Rank #5679 on CommentsLevel 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
OfflineSend mail to iFail Block iFail Invite iFail to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||11/24/2009|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#1314|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#268|
|Content Thumbs:||4410 total, 5059 , 649|
|Comment Thumbs:||21322 total, 22871 , 1549|
|Content Level Progress:|| 8% (8/100) |
Level 144 Content: Faptastic → Level 145 Content: Faptastic
|Comment Level Progress:|| 85.7% (857/1000) |
Level 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
|Total Comments Made:||2025|
latest user's comments
|#40 - OP, please use the dedicated politics channels; 'trump' or 'cr…||08/26/2016 on Milo On Clinton's AltRight...||0|
|#23 - Any tips on how to prepare myself? I'm pretty scared - sho… [+] (4 new replies)||08/25/2016 on PREPARE YOURSELVES!!!||+3|
|#41 - >TFW My dad's a realtor/||08/24/2016 on How To: Cheeky Lil Bitch||0|
|#12 - Except it really isn't.||08/23/2016 on reading||+2|
|#56 - As much as you faggots might not want to believe; this content…||08/18/2016 on islam comp: Happy birthday...||+4|
|#14 - If that bothers you; I'd lighten the **** up if I were you. …||08/18/2016 on animation||+27|
|#10 - To be fair, I know a lot of people who got ****** after taking…||08/18/2016 on Rejection||+20|
|#39 - 1.) Who do you mean by 'they' when you say 'they don't need to…||08/18/2016 on CERTAIN KINDS OF LOVE ARE BAD!||+1|
|#145 - Well, what I meant to say is, it's so dangerously biased that …||08/12/2016 on Zamuelic Ystuslyiv Undextus||+1|
|#133 - Alright, just wondered - I don't really want to get into the u… [+] (3 new replies)||08/11/2016 on Zamuelic Ystuslyiv Undextus||0|
#138 - elvoz (08/11/2016) [-]
Oh, my initial comment is incredibly biased. There is nobody left on FJ for me to convince. This late in the game there is nothing I could say or do to swing anybody here one way or the other, so I'll just say what I want. The only way people will change their minds now is if something happens between now and November where Clinton or Trump does something either miraculously good or insanely bad, though I'd bank that Clinton will probably get destroyed on-stage against Trump and that could very well swing voters. But as for me there is nothing left for me to do but circlejerk, piss people off, and other general means of douchebaggery.
The thing about the recent polls is that you have to look at both the polling methods and the people running the polls. A lot of the polls performed are done with flaws. The most common one is self-reporting and opt-in surveys. This only attracts certain people and presents biases among the correspondents. The other issue, people running the polls, presents a different problem where the results could be falsely reported, the polls could be run with the intent to take samples that heavily support what the people running it support, or simply they don't know how to run polls. That being said, a lot of the polls that keep popping up are from mainstream news corporations and are opt-in surveys. This isn't quite rigging polls, but it is doing them in such a way as to give Clinton favorable numbers. It would make sense that most of the people who watch CNN and care to opt in to their surveys would be quite the Democrats and would have a strong bias towards Clinton, and this is before the possibility that the corporations themselves could intentionally tamper with the results. Remember: back in December of 2015 the various sites like ABC, CNN, MSNBC all did online reader surveys for the election and Trump won in all of them by a huge majority, prompting these sites to take down the live polling results and later put up new "results" that claimed Sanders was the winner. There has been no indication that they have stopped, because it isn't illegal for them to do this and they have no obligation to stop if they are using underhanded tactics.
#298 - anon (08/12/2016) [-]
It likely won't matter if Trump annihilates Clinton in the debates because the mainstream media will only report on the parts that fit their narrative, and it's pretty clear where their bias lies, and since not everybody will watch the debates live...
#145 - iFail (08/12/2016) [-]
Well, what I meant to say is, it's so dangerously biased that I think it sacrifices the integrity of your point - the notion that nobody supports Clinton for her politics and that the majority American voting population (approx 241 million - so over 120 million Americans) are voting for her just because they've been taken in by biased media. That not one of those Americans is a freethinker who believes in Clinton's political stance; but that all those in favour of Trump are. It's just false.