi Life proves that Nintendo hates gay people because they released the game.
#153 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
..? I have no idea what you're talking about now. I think you're getting an idea that I'm not saying. Plus, I don't even know if that game was supported by Nintendo. There's a difference between putting it on their console and putting their label on it.

I also have no idea what you mean by Tomodachi Life proving anything...

But we can agree to disagree, though I feel we're still on two different subjects. Something I am saying, or something you're skimming over, seems to make you think I'm saying Nintendo made the game, when I'm only saying they supported its creation fully and put their label on it.
User avatar #154 - sagedivinity (11/22/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure I understand what your saying. I just disagree with you. You seem to think that Nintendo funding Bayonetta means they are willing to do something new, right? I disagree with that. So I drew a comparison to Tomodachi Life.

If Nintendo funding Bayonetta 2 means they are willing to break out of their mold and make new games then Nintendo supporting Tomodachi Life means they are opposed to homosexuality. I don't think either are true, though.

By the way, even if Bayonetta 2 somehow proved Nintendo capable of making something new that wouldn't entirely disprove the statement I made in the first comment. Of course, occasionally they release something that isn't a sequel, remake, HD remaster, or based off an established character or franchise, look at Splatoon. I'm saying they rely far too heavily on those things for their games to the point that if you took it all away they'd be a dead company,
#79 - iworkforlaughs (11/22/2014) [-]
I quit I'm using sense and reason and you're just saying words at this point. Jesus christ you must have a cape hanging out of your mouth because everything you have said has been super stupid.....
#81 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
... Sense and reason? All you've said is "Bayonetta would be great no matter what platform" and "How did Nintendo support it other than money!?!?!?"

Like... How is that sense and reason to you? Also what would a cape do by hanging out of my mouth? That's kinda confusing.

I'm not saying words though, but I feel that you are just either messing with me or skimming over what I'm saying completely.

I said Bayonetta 2 had Nintendo's input on it, not /that/ much but still, and wouldn't exist without Nintendo's support, but I'm ... saying super stupid things? How?
User avatar #74 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Oh, and I meant 'very little' in this context. There's definitely a difference in the actual game design and what not.
#76 - You did very well, you earned these thumbs!!!!!!!!!!! 11/20/2014 on No One Expected It +1
#192 - She's not eating real potaotes though bro, it's that box … 09/07/2014 on Fat shaming Saturday? 0
#218 - Or that she's shy.....  [+] (4 new replies) 09/02/2014 on (untitled) +1
#220 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
let me rephrase that, it's probably SAFER too assume she is underage haha.
#228 - hidanfangirl (09/02/2014) [-]
You are correct.
#230 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
god im good.
#233 - hidanfangirl (09/02/2014) [-]
#207 - the night is young my dear.....  [+] (6 new replies) 09/02/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #215 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
probably implying she's underage.
#218 - iworkforlaughs (09/02/2014) [-]
Or that she's shy.....
#220 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
let me rephrase that, it's probably SAFER too assume she is underage haha.
#228 - hidanfangirl (09/02/2014) [-]
You are correct.
#230 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
god im good.
#233 - hidanfangirl (09/02/2014) [-]
#204 - Well **** is in the top right hand corner, if you…  [+] (9 new replies) 09/02/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #206 - hidanfangirl (09/02/2014) [-]
I don't have any nudes. Yet.
User avatar #226 - hikewne (09/02/2014) [-]
Tits or GTFO.
#207 - iworkforlaughs (09/02/2014) [-]
the night is young my dear.....
User avatar #215 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
probably implying she's underage.
#218 - iworkforlaughs (09/02/2014) [-]
Or that she's shy.....
#220 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
let me rephrase that, it's probably SAFER too assume she is underage haha.
#228 - hidanfangirl (09/02/2014) [-]
You are correct.
#230 - gugek (09/02/2014) [-]
god im good.
#233 - hidanfangirl (09/02/2014) [-]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - cryotaneko (06/11/2012) [-]
I salute you. Stick it to the man.

By the way, I like your idea of Amon being Aang and such. I think that's a very decent, intelligent theory and I'm starting to believe it too.

Anyways, good show. *nods*
 Friends (0)