Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:8/19/2011
Last Login:1/31/2016
Location:The West
Content Thumbs: 14 total,  17 ,  3
Comment Thumbs: 762 total,  996 ,  234
Content Level Progress: 30.5% (18/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 175 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Content Views:50
Total Comments Made:378
FJ Points:788

latest user's comments

#48 - Im pretty sure that isnt even a tank, it looks like the gunner…  [+] (3 replies) 12/18/2013 on I Like Turtles 0
#54 - anon (12/18/2013) [-]
#62 - internetzsoviet (12/18/2013) [-]
Thats not even close to a Leopard 2. It shows several times that he is sitting in an IFV of some sort.
User avatar
#49 - djequalizee (12/18/2013) [-]
Maybe, thought i remember him being a tank gunner.
#219 - A lot of other groups protest without factual evidence, why do…  [+] (2 replies) 12/02/2013 on My Affirmation 0
User avatar
#223 - cupcakecrusader (12/02/2013) [-]
I'm not trying to ban those that "do not believe the norm", stop making me out to be a neo-nazi or something :\

All I'm saying is that throughout time, time and time and time and time and time again, the walls of history have been painted with various travesties of varies religions, big and small, crude and extensive, established or front.
Handing power to relegion has almost NEVER worked out well, and those where it did are debatable at best. They use the same old tired moral and ethical codes to justify protests based purely on "because our ten thousand year old book, which we claim to be only 4000 years, says it's right/wrong".

If a religious bodies comes and shows that GM crops devistates wildlife, as other factions did, they would be given a fair chance to speak as they wish. However, they march through, make a big to-do over the smallest issue, then when people get interested someone finds a way to stretch the facts to suit the story and they prop them up as doctrine.
User avatar
#391 - internetzsoviet (12/02/2013) [-]
You're overlooking an obvious substrate to why they do this, and it is because their books are based on a deity or entity that we have no concrete and observable evidence to support. I honestly agree with your opinion that theocracies are not an effective means to govern a body of people but you can not remove a group's right to protest. The means to an end is often overlooked, but I agree that protesting and spreading false information is disgusting. Added to that is my extreme disgust for Islam, and my disrespect toward Judaism as well as Christianity (to a lesser extent, however).

#621 - sheer*  [+] (1 reply) 11/18/2013 on Dad hates My Little Pony +1
#649 - legendofbearo (11/18/2013) [-]
I cannot submit myself to an ungentlemanly scat-wagon of discomposed individuals who find it appealing to raise tension and discord for the sheer reason of not accommodating that specific fandom.

I do wish we could leave these fellows alone. There is plentiful bunch of irritation on the planet and within the internet. However what point is there in seeking out that and attacking it rather then avoiding it? Perhaps many people just find it easier to show their distaste for something rather then showing why they enjoy something else. Maybe some people just have little situations surrounding them so they proceed into anything available?

In the end it doesn't make a difference really, the internet is filled with people who don't care for much, and just want to vent their frustration.
#560 - 1) A fetus is indeed an offspring, as it is the biological res…  [+] (2 replies) 11/08/2013 on Abortion Explained 0
User avatar
#563 - tkfourtwoone (11/08/2013) [-]
Then if I stick to your point 2), then what is the difference between a zigot and a fetus?

If we were to follow your logic, than there is no difference between the first two cells divided from the fertilized egg and a 8-month term unborn child.

... I think you can see the logical fallacy in that. A bunch of cells is NOT a person, not yet anyhow.
That's why I brought the 3-month term rule into discussion. Although I'm not sure when the first brain activities occur.

From my point of view, an undeveloped fetus is pretty close to a person in a vegetative state or in a coma. You might argue that it's human, but it's not really a person.
User avatar
#565 - internetzsoviet (11/08/2013) [-]
In definition there is no difference. It is a human offspring. While one is not a living, breathing baby, it is a human offspring with the potential for life. It has been brought forth into the physical world and is now subject to the judgement of others, including an irresponsible or unable mother, depending on the situation.

While I agree that a zygote is not a person, that is not the object of our discussion. The object of my disagreement with you is of your manner of refutation and disdain for understanding of the opposing side. Do not assume your position is worth more than the other, for neither are worth anything in an objective setting.

It's late and I have things to do. Please try to learn something from our discussion, but other than that, decent endeavors to you.